es
Feedback
𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„

𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„

Ir al canal en Telegram

πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360Β° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!

Mostrar mΓ‘s

πŸ“ˆ AnΓ‘lisis del canal de Telegram 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„

El canal 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 π€π…π…π€πˆπ‘π’ 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 π‰π”π’π“πˆπ‚π„ (@currentlegalgk) en el segmento lingΓΌΓ­stico de InglΓ©s es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reΓΊne a 19 109 suscriptores, ocupando la posiciΓ³n 402 en la categorΓ­a Ley y el puesto 21 273 en la regiΓ³n India.

πŸ“Š MΓ©tricas de audiencia y dinΓ‘mica

Desde su creaciΓ³n el Π½Π΅Π²Ρ–Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΎ, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 19 109 suscriptores.

SegΓΊn los ΓΊltimos datos del 24 septiembre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los ΓΊltimos 30 dΓ­as la variaciΓ³n de miembros fue de 74, y en las ΓΊltimas 24 horas de 7, conservando un alto alcance.

  • Estado de verificaciΓ³n: No verificado
  • Tasa de interacciΓ³n (ER): El promedio de interacciΓ³n de la audiencia es 6.86%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 3.25% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
  • Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicaciΓ³n recibe en promedio 1 311 visualizaciones. En el primer dΓ­a suele acumular 621 visualizaciones.
  • Reacciones e interacciΓ³n: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicaciΓ³n es 4.
  • Intereses temΓ‘ticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como judge, supreme, act, evidence, justice.

πŸ“ DescripciΓ³n y polΓ­tica de contenido

El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
β€œπŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT ☺️ 360Β° Cases on topics. Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET. _____________ 🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learn...”

Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (ΓΊltimos datos recibidos el 25 septiembre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analΓ­tica demuestra que la audiencia interactΓΊa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categorΓ­a Ley.

