DevOps & SRE notes
Open in Telegram
Helpful articles and tools for DevOps&SRE WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb79nmmHVvTUnc4tfp2F For paid consultation (RU/EN), contact: @tutunak All ways to support https://telegra.ph/How-support-the-channel-02-19
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel DevOps & SRE notes
Channel DevOps & SRE notes (@devops_sre_notes) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 13 258 subscribers, ranking 9 374 in the Technologies & Applications category and 2 784 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 13 258 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 25 August, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 254 over the last 30 days and by 3 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 16.60%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 4.52% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 2 201 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 599 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 3.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as kubernete, cluster, author, engineering, monitoring.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Helpful articles and tools for DevOps&SRE
WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb79nmmHVvTUnc4tfp2F
For paid consultation (RU/EN), contact: @tutunak
All ways to support https://telegra.ph/How-support-the-channel-02-19”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 26 August, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
13 258
Subscribers
+324 hours
+267 days
+25430 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
August '26
August '26
+281
in 0 channels
July '26
+319
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '26
+324
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '26
+326
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+329
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+197
in 5 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+203
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+197
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+176
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+178
in 1 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+158
in 1 channels
Get PRO
September '25
+41
in 1 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+1 262
in 1 channels
Get PRO
July '25
+3 699
in 9 channels
Get PRO
June '25
+3 743
in 3 channels
Get PRO
May '25
+1 435
in 3 channels
Get PRO
April '25
+936
in 3 channels
Get PRO
March '25
+241
in 2 channels
Get PRO
February '25
+189
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '25
+579
in 1 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+1 109
in 1 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+435
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+462
in 2 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+617
in 1 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+704
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+374
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+420
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+505
in 1 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+610
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+710
in 1 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+1 527
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+549
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+159
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+10 415
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+29
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+9 830
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+2 956
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+7 034
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+29
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+1 145
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+4 704
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+19
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+1 098
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 26 August | +2 | |||
| 25 August | +4 | |||
| 24 August | +5 | |||
| 23 August | +8 | |||
| 22 August | +9 | |||
| 21 August | +8 | |||
| 20 August | +6 | |||
| 19 August | +8 | |||
| 18 August | +62 | |||
| 17 August | +7 | |||
| 16 August | +6 | |||
| 15 August | +2 | |||
| 14 August | +10 | |||
| 13 August | +14 | |||
| 12 August | +10 | |||
| 11 August | +13 | |||
| 10 August | +15 | |||
| 09 August | +12 | |||
| 08 August | +12 | |||
| 07 August | +13 | |||
| 06 August | +5 | |||
| 05 August | +10 | |||
| 04 August | +3 | |||
| 03 August | +13 | |||
| 02 August | +12 | |||
| 01 August | +12 |
Channel Posts
🛡 Open-source and cloud-native Web Application Firewall (WAF)
https://github.com/bunkerity/bunkerweb
| 2 | The article challenges the traditional "three pillars" of observability (metrics, logs, traces), arguing that they are insufficient for modern, distributed architectures. Through three real-world incident examples at a large financial institution, the author demonstrates that application-level telemetry often fails to reveal actual customer impact. Instead of siloed data, the author advocates for "single threads"—clear, end-to-end distributed traces of individual customer requests—enriched with business context and measured by customer-facing Service Level Objectives (SLOs).
https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/you-dont-need-three-pillars-you-need-single-threads | 836 |
| 3 | A command-line tool for Jira workflow management. Quickly select issues, track your current work, and generate consistent branch names.
