¡Ya disponible! Investigación de Telegram 2025 — los principales insights del año 
Martin Geddes Channel
Ir al canal en Telegram
I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Martin Geddes Channel
El canal Martin Geddes Channel (@geddes) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 14 800 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 3 765 en la categoría Política y el puesto 2 580 en la región EEUU.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 14 800 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 17 junio, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -229, y en las últimas 24 horas de -10, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 11.94%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 5.77% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 1 768 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 855 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 0.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como justice, ghost, essay, authority, procedure.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 18 junio, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Política.
14 800
Suscriptores
-1024 horas
-507 días
-22930 días
Carga de datos en curso...
Canales Similares
Nube de Etiquetas
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
junio '26
junio '26
+1
en 5 canales
mayo '26
+7
en 4 canales
Get PRO
abril '26
+3
en 4 canales
Get PRO
marzo '26
+1
en 6 canales
Get PRO
febrero '26
+4
en 3 canales
Get PRO
enero '26
+12
en 8 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '25
+12
en 6 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+8
en 5 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+9
en 8 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '25
+223
en 8 canales
Get PRO
agosto '25
+23
en 10 canales
Get PRO
julio '25
+32
en 10 canales
Get PRO
junio '25
+11
en 11 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+20
en 15 canales
Get PRO
abril '25
+13
en 9 canales
Get PRO
marzo '25
+21
en 13 canales
Get PRO
febrero '25
+20
en 11 canales
Get PRO
enero '25
+14
en 10 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '24
+131
en 22 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '24
+19
en 9 canales
Get PRO
octubre '24
+1
en 9 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '24
+28
en 12 canales
Get PRO
agosto '24
+41
en 15 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+28
en 14 canales
Get PRO
junio '24
+26
en 8 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+77
en 14 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+40
en 11 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+80
en 6 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+108
en 12 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+86
en 11 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+50
en 8 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+113
en 13 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+115
en 16 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '23
+49
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '23
+67
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '23
+159
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '23
+178
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '23
+120
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '23
+123
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '23
+101
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '23
+210
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '23
+204
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '22
+325
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '22
+359
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '22
+232
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '22
+259
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '22
+235
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '22
+475
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '22
+129
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '22
+214
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '22
+146
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '22
+254
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '22
+188
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '22
+723
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '21
+233
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '21
+843
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '21
+936
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '21
+162
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '21
+195
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '21
+587
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '21
+1 883
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '21
+2 220
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '21
+2 330
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '21
+3 825
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '21
+4 041
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '21
+10 290
en 0 canales
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 18 junio | 0 | |||
| 17 junio | 0 | |||
| 16 junio | 0 | |||
| 15 junio | 0 | |||
| 14 junio | +1 | |||
| 13 junio | 0 | |||
| 12 junio | 0 | |||
| 11 junio | 0 | |||
| 10 junio | 0 | |||
| 09 junio | 0 | |||
| 08 junio | 0 | |||
| 07 junio | 0 | |||
| 06 junio | 0 | |||
| 05 junio | 0 | |||
| 04 junio | 0 | |||
| 03 junio | 0 | |||
| 02 junio | 0 | |||
| 01 junio | 0 |
Publicaciones del Canal
Before asking whether a system is true, lawful, scientific, authoritative, or intelligent, there is a prior question:
Is it still attached enough to reality to be meaningfully wrong?
The Prolegomena Tool is a free AI-assisted diagnostic for detecting when symbolic systems have drifted from the realities they claim to represent.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-prolegomena-tool-an-ai-not-even
| 2 | A short history of how we got here, because the chronology is the whole story.
January: the Pentagon demands unrestricted use of Claude for autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. Anthropic says no.
February: the President orders every federal agency to drop Anthropic. The Defense Secretary bans Pentagon contractors from doing business with them. A rival announces its classified-network deal within hours.
March: the Pentagon designates an American company a "supply chain risk" under a statute written for foreign adversaries. A federal judge blocks it.
