πππππ πππππππ ππ π ππππ ππ πππππππ πππππππ
Kanalga Telegramβda oβtish
π² Contact β @CurrentLegalGKBOT βΊοΈ 360Β° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PCS J, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ π§ Daily Quiz β @LegalQuizzes β³π Enjoy Learning!
Ko'proq ko'rsatishπ Telegram kanali πππππ πππππππ ππ π ππππ ππ πππππππ πππππππ analitikasi
πππππ πππππππ ππ π ππππ ππ πππππππ πππππππ (@currentlegalgk) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 19 131 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Qonun toifasida 403-o'rinni va Hindiston mintaqasida 21 395-o'rinni egallagan.
π Auditoriya koβrsatkichlari va dinamika
Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠΎ sanasidan buyon loyiha tez oβsib, 19 131 obunachiga ega boβldi.
14 Oktabr, 2026 dagi oxirgi maβlumotlarga koβra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 53 ga, soβnggi 24 soatda esa 0 ga oβzgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya oβrtacha 5.82% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 3.31% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni toβplaydi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post oβrtacha 1 114 marta koβriladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 633 ta koβrish yigβiladi.
- Reaksiyalar va oβzaro taβsir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga oβrtacha 3 ta reaksiya keladi.
- Tematik yoβnalishlar: Kontent judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.
π Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida taβriflaydi:
βπ² Contact β @CurrentLegalGKBOT
βΊοΈ 360Β° Cases on topics.
Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PCS J, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
π§ Daily Quiz β @LegalQuizzes
β³π Enjoy Lear...β
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi maβlumot 15 Oktabr, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli boβlib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Qonun toifasidagi muhim taβsir nuqtasiga aylantirishini koβrsatadi.
19 131
Obunachilar
Ma'lumot yo'q24 soatlar
-37 kun
+5330 kun
Ma'lumot yuklanmoqda...
O'xshash kanallar
Taglar buluti
Kirish va chiqish esdaliklari
---
---
---
---
---
---
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Oktabr '26Okt '26
Oktabr '26
+67
0 kanalda
Sentabr '26
+245
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '26
+134
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '26
+112
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '26
+142
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '26
+129
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '26
+58
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '26
+19
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '26
+54
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '26
+58
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '25
+51
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '25
+60
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '25
+68
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '25
+70
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '25
+46
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '25
+55
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+30
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '25
+41
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+74
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '25
+56
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+209
4 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '24
+354
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+567
3 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+657
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+1 236
3 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+1 623
4 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+2 406
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+2 347
2 kanalda
Get PRO
May '24
+2 218
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '24
+1 931
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+2 087
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+1 940
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+2 283
3 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '23
+1 968
3 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '23
+530
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '23
+1 266
0 kanalda
| Sana | Obunachilarni jalb qilish | Esdaliklar | Kanallar | |
| 13 Oktabr | +11 | |||
| 12 Oktabr | 0 | |||
| 11 Oktabr | 0 | |||
| 10 Oktabr | 0 | |||
| 09 Oktabr | +8 | |||
| 08 Oktabr | 0 | |||
| 07 Oktabr | +4 | |||
| 06 Oktabr | +12 | |||
| 05 Oktabr | +9 | |||
| 04 Oktabr | 0 | |||
| 03 Oktabr | +6 | |||
| 02 Oktabr | +2 | |||
| 01 Oktabr | +15 |
Kanal postlari
β³π
1ST WEEKLY UPDATE:β
Say No To Regular Clutter And Yes To Organised info.1. Testimony For Sexual Offence Within Home Does Not Require Same Corroboration As Crimes Committed In Open: Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/testimony-for-sexual-offence-within-home-does-not-require-same-corroboration-as-crimes-committed-in-open-supreme-court-552596
| 2 | #Question@CurrentLegalGK
When and how can accused get the copy of FIR, can he get it free of cost? | 1 785 |
| 3 | Whether IPC Prosecution Can Continue After Sanction Under PC Act Was Refused: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-ipc-prosecution-continue-sanction-pc-act-refused-552564 | 1 883 |
| 4 | Casteist slurs on social media can attract SC/ST Act: What Calcutta HC said on βpublic viewβ π
#explained_law #express_explained | 1 713 |
| 5 | O. 2 R. 2 CPC | Omitted Relief Remains Barred Despite Order 23 Liberty To File Fresh Suit : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/o-2-r-2-cpc-omitted-relief-remains-barred-despite-order-23-liberty-to-file-fresh-suit-supreme-court-552332
Looking for legal news and events. Download LiveLaw app, India's no:1 Legal news app.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sinergialabs.livelaw | 1 472 |
| 6 | Accused Entitled To Seek Production Of Prosecution's Unrelied Documents At Appro.pdf | 1 366 |
| 7 | 202606081919313969.pdf | 1 289 |
| 8 | S. 53 Patents Act | Should Patent Term Be Counted From Date Of Grant If There Was Delay In Deciding Application? Supreme Court To Decide
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/s-53-patents-act-should-patent-term-be-counted-from-date-of-grant-if-there-was-delay-in-deciding-application-supreme-court-to-decide-552272
#Patent@CurrentLegalGK | 1 234 |
| 9 | ππ΅EXPLAINED | 166 MOTO VEHICLE JURISDICTION
ISSUE:
Whether a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) can exercise territorial jurisdiction over a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, merely because the insurance company has an office within its local limits, even when the accident occurred elsewhere and the claimant neither resides nor carries on business there.
