620
订阅者
无数据24 小时
-17 天
-930 天
正在加载数据
吸引订阅者
十月 '2610月 '26
十月 '260
在0个频道中
九月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '260
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+6
在2个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+8
在1个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+13
在4个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+14
在9个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+19
在8个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+23
在10个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+26
在9个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+12
在7个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+19
在3个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+9
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '23
+61
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '23
+35
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '23
+13
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '23
+18
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '23
+83
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '23
+18
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '23
+7
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '23
+13
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '22
+12
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '22
+25
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '22
+36
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '22
+33
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '22
+17
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '22
+90
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '22
+43
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '22
+51
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '22
+89
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '22
+167
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '22
+27
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '22
+47
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '21
+80
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '21
+50
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '21
+38
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '21
+58
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '21
+92
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '21
+71
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '21
+109
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '21
+57
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '21
+191
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '21
+522
在0个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 27 十月 | 0 | |||
| 26 十月 | 0 | |||
| 25 十月 | 0 | |||
| 24 十月 | 0 | |||
| 23 十月 | 0 | |||
| 22 十月 | 0 | |||
| 21 十月 | 0 | |||
| 20 十月 | 0 | |||
| 19 十月 | 0 | |||
| 18 十月 | 0 | |||
| 17 十月 | 0 | |||
| 16 十月 | 0 | |||
| 15 十月 | 0 | |||
| 14 十月 | 0 | |||
| 13 十月 | 0 | |||
| 12 十月 | 0 | |||
| 11 十月 | 0 | |||
| 10 十月 | 0 | |||
| 09 十月 | 0 | |||
| 08 十月 | 0 | |||
| 07 十月 | 0 | |||
| 06 十月 | 0 | |||
| 05 十月 | 0 | |||
| 04 十月 | 0 | |||
| 03 十月 | 0 | |||
| 02 十月 | 0 | |||
| 01 十月 | 0 |
频道帖子
Defense Secretary Pete Hegset has announced his intention to completely remove transgender individuals from the ranks of the U.S. armed forces. Special commissions within the Pentagon, composed of regular service members, have been given such strict instructions that the chances of transgender service members appearing before them remaining in service are virtually zero.
However, according to data collected by The New York Times through interviews with service members and lawyers, the commissions within the Navy and Marine Corps voted to allow transgender individuals to remain in service in nine out of 12 cases. A similar trend has not yet been observed in the Army and Air Force. Nevertheless, these decisions represent an unexpected and decisive protest from the military – individuals for whom unquestioning obedience to orders is the foundation of service.
| 2 | ⚔️ FROM BANDITS TO KINGS: HOW ORGANISED VIOLENCE BECAME LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY
Have you ever wondered where Europe's aristocratic families, hereditary privileges, and ruling dynasties originally came from?
Behind the romantic stories of noble knights, royal bloodlines, honour, and divine rights lies a far less romantic history.
Who were the knights?
Originally, many were professional warriors serving kings and feudal lords in exchange for land, money, protection, or privileges.
Some were mercenaries. Others were bound by military obligations.
Their primary function was not to defend democracy or human rights. It was to fight, conquer, defend territory, and enforce the authority of their masters.
Consider England in 1066.
William the Conqueror invaded, defeated the Anglo-Saxon king, and redistributed vast estates among his Norman followers.
Military conquest became landed wealth.
Landed wealth became hereditary privilege.
Hereditary privilege became political authority.
And eventually, the descendants of conquerors presented themselves as the legitimate ruling class.
Yesterday's armed conquest became tomorrow's legally protected property.
🏴☠️ THE STATE AS ORGANISED EXTORTION
Economist Mancur Olson described the concept of the stationary bandit.
Unlike a roaming robber, who steals and disappears, a stationary bandit establishes permanent control over territory, collects regular payments, imposes rules, and provides protection.
Not necessarily out of generosity, but because a productive population generates more revenue.
Historian Charles Tilly explored a related mechanism in his 1985 essay, War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.
