es
Feedback
📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

Ir al canal en Telegram

Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services

Mostrar más

📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

El canal 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚 (@lawstuden) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 16 871 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 464 en la categoría Ley y el puesto 24 925 en la región India.

📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica

Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 16 871 suscriptores.

Según los últimos datos del 30 julio, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 9, y en las últimas 24 horas de 6, conservando un alto alcance.

  • Estado de verificación: No verificado
  • Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 22.85%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 7.76% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
  • Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 3 853 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 1 308 visualizaciones.
  • Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 2.
  • Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como property, cpc, decree, act, provision.

📝 Descripción y política de contenido

El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services

Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 31 julio, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Ley.

16 871
Suscriptores
+624 horas
+37 días
+930 días
Archivo de publicaciones
According to the Explanation in Section 41, a person is said to be "acquainted" with the handwriting of another person in all the following situations EXCEPT: A) When he has seen that person write B) When he has received documents purporting to be written by that person in answer to his own C) When documents purporting to be written by that person have been habitually submitted to him in the ordinary course of business D) When he has been told by a friend what the handwriting looks like

Under Section 41(1), when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, whose opinion is a relevant fact?
Anonymous voting

To determine if an obstruction to a harbour is caused by a certain sea-wall, the fact that other similarly situated harbours began to be obstructed at the same time is relevant. This is an illustration of:
Anonymous voting

Under Section 40, facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they:
Anonymous voting

As per the illustrations in Section 39, if the question is whether the death of A was caused by poison, the opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced by that poison are:
Anonymous voting

Under the Explanation to Section 39, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, shall be considered a(n):
Anonymous voting

If the Court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to information transmitted or stored in any computer resource, whose opinion is a relevant fact under Section 39(2)?
Anonymous voting

According to Section 39(1), individuals whose opinions are relevant on points of foreign law, science, art, handwriting or finger impressions are called:
Anonymous voting

According to Section 38, any party to a suit may show that a judgment (which is relevant under sections 34, 35 or 36 and proved by the adverse party) was:
Anonymous voting

Based on Illustration (d) of Section 37: A is charged with theft and with having been previously convicted of theft. The previous conviction is:
Anonymous voting

Based on Illustration (b) of Section 37: A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction. As between A and C, the judgment against B is:
Anonymous voting

Under Section 37, judgments other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 are generally:
Anonymous voting

A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges a public right of way. C had earlier sued A for trespass and A denied the same right of way. Under Section 36, the existence of the decree in the suit between A and C is:
Anonymous voting

According to Section 36, judgments, orders or decrees relating to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry are relevant, but:
Anonymous voting

Under Section 35, a final judgment of a competent Court in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction is considered:
Anonymous voting

Under Section 34, the existence of any judgment, order, or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a:
Anonymous voting

Under Section 33, when a statement forms part of a longer conversation or document, how much evidence shall be given?
Anonymous voting

Under Section 32, when the Court has to form an opinion as to a law of any country, what is considered relevant? A) Any anonymous blog post discussing the law B) Any statement of such law contained in a book purporting to be published under the authority of the Government of such country C) The personal opinion of a foreign law student D) A local newspaper editorial from that country