Martin Geddes Channel
Open in Telegram
I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Martin Geddes Channel
Channel Martin Geddes Channel (@geddes) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 14 577 subscribers, ranking 3 777 in the Politics category and 2 594 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 14 577 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 21 July, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -195 over the last 30 days and by -8 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 13.34%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 6.55% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 1 944 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 955 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as justice, ghost, essay, authority, procedure.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 22 July, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Politics category.
14 577
Subscribers
-824 hours
-547 days
-19530 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
July '26
July '26
+2
in 10 channels
June '26
+5
in 8 channels
Get PRO
May '26
+7
in 4 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+3
in 4 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+1
in 6 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+4
in 3 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+12
in 8 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+12
in 6 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+8
in 5 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+9
in 8 channels
Get PRO
September '25
+223
in 8 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+23
in 10 channels
Get PRO
July '25
+32
in 10 channels
Get PRO
June '25
+11
in 11 channels
Get PRO
May '25
+20
in 15 channels
Get PRO
April '25
+13
in 9 channels
Get PRO
March '25
+21
in 13 channels
Get PRO
February '25
+20
in 11 channels
Get PRO
January '25
+14
in 10 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+131
in 22 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+19
in 9 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+1
in 9 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+28
in 12 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+41
in 15 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+28
in 14 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+26
in 8 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+77
in 14 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+40
in 11 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+80
in 6 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+108
in 12 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+86
in 11 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+50
in 8 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+113
in 13 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+115
in 16 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+49
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+67
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+159
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+178
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+120
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+123
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+101
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+204
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+325
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+359
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+232
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+259
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+235
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+475
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+129
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+214
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+146
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '22
+254
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '22
+188
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '22
+723
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '21
+233
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '21
+843
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '21
+936
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '21
+162
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '21
+195
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '21
+587
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '21
+1 883
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '21
+2 220
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '21
+2 330
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '21
+3 825
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '21
+4 041
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '21
+10 290
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 22 July | 0 | |||
| 21 July | 0 | |||
| 20 July | 0 | |||
| 19 July | 0 | |||
| 18 July | 0 | |||
| 17 July | 0 | |||
| 16 July | 0 | |||
| 15 July | 0 | |||
| 14 July | 0 | |||
| 13 July | 0 | |||
| 12 July | 0 | |||
| 11 July | 0 | |||
| 10 July | 0 | |||
| 09 July | 0 | |||
| 08 July | 0 | |||
| 07 July | 0 | |||
| 06 July | +1 | |||
| 05 July | 0 | |||
| 04 July | 0 | |||
| 03 July | +1 | |||
| 02 July | 0 | |||
| 01 July | 0 |
Channel Posts
I’ve opened a limited sale of my signed photographic prints to help fund my ongoing truth and freedom work.
Support the mission, receive a handmade print or postcard as a thank-you.
What I’m really selling is resistance to tyranny. The art is simply the conduit.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/art-sale-to-fund-my-freedom-work
| 2 | They thought they were doing a political hit job.
What if they were actually attacking the Republic?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/on-judicial-immunity-enemy-combatants | 1 380 |
| 3 | If a court can nullify your constitutional rights by uttering a single political label, do you still have constitutional rights?
My latest essay examines a custody case that became something much larger: a constitutional recognition failure.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/steal-a-child-or-a-constitution | 1 449 |
| 4 | The real war was never over Q. It was always over sovereign self-recognition.
A child custody case unexpectedly exposed a constitutional primitive hiding in plain sight.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-real-war-is-over-sovereign-self | 1 763 |
| 5 |  No text... | 1 605 |
| 6 | Everyone asks, “Is Q military intelligence?”
I now think that’s the wrong question.
Instead of asking AI for a verdict, I built a six-stage reasoning architecture that separates evidence, ontology, assumptions, reconstruction, and recursive consistency. Both Grok and ChatGPT independently converged on the same conclusion.
The result surprised me. The biggest contribution isn’t the answer—it’s a new way to analyse contested historical realities.
Who is Q? became Why Q?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/so-is-q-a-military-intelligence-program | 2 953 |
| 7 | A 200-year-old London milestone turned out to be an unexpected laboratory for AI reasoning.
Four analytical perspectives. One ordinary object. A surprising amount of insight.
The bottleneck is often not reasoning power, but perspective.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/a-sign-a-symbol-a-signifier-or-what | 1 573 |
| 8 | After eight years, I no longer think the most interesting question is “Who is Q?”
I think the more interesting question is:
What kind of hidden runtime could have generated the history we can now observe?
My concluding essay introduces the idea of computational historiography—using AI to compare competing reconstructions of history rather than simply arguing over narratives.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-final-qonvergence-part-3-the | 2 597 |
| 9 | Yesterday I documented the chronology. Today I explain the method.
Rather than arguing about Q, I apply three AI analytical tools to the evidence itself—and publish the raw outputs. The real story isn’t my conclusions, but how AI can now act as an instrument for disciplined inquiry into contested subjects.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-final-qonvergence-part-2-the | 2 320 |
| 10 | Q is no longer confined to anonymous message boards.
