ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Open in Telegram
π² Contact β @CurrentLegalGKBOT βΊοΈ 360Β° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ π§ Daily Quiz β @LegalQuizzes β³π Enjoy Learning!
Show moreπ Analytical overview of Telegram channel ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Channel ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’ (@currentlegalgk) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 19 054 subscribers, ranking 405 in the Law category and 21 551 in the India region.
π Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠΎ, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 19 054 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 04 September, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 162 over the last 30 days and by 8 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 6.64%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 3.45% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 1 265 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 657 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 4.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice.
π Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
βπ² Contact β @CurrentLegalGKBOT
βΊοΈ 360Β° Cases on topics.
Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
π§ Daily Quiz β @LegalQuizzes
β³π Enjoy Learn...β
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 05 September, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Law category.
19 054
Subscribers
+824 hours
+307 days
+16230 days
Posts Archive
4236520191410558524judgement16-jan-2025-584629.pdf3.02 KB
Only second question has relevance and it was shared twice by us.
1. https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4896
2. https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/7516
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
In which of the following cases it was observed that if the information received by an officer-in-charge of Police Station discloses commission of a cognizable offence, it is mandatory to register FIR ?
(1) Jyotsna Devi v. State of Assam & others, AIR 2025 SC 4576.
(2) M. Jameela v. State of Kerala & another etc., AIR 2025 SC 5363.
(3) Mohammad Afzal Mohammad Sharif v. State of Maharashtra & others, AIR 2025 SC 4842.
(4) Akhtar Ali alias Ali Akhtar alias Shamim alias Raja Ustad v. State of Uttarakhand, AIR 2025 SC 4717.
which of the following cases Supreme Court pointed out the points of difference between Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S., 2023 and Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., 1973 ?
(1) State of Punjab v. Harikesh, AIR 2025 SC 729
(2) Om Prakash Ambadkar v. State of Maharashtra and others, AIR 2025 SC 970
(3) Omi alias Omkar Rathore & another v. State of M.P. & another, AIR 2025 SC 721
(4) Hansraj v. State of Chhattisgarh, AIR 2025 SC 841
The difference between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' was explained by Justice in State of A.P. v. Rayavarapu Punnayya, AIR 1977
(1) R.S. Sarkaria
(2) M.H. Beg
(3) P.N. Bhagwati
(4) V.R. Krishna lyer
Police can freeze bank accounts without court order: Karnataka HC
https://www.medianama.com/2026/08/223-karnataka-high-court-bank-account-freeze/
Exclusive | Why India is making IST legally enforceable: An expert explains π
#explained_sci_tech #express_explained
Why Goa's anti-conversion bill has hit a wall π
#express_explained
π ALL THE BEST RAJ APO CANDIDATES π
Can Accused Inspect Evidence Not Relied By Prosecution Before Trial? Supreme Court Reserves Order
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/can-accused-inspect-evidence-not-relied-by-prosecution-before-trial-supreme-court-reserves-order-548143
Imprisonment "as well as" fine, Does that mean "AND" in Section 8 of BNS?
Shanti Lal vs State Of M.P 2007
Answer: Para 22.Section 8(2)(a) #BNS@CurrentLegalGK
Multiple Cases Per Se Not Ground To Pass Externment Order : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/multiple-cases-per-se-not-ground-to-pass-externment-order-supreme-court-547945
State security act
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
A agrees with B to arrange a woman as a wife for Bβs nephew for βΉ50,000. A brings the woman to the railway station to convince B that the arrangement is genuine. After B arranges and pays βΉ50,000, A takes him towards the womanβs supposed residence, but deliberately escapes with the money. The agreement itself is void/unenforceable in civil law. Can A nevertheless be convicted for cheating? Give reasons.
Answer
Voice Samples And Article 20(3): Where Does Forensic Identification End And Self-Incrimination Begin?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/voice-samples-article203-forensic-identification-end-self-incrimination-begin-547806
π°
Settlement amount and subsequent maintenance claim?
Reji Baby Versus Subi Mary 2026The Supreme Court has quashed proceedings initiated by a wife and daughter against the husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Court observed that where the wife had voluntarily relinquished all monetary claims, including maintenance, under a Settlement Agreement and subsequent affidavit before the Family Court, such claims could not be revived through subsequent proceedings. #DV@CurrentLegalGK
π°π
Child Marriage and Religion Game.
π Caseβ Moidutty Musliyar v Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station, 2024
β
Ratio decidendiβ
1. Citizen- Section 1(2) of Act says applicable to all citizens without and beyond india as well (Citizens 1st then comes religion)
2. Savings Clause- 1875 Majority Act says above 18 persons in major but section 2 mentionsβ> Marriage, Dower, Divorce And Adoption; Religious Rites and Person Attained Majority Before 1875 Act.
βHowever Court said 2006 Act will override 1875 Act so far as child marriage is consideredβ
β
Precedents Relied Uponβ
1. Independent Thought v. Union of India, 2017 (Two concurring Judgments delivered in this case)
π¨ββοΈ Justice Madan B. Lokur:
PCMA is a secular law prevails over Hindu and Muslim law.
π¨ββοΈ Justice Deepak Gupta:
The Special Act deals with children prevail over Hindu and Muslim law. (Generalia Specilibus Non Derogant)
2. Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Shaikh v. State of Gujarat, 2016
Muslim personal law would not prevail over 2006 child marriage act
3. Khaledur Rahman v. State of
Kerala, 2022
It is trite law that when the provisions of a statute are repugnant to, or contrary to the customary law or personal law, in the absence of any specific exclusion of the said customary or personal law from the statutory provisions, the statute will prevail, and the personal law or the customary law shall stand abrogated to the extent of the inconsistency4. Mohamed Abbas M. v. Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, 2015 Provisions of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 are in no way against the religious rights of Muslim or any religion guaranteed under Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution. β DISAGREEMENT with High courtsβ (Muslim girl can marry upon reaching puberty) 1. Patna High Court- Md. Idris v. State of Bihar and Others, 1980 2. Punjab and Haryana High Court- Jammu v. State of Haryana, 2010 3. Delhi High Court- Tahra Begum v. State Of Delhi, 2012
Held: Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Overrides all religion including muslim personal law.β‘Matter sub judice before Supreme court as well- https://t.me/LegalQuizzes/304157 @CurrentLegalGK
It relied on the decision in Khaledur Rahman v. State of Kerala and Anr. and referred to Sections 2(1)(d) and 42A of the POCSO Act.
Muslim Man Having Sexual Intercourse With Minor Wife Liable Under POCSO Act: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-sexual-intercourse-wife-18-years-pocso-547849