https://github.com/tutunak/jcli | 946 |
| 4 | Agentic CI/CD: Kubernetes Deployment Gates with Elastic MCP Server — Elastic Observability Labs
https://www.elastic.co/observability-labs/blog/agentic-cicd-kubernetes-mcp-server | 1 328 |
| 5 | From Silos to Service Topology: Why Netflix Built a Real-Time Service Map
https://netflixtechblog.com/from-silos-to-service-topology-why-netflix-built-a-real-time-service-map-0165ba13a7bc | 1 475 |
| 6 | How GitHub uses eBPF to improve deployment safety
https://github.blog/engineering/infrastructure/how-github-uses-ebpf-to-improve-deployment-safety/ | 1 715 |
| 7 | https://www.cncf.io/blog/2026/06/25/building-a-cluster-aware-ai-agent-with-kubernetes-argo-cd-and-gitops/
Practical walkthrough for a self-hosted, read-only cluster AI agent with GitHub Actions, Argo CD Image Updater, and no cluster data leaving the network. Good pattern material for safe “AI assistant inside the cluster” experiments. | 2 068 |
| 8 | Morgan Stanley presented their journey scaling Flux to manage over 500 clusters and tens of thousands of resources. They detailed their transition from push-based CI/CD pipelines to a pull-based, continuous reconciliation model using Flux to eliminate configuration drift. The article outlines their strategy for handling enterprise-grade security, performance tuning for scale, and adapting architecture (like moving from Git to S3) to meet high availability and compliance needs.
https://fluxcd.io/blog/2026/03/stairway-to-gitops-morgan-stanley/ | 2 490 |
| 9 | Trusted builds made easy! A cloud-native software factory for building, testing, and releasing trusted software artifacts
Konflux is an open-source, Kubernetes-native CI/CD platform that manages the full software delivery lifecycle for software artifacts — with supply chain trust built in from the start. Built on Tekton and the Conforma policy framework, it brings together best-in-class open source projects into a single, integrated software factory. Managed by a Kubernetes operator, Konflux runs on Kind, OpenShift, and any conformant Kubernetes cluster.
https://github.com/konflux-ci/konflux-ci | 2 380 |
| 10 | A lightweight tool for deploying and managing containerised applications across a network of Docker hosts. Bridging the gap between Docker and Kubernetes ✨
https://github.com/psviderski/uncloud | 2 475 |
| 11 | Deep dive into Prometheus’s use-uncached-io work and why page cache behavior can make Kubernetes container memory metrics misleading. Useful for anyone running Prometheus at scale: covers memory predictability, compaction writes, OOM risk, and tradeoffs around direct I/O.
https://prometheus.io/blog/2026/03/05/uncached-io/ | 2 546 |
| 12 | Ministack: Free, open-source local AWS emulator - 55+ services, Terraform compatible, real databases. Free forever. MIT licensed.
https://github.com/ministackorg/ministack | 2 714 |
| 13 | Kubernetes configuration tracking controller.
Wave watches Deployments, StatefulSets and DaemonSets within a Kubernetes cluster and ensures that their Pods always have up to date configuration.
By monitoring mounted ConfigMaps and Secrets, Wave can trigger a Rolling Update of the Deployment when the mounted configuration is changed.
https://github.com/wave-k8s/wave | 2 432 |
| 14 | No text... | 2 414 |
| 15 | Hands-on vendor-neutral instrumentation for GenAI spans, tool calls, token metrics, and trace exploration. Worth reading if you want AI-agent debugging to fit existing OTel/Grafana/Loki-style observability rather than a separate black box.
https://opentelemetry.io/blog/2026/genai-observability/ | 2 188 |
| 16 | No text... | 2 186 |
| 17 |  Lessons from Moving a Live Production Database describes the complex process of migrating a massive dataset while keeping the service available to users.
The case study covers specific strategies for achieving zero downtime during a high-risk infrastructure change.
But is zero downtime always worth the engineering effort?
Imagine that you have two options:
1. Spend several weeks preparing and testing a zero-downtime migration.
2. Schedule 20 minutes of downtime during a low-traffic period.
Considering that 99.9% availability allows approximately 43 minutes of downtime per month, which option would you choose?
What factors would change your decision: revenue loss, SLA penalties, customer expectations, rollback complexity, or the size of the engineering team?
https://www.tines.com/blog/zero-downtime-database-migrations-lessons-from-moving-a-live-production/ | 2 320 |
| 18 | Containerlab focuses on the containerized Network Operating Systems which are typically used to test network features and designs
https://github.com/srl-labs/containerlab | 2 294 |
| 19 | No text... | 2 577 |
| 20 | The article explores how integrating these two prominent tools can accelerate and enhance platform engineering initiatives.
https://platformengineering.org/blog/platform-engineering-with-crossplane-and-argocd | 2 615 |