19 109
Suscriptores
+724 horas
+197 dΓ­as
+7430 dΓ­as
Atraer Suscriptores
sep '26
septiembre '26
+220
en 0 canales
agosto '26
+134
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '26
+112
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '26
+142
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '26
+129
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '26
+58
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '26
+19
en 1 canales
Get PRO
febrero '26
+54
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '26
+58
en 1 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '25
+51
en 1 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+60
en 1 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+68
en 2 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '25
+70
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '25
+46
en 1 canales
Get PRO
julio '25
+55
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '25
+18
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+30
en 2 canales
Get PRO
abril '25
+41
en 2 canales
Get PRO
marzo '25
+74
en 1 canales
Get PRO
febrero '25
+56
en 1 canales
Get PRO
enero '25
+209
en 4 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '24
+354
en 2 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '24
+567
en 3 canales
Get PRO
octubre '24
+657
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '24
+1 236
en 3 canales
Get PRO
agosto '24
+1 623
en 4 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+2 406
en 1 canales
Get PRO
junio '24
+2 347
en 2 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+2 218
en 2 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+1 931
en 1 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+2 087
en 2 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+1 940
en 2 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+2 283
en 3 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+1 968
en 3 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+530
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+1 266
en 0 canales
Fecha
Crecimiento de Suscriptores
Menciones
Canales
25 septiembre+7
24 septiembre+8
23 septiembre+10
22 septiembre+13
21 septiembre+3
20 septiembre+2
19 septiembre+5
18 septiembre+8
17 septiembre+3
16 septiembre+5
15 septiembre+4
14 septiembre+1
13 septiembre+4
12 septiembre+6
11 septiembre+7
10 septiembre+8
09 septiembre+13
08 septiembre+3
07 septiembre+3
06 septiembre+4
05 septiembre+5
04 septiembre+8
03 septiembre+23
02 septiembre+2
Publicaciones del Canal
2
Andhra Pradesh Civil Judge Examination Notification Out Total Vacancies - 119 Online Applications - 1.10.2026 to 26.10.2026
221
3
πŸ™‚<-->πŸ™ƒ WHEN SHALL MEANS MAY AND MAY MEANS SHALL? The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rakesh Ranjan Shrivastava v. State of Jharkhand (2024) the Court observed: SUBSTANCE OVER FORM ALWAYS "There is no doubt that the word "may" ordinarily does not mean "must". Ordinarily, "may" will not be construed as "shall". But this is not an inflexible rule. The use of the word "may" in certain legislations can be construed as "shall", and the word "shall" can be construed as "may". It all depends on the nature of the power conferred by the relevant provision of the statute and the effect of the exercise of the power. The legislative intent also plays a role in the interpretation of such provisions. Even the context in which the word "may" has been used is also relevant." Now in the present case, how is the following phrase read as shall? Unless the sample has already been tested or analysed in the Central Drugs Laboratory, where a person has under sub-section (3) notified his intention of adducing evidence in controversion of a Government Analyst's report, the Court may, of its own motion or in its discretion at the request either of the complainant or the accused, cause the sample of the drug or cosmetic produced before the Magistrate under sub-section (4) of section 23 to be sent for test or analysis to the said Laboratory... WHY "MAY" IN S.25(4) READS AS "SHALL": SIX REASONS (i) S.25(3) creates a specific statutory right β€” the legislature expressly carved out an exception to conclusiveness; recognising a right to challenge the Government Analyst's report was a conscious legislative choice. (ii) S.25(4) is the mechanism to make that right effective β€” once S.25(3) is exercised, the sample goes to the Central Drugs Laboratory and its report becomes conclusive evidence; the provision is substantive, not merely procedural. (iii) Supreme Court treats this as a valuable statutory right β€” if the sample is not sent while still testable, the accused permanently loses independent analysis; delay attributable to the prosecution can be fatal to the prosecution. (iv) Treating "may" as purely discretionary defeats S.25(3) itself β€” the legislature cannot be taken to have created a right while simultaneously conferring unfettered discretion to refuse the mechanism for exercising it; that renders the protection in sub-section (3) largely illusory. (v) "May" must be read in context of the consequences of non-exercise β€” where S.25(3) is complied with and statutory conditions are satisfied, refusal to send the sample to CDL deprives the person of the very safeguard the legislature intended. (vi) Purposive construction, not mechanical substitution the principle is not that "may" invariably means "shall"; rather, in the specific statutory context of S.25(3) and (4), legislative intent, nature of the right, and consequences of non-exercise justify reading "may" as "shall" to give effect to the provision rather than render the right ineffective. #IOS@CurrentLegalGK
146
4
maxmed-life-science-vs-state-702354.pdf
296
5
S 156(3) CrPC Order Is Pre-Cognizance Step, Sanction Under S 197 CrPC Not Required At That Stage: Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-1563-precognizance-step-sanction-section197-crpc-that-stage-551655
462
6
Completed Trial Cannot Be Remanded Merely For Procedural Lapse Without Proof Of Prejudice : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/completed-trial-cannot-be-remanded-merely-for-procedural-lapse-without-proof-of-prejudice-supreme-court-551753
445
7
S.413 BNSS | Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal By Magistrate Lies Before Sessions Court : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/s413-bnss-victims-appeal-against-acquittal-by-magistrate-lies-before-sessions-court-supreme-court-551787
400
8
Constituent Assembly Debates on Fundamental Rights. Give a reading for better understanding. #COI@CurrentLegalGK
725
9
Article 324(5) of the Constitution states that the CEC can be removed from office only β€œin like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court.” This framing can also be found in Section 11(2) of the 2023 Act. The article further states that β€œany other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner”.
704
10
Opposition seeks Gyanesh Kumar exit: How can a Chief Election Commissioner be removed? πŸ”— #chief_election_commissioner #election_commission_of_india #express_explained
772
11
Magistrate Cannot Revert To Pre-Cognizance Stage And Invoke S.156(3) Cr.P.C. Once Inquiry Is Taken Up U/ S 202: Bombay High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/magistrate-cannot-revert-s1563-crpc-once-inquiry-s202-551536
780
12
Victim Can't Introduce Evidence At Trial Which Is Not Included In Chargesheet By Prosecution: Orissa High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/orissa-high-court/orissa-high-court-victim-introduce-evidence-trial-not-included-chargesheet-prosecution-551649
703
13
Supreme Court Lays Down Safeguards To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Child Custody Cases, Quashes False FIR Against Father https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-lays-down-safeguards-to-prevent-misuse-of-pocso-act-in-child-custody-cases-quashes-false-fir-against-father-551637
