Martin Geddes Channel
前往频道在 Telegram
I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes
显示更多📈 Telegram 频道 Martin Geddes Channel 的分析概览
频道 Martin Geddes Channel (@geddes) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 14 636 名订阅者，在 政治 类别中位列第 3 778，并在 美国 地区排名第 2 580 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 14 636 名订阅者。
根据 12 七月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 -205，过去 24 小时变化为 -8，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 未认证
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 14.80%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 6.87% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 2 167 次浏览，首日通常累积 1 006 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 0。
- 主题关注点： 内容集中在 justice, ghost, essay, authority, procedure 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台：
“I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes”
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 13 七月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 政治 类别中的关键影响点。
14 636
订阅者
-824 小时
-387 天
-20530 天
数据加载中...
相似频道
标签云
进出提及
---
---
---
---
---
---
吸引订阅者
七月 '26
七月 '26
+2
在7个频道中
六月 '26
+5
在8个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+7
在4个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+3
在4个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+1
在6个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+4
在3个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+12
在8个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+12
在6个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+8
在5个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+9
在8个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+223
在8个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+23
在10个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+32
在10个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+11
在11个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+20
在15个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+13
在9个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+21
在13个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+20
在11个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+14
在10个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+131
在22个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+19
在9个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+1
在9个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+28
在12个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+41
在15个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+28
在14个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+26
在8个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+77
在14个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+40
在11个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+80
在6个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+108
在12个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+86
在11个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+50
在8个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+113
在13个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+115
在16个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+49
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '23
+67
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '23
+159
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '23
+178
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '23
+120
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '23
+123
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '23
+101
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '23
+210
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '23
+204
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '22
+325
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '22
+359
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '22
+232
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '22
+259
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '22
+235
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '22
+475
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '22
+129
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '22
+214
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '22
+146
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '22
+254
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '22
+188
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '22
+723
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '21
+233
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '21
+843
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '21
+936
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '21
+162
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '21
+195
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '21
+587
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '21
+1 883
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '21
+2 220
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '21
+2 330
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '21
+3 825
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '21
+4 041
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '21
+10 290
在0个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 13 七月 | 0 | |||
| 12 七月 | 0 | |||
| 11 七月 | 0 | |||
| 10 七月 | 0 | |||
| 09 七月 | 0 | |||
| 08 七月 | 0 | |||
| 07 七月 | 0 | |||
| 06 七月 | +1 | |||
| 05 七月 | 0 | |||
| 04 七月 | 0 | |||
| 03 七月 | +1 | |||
| 02 七月 | 0 | |||
| 01 七月 | 0 |
频道帖子
They thought they were doing a political hit job.
What if they were actually attacking the Republic?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/on-judicial-immunity-enemy-combatants
| 2 | If a court can nullify your constitutional rights by uttering a single political label, do you still have constitutional rights?
My latest essay examines a custody case that became something much larger: a constitutional recognition failure.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/steal-a-child-or-a-constitution | 922 |
| 3 | The real war was never over Q. It was always over sovereign self-recognition.
A child custody case unexpectedly exposed a constitutional primitive hiding in plain sight.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-real-war-is-over-sovereign-self | 1 262 |
| 4 |  没有文字... | 1 335 |
| 5 | Everyone asks, “Is Q military intelligence?”
I now think that’s the wrong question.
Instead of asking AI for a verdict, I built a six-stage reasoning architecture that separates evidence, ontology, assumptions, reconstruction, and recursive consistency. Both Grok and ChatGPT independently converged on the same conclusion.
The result surprised me. The biggest contribution isn’t the answer—it’s a new way to analyse contested historical realities.
Who is Q? became Why Q?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/so-is-q-a-military-intelligence-program | 2 634 |
| 6 | A 200-year-old London milestone turned out to be an unexpected laboratory for AI reasoning.
Four analytical perspectives. One ordinary object. A surprising amount of insight.
The bottleneck is often not reasoning power, but perspective.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/a-sign-a-symbol-a-signifier-or-what | 1 405 |
| 7 | After eight years, I no longer think the most interesting question is “Who is Q?”
I think the more interesting question is:
What kind of hidden runtime could have generated the history we can now observe?
My concluding essay introduces the idea of computational historiography—using AI to compare competing reconstructions of history rather than simply arguing over narratives.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-final-qonvergence-part-3-the | 2 417 |
| 8 | Yesterday I documented the chronology. Today I explain the method.
Rather than arguing about Q, I apply three AI analytical tools to the evidence itself—and publish the raw outputs. The real story isn’t my conclusions, but how AI can now act as an instrument for disciplined inquiry into contested subjects.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-final-qonvergence-part-2-the | 2 129 |
| 9 | Q is no longer confined to anonymous message boards.
Whether you regard it as meaningful, malign, or irrelevant, themes once dismissed as “fringe” are increasingly appearing in official communications from the White House and US government departments.
This first article doesn’t argue what Q is. It simply documents the chronology.
