አዲስ ምልከታ🌍

playing the devils advocate here, and trying to find weaknesses in this argument: one can say they just found a way to make the laser lights work within the ionosphere. Now can they also say the satellites can work while flying at great speed that require exceeding earth's escape velocity (thousands of kilometers per hour), and staying in sync with each other, aiming laser light at each other at centimeter level precision while flying at those insane speeds. Any sane engineer, regardless of their intelligence, will look at this problem and say, nah this is impossible. Unless, of course, there were ways to simplify our model... just like NASA does when they try to do the math of aircraft flight. Their documents say things like "A stationary atmosphere" or "A flat plane of earth" will simplify their model and the equations they use. These seem like convenient excuses that can just be used a way of plausible deniability when they're asked why they chose that approach, because they can say "in the real scenarios we use the actual complex equations" and of course everyone else will not question them further because they believe in rational answers and the need for hard evidence. But we are not everyone else, we did not get here by believing the answers they give us. This means we can see through the cracks of their lies, just like in the aircraft motion equations, the space-x case also shows us that they are making these satellites work on a flat earth system and then finding very good lies that convince the whole world that they are orbiting the globe earth. And the proof to that is in this laser based mesh networking situation.