639
14
𝐍𝐎 π–π‘πˆπ“π“π„π π†π‘πŽπ”ππƒπ’ π’π“πˆπ‹π‹ 𝐍𝐎 ππ€πˆπ‹ 𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐃. (MP HC) π‘π„π€π’πŽππ’ 𝑖𝑑 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“π‘™π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘š π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘Žπ‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘  π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ β„Žπ‘–π‘  π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘. β„Žπ‘’ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘™π‘’π‘”π‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘¦ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘š π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘œπ‘’π‘‘π‘ π‘’π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘π‘Žπ‘–π‘™ π‘ β„Žπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘™π‘¦ π‘Žπ‘“π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ β„Žπ‘–π‘  π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘, π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘¦ 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 π‘Žπ‘› π‘–π‘šπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘–π‘›π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘ π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘ π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘  π‘Žπ‘”π‘Žπ‘–π‘›π‘ π‘‘ β„Žπ‘–π‘š. π‘›π‘œ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘  𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘œπ‘› π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘’π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘π‘™π‘–π‘ β„Ž π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘¦ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘—π‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘π‘Žπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘› π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘’π‘”π‘’π‘‘ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘π‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘’. β„Žπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿ, π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘’ π‘œπ‘’π‘‘ π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘š π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘’π‘  π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“π‘™π‘’π‘π‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘ π‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ 𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑑 π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘”, π‘€β„Žπ‘–π‘β„Ž π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘‘π‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘  π‘£π‘–π‘œπ‘™π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘–π‘π‘™π‘’ 22(1) π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘‘π‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ π‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘–π‘Ž π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘™π‘Žπ‘€ π‘™π‘Žπ‘–π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘€π‘› 𝑏𝑦 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ β„Žπ‘œπ‘›'𝑏𝑙𝑒 π‘ π‘’π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘šπ‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘‘ 𝑖𝑛 π‘šπ‘–β„Žπ‘–π‘Ÿ π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘—π‘’π‘ β„Ž π‘ β„Žπ‘Žβ„Ž (π‘ π‘’π‘π‘Ÿπ‘Ž). π‘›π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘™π‘’π‘ π‘ , π‘ π‘’π‘β„Ž 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑑, 𝑏𝑦 𝑖𝑑𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓, π‘€π‘œπ‘’π‘™π‘‘ π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘™π‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘› π‘π‘Žπ‘–π‘™ 𝑖𝑛 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘‘π‘  π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘–π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’π‘šπ‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘’ 𝑖𝑛 π‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘–π‘π‘’π‘™π‘Žπ‘Ÿ. 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐄𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐓 ππŽπ“ π‘π„π‹πˆπ„πƒ π„π—ππ‘π„π’π’π‹π˜ 𝐁𝐔𝐓 π‘π„π‹πˆπ„πƒ 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐓𝐄 π–π‡πˆπ‚π‡ πˆπ’ πŒπŽπ’π“ π‚π‹πŽπ’π„π’π“ 𝐋𝐀𝐖 𝐎𝐍 πˆπ’π’π”π„ 𝐀𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐃 π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘šπ‘’π‘”β„Žπ‘Žπ‘™π‘Žπ‘¦π‘Ž 𝑣𝑠. π‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘”β„Žπ‘’π‘£π‘Žπ‘›π‘ β„Žπ‘– @ 𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑖 @ 𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑒 π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘› 𝑖𝑑 β„Žπ‘Žπ‘  𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 β„Žπ‘’π‘™π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘  π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ: β€œ11.... π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ž π‘“π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‘π‘–π‘“π‘“π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑀𝑒𝑒𝑛 π‘›π‘œπ‘›-π‘ π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘›π‘œπ‘›-π‘“π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘›π‘–π‘ β„Žπ‘–π‘›π‘” π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘  π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ. π‘€β„Žπ‘–π‘™π‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘“π‘–π‘Ÿπ‘ π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘”π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘¦ π‘šπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘ π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘, 𝑖𝑛 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘ π‘’π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘”π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘¦, π‘œπ‘›π‘’ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘  π‘‘π‘œ 𝑠𝑒𝑒 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘—π‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘π‘Žπ‘’π‘ π‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘ π‘’π‘‘. 𝑖𝑛 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘–π‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘’, 𝑖𝑑 𝑖𝑠 π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘Žπ‘  𝑖𝑓 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘ π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘’π‘‘ π‘€π‘–π‘‘β„Ž π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘‘...." #BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
798
15
raju-sonker-v-state-of-madhya-pradesh-702117.pdf
757
16
Arrest Grounds Not Given In Writing Violates Article 22(1), But Doesn't Automatically Entitle Accused To Bail: MP High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/arrest-grounds-not-communicated-article-221-violation-no-bail-551513
821
17
#Question@CurrentLegalGK #POCSO@CurrentLegalGK #Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK What is the standard of proof is required for the accused to rebut the reverse presumption in section 29 POCSO. Read Twice.
821
18
27ba55e9d95d00f756aa87735e17e409b6d96459d0c4d0ee2c3862cb0145d4c21790163171.pdf
886
19
There is a split verdict on whether a reference to larger bench on the issue of validity of ECI appointment Act should be done hence a matter before CJI for a larger bench to decide whether the split verdict delivered on reference to larger bench to be considered or not. Is it required? will it save time?
820
20
Supreme Court delivers split verdict on Centre's demand to send Election Commissioner appointment case to larger bench | https://www.barandbench.com/news/supreme-court-delivers-split-verdict-on-centres-demand-to-send-election-commissioner-appointment-case-to-larger-bench
743