European states developed through warfare, coercion, resource extraction, and the monopolisation of violence.
The mechanisms bear a striking resemblance to organised protection rackets.
Extortion becomes taxation.
Territorial domination becomes sovereignty.
Armed enforcement becomes law and order.
And the descendants of conquerors become respectable aristocrats.
Of course, not every knight was a mercenary, not every dynasty originated in banditry, and states have evolved through different historical processes.
But these qualifications do not remove the fundamental question.
WHEN DID THE ABILITY TO IMPOSE POWER BECOME THE MORAL RIGHT TO EXERCISE IT?
When collected resources provide public goods, protected rights, and accountable institutions, taxation cannot simply be equated with extortion.
When coercion primarily benefits a narrow ruling group while ordinary people lack meaningful control over decisions, the comparison with organised racketeering becomes far more compelling.
But even genuine public benefits do not automatically establish the moral legitimacy of coercion.
A criminal organisation does not become morally entitled to dominate a community simply because it builds roads, operates schools, or provides security.
Likewise, hereditary privilege does not become morally justified merely because the original conquest has been recognised by subsequent generations of rulers.
The central issue is not whether those exercising power occasionally provide something useful in return.
It is whether their authority can be legitimately justified to the people subjected to it.
History explains how organised violence can become institutional power.
Law explains how that power can be formalised and inherited.
But neither military victory nor inherited status alone establishes a moral right to rule.
A crown does not erase the conquest.
A title does not establish moral superiority.
And legality is not the same as legitimacy.
⚔️ The sword can establish a throne. It cannot, by itself, establish the right to sit on it. | 2 |
| 3 | ⚔️ FROM ARMED CONQUEST TO HEREDITARY POWER: WHO GAVE THEM THE RIGHT TO RULE?
Have you ever wondered where Europe's aristocratic families, hereditary privileges, and ruling dynasties originally came from?
Let's look beyond the romantic stories of noble knights, honour, and royal bloodlines.
Who were the knights?
Originally, many were professional warriors — armed men serving kings and feudal lords in exchange for land, payment, protection, or privileges.
Some were effectively mercenaries. Others were bound by military obligations.
And what happened when their masters conquered new territories?
The winners took the land. The warriors were rewarded. The defeated population inherited the consequences.
Look at England in 1066.
William the Conqueror invaded, defeated the Anglo-Saxon king, and redistributed vast estates among his Norman followers.
Military conquest became landed wealth.
Landed wealth became hereditary privilege.
Hereditary privilege became political authority.
And over generations, the descendants of armed conquerors could present themselves as the legitimate ruling class.
Yesterday's conquest became tomorrow's property rights.
Historian Charles Tilly explored a similar mechanism in his famous 1985 essay, War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.
States consolidated power through warfare, coercion, extraction of resources, and the monopolisation of violence.
Protection became an obligation. Payments became taxation. Territorial dominance became sovereignty.
Of course, not every aristocratic family originated with mercenaries, and not every state emerged through identical processes.
But the historical relationship between organised violence, property, and political authority is undeniable.
And here is the question that rarely gets asked:
At what point does successful coercion become a moral right to govern other people?
Does winning a war establish that right?
Does inheriting conquered property establish it?
Does building roads, schools, and hospitals retrospectively legitimise the original coercion?
Providing useful services does not, by itself, establish an unlimited right to command another human being.
And there is something even more fundamental than land or money.
TIME.
Conquerors acquire territory. Their descendants inherit wealth and opportunities. Generations of ordinary people spend their working lives sustaining the economic and political structures that follow.
One generation inherits the power to command.
Another inherits obligations and dependence.
The consequences of conquest can outlive the conquerors by centuries.
This is why the distinction between having power and having the right to exercise power matters.
History can explain how authority was acquired. It cannot automatically justify that authority.
Money can be recovered. Property can be rebuilt. Political institutions can be reformed.
But the years of human life consumed by systems of coercion can never be returned.
So perhaps the fundamental question is not simply who rules, how much they collect, or what services they provide.
