𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes ⏳🚀 Enjoy Learning!
نمایش بیشتر📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™
کانال 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™ (@currentlegalgk) در بخش زبانی انگلیسی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 18 966 مشترک است و جایگاه 408 را در دسته قانونی و رتبه 22 023 را در منطقه الهند دارد.
📊 شاخصهای مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 18 966 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین دادهها در تاریخ 25 اوت, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر 73 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر 0 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گستردهای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 6.01% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 3.40% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب میکند.
- دسترسی پستها: هر پست به طور میانگین 1 140 بازدید دریافت میکند. در اولین روز معمولاً 645 بازدید جمعآوری میشود.
- واکنشها و تعامل: مخاطبان بهطور فعال حمایت میکنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 4 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاههای شخصی توصیف میکند:
“📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT
☺️ 360° Cases on topics.
Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes
⏳🚀 Enjoy Learn...”
به لطف بهروزرسانیهای پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 31 اوت, 2026)، کانال همواره بهروز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیلها نشان میدهد مخاطبان بهطور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته قانونی تبدیل کردهاند.
18 966
مشترکین
اطلاعاتی وجود ندارد24 ساعت
+477 روز
+7330 روز
آرشیو پست ها
PRAMOD KUMAR SHUKLA VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
…an order passed under Section 156(3) of the Cr.PC is confined to directing, or declining to direct, the exercise of the statutory power of investigation under Chapter XII of the Code. Such an order neither entails an adjudication on the merits of the allegations nor determines any right or liability of the proposed accused. Applying the same principle, the rejection of an application under Section 156(3) of the Cr.PC, being an order rendered at the threshold without any adjudication on the merits after trial, cannot be accorded such finality as would attract the doctrine of res judicata so as to bar the subsequent registration of an FIR or the continuation of criminal proceedings founded upon the same or substantially similar allegations.”, the Court observed
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
Police Can Register FIR Even If Magistrate Rejected S.156(3) CrPC Application : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/police-can-register-fir-even-if-magistrate-rejected-s1563-crpc-application-supreme-court-546532
Landmark
Deena v. Union of India (1983), a three-Judge Bench had examined different methods of execution, including electrocution, lethal gas, shooting and lethal injection, and concluded that none had any “distinct or demonstrable advantage” over hanging.
Recent
Rishi Malhotra v. UOI 2026
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
No Evidence Lethal Injection Is More Humane Than Hanging For Death Sentence: Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/no-evidence-lethal-injection-is-more-humane-than-hanging-for-death-sentence-supreme-court-546511
" BCI Chief has done nothing for lawyers", Saurav Das on NALSAR Row https://share.google/owdhQkVMhyvA2bL21
To save your time.
Just to inform that try to avoid reading it as it has nothing new except for last segment which says SOPs of states mentions prima facie cofnizable offence doctrine which was mentioned in lalita kumari even in section 173(3).
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGKSection 173(3) BNSS: Rethinking Preliminary Enquiry | SCC Times https://share.google/GgLfN9cDDyV19NuIK
The Law Commission report addresses the guidelines for Section 9 of the Corruption Act, which pertains to commercial organizations offering bribes. To date, the government has not prescribed any guidelines for the defense of commercial organizations regarding this offense.
#PC@CurrentLegalGK
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
A hypothetical scenerio with a real provision backing. (Little technical)
Can there be a situation where a person may be held liable for an attempt of an attempt to an offence as in a case where attempt to do something is one of the ingredient to that offence
Think 🤔💬Hint: §7 POC Act
Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai Elected Supreme Court Bar Association President
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-bar-association-elections-senior-advocate-pradeep-rai-elected-as-president-jagdeep-dhankhar-casts-vote-546368
OpenAI alerted the FBI after detecting months of ChatGPT conversations in which a former Goldman Sachs analyst described plans to harm his ex-girlfriend.
https://www.medianama.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/openai-gpt-store-1704436224.jpg
“The first landmark judgment which actually spotted the virtue of non-arbitrariness in Article 14 was S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India .
#COI@CurrentLegalGK
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
#Landmark@CurrentLegalGK
It is well settled in law that a preliminary decree declares the rights and liabilities, but in a given case, a decree may be both preliminary and final and that apart, a decree may be partly preliminary and partly final. It has been so held in Rachakonda Venkat Rao v. R. Satya Bai 2003 It is worth noting that what is executable is a final decree and not a preliminary decree unless and until the final decree is a part of the preliminary decree. That apart, a final decree proceeding may be initiated at any point of time. It has been so enunciated in Hasham Abbas Sayyad v. Usman Abbas Sayyad 2007
Final Decree Application Not Necessary When Preliminary Decree Specifies Option If Physical Partition Was Impractical : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/final-decree-application-not-necessary-when-preliminary-decree-specifies-option-if-physical-partition-was-impractical-supreme-court-534690
Writ Petition For Contractual Dues Against State Not Entertainable Unless Amount Is Admitted: Allahabad High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-writ-petition-contractual-dues-entertainable-quantum-admitted-546043
MORALITY v. MOTIVE
“None of the circumstances having been proved, we are inclined to find the probable and more possible version of the accused, that the deceased drowned accidentally. The accused are guilty of having fled from the spot and not having attempted to rescue the drowning person, by crying out for help. Their conduct of having gone for a movie after witnessing their friend drowning, though reprehensible, cannot be found to be an incriminating circumstance, to establish murder rather than drowning. The hypothesis of innocence is crystal clear, and circumstances indicate an accident and not a premeditated murder.”, the Court added.
Fleeing After Friend's Drowning, Though Reprehensible Conduct, Not Per Se Suggestive Of Murder: Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/fleeing-after-friends-drowning-though-reprehensible-conduct-not-per-se-suggestive-of-murder-supreme-court-546049
LiveLaw Supreme Court Half Yearly Digest 2026 - BSA & Indian Evidence Act
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgments-and-orders-bharatiya-sakshya-adhiniyam-evidence-act-half-yearly-digest-546009
