็ฐๅทฒไธ็บฟ๏ผ2025 ๅนด Telegram ็ ็ฉถ โ ๅนดๅบฆๅ
ณ้ฎๆดๅฏ 
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
๐ฒ Contact โ @CurrentLegalGKBOT โบ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ ๐ง Daily Quiz โ @LegalQuizzes โณ๐ Enjoy Learning!
ๆพ็คบๆดๅค๐ Telegram ้ข้ ๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข ็ๅๆๆฆ่ง
้ข้ ๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข (@currentlegalgk) ่ฑ่ฏญ ่ฏญ่จ่ต้ไธญ็ ๆฏๆดป่ทๅไธ่ ใ็ฎๅ็คพๅบ่้ไบ 18 912 ๅ่ฎข้ ่ ๏ผๅจ ๆณๅพ ็ฑปๅซไธญไฝๅ็ฌฌ 410๏ผๅนถๅจ ๅฐๅบฆ ๅฐๅบๆๅ็ฌฌ 23 169 ไฝใ
๐ ๅไผๆๆ ไธๅข้ฟๅจๆ
่ช ะฝะตะฒัะดะพะผะพ ๅๅปบไปฅๆฅ๏ผ้กน็ฎไฟๆ้ซ้ๅข้ฟ๏ผๅธๅผไบ 18 912 ๅ่ฎข้ ่ ใ
ๆ นๆฎ 17 ๅ ญๆ, 2026 ็ๆๆฐๆฐๆฎ๏ผ้ข้ไฟๆ็จณๅฎ่ฟ่ฝฌใ่ฟๅป 30 ๅคฉ่ฎข้ ไบบๆฐๅๅไธบ 68๏ผ่ฟๅป 24 ๅฐๆถๅๅไธบ -3๏ผๆดไฝ่งฆ่พพไป็ถๅฏ่งใ
- ่ฎค่ฏ็ถๆ๏ผ ๆช่ฎค่ฏ
- ไบๅจ็ (ER)๏ผ ๅนณๅๅไผไบๅจ็ไธบ 6.32%ใๅ ๅฎนๅๅธๅ 24 ๅฐๆถๅ ้ๅธธ่ฝ่ทๅพ 3.25% ็ๅๅบ๏ผๅ ่ฎข้ ่ ๆป้ใ
- ๅธๅญ่ฆ็๏ผ ๆฏ็ฏๅธๅญๅนณๅๅฏ่ทๅพ 1 196 ๆฌกๆต่ง๏ผ้ฆๆฅ้ๅธธ็ดฏ็งฏ 615 ๆฌกๆต่งใ
- ไบๅจไธๅ้ฆ๏ผ ๅไผ็งฏๆๅไธ๏ผๅๅธๅนณๅๅๅบๆฐไธบ 2ใ
- ไธป้ขๅ ณๆณจ็น๏ผ ๅ ๅฎน้ไธญๅจ judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice ็ญๆ ธๅฟไธป้ขไธใ
๐ ๆ่ฟฐไธๅ ๅฎน็ญ็ฅ
ไฝ่
ๅฐ่ฏฅ้ข้ๅฎไฝไธบ่กจ่พพไธป่ง่ง็น็ๅนณๅฐ๏ผ
โ๐ฒ Contact โ @CurrentLegalGKBOT
โบ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.
Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐ง Daily Quiz โ @LegalQuizzes
โณ๐ Enjoy Learn...โ
ๅญๅ้ซ้ขๆดๆฐ๏ผๆๆฐๆฐๆฎ้้ไบ 18 ๅ ญๆ, 2026๏ผ๏ผ้ข้ๅง็ปไฟๆๆฐ้ฒๅบฆไธ้ซ่ฆ็ใๅๆๆพ็คบๅไผ็งฏๆไบๅจ๏ผไฝฟๅ ถๆไธบ ๆณๅพ ็ฑปๅซไธญ็ๅ ณ้ฎๅฝฑๅ็นใ
Age Determination POCSO JJ Act | Rule 12 of 2007 or section 94 of 2015 act which one to prefer?
๐จโโ๏ธ๐จโโ๏ธ Durgesh Vanshkar
v.
State of Madhya Pradesh
[MPHC, 2024]
Main issue: Application of section 94 on prior cases under 2007 rules and application of s. 6 GCA in rules 2007
๐ค Why JJ is Referred in POCSO and how this controversy started.
Jarnail Singh Vs.
State of Haryana (2013)
In our view, there is hardly any difference in so far as the issue of minority is concerned, between a child in conflict with law, and a child who is a victim of crime.
Whether Scholar register entry or birth certificate from school conclusive? answer ๐P. Yuvaprakashโ case (supra) has been re-affirmed by the Honโble Apex Court in Manak Chand alias Mani Vs. State of Haryana, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1397 in which ratio of Birad Mal Singhvi (supra) has been relied. Also Admissibility and probative values are different and see birad mal singhvi case for corroboration required. @CurrentLegalGK
Criteria: Brevity and simple explanation