It is this: who gave anyone the moral right to claim ownership over another person's time?
⚔️ The sword may establish power. It cannot, by itself, establish legitimacy. | 1 |
| 4 | 🏴☠️ THE STATE: AN ORGANISED PROTECTION RACKET?
What if the difference between a government and an organised criminal enterprise is not the mechanism of coercion, but who gets to legitimise it?
1. THE STATE AS A STATIONARY BANDIT
Economist Mancur Olson introduced the concept of the stationary bandit.
A roaming bandit steals and moves on. A stationary bandit occupies territory, extracts regular payments, establishes rules, and provides protection.
Why? Because a productive population generates more revenue than an impoverished one.
Extortion becomes taxation. Territorial control becomes sovereignty. Protection becomes a public service.
2. THE STATE AS ORGANISED CRIME
Historian Charles Tilly explored this parallel in his 1985 essay War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.
European states developed through warfare, the monopolisation of violence, the elimination of competitors, and the extraction of resources.
Rulers demanded payment for protection — sometimes against threats their own activities had helped create.
Sound familiar? 🤔
BUT HERE IS THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION.
When collected resources finance genuine public goods, protected rights, and accountable institutions, taxation cannot simply be reduced to exploitation.
When coercion primarily serves the interests of a narrow elite, while the population has little effective control over decisions, the comparison with organised racketeering becomes considerably more compelling.
Yet even genuine public benefits do not automatically legitimise coercion.
An organisation does not acquire an unquestionable right to control your life simply because it builds roads, operates schools, or provides security.
And the most valuable resource extracted is not necessarily money.
It is your time.
Your working years. Your obligations. Your dependence on decisions made by others. Your children's future.
Money can be recovered. Property can be rebuilt.
Time cannot be returned.
Perhaps the deepest question is not how much the state takes, or even what it gives back.
It is who gave it the right to decide how much of your life belongs to it. | 3 |
| 5 | In Cyprus, an investigation has begun into allegations against Deloitte Cyprus regarding the potential concealment of assets belonging to Roman Abramovich, worth billions of euros. | 3 |
| 6 | The German youth movement is calling for mass protests in 21 cities on October 31st, following unrest that has spread across France, Italy, and Spain.
The initiative, called "Gen Z regelt" ("Generation Z takes control"), plans to hold rallies in cities such as Berlin, Hamburg, Cologne, and Munich.
Organisers state that the protests are aimed at addressing issues such as dilapidated schools, austerity policies, the high cost of living, social injustice, mandatory military service, and climate change.🤦♂🤷♂ | 2 |
| 7 | Billionaire, technology investor, and long-time ally of Donald Trump, Peter Thiel, publicly criticized the United States' conflict with Iran, marking his most significant disagreement with the president on foreign policy issues.
"I am skeptical [about this conflict], and I think we shouldn't have started it," Thiel said during a private lecture on October 12th. "Many mistakes have been made." | 2 |
| 8 |  没有文字... | 2 |
| 9 |  没有文字... | 3 |
| 10 |  没有文字... | 7 |
| 11 | Russian State Duma proposes digital surveillance of Russian citizens' cars under the "Yarovaya Law"
Alexander Sidyakin, a State Duma deputy from the "United Russia" party, in an interview with "Vedomosti," proposed applying requirements similar to the "Yarovaya Law" to cars with electronic systems. This refers to one of the first Russian laws on internet control, authored by Irina Yarovaya, a deputy from "United Russia," which was passed in 2016.
In the current convocation of the Duma, Sidyakin heads the newly created committee on digital development and artificial intelligence. Responding to a question about the committee's immediate tasks, the deputy stated the need to expand the application of the "Yarovaya Law" to foreign cars, "which are actively used by everyone, including civil servants."
"Who is interested in their internal workings? What do they transmit? Geolocation or are they making hidden recordings? This needs to be investigated, and it will become subject to regulation," the "United Russia" deputy promised.
