cookie

Ми використовуємо файли cookie для покращення вашого досвіду перегляду. Натиснувши «Прийняти все», ви погоджуєтеся на використання файлів cookie.

avatar

Thuletide

Posts cover NWO agenda (COVID, Agenda 21, anti-White hate, anti-family agenda, etc.), European history, archaeology, genetics, etc. / thuletide.wordpress.com / gab.com/thuletide / t.me/racerealismchannel / You can plagiarize any of my writing & content

Більше
США1 220Англійська21 018Політика2 268
Рекламні дописи
25 173
Підписники
Немає даних24 години
+317 днів
-2430 днів

Триває завантаження даних...

Приріст підписників

Триває завантаження даних...

Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
Study: Blacks and Hispanics prefer fat women. White men are twice as likely as Hispanic men to prefer thin/healthy women, and four times more likely than Black men. The authors did not conclude that Blacks and Hispanics have a natural preference for fat women, and Whites for thin women. Instead, they blamed the evil, sexist mainstream media for propagating "white idealizations of thin female bodies," but claimed that Blacks and Hispanics are somehow impervious to this nefarious propaganda. Source: Internet Daters’ Body Type Preferences: Race–Ethnic and Gender Differences, Glasser (2009)
Показати все...
Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
Elon temporarily banned British ANTIFA organization "Hope Not Hate" for doxing. You should mass report their dox posts whenever you see them.
Показати все...
Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation (2013) "From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates." "Selfish and traitorous strategies are self-limiting because such agents do not cooperate with agents sharing the same genes. Traitorous strategies fare even worse than selfish ones because traitors are exploited by ethnocentrics across group boundaries in the same manner as humanitarians are, via unreciprocated cooperation." The published paper is paywalled but the preprint is accessible here: https://escholarship.org/content/qt72z42376/qt72z42376_noSplash_4b566ab45881562861ca6d054eef8e9f.pdf
Показати все...
Some people misunderstand when I point out that libtards are often individualistic, psychopathic, Machiavellian, etc. Firstly, these traits *correlate* with leftism, so there is room for variation. Secondly, leftism results from a combination of traits, not singular traits. Individuals may exhibit certain traits that are disproportionately represented among leftists without being leftists themselves. Some typical "leftist" traits are adaptive when combined with characteristics that mitigate potential negative effects. For example, society benefits from a certain percentage of people who exhibit low disgust sensitivity (see: surgeons) or psychopathic tendencies (soldiers). Geniuses are often mildly psychopathic, low in conscientiousness and empathy (see here). The individualism of the right (i.e. of significantly less dysgenic people) is clearly distinct from the parochial, hedonistic, spiteful individualism of the left. The former produces explorers, pioneers, heroic Achillean warriors. The latter produces people like this witch, who "set up a special human-rights carve-out that allows her to racially discriminate in the hiring process for positions *except* her own" $219k per year job.
Показати все...
th_l_t_d_ ❄️🌊 (@thltd_) on X

Why are leftists like this? Pure spite because they are, on average, uglier, shorter, poorer, weaker, more neurotic, more mentally ill, more selfish, narcissistic, etc. They also have low disgust sensitivity, impaired threat detection, and so on. I will post many citations in 🧵

By the way, when I say, "you won't change a thing," I mean legally. We can shift the Overton window metapolitically, but no policies will be implemented without our people in positions of power and influence. That being said, I see little evidence that IRL "dissident activism" has substantially shifted the Overton window. The change has been driven almost entirely by Trump and similar politicians, and by the online culture war. You can reach far more people via social media than you ever could by doing marches, banner drops, protests, etc. (which are generally perceived negatively by the public anyway). Currently, the aim of entryism should be to keep the far-right tail of the Overton window within frame and to expand it gradually. In most Western countries, that means mass deportation (of illegals), zero net migration, repealing DEI/AA, overturning "hate speech" laws and implementing new free speech laws, gutting woke institutions, cracking down on crime, etc.
Показати все...
Thuletide

If you are intelligent, competent, measured, and are not prone to spergouts or causing optical disasters, you should get involved with mainstream politics to steer things in the right direction. The more we do now, the more power and influence we'll have in future. Forget LARPy "street protest" organizations, farcical startup parties with questionable branding, IRL "dissident" things in general. They'll ruin your life and you won't change a thing. Join a think tank, help with Trump 2024, Project 2025, etc. A few dedicated, capable men in the right places can make a world of difference, even working behind the scenes. Imagine: Neo-Cons, but good. "The Neoconservative "movement" was really just two dozen tight-knit guys. Nearly the entire foreign policy establishment was opposed to invading Iraq but was overruled by this small coterie because they had Cheney's and Rumsfeld's ears. [...] a whitepill because it shows how this small group of people took power from behind shadows without even a mass movement or…

If you are intelligent, competent, measured, and are not prone to spergouts or causing optical disasters, you should get involved with mainstream politics to steer things in the right direction. The more we do now, the more power and influence we'll have in future. Forget LARPy "street protest" organizations, farcical startup parties with questionable branding, IRL "dissident" things in general. They'll ruin your life and you won't change a thing. Join a think tank, help with Trump 2024, Project 2025, etc. A few dedicated, capable men in the right places can make a world of difference, even working behind the scenes. Imagine: Neo-Cons, but good. "The Neoconservative "movement" was really just two dozen tight-knit guys. Nearly the entire foreign policy establishment was opposed to invading Iraq but was overruled by this small coterie because they had Cheney's and Rumsfeld's ears. [...] a whitepill because it shows how this small group of people took power from behind shadows without even a mass movement or electoral constituency." (AP on X). This should go without saying: Don't have a "secret groyper account," don't associate with "us" at all. As soon as you do, it's over. We've seen it time and time again. You must be squeaky clean, leave no trace. Our ideas are going mainstream, but *we* are not. Moreover, if you are already known in IRL "far-right" politics, then you are, unfortunately, a tarnished untouchable. This post does not apply to you - your mere presence will sabotage an organization, if you are not immediately expelled or rejected due to your political history.
Показати все...
AP (@AsabiyyahPepe) on X

The Neoconservative "movement" was really just two dozen tight-knit guys. Nearly the entire foreign policy establishment was opposed to invading Iraq but was overruled by this small coterie because they had Cheney's and Rumsfeld's ears.

Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
Показати все...
Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
You may ask: "Why would Jews relentlessly promote Islamic immigration when they know most of these MENA 'refugees' are vehemently anti-Semitic?" We know they are not unintelligent (see here and here), so this 1992 study on Jewish mental health may provide some clues.
Показати все...
Оберіть інший тариф

На вашому тарифі доступна аналітика тільки для 5 каналів. Щоб отримати більше — оберіть інший тариф.