Whether you regard it as meaningful, malign, or irrelevant, themes once dismissed as “fringe” are increasingly appearing in official communications from the White House and US government departments.
This first article doesn’t argue what Q is. It simply documents the chronology.
Judge the pattern for yourself.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-final-qonvergence-part-1-the | 2 649 |
| 11 | After two years of intensive AI use, I realised the prompt isn’t the unit of work.
The project is.
Here are the workflows, tools, and mental models I’ve developed to turn AI from an answer machine into a thinking partner.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/tips-on-how-i-get-ai-to-work-for | 2 175 |
| 12 | Last year, readers bought a used Chevy Malibu for a school teacher who had lost her child, her financial security, and much of her life after a family-court battle that imported political narratives into a custody dispute.
One year on, she has written to tell you what your generosity meant.
The most moving part isn’t her letter.
It’s the handwritten note from one of her pupils.
Sometimes the biggest constitutional questions are revealed through the smallest acts of kindness.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/one-year-on-an-update-from-the-qanon | 2 281 |
| 13 | I published something more personal than usual.
“And then it was over” — Testimony of an Anon.
Not analysis this time. Testimony.
What it cost. What sustained me. Why the exile now feels like it is ending.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/and-then-it-was-over | 2 278 |
| 14 | Auftragstaktik. Mosaic Warfare. Discipleship. Q.
Different domains. Same underlying problem.
When propagation fails, reconstruction begins.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/auftragstaktik-mosaic-warfare-discipleship | 2 069 |
| 15 | Before asking whether a system is true, lawful, scientific, authoritative, or intelligent, there is a prior question:
Is it still attached enough to reality to be meaningfully wrong?
The Prolegomena Tool is a free AI-assisted diagnostic for detecting when symbolic systems have drifted from the realities they claim to represent.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-prolegomena-tool-an-ai-not-even | 2 371 |
| 16 | A short history of how we got here, because the chronology is the whole story.
January: the Pentagon demands unrestricted use of Claude for autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. Anthropic says no.
February: the President orders every federal agency to drop Anthropic. The Defense Secretary bans Pentagon contractors from doing business with them. A rival announces its classified-network deal within hours.
March: the Pentagon designates an American company a "supply chain risk" under a statute written for foreign adversaries. A federal judge blocks it.
May: the Pentagon signs AI deals with seven companies. Anthropic is not one of them.
June 9: Anthropic releases Fable 5.
June 12: Commerce issues an export control directive over a jailbreak that, by the government's own account, was demonstrated verbally, came with no written explanation, and involves a capability you can get from other publicly available models today.
Two things are true at once.
First: Anthropic spent months marketing Mythos as too dangerous to release. Sam Altman said it was "incredible marketing to say we have built a bomb." The Commerce Department has now formally agreed it is a bomb. If you describe your product as a munition in every press release, eventually a government takes you at your word. They wrote the legal predicate themselves and called it a brand.
Second: we have run this experiment before. In the 90s the government classified encryption as a munition under ITAR. Activists defeated it by printing PGP's source code as a book, because books are protected speech and floppy disks were arms exports. A t-shirt with three lines of RSA Perl was legally a munition. The controls collapsed because math does not stop at customs.
The new wrinkle is the "deemed export" rule: showing controlled technology to a foreign national inside the US counts as exporting it abroad. Which is why Anthropic's own foreign-national employees are now locked out of the model they built. The munition is in the building and the people who made it are not allowed to look at it.
The jailbreak is the paperwork. The refusal was in January.
https://x.com/gothburz/status/2065601302705398034?s=46 | 1 722 |
| 17 | What if the self is not the primary object of psychology, psychotherapy, psychiatry, sociology, theology, ethics, and education?
What if it is a continuity-preserving structure — one of the mechanisms through which reality, identity, and social obligations are held in workable relation?
A new essay exploring a possible category error at the heart of how we think about human experience.
“The self is one answer to that question. It is not the question itself.”
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-self-may-not-be-what-we-think | 1 789 |
| 18 | Most people (and AI models) read documents.
GTFO reads the system that produced them.
I’ve just published a free AI tool for reconstructing the runtime behind policies, procedures, decisions, reports, and bureaucratic narratives.
Think of it as a CT scan for organisations.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/gtfo-a-ct-scan-for-bureaucracy | 2 201 |
| 19 | We know how to service a van.
We don’t know how to service a civilisation.
Really.
A short essay on the missing discipline that asks whether our symbolic systems remain attached to reality.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-cartography-before-knowledge | 1 977 |
| 20 | What happens if a constitutional injury cannot be fully undone?
My latest essay explores a bizarre child-custody case that evolved into a stress test of constitutional rights, institutional legitimacy, and the meaning of restoration itself.
The deeper question is not who won the case.
It is whether lawful continuity can be built upon unlawful discontinuity.
And if not, what does genuine recovery require?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-constitutional-injury-recovery | 2 513 |