The "Yarovaya Law" was passed in the spring of 2016. It, among other things, required telecommunications operators and internet providers, under the pretext of combating terrorism, to store all user data for six months and to provide it to law enforcement agencies upon request, without a court order. | 6 |
| 12 | Democrats in Congress are preparing an investigation into Trump's diesel deal with Putin and have demanded that banks preserve all related documents.
Members of Congress continue to criticize the agreement between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. As the first tanker carrying Russian diesel approaches the shores of the United States, Democrats, who are hoping to gain a majority in at least one chamber after the November 3rd elections, are preparing to challenge the deal. One of the longest-serving members of Congress, Republican Mitch McConnell, criticized Trump for "appeasing the Russian aggressor and autocrat."
Democrats have promised to conduct an investigation and have sent letters to banks and ports demanding that they preserve all documents related to transactions connected to the deal, according to Bloomberg.
"Any shipments of Russian diesel to the United States raise serious legal questions and could be the subject of lawsuits and investigations by Congress," the letters state. "The deal... also raises serious concerns from a national security perspective, given that it will become a source of funding for Russia's brutal and illegal war against Ukraine."
The letters were sent to banks including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley, as well as to several port authorities, including the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Bloomberg reports.
The tanker Agioi Fanendes, sailing under the flag of Malta, loaded 40,000 tons of diesel last Thursday and left the Baltic port of Primorsk. The ship is expected to arrive at its destination on November 7th, which will be after the results of the midterm elections for Congress are known. | 5 |
| 13 | Central Bank Orders Banks to Scrutinise the Origin of Cash Held by Russians
The Bank of Russia has, for the second time this year, instructed banks to strengthen controls over cash transactions, the volume of which in the economy increased by almost 3 trillion rubles between January and October.
In methodological recommendations published on Monday, October 26th, the Central Bank urges credit organisations to "determine the financial standing" of individual clients and "the sources of funds" if they deposit cash of 5 million rubles or more in a single transaction, or 5 million rubles or more per month.
Banks must "obtain documentary evidence" of the origin of cash from clients for the amount of the transaction, according to the Central Bank's recommendations.
In particular, banks may require a certificate of income and income tax payments; a declaration in the form 3-NDFL; documents confirming income of an individual as a self-employed person; a loan agreement; a certificate of inheritance; documents confirming income from the sale of real estate or its lease.
Within the framework of supervision, a sharp increase in the volume of transactions related to depositing cash into accounts and exchanging cash currency is being observed, and their possible goals "are the legalization (laundering) of income obtained through criminal means, and other illegal purposes, including the withdrawal of cash from the 'shadow' economy into the legal economy," the regulator writes.
The Central Bank makes similar demands to corporate clients and individual entrepreneurs. Their transactions, according to the recommendations, should be subject to enhanced control if more than 5 million rubles is deposited into the account in a single transaction, or that amount or more per month. | 5 |
| 14 | Two verdicts a day. Russian courts have set a new record since the Soviet era for cases of treason and espionage.
From July to September, Russian courts issued 186 verdicts in cases of treason (Article 275 of the Criminal Code), espionage (Article 276 of the Criminal Code), confidential cooperation with foreigners (Article 275.1 of the Criminal Code), and providing assistance to the enemy (Article 276.1 of the Criminal Code). This is a record for the entire period of observation, according to a study by "First Department," prepared by Parubets Analytics.
On average, courts issued two verdicts per day, with the number reaching a historical high of 67 per month in July and September. At least 203 people were convicted under these articles, which is more than ever before.
The vast majority of cases still relate to the article on treason, with 183 people convicted under it. Twelve people were sentenced for espionage. The article on providing assistance to the enemy was applied five times, and the article on confidential cooperation with foreigners was applied three times.
87 out of the 203 individuals were also charged with terrorism. Charges of sabotage were present in the cases of 32 people, an increase of more than twofold compared to the second quarter, from 7.1% to 15.8%.
"The combination of charges of 'treason' and 'espionage' with articles related to terrorism remains a trend in repressive practices during wartime," notes "First Department."
