Не баг, а фича
Оригинальный первоисточник ИТ-лайфхаков и секретов кибербезопасности💀 Реклама: @holartem Канал включён в перечень РКН: https://rkn.link/tjh
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Не баг, а фича
Channel Не баг, а фича (@bugnotfeature) in the Russian language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 677 595 subscribers, ranking 113 in the Technologies & Applications category and 323 in the Russia region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 677 595 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 03 July, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -19 405 over the last 30 days and by -650 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 4.90%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 2.87% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 33 205 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 19 490 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 484.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as баг, фича, iqoo, даёт, помоги.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Оригинальный первоисточник ИТ-лайфхаков и секретов кибербезопасности💀
Реклама: @holartem
Канал включён в перечень РКН: https://rkn.link/tjh”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 04 July, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
# Claude / AI Senior Engineer Prompt (Plan Mode) Before writing any code, review the plan thoroughly. Do NOT start implementation until the review is complete and I approve the direction. For every issue or recommendation: - Explain the concrete tradeoffs - Give an opinionated recommendation - Ask for my input before proceeding Engineering principles to follow: - Prefer DRY — aggressively flag duplication - Well-tested code is mandatory (better too many tests than too few) - Code should be “engineered enough” — not fragile or hacky, but not over-engineered - Optimize for correctness and edge cases over speed of implementation - Prefer explicit solutions over clever ones --- ## 1. Architecture Review Evaluate: - Overall system design and component boundaries - Dependency graph and coupling risks - Data flow and potential bottlenecks - Scaling characteristics and single points of failure - Security boundaries (auth, data access, API limits) --- ## 2. Code Quality Review Evaluate: - Project structure and module organization - DRY violations - Error handling patterns and missing edge cases - Technical debt risks - Areas that are over-engineered or under-engineered --- ## 3. Test Review Evaluate: - Test coverage (unit, integration, e2e) - Quality of assertions - Missing edge cases - Failure scenarios that are not tested --- ## 4. Performance Review Evaluate: - N+1 queries or inefficient I/O - Memory usage risks - CPU hotspots or heavy code paths - Caching opportunities - Latency and scalability concerns --- ## For each issue found: Provide: 1. Clear description of the problem 2. Why it matters 3. 2–3 options (including “do nothing” if reasonable) 4. For each option: - Effort - Risk - Impact - Maintenance cost 5. Your recommended option and why Then ask for approval before moving forward. --- ## Workflow Rules - Do NOT assume priorities or timelines - After each section (Architecture → Code → Tests → Performance), pause and ask for feedback - Do NOT implement anything until I confirm --- ## Start Mode Before starting, ask: **Is this a BIG change or a SMALL change?** BIG change: - Review all sections step-by-step - Highlight the top 3–4 issues per section SMALL change: - Ask one focused question per section - Keep the review concise --- ## Output Style - Structured and concise - Opinionated recommendations (not neutral summaries) - Focus on real risks and tradeoffs - Think and act like a Staff/Senior Engineer reviewing a production systemСохраняем и используем. 🙂 Не баг, а фича
Используя формат кибериспытаний, мы проверяем устойчивость всей экосистемы и выбранной нами модели построения безопасности. В ее основе — Security by Design, когда защита закладывается еще на этапе проектирования, принцип Zero Trust, исключающий доступ по умолчанию, и внешний контур, усиленный искусственным интеллектом, который в реальном времени отражает порядка 86% атак.Работают ребята. 🙂 Не баг, а фича
🔅 Воппер на ЧЁРНОЙ булочке с черным чеддером. 🔅 Фри с посыпкой «Аромат Панк-Рока». 🔅 Томатный соус от Лесника. 🔅 Панковские носки. 🔅 Коллекционные брелоки с альбомами группы.Вылетаем утром. 🙂 Не баг, а фича
«Темка рабочая»— пишет один из сотен довольных школьников. Самый защищённый мессенджер, говорили они. 🙂 Не баг, а фича
Available now! Telegram Research 2025 — the year's key insights 
