𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐅𝐅𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐒 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐄
Открыть в Telegram
📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PCS J, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes ⏳🚀 Enjoy Learning!
Больше📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐅𝐅𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐒 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐄
Канал 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐅𝐅𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐒 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐄 (@currentlegalgk) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 19 131 подписчиков, занимая 403 место в категории Закон и право и 21 395 место в регионе Индия.
📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика
С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 19 131 подписчиков.
Согласно последним данным от 14 октября, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило 53, а за последние 24 часа — 0, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.
- Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
- Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 5.82%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 3.31% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
- Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 1 114 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 633 просмотров.
- Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 3.
- Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice.
📝 Описание и контентная политика
Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT
☺️ 360° Cases on topics.
Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PCS J, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes
⏳🚀 Enjoy Lear...”
Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 15 октября, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Закон и право.
19 131
Подписчики
Нет данных24 часа
-37 дней
+5330 дней
Загрузка данных...
Похожие каналы
Облако тегов
Входящие и исходящие упоминания
---
---
---
---
---
---
Привлечение подписчиков
октябрь '26окт. '26
октябрь '26
+67
в 0 каналах
сентябрь '26
+245
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '26
+134
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '26
+112
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '26
+142
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '26
+129
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '26
+58
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '26
+19
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '26
+54
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '26
+58
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '25
+51
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '25
+60
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '25
+68
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '25
+70
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '25
+46
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
июль '25
+55
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '25
+18
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '25
+30
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '25
+41
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
март '25
+74
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '25
+56
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
январь '25
+209
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '24
+354
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '24
+567
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '24
+657
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '24
+1 236
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
август '24
+1 623
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
июль '24
+2 406
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '24
+2 347
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
май '24
+2 218
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '24
+1 931
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
март '24
+2 087
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '24
+1 940
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
январь '24
+2 283
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '23
+1 968
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '23
+530
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '23
+1 266
в 0 каналах
| Дата | Привлечение подписчиков | Упоминания | Каналы | |
| 13 октября | +11 | |||
| 12 октября | 0 | |||
| 11 октября | 0 | |||
| 10 октября | 0 | |||
| 09 октября | +8 | |||
| 08 октября | 0 | |||
| 07 октября | +4 | |||
| 06 октября | +12 | |||
| 05 октября | +9 | |||
| 04 октября | 0 | |||
| 03 октября | +6 | |||
| 02 октября | +2 | |||
| 01 октября | +15 |
Посты канала
⏳🚀
1ST WEEKLY UPDATE:—
Say No To Regular Clutter And Yes To Organised info.1. Testimony For Sexual Offence Within Home Does Not Require Same Corroboration As Crimes Committed In Open: Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/testimony-for-sexual-offence-within-home-does-not-require-same-corroboration-as-crimes-committed-in-open-supreme-court-552596
| 2 | #Question@CurrentLegalGK
When and how can accused get the copy of FIR, can he get it free of cost? | 1 785 |
| 3 | Whether IPC Prosecution Can Continue After Sanction Under PC Act Was Refused: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-ipc-prosecution-continue-sanction-pc-act-refused-552564 | 1 883 |
| 4 | Casteist slurs on social media can attract SC/ST Act: What Calcutta HC said on ‘public view’ 🔗
#explained_law #express_explained | 1 713 |
| 5 | O. 2 R. 2 CPC | Omitted Relief Remains Barred Despite Order 23 Liberty To File Fresh Suit : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/o-2-r-2-cpc-omitted-relief-remains-barred-despite-order-23-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-supreme-court-552332
Looking for legal news and events. Download LiveLaw app, India's no:1 Legal news app.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sinergialabs.livelaw | 1 472 |
| 6 | Accused Entitled To Seek Production Of Prosecution's Unrelied Documents At Appro.pdf | 1 366 |
| 7 | 202606081919313969.pdf | 1 289 |
| 8 | S. 53 Patents Act | Should Patent Term Be Counted From Date Of Grant If There Was Delay In Deciding Application? Supreme Court To Decide
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/s-53-patents-act-should-patent-term-be-counted-from-date-of-grant-if-there-was-delay-in-deciding-application-supreme-court-to-decide-552272
#Patent@CurrentLegalGK | 1 234 |
| 9 | 📍🛵EXPLAINED | 166 MOTO VEHICLE JURISDICTION
ISSUE:
Whether a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) can exercise territorial jurisdiction over a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, merely because the insurance company has an office within its local limits, even when the accident occurred elsewhere and the claimant neither resides nor carries on business there.
PROVISIONS INVOLVED
1. Section 166(1) & (2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (options for filing a claim application).
2. Section 149(2) and Section 168(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (insurer’s rights and notice requirements).
3. Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (contrast with CPC territorial jurisdiction).
4. Section 21(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (objection to jurisdiction at appellate / post-award stage).
CONCLUSIONS
1. Under Section 166(2), a claimant has four options: (a) place where the claimant resides,
(b) place where the accident occurred,
(c) place where the claimant carries on business, or
(d) place where the defendant resides.