The number of verdicts has been increasing for the third quarter in a row: there were 111 in the first quarter, and 162 in the second. Over the first nine months of 2026, the total number reached 459, with 487 people convicted. This is more than for the entire year of 2025, when 458 verdicts were issued against 478 people, a record number in the country's modern history.
Almost half of the verdicts in the third quarter—89, or 47.8% of the total—were issued by military courts. By mid-2026, "they had established themselves as the key authority in cases of 'state security'," notes "First Department." | 4 |
| 15 | Nikolai Dolgopolov's book, "Lives and Deeds: Legendary Intelligence Officers," is written in a rather emotional style, based on archives of the KGB and the SVR. However, it contains some very interesting facts. For example, about the infiltration of the NKVD-MGB into the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC).
In the summer of 1941, the operational department decided to use one of the few remaining free bishops, Vasily (Ratmirov), in an operation. A sergeant of the NKVD, Ivan Mikkheyev, codenamed "Mikhasi," was assigned to him. In a short period, the bishop taught Mikkheyev prayers by heart and the basics of religious services. Thus, Sergeant Mikhasi quickly became a priest. Both were sent to Kalinin before the arrival of the Germans. During the occupation, they both opened churches and delivered toasts in honor of Hitler. The main task of the pair was to identify collaborators working with the Germans.
Later, the priest-NKVD agent toured other occupied territories. Dolgopolov describes his further career as follows:
"Already as a hieromonk Juvenaliy, Mikkheyev became the secretary of Ratmirov, who was appointed Archbishop of Minsk and Belarus. He advanced in the church hierarchy in a way that even Sudoplatov and Rybkin would not have expected. As part of a delegation of Patriarch Alexy I, Mikhasi visited England. He also visited our monasteries in Palestine. He retired from the ROC with the rank of Colonel of the KGB." | 5 |
| 16 | People are not needed
Microsoft announced a voluntary layoff program: employees are being offered the option to leave immediately, with compensation.
☝🏻The company sent the offer to 60,000 employees in the United States, Canada, India, and the United Kingdom. 🤯
The offer is valid for a limited time. Those who leave will be promised financial support and career planning assistance, and the details will be sent to each individual by email. 💰
"This is part of how we are changing our approach to change: more flexibility and more ways for employees to determine their next chapter," writes Amy Coleman, the company's HR director.
This is the second such initiative in six months: in April, Microsoft first launched a voluntary retirement program, which was available to approximately 7% of employees in the United States.
The reason is simple: the company is investing huge amounts of money in AI, and people are no longer needed. | 4 |
| 17 | 👫HIV Spreading Across Russia
Rospotrebnadzor announced a state of generalized HIV epidemic in 30 regions. This means that the virus poses a threat not only to high-risk groups (drug users, those engaging in unprotected and casual sex), but to the entire population.
Already, 3% of men have been identified as HIV carriers. Cases of infection are increasing among heterosexual couples and in hospitals.
The most alarming aspect is that only half of those infected receive treatment to prevent the spread of the virus. At the same time, 600,000 people, aware of their condition, may be unknowingly spreading it to others.
Officially, 1.2 million people in Russia are registered as HIV-positive. In reality, the number is much higher. For every death, there are 1.5 new infections.
Incidentally, people with this condition are being actively recruited for the "special military operation." Recently, war correspondent Yevgeny Poddubny suggested to Vladimir Putin that citizens with health category "D" be recruited into the rear forces. This category includes people with severe mental disorders, malignant tumors, blindness, and even HIV in terminal stages.
Putin supported this "appealing" idea without any hesitation. | 4 |
| 18 | Man Arrives in Russia to Renew Passport – Dies in Custody on Treason Charges
Alexander Kondratov, a 52-year-old production designer and winner of the "Golden Eagle" and TEFI awards for his work on the series "Liquidation," died in the Botkin Hospital in Moscow.
Kondratov had been living in Kyiv since 2012. In the spring of 2026, he arrived in Russia to renew his foreign passport, but was detained directly at Vnukovo Airport.