May: the Pentagon signs AI deals with seven companies. Anthropic is not one of them.
June 9: Anthropic releases Fable 5.
June 12: Commerce issues an export control directive over a jailbreak that, by the government's own account, was demonstrated verbally, came with no written explanation, and involves a capability you can get from other publicly available models today.
Two things are true at once.
First: Anthropic spent months marketing Mythos as too dangerous to release. Sam Altman said it was "incredible marketing to say we have built a bomb." The Commerce Department has now formally agreed it is a bomb. If you describe your product as a munition in every press release, eventually a government takes you at your word. They wrote the legal predicate themselves and called it a brand.
Second: we have run this experiment before. In the 90s the government classified encryption as a munition under ITAR. Activists defeated it by printing PGP's source code as a book, because books are protected speech and floppy disks were arms exports. A t-shirt with three lines of RSA Perl was legally a munition. The controls collapsed because math does not stop at customs.
The new wrinkle is the "deemed export" rule: showing controlled technology to a foreign national inside the US counts as exporting it abroad. Which is why Anthropic's own foreign-national employees are now locked out of the model they built. The munition is in the building and the people who made it are not allowed to look at it.
The jailbreak is the paperwork. The refusal was in January.
https://x.com/gothburz/status/2065601302705398034?s=46 | 555 |
| 3 | What if the self is not the primary object of psychology, psychotherapy, psychiatry, sociology, theology, ethics, and education?
What if it is a continuity-preserving structure — one of the mechanisms through which reality, identity, and social obligations are held in workable relation?
A new essay exploring a possible category error at the heart of how we think about human experience.
“The self is one answer to that question. It is not the question itself.”
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-self-may-not-be-what-we-think | 888 |
| 4 | Most people (and AI models) read documents.
GTFO reads the system that produced them.
I’ve just published a free AI tool for reconstructing the runtime behind policies, procedures, decisions, reports, and bureaucratic narratives.
Think of it as a CT scan for organisations.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/gtfo-a-ct-scan-for-bureaucracy | 1 239 |
| 5 | We know how to service a van.
We don’t know how to service a civilisation.
Really.
A short essay on the missing discipline that asks whether our symbolic systems remain attached to reality.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-cartography-before-knowledge | 1 174 |
| 6 | What happens if a constitutional injury cannot be fully undone?
My latest essay explores a bizarre child-custody case that evolved into a stress test of constitutional rights, institutional legitimacy, and the meaning of restoration itself.
The deeper question is not who won the case.
It is whether lawful continuity can be built upon unlawful discontinuity.
And if not, what does genuine recovery require?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-constitutional-injury-recovery | 1 875 |
| 7 | As I stare out of my window, the storm clouds gather.
Not just over County Durham, but over finance, governance, media, law, and the stories we tell ourselves about reality.
A field report from the invisible battlefield of information and financial resources.
Nothing happens, until everything happens.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/as-i-stare-out-of-my-window | 1 628 |
| 8 | I asked a simple question: Which court convicted me?
After two years, two judicial reviews, dozens of FOI requests, and a conviction carrying six points and a £1,500 fine, I still couldn’t get a straightforward answer.
The story turned out not to be about corruption, but something stranger.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/yes-but-exactly-which-court-convicted | 1 825 |
| 9 | Books have front matter.
Forewords. Prefaces. Prologues.
Yet philosophy, science, law, theology, economics, and governance are usually treated as though they have none.
What if every symbolic discipline depends upon a quieter, older territory concerned with whether its symbols remain attached to reality in the first place?
I call this neglected territory the General Prolegomena.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-general-prolegomena | 1 898 |
| 10 | Published: Not the American Declaration of Independence
What if constitutions and governance systems are not just political artefacts, but engineering objects — with drift, failure modes, observability requirements, and maintenance burdens?
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/not-the-american-declaration-of-independence | 2 231 |
| 11 | Republics do not primarily fail because citizens stop caring.
