📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

Открыть в Telegram

Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services

Больше

Сеть:📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚Индия24 901 Закон и право465...

📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

Канал 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚 (@lawstuden) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 16 869 подписчиков, занимая 465 место в категории Закон и право и 24 901 место в регионе Индия.

📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика

С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 16 869 подписчиков.

Согласно последним данным от 31 июля, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило 17, а за последние 24 часа — 7, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.

Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 22.84%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 7.74% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 3 854 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 1 305 просмотров.
Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 1.
Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как property, cpc, decree, act, provision.

📝 Описание и контентная политика

Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services”

Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 01 августа, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Закон и право.

16 869

Подписчики

+724 часа

+87 дней

+1730 день

3 854

Просмотры поста

~ 1 30524 часа

~ 1 86648 часов

22.84%

Коэффициент вовлеченности

~ 1

Постов в день

Ads index

beta

Архив постов

16 869

According to the Explanation in Section 41, a person is said to be "acquainted" with the handwriting of another person in all the following situations EXCEPT: A) When he has seen that person write B) When he has received documents purporting to be written by that person in answer to his own C) When documents purporting to be written by that person have been habitually submitted to him in the ordinary course of business D) When he has been told by a friend what the handwriting looks like

16 869

Under Section 41(1), when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, whose opinion is a relevant fact?

Anonymous voting

16 869

To determine if an obstruction to a harbour is caused by a certain sea-wall, the fact that other similarly situated harbours began to be obstructed at the same time is relevant. This is an illustration of:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 40, facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they:

Anonymous voting

16 869

As per the illustrations in Section 39, if the question is whether the death of A was caused by poison, the opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced by that poison are:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under the Explanation to Section 39, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, shall be considered a(n):

Anonymous voting

16 869

If the Court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to information transmitted or stored in any computer resource, whose opinion is a relevant fact under Section 39(2)?

Anonymous voting

16 869

According to Section 39(1), individuals whose opinions are relevant on points of foreign law, science, art, handwriting or finger impressions are called:

Anonymous voting

16 869

https://youtube.com/@lawexplorer

16 869

According to Section 38, any party to a suit may show that a judgment (which is relevant under sections 34, 35 or 36 and proved by the adverse party) was:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Based on Illustration (d) of Section 37: A is charged with theft and with having been previously convicted of theft. The previous conviction is:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Based on Illustration (b) of Section 37: A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction. As between A and C, the judgment against B is:

Anonymous voting

16 869

https://youtu.be/oadCYAmy6MU

16 869

Under Section 37, judgments other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 are generally:

Anonymous voting

16 869

A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges a public right of way. C had earlier sued A for trespass and A denied the same right of way. Under Section 36, the existence of the decree in the suit between A and C is:

Anonymous voting

16 869

According to Section 36, judgments, orders or decrees relating to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry are relevant, but:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 35, a final judgment of a competent Court in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction is considered:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 34, the existence of any judgment, order, or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a:

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 33, when a statement forms part of a longer conversation or document, how much evidence shall be given?

Anonymous voting

16 869

Under Section 32, when the Court has to form an opinion as to a law of any country, what is considered relevant? A) Any anonymous blog post discussing the law B) Any statement of such law contained in a book purporting to be published under the authority of the Government of such country C) The personal opinion of a foreign law student D) A local newspaper editorial from that country