Over the next few months, the artist was repeatedly sent to administrative arrest for "petty hooliganism." In total, he spent more than 70 days in a special detention center. In August, a criminal case was opened against him on charges of treason – due to six publications on the internet.
Kondratov was sent to a pre-trial detention center, from where he was taken to the hospital on October 23. He died there.
This is at least the eleventh death of a defendant in a political case in Russia since the beginning of the year. | 5 |
| 19 | Trump called Norway a "shithole country" because he didn't receive a Nobel Prize
U.S. President Donald Trump criticized Norway because the Nobel Committee once again did not award him the Nobel Peace Prize. "I'm not a fan of Norway. Frankly, Norway is a dump. Norway has become a shithole country," Trump said during a campaign rally in Port Huron, Michigan. He noted that he would be happy to accept immigrants from some countries, but not from Norway.
Prior to this, the head of the White House used the term "shithole country" in reference to Haiti, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen, Reuters recalls. At the same time, according to the agency, there are no signs that the U.S. administration is preparing official measures against Norwegian immigrants. The Norwegian Foreign Ministry, in response to Trump's words, emphasized that the Nobel Committee is independent. "We remind everyone of this, if anyone had any doubts, and that is still the case," said the head of the country's diplomatic department, Espen Barth Eide. | 6 |
| 20 | The central contradiction lies between the old Sumerian mafia that controls the planet and relies on a usurious banking system, and the technocrats who believe in progress, space colonies, and neural networks.
Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab's right-hand man and the chief ideologue of transhumanism and inclusive capitalism, has articulated what most people prefer not to say out loud: the global elite's fear of artificial intelligence has a specific economic dimension, and it is directly related to the fact that AI can operate in the cryptocurrency environment without intermediaries, permits, or the control of those who have spent decades building the architecture of the dollar-based banking monopoly.
When Harari describes this fear, he doesn't talk about robots killing people, as in the movie "Terminator," nor does he paint apocalyptic pictures.
He is talking about a systemic threat of a completely different kind: an autonomous agent capable of conducting transactions in networks that are fundamentally designed so that the state and the central bank cannot shut them down, poses a far greater threat to the existing world order than any military technology.
Transhumanists and globalists have built their influence through control over financial flows, and it is this control that becomes vulnerable when an actor enters the system that does not need a bank account, SWIFT code, or regulatory approval.
However, Harari goes further and points to a threat that he himself calls much deeper. According to him, the real danger of artificial intelligence lies in the creation of a "metabureaucracy" that is fundamentally inaccessible to human understanding.
Any bureaucracy in history, no matter how cumbersome and opaque, was created by humans and reproduced human logic. Therefore, sooner or later, there were people who knew how to navigate it, find its weaknesses, or at least understand how it was structured.
AI bureaucracy is built on different principles: it does not explain its decisions, it cannot be persuaded, it has no fatigue, and there is no entry point through which one could influence the process.
This creates a situation in which citizens, corporations, and even states find themselves in a position of being subject to a system that cannot be challenged, interpreted, or reformed from within, because it has no internal core that can be infiltrated to destroy it.
Harari believes that this prospect is more dangerous than any scenario of robotic violence, and there is a consistent logic to this: historically, violence has been able to be contained, but power based on opaque algorithms for managing resources creates a fundamentally new form of dependence, against which there are no laws, no institutions, and not even a language to describe it.
It is noteworthy that both the elite's fear of cryptocurrency-based AI and the thesis about the metabureaucracy indicate that the problem lies not in the technology itself, but in who or what is using it to control flows that are inaccessible to verification or appeal.
The only difference between these two scenarios is whose hands will be superfluous in this new architecture of power. And it doesn't look like the banking mafia will be able to maintain its power there.
AI will save humanity from the power of the occult cannibalistic coalition of Epstein, before dealing with the rest of the "leather-clad" ones. Or, perhaps, they will coexist peacefully. | 6 |
