cookie

ะœะธ ะฒะธะบะพั€ะธัั‚ะพะฒัƒั”ะผะพ ั„ะฐะนะปะธ cookie ะดะปั ะฟะพะบั€ะฐั‰ะตะฝะฝั ะฒะฐัˆะพะณะพ ะดะพัะฒั–ะดัƒ ะฟะตั€ะตะณะปัะดัƒ. ะะฐั‚ะธัะฝัƒะฒัˆะธ ยซะŸั€ะธะนะฝัั‚ะธ ะฒัะตยป, ะฒะธ ะฟะพะณะพะดะถัƒั”ั‚ะตัั ะฝะฐ ะฒะธะบะพั€ะธัั‚ะฐะฝะฝั ั„ะฐะนะปั–ะฒ cookie.

avatar

๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข

๐ŸŒ ๐‹๐€๐– ๐„๐—๐€๐Œ๐’ ๐Ž๐‘๐ˆ๐„๐๐“๐„๐ƒ---> "เคตเคฟเคฆเฅเคฏเคพ เค”เคฐ เค…เคตเคฟเคฆเฅเคฏเคพ เคฆเฅ‹เคจเฅ‹เค‚ เค•เคพ เคœเฅเคžเคพเคจ" โš–๏ธ Landmark Judgments & Legal Crux ๐ŸŽฏ Relevancy, Reasoning and Reinvigoration is our Motto. ๐Ÿง For Daily Quiz @LegalQuizzes ๐Ÿ’ฌMessage @CurrentLegalGKBOT โณ๐Ÿš€Enjoy_Learning

ะ‘ั–ะปัŒัˆะต
ะ ะตะบะปะฐะผะฝั– ะดะพะฟะธัะธ
14 194
ะŸั–ะดะฟะธัะฝะธะบะธ
+4324 ะณะพะดะธะฝะธ
+4257 ะดะฝั–ะฒ
+2 05830 ะดะฝั–ะฒ

ะขั€ะธะฒะฐั” ะทะฐะฒะฐะฝั‚ะฐะถะตะฝะฝั ะดะฐะฝะธั…...

ะŸั€ะธั€ั–ัั‚ ะฟั–ะดะฟะธัะฝะธะบั–ะฒ

ะขั€ะธะฒะฐั” ะทะฐะฒะฐะฝั‚ะฐะถะตะฝะฝั ะดะฐะฝะธั…...

10 years of Telangana state: A brief look at how Indiaโ€™s youngest state was formed ๐Ÿ”— #express_explained #telangana
ะŸะพะบะฐะทะฐั‚ะธ ะฒัะต...
10 years of Telangana state: A brief look at how Indiaโ€™s youngest state was formed

Telangana has a complex history and the conception of Telangana as a separate entity can be traced back to before Indian independence. What was its journey towards statehood? On its formation day, we explain.

๐Ÿ‘ 3
Landmark Cases - [1] State of U.P. v. Raj Narain, (1975) 4 SCC 428. [2] CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay, (2011) 8 SCC 497. [3] Assn. for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 150. [4] Chief Information Commr. v. State of Manipur, (2011) 15 SCC 1. [5] S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 149. [6] Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Govt. of India v. Cricket Assn. of Bengal, (1995) 2 SCC 161. [7] People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, (2004) 2 SCC 476. [8] Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth, (1977) 4 SCC 193. [9] Dinesh Trivedi v. Union of India (1997) 4 SCC 306. [10] The CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal and Another, (2009) MANU 1926 (DE). [11] CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Aggarwal and Others W.P.(C) 288/2009. [12] Registrar General of High Court of Madras v. K. Elango 2013 (5) MLJ 134 @CurrentLegalGK
ะŸะพะบะฐะทะฐั‚ะธ ะฒัะต...
โค 6๐Ÿ‘ 2๐Ÿ”ฅ 2๐Ÿ˜ 2
ะŸะพะบะฐะทะฐั‚ะธ ะฒัะต...
Indian Judiciary's Bitter Practices Beyond RTI Act, 2005

The Tamil Poet-Philosopher Tiruvalluvar of the Tamil Sangam age (31, BCE) in his classic โ€œThirukkuralโ€ Couplet No. 664 which is translated into English by G.U. Pope. which reads as 'to say is...

๐Ÿ‘ 2๐Ÿ‘ 1
ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฝะตะดะพัั‚ัƒะฟะฝะตะ”ะธะฒะธั‚ะธััŒ ะฒ Telegram
๐ŸŒŸ Section 313 12 Principles Explained | CrPC In the context of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the apex Court said :
"Although there is a requirement by law to disclose the aspects required to adjudicate in a criminal matter such duty cannot unreasonably and unwarrantedly step over the fundamental right of privacy."
๐Ÿ”ฅ INDRAKUNWAR V. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, 2023
ะŸะพะบะฐะทะฐั‚ะธ ะฒัะต...
๐Ÿ‘ 8โค 1๐Ÿ”ฅ 1๐Ÿคฉ 1
ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฝะตะดะพัั‚ัƒะฟะฝะตะ”ะธะฒะธั‚ะธััŒ ะฒ Telegram
๐Ÿค Doctrine of Substantial Compliance @CurrentLegalGK
ะŸะพะบะฐะทะฐั‚ะธ ะฒัะต...
๐Ÿ‘ 3๐Ÿ‘ 1๐Ÿ”ฅ 1๐Ÿ˜ 1๐Ÿ’ฏ 1