2. The statute deliberately omits “place where the defendant carries on business.”
3. The word “defendant” in Section 166(2) does not include the insurer, because impleadment of the insurer is optional, not mandatory.
4. When an objection to territorial jurisdiction is raised before the Tribunal at the threshold (before adjudication on merits), the strict requirements of Section 166(2) must be satisfied. The “failure of justice” test under Section 21(1) CPC applies only at the appellate or post-award stage.
APPRECIATION:
In the present case, the claimant’s own pleadings showed residence in Chittoor, accident in Tirupati, and no business connection with Chennai. No part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of MACT Chennai.
REASONING
✓Beneficial interpretation cannot override clear statutory language.
✓Extending jurisdiction merely because an insurer has a branch office would rewrite the statute.
#Motor@CurrentLegalGK | 1 118 |
| 10 | Reliance was placed on Rekha v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ameena Begum v. State of Telangana to contend that a mere possibility of the detenue becoming involved in crime again, without cogent material supporting such an apprehension, cannot furnish a valid basis for preventive detention | 953 |
| 11 | Supreme Court Quashes NSA Detention Of Sambhal Violence Accused, Imposes Rs 10 Lakh Cost On UP Govt
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/suprem-court-quashes-nsa-detention-of-sambhal-violence-accused-imposes-rs-10-lakh-cost-on-up-govt-552197
#NSA@CurrentLegalGK | 1 027 |
| 12 |  #Translation@CurrentLegalGK
Translate this into English | 1 054 |
| 13 | Right Of Accused: Accessing FIRs At Earliest Stage
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/accused-right-accessing-firs-earliest-stage-551816
Looking for legal news and events. Download LiveLaw app, India's no:1 Legal news app.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sinergialabs.livelaw | 1 093 |
| 14 | Right Of Accused: Accessing FIRs At Earliest Stage
https://www-livelaw-in-nliu.knimbus.com/articles/accused-right-accessing-firs-earliest-stage-551816 | 13 |
| 15 | 🚗💀ALISTER ANTHONY PAREIRA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 2012 SC
✓FACTS
On 12 November 2006 (3:45–4:00 a.m.) the appellant drove car MH-01-R-580 on Carter Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai, at high speed while under influence of alcohol (0.112% w/v ethyl alcohol in blood; liquor bottle recovered). He rammed the vehicle onto the pavement where labourers were asleep in temporary huts, killing 7 and causing injuries (including grievous hurt) to 8. Appellant was a resident of the area and knew people slept there. Long curved brake marks (~70 ft) were found. No pre-accident mechanical defect existed (steering, brakes, gears operative). Appellant admitted driving and the accident but claimed mechanical failure.
Trial Court convicted under ss. 304A & 337 IPC. High Court convicted under ss. 304 Part II, 338 & 337 IPC.
👨⚖️ LAW OF RASH, NEGLIGENCE AND KNOWLEDGE
Para 37-43, 50, 57, 70-71
1. The applicability
of Section 304A IPC is limited to rash or negligent acts which
B cause death but fall short of culpable homicide amounting to
murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
2. Like Section 304A, Sections 279, 336, 337 and 338D IPC are attracted for only the negligent or rash act.
3. The sections are for the inherent danger of the acts specified therein
irrespective of knowledge or intention to produce the result and
irrespective of the result.
4. The question is whether indictment of an accused under Section 304 Part II and Section 338 IPC can co-exist in a case of single rasu or negligent act. We think it can. We do not think that two charges are mutually destructive. If the act is done with the knowledge of the dangerous consequences which are likely to follow and if death is caused then not only that the punishment is for the act but also for the resulting homicide and a case may fall within Section 299 or Section 300 depending
upon the mental state of the accused viz.
5. A person, responsible for a reckless or rash or negligent act that causes death which he had knowledge as a
reasonable man that such act was dangerous enough to lead
to some untoward thing and the death was likely to be caused, may be attributed with the knowledge of the consequence and
may be fastened with culpability of homicide not amounting to
murder and punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC.
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK | 1 298 |
| 16 | d65080a0c9e49de5da9d872fd1118928b3fc8e89b62a37cd571d9a8baea6c3271790511893.pdf | 1 283 |
| 17 | Know The Law | When Can An Issue Be Tried First Under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC As Preliminary Issue?
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/when-can-an-issue-be-tried-first-under-orderxiv-rule2-cpc-551862 | 1 411 |
| 18 | 307007feb2b7fb1bb2677ed3dd6f78eb36449d4954b861b8b7c6bc56d9634c161790434958.pdf | 1 476 |
| 19 | Know The Law | Where Can A Motor Accident Claim Be Filed? Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/supreme-court-where-can-motor-accident-claim-be-filed-551861 | 1 274 |
| 20 | Know The Law | Consequences Of Not Furnishing Written Grounds Of Arrest : Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/know-the-law-consequences-of-not-furnishing-written-grounds-of-arrest-supreme-court-explains-551870 | 1 154 |
