𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™
前往频道在 Telegram
📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes ⏳🚀 Enjoy Learning!
显示更多📈 Telegram 频道 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™ 的分析概览
频道 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™ (@currentlegalgk) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 19 048 名订阅者，在 法律 类别中位列第 406，并在 印度 地区排名第 21 607 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 19 048 名订阅者。
根据 02 九月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 137，过去 24 小时变化为 -1，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 未认证
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 6.32%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 3.45% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 1 202 次浏览，首日通常累积 656 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 4。
- 主题关注点： 内容集中在 judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台：
“📲 Contact → @CurrentLegalGKBOT
☺️ 360° Cases on topics.
Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz → @LegalQuizzes
⏳🚀 Enjoy Learn...”
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 03 九月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 法律 类别中的关键影响点。
19 048
订阅者
-124 小时
-17 天
+13730 天
帖子存档
Why Goa's anti-conversion bill has hit a wall 🔗
#express_explained
Can Accused Inspect Evidence Not Relied By Prosecution Before Trial? Supreme Court Reserves Order
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/can-accused-inspect-evidence-not-relied-by-prosecution-before-trial-supreme-court-reserves-order-548143
Imprisonment "as well as" fine, Does that mean "AND" in Section 8 of BNS?
Shanti Lal vs State Of M.P 2007
Answer: Para 22.Section 8(2)(a) #BNS@CurrentLegalGK
Multiple Cases Per Se Not Ground To Pass Externment Order : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/multiple-cases-per-se-not-ground-to-pass-externment-order-supreme-court-547945
State security act
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
A agrees with B to arrange a woman as a wife for B’s nephew for ₹50,000. A brings the woman to the railway station to convince B that the arrangement is genuine. After B arranges and pays ₹50,000, A takes him towards the woman’s supposed residence, but deliberately escapes with the money. The agreement itself is void/unenforceable in civil law. Can A nevertheless be convicted for cheating? Give reasons.
Answer
Voice Samples And Article 20(3): Where Does Forensic Identification End And Self-Incrimination Begin?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/voice-samples-article203-forensic-identification-end-self-incrimination-begin-547806
💰
Settlement amount and subsequent maintenance claim?
Reji Baby Versus Subi Mary 2026The Supreme Court has quashed proceedings initiated by a wife and daughter against the husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Court observed that where the wife had voluntarily relinquished all monetary claims, including maintenance, under a Settlement Agreement and subsequent affidavit before the Family Court, such claims could not be revived through subsequent proceedings. #DV@CurrentLegalGK
Repost from 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™
👰🏏
Child Marriage and Religion Game.
📝 Case— Moidutty Musliyar v Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station, 2024
✅ Ratio decidendi—
1. Citizen- Section 1(2) of Act says applicable to all citizens without and beyond india as well (Citizens 1st then comes religion)
2. Savings Clause- 1875 Majority Act says above 18 persons in major but section 2 mentions—> Marriage, Dower, Divorce And Adoption; Religious Rites and Person Attained Majority Before 1875 Act.
“However Court said 2006 Act will override 1875 Act so far as child marriage is considered”
✅ Precedents Relied Upon—
1. Independent Thought v. Union of India, 2017 (Two concurring Judgments delivered in this case)
👨⚖️ Justice Madan B. Lokur:
PCMA is a secular law prevails over Hindu and Muslim law.
👨⚖️ Justice Deepak Gupta:
The Special Act deals with children prevail over Hindu and Muslim law. (Generalia Specilibus Non Derogant)
2. Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Shaikh v. State of Gujarat, 2016
Muslim personal law would not prevail over 2006 child marriage act
3. Khaledur Rahman v. State of
Kerala, 2022
It is trite law that when the provisions of a statute are repugnant to, or contrary to the customary law or personal law, in the absence of any specific exclusion of the said customary or personal law from the statutory provisions, the statute will prevail, and the personal law or the customary law shall stand abrogated to the extent of the inconsistency4. Mohamed Abbas M. v. Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, 2015 Provisions of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 are in no way against the religious rights of Muslim or any religion guaranteed under Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution. ✅ DISAGREEMENT with High courts— (Muslim girl can marry upon reaching puberty) 1. Patna High Court- Md. Idris v. State of Bihar and Others, 1980 2. Punjab and Haryana High Court- Jammu v. State of Haryana, 2010 3. Delhi High Court- Tahra Begum v. State Of Delhi, 2012
Held: Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Overrides all religion including muslim personal law.⚡Matter sub judice before Supreme court as well- https://t.me/LegalQuizzes/304157 @CurrentLegalGK
It relied on the decision in Khaledur Rahman v. State of Kerala and Anr. and referred to Sections 2(1)(d) and 42A of the POCSO Act.
Muslim Man Having Sexual Intercourse With Minor Wife Liable Under POCSO Act: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-sexual-intercourse-wife-18-years-pocso-547849
“It is not necessary that a person against whom the offence under Section 3 of the PMLA is alleged must have been shown as the accused in the scheduled offence. What is held in paragraph 270 of the decision of this Court in the case of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary supports the above conclusion. The conditions precedent for attracting the offense under Section 3 of the PMLA are that there must be a scheduled offense and that there must be proceeds of crime in relation to the scheduled offence as defined in clause (u) of subsection (1) of Section 3 of the PMLA
#PMLA@CurrentLegalGK
Prosecuting Professionals Under PMLA: Advice, Association, Or Complicity?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/prosecuting-professionals-pmla-advice-association-complicity-547709
Lucknow Development Authority
v.
Union of India
2026
Appellant is a creature of a statute of urban planning 1973, the appellant cannot be equated with the State of UP. In terms of Article 131 of the Constitution of India, the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction is confined to disputes between the Government of India and one or more States. The expression 'States' in Article 131 refers to the constituent States of the Union enlisted in the First Schedule of the Constitution, as distinct from a 'State' defined in Article 12. While the appellant may fall within Article 12 as an instrumentality of the State, it is not a State for the purposes of Article 131. The jurisdiction under clauses (a), (b) and (c) of Article 131 can be invoked only by the States specified in the First Schedule, and not by any authority or instrumentality covered by Article 12.
The core reason is difference in purpose of Article 12 and 131.
🌟
DEFINITION OF STATE UNDER ARTICLE 12 v. 131
M/S. TASHI DELEK GAMING SOLUTIONS LTD.
V.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
The enlarged definition of 'State' under Article 12 would not extend to Article 131 of the Constitution
#COI@CurrentLegalGKShare your feedback | High-Powered Task Force on Examination Reforms
https://examreforms-taskforce.dopt.gov.in/
🚺 👒
WHAT IS MODESTY | PROPERLY DISCUSSED IN THIS CASE
Tarkeshwar Sahu vs State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) 2006https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1438339/ #BNS@CurrentLegalGK
