📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

Open in Telegram

Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services

Network:📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚India24 901 Law465...

📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

Channel 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚 (@lawstuden) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 16 869 subscribers, ranking 465 in the Law category and 24 901 in the India region.

📊 Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 16 869 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 31 July, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 17 over the last 30 days and by 7 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

Verification status: Not verified
Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 22.84%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 7.74% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
Post reach: On average, each post receives 3 854 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 1 305 views.
Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 1.
Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as property, cpc, decree, act, provision.

📝 Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services”

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 01 August, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Law category.

16 869

Subscribers

+724 hours

+87 days

+1730 days

3 854

Post views

~ 1 30524 hours

~ 1 86648 hours

22.84%

Engagement rate

~ 1

Posts per day

Ads index

beta

Posts Archive

16 869

According to the Explanation in Section 41, a person is said to be "acquainted" with the handwriting of another person in all the following situations EXCEPT: A) When he has seen that person write B) When he has received documents purporting to be written by that person in answer to his own C) When documents purporting to be written by that person have been habitually submitted to him in the ordinary course of business D) When he has been told by a friend what the handwriting looks like

16 869

Under Section 41(1), when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, whose opinion is a relevant fact?

Anonymous voting

16 869

To determine if an obstruction to a harbour is caused by a certain sea-wall, the fact that other similarly situated harbours began to be obstructed at the same time is relevant. This is an illustration of:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 40, facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they:

Anonymous voting

16 869

As per the illustrations in Section 39, if the question is whether the death of A was caused by poison, the opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced by that poison are:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under the Explanation to Section 39, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, shall be considered a(n):

Anonymous voting

16 869

If the Court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to information transmitted or stored in any computer resource, whose opinion is a relevant fact under Section 39(2)?

Anonymous voting

16 869

According to Section 39(1), individuals whose opinions are relevant on points of foreign law, science, art, handwriting or finger impressions are called:

Anonymous voting

16 869

https://youtube.com/@lawexplorer

16 869

According to Section 38, any party to a suit may show that a judgment (which is relevant under sections 34, 35 or 36 and proved by the adverse party) was:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Based on Illustration (d) of Section 37: A is charged with theft and with having been previously convicted of theft. The previous conviction is:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Based on Illustration (b) of Section 37: A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction. As between A and C, the judgment against B is:

Anonymous voting

16 869

https://youtu.be/oadCYAmy6MU

16 869

Under Section 37, judgments other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 are generally:

Anonymous voting

16 869

A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges a public right of way. C had earlier sued A for trespass and A denied the same right of way. Under Section 36, the existence of the decree in the suit between A and C is:

Anonymous voting

16 869

According to Section 36, judgments, orders or decrees relating to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry are relevant, but:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 35, a final judgment of a competent Court in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction is considered:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 34, the existence of any judgment, order, or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 33, when a statement forms part of a longer conversation or document, how much evidence shall be given?

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 32, when the Court has to form an opinion as to a law of any country, what is considered relevant? A) Any anonymous blog post discussing the law B) Any statement of such law contained in a book purporting to be published under the authority of the Government of such country C) The personal opinion of a foreign law student D) A local newspaper editorial from that country