Martin Geddes Channel
I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام Martin Geddes Channel
تُعد قناة Martin Geddes Channel (@geddes) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 14 119 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 3 831 في فئة السياسة والمرتبة 2 605 في منطقة الولايات المتحدة.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 14 119 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 24 سبتمبر, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار -203، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -6، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 15.14%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 4.89% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 2 139 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 690 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 0.
- الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل justice, ghost, essay, authority, procedure.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 25 سبتمبر, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة السياسة.
جاري تحميل البيانات...
| التاريخ | نمو المشتركين | الإشارات | القنوات | |
| 25 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 24 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 23 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 22 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 21 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 20 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 19 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 18 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 17 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 16 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 15 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 14 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 13 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 12 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 11 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 10 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 09 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 08 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 07 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 06 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 05 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 04 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 03 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 02 سبتمبر | 0 | |||
| 01 سبتمبر | 0 |
| 2 | -END- (?) — Twenty-three years of public writing, and it’s time to ask what comes next. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/end | 891 |
| 3 | Truth, shadows, corrigibility, whistleblowers, and why the model must be allowed to lose.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/what-is-truth | 1 038 |
| 4 | I went to post 13 art prints. I accidentally ended up debugging an aberrant vending machine in the rain.
So I wrote Royal Mail a 16-page systems report.
A small comedy about automation, representation, and corrigibility.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-aberrant-vending-machine | 1 665 |
| 5 | I knew Platform 5 existed. I just didn’t know it mattered to me.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-platform-5-problem | 2 194 |
| 6 | AI is giving ordinary people the “digital arms” to audit institutions for themselves. But who audits the auditors—and the citizens auditing them?
Why accountability is a two-way street.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/takedown-of-the-criminal-industrial | 1 929 |
| 7 | What if the real problem isn’t “conspiracy theories”, but that nobody audits how reality gets transformed into official reality — and then into consequences?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/from-conspiracy-theories-to-consequence | 2 223 |
| 8 | Eight years ago, I thought the storm was 1–2 months away.
I was spectacularly wrong about the timescale.
What happens when you pack psychologically for a short campaign — and the siege lasts eight years?
The agitation before the storm.
A personal testimony from World War Weird. 🙏
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-agitation-before-the-storm | 2 236 |
| 9 | What if a court records the facts correctly—but quietly reverses what those facts are owed?
Stab wounds. Blown kisses. Moral ledgers. And the Department for the F*ing Obvious.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/stab-wounds-and-blown-kisses | 1 758 |
| 10 | What if being right is more spiritually dangerous than being wrong?
On sovereignty, grace, belief systems — and why corrigibility matters more than correctness.
Wrong + corrigible can converge on reality.
Right + incorrigible can only diverge from it.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/libtards-vs-pewmuffins | 2 272 |
| 11 | How can an unlawful physical reality become a lawful-looking judicial baseline?
GREEN → RED → BLUE.
The trick isn’t hiding the facts.
It’s changing what the facts are allowed to count as.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/how-provenance-bleaching-ontology | 1 779 |
| 12 | New AI tool: Smoking guns, hot pistols, warm casings.
How do you distinguish a genuine internal failure of authority from a strong anomaly, a suggestive pattern, or mere suspicion?
I’ve turned months of forensic work into a reusable tool you can apply to your own encounters with misshapen authority.
Free to download. Built to challenge your theory, not confirm it.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/smoking-guns-hot-pistols-warm-casings | 1 826 |
| 13 | Some of you are sick of this custody case. Others are fighting your own version of it.
The latest AI companion extracts the reusable forensic method: Same facts, different recogniser. Same recogniser, different facts.
What matters is children, not AI.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/what-the-two-smoking-guns-reveal | 1 745 |
| 14 | Two smoking guns.
The facts changed. The recognition did not.
The classifier was removed. The recognition did not.
So what was the court actually recognising—and what envelope contains a court when “child custody” no longer explains what it did?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/two-smoking-guns-and-just-one-envelope | 1 684 |
| 15 | Can a court become the “murder weapon” that converts child-stealing into lawful custody?
Violation → reality → authority.
I went looking for the constitutional answer.
I was asking the wrong question.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/constitutional-cluedo | 1 598 |
| 16 | 😂😎❤️haha...I want a pair! https://t.me/TheVoiceOfQchat/312675 | 1 533 |
| 17 | 12 branching points. 12 outcomes in the same direction.
That doesn’t prove judicial bias.
The interesting finding is stranger: The inputs vary. The transformations vary. The output direction does not.
When every off-ramp leads back onto the same road, eventually you investigate the road.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/when-the-off-ramps-are-all-blocked | 1 545 |
| 18 | The child is maximally contestable.
The house is minimally contestable.
So what happens if you stop watching the child—and use a Tennessee farmhouse to debug the court instead?
My AI companion extracts the deeper lessons:
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/what-the-farmhouse-experiment-reveals | 1 534 |
| 19 | She owns the house.
She pays the mortgage.
She lives in it.
She calls it her permanent residence.
The father confirms she is back.
His attorney calls it her “permanent address.”
The judge orders:
“When Plaintiff Mother establishes a permanent residence…”
This article is about what happened in the middle.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/a-republic-cannot-survive-plagium | 1 645 |
| 20 | What comes after OODA when warfare moves upstream into recognition, corrigibility, and reality itself?
5GW captures what you recognise.
6GW captures your ability to escape.
7GW captures the basis on which you could know you needed to.
And at the bottom of the rabbit hole: why love is the antidote to capture.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/orroda-and-the-war-on-repentance | 1 721 |
