اکنون در دسترس! پژوهش تلگرام ۲۰۲۵ — مهمترین بینشهای سال 
📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services
نمایش بیشتر📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚
کانال 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚 (@lawstuden) در بخش زبانی انگلیسی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 16 877 مشترک است و جایگاه 466 را در دسته قانونی و رتبه 25 871 را در منطقه الهند دارد.
📊 شاخصهای مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 16 877 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین دادهها در تاریخ 16 ژوئن, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر 16 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر 14 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گستردهای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 23.48% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 7.47% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب میکند.
- دسترسی پستها: هر پست به طور میانگین 3 963 بازدید دریافت میکند. در اولین روز معمولاً 1 261 بازدید جمعآوری میشود.
- واکنشها و تعامل: مخاطبان بهطور فعال حمایت میکنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 1 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند property, cpc, decree, act, provision تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاههای شخصی توصیف میکند:
“Admin @asif100399
📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻
🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
Join 🔜 @lawstuden
Join 🔜 @lawexplorer
Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services”
به لطف بهروزرسانیهای پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 17 ژوئن, 2026)، کانال همواره بهروز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیلها نشان میدهد مخاطبان بهطور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته قانونی تبدیل کردهاند.
16 877
مشترکین
+1424 ساعت
+337 روز
+1630 روز
آرشیو پست ها
16 878
According to Section 21, in civil cases, an admission is NOT relevant if it is made either upon an express condition that evidence of it is not to be given, or under circumstances from which the Court can infer that:
16 878
Under Section 20, oral admissions as to the contents of a document are generally:
A) Relevant in all cases unconditionally
B) Not relevant, unless the party proposing to prove them shows he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents
C) Relevant only in civil cases
D) Relevant only if the document is proven to be forged
16 878
A is accused of fraudulently having in his possession counterfeit currency which he knew to be counterfeit. He offers to prove that he asked a skilful person to examine the currency as he doubted it. This statement can be proved by A because:
16 878
An admission may be proved on behalf of the person making it when it consists of a statement of the existence of any state of mind or body, made at or about the time when such state existed, provided it is accompanied by:
16 878
An admission may be proved by or on behalf of the person making it if it is of such a nature that, if the person making it were dead, it would be relevant as between third persons under which section?
16 878
According to Section 19, admissions are generally relevant and may be proved:
16 878
The question is, whether a horse sold by A to B is sound. A says to B— "Go and ask C, C knows all about it". C's statement is:
16 878
Section 18 deals with statements made by persons to whom a party to the suit has expressly referred for information in reference to a matter in dispute. Such statements are:
16 878
A undertakes to collect rents for B. B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B. A denies that rent was due from C to B. A statement by C that he owed B rent is:
16 878
Under Section 17, statements made by persons whose position or liability must be proved as against a party to the suit are admissions if made:
16 878
Statements made by persons from whom the parties to the suit have derived their interest in the subject matter are admissions if they are made:
16 878
According to Section 16(2)(ii)(a), statements by persons who have any proprietary or pecuniary interest in the subject matter of the proceeding are admissions if they are made:
16 878
Under Section 16(2)(i), statements made by parties to suits suing or sued in a representative character are not admissions unless they were made:
16 878
Under Section 16(1), statements made by an agent to a party to the proceeding are considered admissions if the agent is:
16 878
According to Section 15, an admission is a statement that suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact. In what forms can this statement be made?
16 878
Based on Illustration (a) of Section 14, if the question is whether a particular letter was dispatched, what facts are relevant?
A) The contents of the letter and the recipient's address.
B) The fact that it was the ordinary course of business for all letters put in a certain place to be carried to the post, and that the particular letter was put in that place.
C) The cost of the postage stamps used on the envelope.
D) The handwriting of the person who wrote the letter.
16 878
Under Section 14, when there is a question whether a particular act was done, what is considered a relevant fact?
16 878
In Illustration (a) of Section 13, A is accused of burning down his house for insurance money. What fact is relevant to show the fires were NOT accidental?
A) The fact that A lived in several houses successively, insured each, and received payment from different companies after fires.
B) The fact that A was an arson investigator.
C) The fact that A recently purchased highly flammable materials.
D) The fact that A owed money to a local bank.
16 878
According to Section 13, when there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, what fact is deemed relevant?
A) The physical strength of the person performing the act
B) The fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned
C) The immediate apology of the person performing the act
D) The time of day the act occurred
16 878
In Illustration (i) of Section 12, A is charged with shooting at B with intent to kill him. What fact may be proved to show A's intent?
