📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚
Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services
نمایش بیشتر📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚
کانال 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚 (@lawstuden) در بخش زبانی انگلیسی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 16 871 مشترک است و جایگاه 464 را در دسته قانونی و رتبه 24 925 را در منطقه الهند دارد.
📊 شاخصهای مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 16 871 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین دادهها در تاریخ 30 ژوئیه, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر 9 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر 6 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گستردهای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 22.85% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 7.76% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب میکند.
- دسترسی پستها: هر پست به طور میانگین 3 853 بازدید دریافت میکند. در اولین روز معمولاً 1 308 بازدید جمعآوری میشود.
- واکنشها و تعامل: مخاطبان بهطور فعال حمایت میکنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 2 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند property, cpc, decree, act, provision تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاههای شخصی توصیف میکند:
“Admin @asif100399
📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻
🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
Join 🔜 @lawstuden
Join 🔜 @lawexplorer
Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services”
به لطف بهروزرسانیهای پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 31 ژوئیه, 2026)، کانال همواره بهروز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیلها نشان میدهد مخاطبان بهطور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته قانونی تبدیل کردهاند.
در حال بارگیری داده...
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانالها | |
| 31 ژوئیه | +7 | |||
| 30 ژوئیه | +7 | |||
| 29 ژوئیه | 0 | |||
| 28 ژوئیه | +2 | |||
| 27 ژوئیه | +6 | |||
| 26 ژوئیه | 0 | |||
| 25 ژوئیه | 0 | |||
| 24 ژوئیه | +4 | |||
| 23 ژوئیه | +5 | |||
| 22 ژوئیه | +5 | |||
| 21 ژوئیه | +11 | |||
| 20 ژوئیه | +1 | |||
| 19 ژوئیه | +7 | |||
| 18 ژوئیه | +5 | |||
| 17 ژوئیه | +1 | |||
| 16 ژوئیه | +5 | |||
| 15 ژوئیه | +5 | |||
| 14 ژوئیه | +1 | |||
| 13 ژوئیه | 0 | |||
| 12 ژوئیه | 0 | |||
| 11 ژوئیه | +5 | |||
| 10 ژوئیه | +2 | |||
| 09 ژوئیه | +6 | |||
| 08 ژوئیه | +4 | |||
| 07 ژوئیه | +6 | |||
| 06 ژوئیه | +1 | |||
| 05 ژوئیه | 0 | |||
| 04 ژوئیه | 0 | |||
| 03 ژوئیه | +1 | |||
| 02 ژوئیه | +6 | |||
| 01 ژوئیه | +1 |
| 2 | Under Section 41(1), when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, whose opinion is a relevant fact? | 1 376 |
| 3 | To determine if an obstruction to a harbour is caused by a certain sea-wall, the fact that other similarly situated harbours began to be obstructed at the same time is relevant. This is an illustration of: | 1 902 |
| 4 | Under Section 40, facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they: | 2 226 |
| 5 | As per the illustrations in Section 39, if the question is whether the death of A was caused by poison, the opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced by that poison are: | 2 686 |
| 6 | Under the Explanation to Section 39, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, shall be considered a(n): | 2 966 |
| 7 | If the Court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to information transmitted or stored in any computer resource, whose opinion is a relevant fact under Section 39(2)? | 3 291 |
| 8 | According to Section 39(1), individuals whose opinions are relevant on points of foreign law, science, art, handwriting or finger impressions are called: | 3 376 |
| 9 | https://youtube.com/@lawexplorer | 3 631 |
| 10 | According to Section 38, any party to a suit may show that a judgment (which is relevant under sections 34, 35 or 36 and proved by the adverse party) was: | 3 617 |
| 11 | Based on Illustration (d) of Section 37: A is charged with theft and with having been previously convicted of theft. The previous conviction is: | 3 725 |
| 12 | Based on Illustration (b) of Section 37: A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction. As between A and C, the judgment against B is: | 3 917 |
| 13 | https://youtu.be/oadCYAmy6MU | 1 224 |
| 14 | Under Section 37, judgments other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 are generally: | 3 683 |
| 15 | A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges a public right of way. C had earlier sued A for trespass and A denied the same right of way. Under Section 36, the existence of the decree in the suit between A and C is: | 4 018 |
| 16 | According to Section 36, judgments, orders or decrees relating to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry are relevant, but: | 4 123 |
| 17 | Under Section 35, a final judgment of a competent Court in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction is considered: | 4 319 |
| 18 | Under Section 34, the existence of any judgment, order, or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a: | 4 529 |
| 19 | Under Section 33, when a statement forms part of a longer conversation or document, how much evidence shall be given? | 4 690 |
| 20 | Under Section 32, when the Court has to form an opinion as to a law of any country, what is considered relevant?
A) Any anonymous blog post discussing the law
B) Any statement of such law contained in a book purporting to be published under the authority of the Government of such country
C) The personal opinion of a foreign law student
D) A local newspaper editorial from that country | 1 343 |