Judge the pattern for yourself.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-final-qonvergence-part-1-the | 2 518 |
| 10 | After two years of intensive AI use, I realised the prompt isn’t the unit of work.
The project is.
Here are the workflows, tools, and mental models I’ve developed to turn AI from an answer machine into a thinking partner.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/tips-on-how-i-get-ai-to-work-for | 2 114 |
| 11 | Last year, readers bought a used Chevy Malibu for a school teacher who had lost her child, her financial security, and much of her life after a family-court battle that imported political narratives into a custody dispute.
One year on, she has written to tell you what your generosity meant.
The most moving part isn’t her letter.
It’s the handwritten note from one of her pupils.
Sometimes the biggest constitutional questions are revealed through the smallest acts of kindness.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/one-year-on-an-update-from-the-qanon | 2 227 |
| 12 | I published something more personal than usual.
“And then it was over” — Testimony of an Anon.
Not analysis this time. Testimony.
What it cost. What sustained me. Why the exile now feels like it is ending.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/and-then-it-was-over | 2 145 |
| 13 | Auftragstaktik. Mosaic Warfare. Discipleship. Q.
Different domains. Same underlying problem.
When propagation fails, reconstruction begins.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/auftragstaktik-mosaic-warfare-discipleship | 1 891 |
| 14 | Before asking whether a system is true, lawful, scientific, authoritative, or intelligent, there is a prior question:
Is it still attached enough to reality to be meaningfully wrong?
The Prolegomena Tool is a free AI-assisted diagnostic for detecting when symbolic systems have drifted from the realities they claim to represent.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-prolegomena-tool-an-ai-not-even | 2 315 |
| 15 | A short history of how we got here, because the chronology is the whole story.
January: the Pentagon demands unrestricted use of Claude for autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. Anthropic says no.
February: the President orders every federal agency to drop Anthropic. The Defense Secretary bans Pentagon contractors from doing business with them. A rival announces its classified-network deal within hours.
March: the Pentagon designates an American company a "supply chain risk" under a statute written for foreign adversaries. A federal judge blocks it.
May: the Pentagon signs AI deals with seven companies. Anthropic is not one of them.
June 9: Anthropic releases Fable 5.
June 12: Commerce issues an export control directive over a jailbreak that, by the government's own account, was demonstrated verbally, came with no written explanation, and involves a capability you can get from other publicly available models today.
Two things are true at once.
First: Anthropic spent months marketing Mythos as too dangerous to release. Sam Altman said it was "incredible marketing to say we have built a bomb." The Commerce Department has now formally agreed it is a bomb. If you describe your product as a munition in every press release, eventually a government takes you at your word. They wrote the legal predicate themselves and called it a brand.
Second: we have run this experiment before. In the 90s the government classified encryption as a munition under ITAR. Activists defeated it by printing PGP's source code as a book, because books are protected speech and floppy disks were arms exports. A t-shirt with three lines of RSA Perl was legally a munition. The controls collapsed because math does not stop at customs.
The new wrinkle is the "deemed export" rule: showing controlled technology to a foreign national inside the US counts as exporting it abroad. Which is why Anthropic's own foreign-national employees are now locked out of the model they built. The munition is in the building and the people who made it are not allowed to look at it.
The jailbreak is the paperwork. The refusal was in January.
https://x.com/gothburz/status/2065601302705398034?s=46 | 1 691 |
| 16 | What if the self is not the primary object of psychology, psychotherapy, psychiatry, sociology, theology, ethics, and education?
What if it is a continuity-preserving structure — one of the mechanisms through which reality, identity, and social obligations are held in workable relation?
A new essay exploring a possible category error at the heart of how we think about human experience.
“The self is one answer to that question. It is not the question itself.”
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-self-may-not-be-what-we-think | 1 765 |
| 17 | Most people (and AI models) read documents.
GTFO reads the system that produced them.
I’ve just published a free AI tool for reconstructing the runtime behind policies, procedures, decisions, reports, and bureaucratic narratives.
Think of it as a CT scan for organisations.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/gtfo-a-ct-scan-for-bureaucracy | 2 183 |
| 18 | We know how to service a van.
We don’t know how to service a civilisation.
Really.
A short essay on the missing discipline that asks whether our symbolic systems remain attached to reality.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-cartography-before-knowledge | 1 962 |
| 19 | What happens if a constitutional injury cannot be fully undone?
My latest essay explores a bizarre child-custody case that evolved into a stress test of constitutional rights, institutional legitimacy, and the meaning of restoration itself.
The deeper question is not who won the case.
It is whether lawful continuity can be built upon unlawful discontinuity.
And if not, what does genuine recovery require?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-constitutional-injury-recovery | 2 513 |
| 20 | As I stare out of my window, the storm clouds gather.
Not just over County Durham, but over finance, governance, media, law, and the stories we tell ourselves about reality.
A field report from the invisible battlefield of information and financial resources.
Nothing happens, until everything happens.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/as-i-stare-out-of-my-window | 2 125 |
