uz
Feedback
𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„

𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„

Kanalga Telegram’da oβ€˜tish

πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360Β° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!

Ko'proq ko'rsatish

πŸ“ˆ Telegram kanali 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„ analitikasi

𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„ (@currentlegalgk) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 19 109 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Qonun toifasida 402-o'rinni va Hindiston mintaqasida 21 273-o'rinni egallagan.

πŸ“Š Auditoriya koβ€˜rsatkichlari va dinamika

Π½Π΅Π²Ρ–Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΎ sanasidan buyon loyiha tez oβ€˜sib, 19 109 obunachiga ega boβ€˜ldi.

24 Sentabr, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga koβ€˜ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 74 ga, soβ€˜nggi 24 soatda esa 7 ga oβ€˜zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.

  • Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
  • Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya oβ€˜rtacha 6.86% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 3.25% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni toβ€˜playdi.
  • Post qamrovi: Har bir post oβ€˜rtacha 1 311 marta koβ€˜riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 621 ta koβ€˜rish yigβ€˜iladi.
  • Reaksiyalar va oβ€˜zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga oβ€˜rtacha 4 ta reaksiya keladi.
  • Tematik yoβ€˜nalishlar: Kontent judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.

πŸ“ Tavsif va kontent siyosati

Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
β€œπŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360Β° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learn...”

Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 25 Sentabr, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli boβ€˜lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Qonun toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini koβ€˜rsatadi.

19 109
Obunachilar
+724 soatlar
+197 kun
+7430 kun
Postlar arxiv
Article 324(5) of the Constitution states that the CEC can be removed from office only β€œin like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court.” This framing can also be found in Section 11(2) of the 2023 Act. The article further states that β€œany other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner”.

𝐍𝐎 π–π‘πˆπ“π“π„π π†π‘πŽπ”ππƒπ’ π’π“πˆπ‹π‹ 𝐍𝐎 ππ€πˆπ‹ 𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐃. (MP HC)
π‘π„π€π’πŽππ’
𝑖𝑑 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“π‘™π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘š π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘Žπ‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘  π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ β„Žπ‘–π‘  π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘. β„Žπ‘’ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘™π‘’π‘”π‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘¦ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘š π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘œπ‘’π‘‘π‘ π‘’π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘π‘Žπ‘–π‘™ π‘ β„Žπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘™π‘¦ π‘Žπ‘“π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ β„Žπ‘–π‘  π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘, π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘¦ 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 π‘Žπ‘› π‘–π‘šπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘–π‘›π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘ π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘ π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘  π‘Žπ‘”π‘Žπ‘–π‘›π‘ π‘‘ β„Žπ‘–π‘š. π‘›π‘œ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘  𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘œπ‘› π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘’π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘π‘™π‘–π‘ β„Ž π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘¦ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘—π‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘π‘Žπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘› π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘’π‘”π‘’π‘‘ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘π‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘’. β„Žπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿ, π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘’ π‘œπ‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘š π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘’π‘  π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“π‘™π‘’π‘π‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘ π‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ 𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑑 π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘”, π‘€β„Žπ‘–π‘β„Ž π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘‘π‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘  π‘£π‘–π‘œπ‘™π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘–π‘π‘™π‘’ 22(1) π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘‘π‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ π‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘–π‘Ž π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘™π‘Žπ‘€ π‘™π‘Žπ‘–π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘€π‘› 𝑏𝑦 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ β„Žπ‘œπ‘›'𝑏𝑙𝑒 π‘ π‘’π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘šπ‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘‘ 𝑖𝑛 π‘šπ‘–β„Žπ‘–π‘Ÿ π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘—π‘’π‘ β„Ž π‘ β„Žπ‘Žβ„Ž (π‘ π‘’π‘π‘Ÿπ‘Ž). π‘›π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘™π‘’π‘ π‘ , π‘ π‘’π‘β„Ž 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑑, 𝑏𝑦 𝑖𝑑𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓, π‘€π‘œπ‘’π‘™π‘‘ π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘™π‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘› π‘π‘Žπ‘–π‘™ 𝑖𝑛 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘‘π‘  π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘–π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’π‘šπ‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘’ 𝑖𝑛 π‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘–π‘π‘’π‘™π‘Žπ‘Ÿ. 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐄𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐓 ππŽπ“ π‘π„π‹πˆπ„πƒ π„π—ππ‘π„π’π’π‹π˜ 𝐁𝐔𝐓 π‘π„π‹πˆπ„πƒ 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐓𝐄 π–π‡πˆπ‚π‡ πˆπ’ πŒπŽπ’π“ π‚π‹πŽπ’π„π’π“ 𝐋𝐀𝐖 𝐎𝐍 πˆπ’π’π”π„ 𝐀𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐃 π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘šπ‘’π‘”β„Žπ‘Žπ‘™π‘Žπ‘¦π‘Ž 𝑣𝑠. π‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘”β„Žπ‘’π‘£π‘Žπ‘›π‘ β„Žπ‘– @ 𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑖 @ 𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑒 π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘› 𝑖𝑑 β„Žπ‘Žπ‘  𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 β„Žπ‘’π‘™π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘  π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ: β€œ11.... π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ž π‘“π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‘π‘–π‘“π‘“π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑀𝑒𝑒𝑛 π‘›π‘œπ‘›-π‘ π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘›π‘œπ‘›-π‘“π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘›π‘–π‘ β„Žπ‘–π‘›π‘” π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘  π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ. π‘€β„Žπ‘–π‘™π‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘“π‘–π‘Ÿπ‘ π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘”π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘¦ π‘šπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘ π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘, 𝑖𝑛 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘ π‘’π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘”π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘¦, π‘œπ‘›π‘’ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘  π‘‘π‘œ 𝑠𝑒𝑒 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘—π‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘π‘Žπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘ π‘’π‘‘. 𝑖𝑛 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘–π‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘’, 𝑖𝑑 𝑖𝑠 π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘Žπ‘  𝑖𝑓 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘ π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘’π‘‘ π‘€π‘–π‘‘β„Ž π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘...." #BNSS@CurrentLegalGK

#Question@CurrentLegalGK #POCSO@CurrentLegalGK #Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK What is the standard of proof is required for the accused to rebut the reverse presumption in section 29 POCSO. Read Twice.

There is a split verdict on whether a reference to larger bench on the issue of validity of ECI appointment Act should be done hence a matter before CJI for a larger bench to decide whether the split verdict delivered on reference to larger bench to be considered or not. Is it required? will it save time?

A television programme titled β€œSINchan” features a computer-generated cartoon depiction of a child engaged in acts of a sexual nature, including the visual representation of the child’s private parts. The stated purpose of the programme is to educate on what constitutes sexual arousal among viewers. No real child is involved in the production. 1. Does the creation and broadcast of such content constitute an offence under Section 14 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012? 2. What is the maximum punishment you as a judge can impose legally u/s 14 irrespective of the facts of present case? 3. Are the viewers legally bound to report it, if it is an offence u/s 14? #POCSO@CurrentLegalGK #Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK #Question@CurrentLegalGK