📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish

Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services

Ko'proq ko'rsatish

Tarmoq:📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚Hindiston24 924 Qonun465...

📈 Telegram kanali 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚 analitikasi

📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚 (@lawstuden) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 16 866 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Qonun toifasida 465-o'rinni va Hindiston mintaqasida 24 924-o'rinni egallagan.

📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika

невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 16 866 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.

01 Avgust, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 7 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -5 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.

Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 22.71% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 7.75% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 3 830 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 1 307 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 1 ta reaksiya keladi.
Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent property, cpc, decree, act, provision kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.

📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati

Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Admin @asif100399 📚 For judiciary preparation please subscribe our Youtube channel 👇🏻 🔴 YouTube 🔜 http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER Join 🔜 @lawstuden Join 🔜 @lawexplorer Join 🔜 @indian_judicial_services”

Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 02 Avgust, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Qonun toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.

16 866

Obunachilar

-524 soatlar

+57 kunlar

+730 kunlar

3 830

Post ko'rishlar

~ 1 30724 soatlar

~ 1 86748 soatlar

22.71%

Muloqot nisbati

~ 1

Kuniga postlar

Ads index

beta

Postlar arxiv

16 866

Based on the illustration in Section 41, if B is a merchant and C is his clerk whose duty is to examine correspondence, is C's opinion on the handwriting of A (a regular correspondent) relevant?

Anonymous voting

16 866

According to the Explanation in Section 41, a person is said to be "acquainted" with the handwriting of another person in all the following situations EXCEPT: A) When he has seen that person write B) When he has received documents purporting to be written by that person in answer to his own C) When documents purporting to be written by that person have been habitually submitted to him in the ordinary course of business D) When he has been told by a friend what the handwriting looks like

16 866

Under Section 41(1), when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, whose opinion is a relevant fact?

Anonymous voting

16 866

To determine if an obstruction to a harbour is caused by a certain sea-wall, the fact that other similarly situated harbours began to be obstructed at the same time is relevant. This is an illustration of:

Anonymous voting

16 866

Under Section 40, facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they:

Anonymous voting

16 866

As per the illustrations in Section 39, if the question is whether the death of A was caused by poison, the opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced by that poison are:

Anonymous voting

16 866

Under the Explanation to Section 39, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, shall be considered a(n):

Anonymous voting

16 866

If the Court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to information transmitted or stored in any computer resource, whose opinion is a relevant fact under Section 39(2)?

Anonymous voting

16 866

According to Section 39(1), individuals whose opinions are relevant on points of foreign law, science, art, handwriting or finger impressions are called:

Anonymous voting

16 866

https://youtube.com/@lawexplorer

16 866

According to Section 38, any party to a suit may show that a judgment (which is relevant under sections 34, 35 or 36 and proved by the adverse party) was:

Anonymous voting

16 866

Based on Illustration (d) of Section 37: A is charged with theft and with having been previously convicted of theft. The previous conviction is:

Anonymous voting

16 866

Based on Illustration (b) of Section 37: A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction. As between A and C, the judgment against B is:

Anonymous voting

16 866

https://youtu.be/oadCYAmy6MU

16 866

Under Section 37, judgments other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 are generally:

Anonymous voting

16 866

A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges a public right of way. C had earlier sued A for trespass and A denied the same right of way. Under Section 36, the existence of the decree in the suit between A and C is:

Anonymous voting

16 866

According to Section 36, judgments, orders or decrees relating to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry are relevant, but:

Anonymous voting

16 866

Under Section 35, a final judgment of a competent Court in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction is considered:

Anonymous voting

16 866

Under Section 34, the existence of any judgment, order, or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a:

Anonymous voting

16 866

Under Section 33, when a statement forms part of a longer conversation or document, how much evidence shall be given?

Anonymous voting