They fail when the reconstruction burden required to compare declared authority with operational reality exceeds ordinary human capacity.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-real-subject-was-never-minnesota | 1 926 |
| 12 | On Friday 5 June I’ll be giving a rare public talk in London:
“Corruption — Or Just Continuity?”
Using my own “ghost court” litigation as a starting point, I’ll explore why modern institutions increasingly feel unreal, why people end up talking past one another, and how many things we interpret as corruption may actually be symptoms of a deeper structural problem.
Not a legal talk.
Not a conspiracy talk.
More a journey from outrage to diagnosis.
Details here:
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/london-talk-on-friday-5th-june-corruption | 1 592 |
| 13 | Oak Grove, Minnesota is a tiny municipality. Yet its dispute over voter rosters is now before the Minnesota Supreme Court.
The interesting question isn’t paper versus electronic.
It’s: Who gets to decide who decides?
Using the Vigilance Automator, I show how a local election dispute becomes a live test of authority, accountability, corrigibility, and constitutional self-correction.
Sometimes the smallest places reveal the biggest governance questions.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/oak-grove-mn-so-very-small-yet-so | 1 479 |
| 14 | Minnesota poll pads are not just an election story.
They are a case study in whether citizens can still inspect, challenge, and repair the systems that govern them.
Military is for rupture.
Maintenance is for republics.
Civilisation repair is mostly janitorial.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/minnesota-poll-pads-and-the-vigilance | 1 474 |
| 15 | Most people think they lose their home, business, child, licence, or liberty because “the law was against them”.
Often the real issue is simpler: the system cannot cleanly reconstruct the attributable act that created the personal obligation in the first place.
Two recent UK Council Tax cases expose the pattern clearly.
Continuity first vs reconstruction first.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/how-not-to-lose-your-home-business | 2 209 |
| 16 | I’ve started revisiting some of my older COVID-era essays to see what still holds up years later.
This one isn’t really about predictions — it’s about how to remain psychologically grounded and effective during periods of upheaval.
Stakeholder maps. Safety vs certainty. Recovering agency under stress.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/weathering-the-storm-personal-strategies | 1 736 |
| 17 | What if trafficking is not the deepest category of harm — just one visible payload inside a much bigger pattern?
A new essay on dependency–continuity corruption, continuity reversal, and why modern criminology may be thinking geometrically about fundamentally topological problems.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/its-bigger-than-just-child-trafficking | 1 809 |
| 18 | I spent the early 2000s working on telecoms network overload and performance engineering.
What started as a technical problem eventually turned into something much larger.
This essay traces the path from ∆Q — a mathematical approach to quality degradation under load — to a broader idea I now call ∆R: reconstructability under constraint.
The core claim is simple: Civilisation itself behaves like a reconstructive system operating under load.
Courts, bureaucracies, AI systems, media, institutions, and packet networks all face the same deep structural problem: how to preserve continuity when finite coordination capacity collides with unlimited demand.
Along the way the essay explores:
- why networks do not really “transmit data”
- topology vs geometry in governance
- why degradation is unavoidable
- why institutions drift toward continuity-first behaviour
- and why scaling civilisation may ultimately be a reconstructability problem.
This is probably the deepest and most important piece I have published in years.
“From ∆Q to ∆R — a science of reconstructability”
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/from-q-to-r-a-science-of-reconstructability | 2 288 |
| 19 | I’ve released the initial public version of the ΩΛ∆∑ (OLDS) Canon: an experimental AI-era governance diagnostics toolkit.
It applies computer science and information security ideas to questions of attribution, procedural continuity, synthetic governance, and institutional reconstructability.
Free download (donationware):
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/civilisation-repair-toolkit-free | 2 156 |
| 20 | “You need to conquer yourself before you can restore your country.”
I spent my rent money travelling to London to photograph the Tommy Robinson “Unite the Kingdom” rally.
What I found was not really “far-right extremism”.
Nor was it heroic nationalism.
It was something sadder: a people sensing decline, but struggling to respond coherently to it.
Photo essay now live:
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/if-this-is-patriotism | 2 670 |
