𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™
Открыть в Telegram
📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes ⏳🚀 Enjoy Learning!
Больше📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™
Канал 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™ (@currentlegalgk) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 19 058 подписчиков, занимая 406 место в категории Закон и право и 21 550 место в регионе Индия.
📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика
С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 19 058 подписчиков.
Согласно последним данным от 03 сентября, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило 161, а за последние 24 часа — 23, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.
- Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
- Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 6.40%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 3.51% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
- Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 1 220 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 669 просмотров.
- Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 4.
- Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice.
📝 Описание и контентная политика
Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT
☺️ 360° Cases on topics.
Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes
⏳🚀 Enjoy Learn...”
Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 04 сентября, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Закон и право.
19 058
Подписчики
+2324 часа
+227 дней
+16130 дней
Архив постов
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
In which of the following cases it was observed that if the information received by an officer-in-charge of Police Station discloses commission of a cognizable offence, it is mandatory to register FIR ?
(1) Jyotsna Devi v. State of Assam & others, AIR 2025 SC 4576.
(2) M. Jameela v. State of Kerala & another etc., AIR 2025 SC 5363.
(3) Mohammad Afzal Mohammad Sharif v. State of Maharashtra & others, AIR 2025 SC 4842.
(4) Akhtar Ali alias Ali Akhtar alias Shamim alias Raja Ustad v. State of Uttarakhand, AIR 2025 SC 4717.
which of the following cases Supreme Court pointed out the points of difference between Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S., 2023 and Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., 1973 ?
(1) State of Punjab v. Harikesh, AIR 2025 SC 729
(2) Om Prakash Ambadkar v. State of Maharashtra and others, AIR 2025 SC 970
(3) Omi alias Omkar Rathore & another v. State of M.P. & another, AIR 2025 SC 721
(4) Hansraj v. State of Chhattisgarh, AIR 2025 SC 841
The difference between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' was explained by Justice in State of A.P. v. Rayavarapu Punnayya, AIR 1977
(1) R.S. Sarkaria
(2) M.H. Beg
(3) P.N. Bhagwati
(4) V.R. Krishna lyer
Police can freeze bank accounts without court order: Karnataka HC
https://www.medianama.com/2026/08/223-karnataka-high-court-bank-account-freeze/
Exclusive | Why India is making IST legally enforceable: An expert explains 🔗
#explained_sci_tech #express_explained
Why Goa's anti-conversion bill has hit a wall 🔗
#express_explained
Can Accused Inspect Evidence Not Relied By Prosecution Before Trial? Supreme Court Reserves Order
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/can-accused-inspect-evidence-not-relied-by-prosecution-before-trial-supreme-court-reserves-order-548143
Imprisonment "as well as" fine, Does that mean "AND" in Section 8 of BNS?
Shanti Lal vs State Of M.P 2007
Answer: Para 22.Section 8(2)(a) #BNS@CurrentLegalGK
Multiple Cases Per Se Not Ground To Pass Externment Order : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/multiple-cases-per-se-not-ground-to-pass-externment-order-supreme-court-547945
State security act
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
A agrees with B to arrange a woman as a wife for B’s nephew for ₹50,000. A brings the woman to the railway station to convince B that the arrangement is genuine. After B arranges and pays ₹50,000, A takes him towards the woman’s supposed residence, but deliberately escapes with the money. The agreement itself is void/unenforceable in civil law. Can A nevertheless be convicted for cheating? Give reasons.
Answer
Voice Samples And Article 20(3): Where Does Forensic Identification End And Self-Incrimination Begin?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/voice-samples-article203-forensic-identification-end-self-incrimination-begin-547806
💰
Settlement amount and subsequent maintenance claim?
Reji Baby Versus Subi Mary 2026The Supreme Court has quashed proceedings initiated by a wife and daughter against the husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Court observed that where the wife had voluntarily relinquished all monetary claims, including maintenance, under a Settlement Agreement and subsequent affidavit before the Family Court, such claims could not be revived through subsequent proceedings. #DV@CurrentLegalGK
Repost from 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™
👰🏏
Child Marriage and Religion Game.
📝 Case— Moidutty Musliyar v Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station, 2024
✅ Ratio decidendi—
1. Citizen- Section 1(2) of Act says applicable to all citizens without and beyond india as well (Citizens 1st then comes religion)
2. Savings Clause- 1875 Majority Act says above 18 persons in major but section 2 mentions—> Marriage, Dower, Divorce And Adoption; Religious Rites and Person Attained Majority Before 1875 Act.
“However Court said 2006 Act will override 1875 Act so far as child marriage is considered”
✅ Precedents Relied Upon—
1. Independent Thought v. Union of India, 2017 (Two concurring Judgments delivered in this case)
👨⚖️ Justice Madan B. Lokur:
PCMA is a secular law prevails over Hindu and Muslim law.
👨⚖️ Justice Deepak Gupta:
The Special Act deals with children prevail over Hindu and Muslim law. (Generalia Specilibus Non Derogant)
2. Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Shaikh v. State of Gujarat, 2016
Muslim personal law would not prevail over 2006 child marriage act
3. Khaledur Rahman v. State of
Kerala, 2022
It is trite law that when the provisions of a statute are repugnant to, or contrary to the customary law or personal law, in the absence of any specific exclusion of the said customary or personal law from the statutory provisions, the statute will prevail, and the personal law or the customary law shall stand abrogated to the extent of the inconsistency4. Mohamed Abbas M. v. Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, 2015 Provisions of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 are in no way against the religious rights of Muslim or any religion guaranteed under Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution. ✅ DISAGREEMENT with High courts— (Muslim girl can marry upon reaching puberty) 1. Patna High Court- Md. Idris v. State of Bihar and Others, 1980 2. Punjab and Haryana High Court- Jammu v. State of Haryana, 2010 3. Delhi High Court- Tahra Begum v. State Of Delhi, 2012
Held: Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Overrides all religion including muslim personal law.⚡Matter sub judice before Supreme court as well- https://t.me/LegalQuizzes/304157 @CurrentLegalGK
It relied on the decision in Khaledur Rahman v. State of Kerala and Anr. and referred to Sections 2(1)(d) and 42A of the POCSO Act.
Muslim Man Having Sexual Intercourse With Minor Wife Liable Under POCSO Act: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-sexual-intercourse-wife-18-years-pocso-547849
“It is not necessary that a person against whom the offence under Section 3 of the PMLA is alleged must have been shown as the accused in the scheduled offence. What is held in paragraph 270 of the decision of this Court in the case of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary supports the above conclusion. The conditions precedent for attracting the offense under Section 3 of the PMLA are that there must be a scheduled offense and that there must be proceeds of crime in relation to the scheduled offence as defined in clause (u) of subsection (1) of Section 3 of the PMLA
#PMLA@CurrentLegalGK
Prosecuting Professionals Under PMLA: Advice, Association, Or Complicity?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/prosecuting-professionals-pmla-advice-association-complicity-547709