PROVISIONS INVOLVED
1. Section 166(1) & (2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (options for filing a claim application).
2. Section 149(2) and Section 168(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (insurerβs rights and notice requirements).
3. Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (contrast with CPC territorial jurisdiction).
4. Section 21(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (objection to jurisdiction at appellate / post-award stage).
CONCLUSIONS
1. Under Section 166(2), a claimant has four options: (a) place where the claimant resides,
(b) place where the accident occurred,
(c) place where the claimant carries on business, or
(d) place where the defendant resides.
2. The statute deliberately omits βplace where the defendant carries on business.β
3. The word βdefendantβ in Section 166(2) does not include the insurer, because impleadment of the insurer is optional, not mandatory.
4. When an objection to territorial jurisdiction is raised before the Tribunal at the threshold (before adjudication on merits), the strict requirements of Section 166(2) must be satisfied. The βfailure of justiceβ test under Section 21(1) CPC applies only at the appellate or post-award stage.
APPRECIATION:
In the present case, the claimantβs own pleadings showed residence in Chittoor, accident in Tirupati, and no business connection with Chennai. No part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of MACT Chennai.
REASONING
βBeneficial interpretation cannot override clear statutory language.
βExtending jurisdiction merely because an insurer has a branch office would rewrite the statute.
#Motor@CurrentLegalGK | 1 118 |
| 10 | Reliance was placed on Rekha v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ameena Begum v. State of Telangana to contend that a mere possibility of the detenue becoming involved in crime again, without cogent material supporting such an apprehension, cannot furnish a valid basis for preventive detention | 953 |
| 11 | Supreme Court Quashes NSA Detention Of Sambhal Violence Accused, Imposes Rs 10 Lakh Cost On UP Govt
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/suprem-court-quashes-nsa-detention-of-sambhal-violence-accused-imposes-rs-10-lakh-cost-on-up-govt-552197
#NSA@CurrentLegalGK | 1 027 |
| 12 |  #Translation@CurrentLegalGK
Translate this into English | 1 054 |
| 13 | Right Of Accused: Accessing FIRs At Earliest Stage
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/accused-right-accessing-firs-earliest-stage-551816
Looking for legal news and events. Download LiveLaw app, India's no:1 Legal news app.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sinergialabs.livelaw | 1 093 |
| 14 | Right Of Accused: Accessing FIRs At Earliest Stage
https://www-livelaw-in-nliu.knimbus.com/articles/accused-right-accessing-firs-earliest-stage-551816 | 13 |
| 15 | ππALISTER ANTHONY PAREIRAΒ v.Β STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 2012 SC
βFACTS
On 12 November 2006 (3:45β4:00 a.m.) the appellant drove car MH-01-R-580 on Carter Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai, at high speed while under influence of alcohol (0.112% w/v ethyl alcohol in blood; liquor bottle recovered). He rammed the vehicle onto the pavement where labourers were asleep in temporary huts, killing 7 and causing injuries (including grievous hurt) to 8. Appellant was a resident of the area and knew people slept there. Long curved brake marks (~70 ft) were found. No pre-accident mechanical defect existed (steering, brakes, gears operative). Appellant admitted driving and the accident but claimed mechanical failure.
Trial Court convicted under ss. 304A & 337 IPC. High Court convicted under ss. 304 Part II, 338 & 337 IPC.
π¨ββοΈ LAW OF RASH, NEGLIGENCE AND KNOWLEDGE
Para 37-43, 50, 57, 70-71
1. The applicability
of Section 304A IPC is limited to rash or negligent acts which
B cause death but fall short of culpable homicide amounting to
murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
2. Like Section 304A, Sections 279, 336, 337 and 338D IPC are attracted for only the negligent or rash act.
3. The sections are for the inherent danger of the acts specified therein
irrespective of knowledge or intention to produce the result and
irrespective of the result.
4. The question is whether indictment of an accused under Section 304 Part II and Section 338 IPC can co-exist in a case of single rasu or negligent act. We think it can. We do not think that two charges are mutually destructive. If the act is done with the knowledge of the dangerous consequences which are likely to follow and if death is caused then not only that the punishment is for the act but also for the resulting homicide and a case may fall within Section 299 or Section 300 depending
upon the mental state of the accused viz.
5. A person, responsible for a reckless or rash or negligent act that causes death which he had knowledge as a
reasonable man that such act was dangerous enough to lead
to some untoward thing and the death was likely to be caused, may be attributed with the knowledge of the consequence and
may be fastened with culpability of homicide not amounting to
murder and punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC.
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK | 1 298 |
| 16 | d65080a0c9e49de5da9d872fd1118928b3fc8e89b62a37cd571d9a8baea6c3271790511893.pdf | 1 283 |
| 17 | Know The Law | When Can An Issue Be Tried First Under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC As Preliminary Issue?
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/when-can-an-issue-be-tried-first-under-orderxiv-rule2-cpc-551862 | 1 411 |
| 18 | 307007feb2b7fb1bb2677ed3dd6f78eb36449d4954b861b8b7c6bc56d9634c161790434958.pdf | 1 476 |
| 19 | Know The Law | Where Can A Motor Accident Claim Be Filed? Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/supreme-court-where-can-motor-accident-claim-be-filed-551861 | 1 274 |
| 20 | Know The Law | Consequences Of Not Furnishing Written Grounds Of Arrest : Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/know-the-law-consequences-of-not-furnishing-written-grounds-of-arrest-supreme-court-explains-551870 | 1 154 |
