Endi mavjud! Telegram Tadqiqoti 2025 — yilning asosiy insaytlari 
Thuletide
Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
Ko'proq ko'rsatish📈 Telegram kanali Thuletide analitikasi
Thuletide (@thuletide) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 22 620 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Siyosat toifasida 2 602-o'rinni va AQSH mintaqasida 1 765-o'rinni egallagan.
📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika
невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 22 620 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.
04 Iyul, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 104 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -1 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 32.80% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 18.46% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 7 420 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 4 175 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
- Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 0 ta reaksiya keladi.
- Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent tattoo, retard, wing, act, birth kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.
📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel”
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 05 Iyul, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Siyosat toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.
22 620
Obunachilar
-124 soatlar
+307 kunlar
+10430 kunlar
Ma'lumot yuklanmoqda...
O'xshash kanallar
Taglar buluti
Kirish va chiqish esdaliklari
---
---
---
---
---
---
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Iyul '26
Iyul '26
+52
24 kanalda
Iyun '26
+353
136 kanalda
Get PRO
May '26
+265
73 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '26
+187
99 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '26
+149
87 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '26
+240
117 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '26
+152
64 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '25
+166
89 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '25
+197
84 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '25
+116
106 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '25
+570
180 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '25
+123
57 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '25
+153
89 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+79
70 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+135
87 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '25
+80
46 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+89
50 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '25
+136
108 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+193
104 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '24
+214
124 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+209
163 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+174
115 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+194
181 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+306
221 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+177
121 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+145
98 kanalda
Get PRO
May '24
+310
106 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '24
+326
123 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+416
162 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+489
190 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+550
191 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '23
+555
174 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '23
+382
181 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '23
+685
218 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '23
+153
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '23
+825
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '23
+697
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '23
+950
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '23
+1 000
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '23
+536
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '23
+384
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '23
+612
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '23
+874
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '22
+448
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '22
+816
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '22
+935
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '22
+818
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '22
+1 133
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '22
+734
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '22
+824
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '22
+1 461
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '22
+1 236
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '22
+1 521
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '22
+922
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '22
+1 357
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '21
+1 354
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '21
+979
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '21
+1 120
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '21
+957
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '21
+981
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '21
+921
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '21
+883
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '21
+1 189
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '21
+1 488
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '21
+1 157
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '21
+28
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '21
+224
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '20
+415
0 kanalda
| Sana | Obunachilarni jalb qilish | Esdaliklar | Kanallar | |
| 05 Iyul | +2 | |||
| 04 Iyul | +6 | |||
| 03 Iyul | +10 | |||
| 02 Iyul | +16 | |||
| 01 Iyul | +18 |
Kanal postlari
Immigration is a less immediate and arguably less significant threat to the future of America and the West than online censorship/surveillance throttling the only quasi-free source of information and discourse available today.
Social credit systems loom on the horizon and people either don't care or actively facilitate and applaud the encroaching tyranny: "I support totaldox because I'm too dumb to spot Indian engagement farmers and AI bots on Twitter, and I'm too irresponsible of a parent to protect my kids from porn via the variety of tools that are already at my disposal."
If by some miracle, social credit systems do not materialize: In America the woke will still ruin your life for saying what needs to be said under your real name and face, and things are far worse in Western countries with intentionally nebulous "hate speech" laws; people are frequently jailed for voicing milquetoast opposition to leftist regimes.
| 2 |  X/Twitter worked on the Kids Online Safety Act, part of the KIDS Act (recently passed in the House). They are 100% on board with digital identity and deanonymization. | 3 586 |
| 3 | "X likely wants device fingerprints so they can track/deanonymize users" — turns out it was even worse than I imagined, they want your biometric data: face and actual fingerprints. https://t.me/thuletide/8200 | 3 249 |
| 4 | Looks like 2022 Thuletide was correct about the first part. I hope I'm not vindicated on the second.
https://t.me/thuletide/2688 | 3 324 |
| 5 |  New deanonymization feature on X/Twitter:
Mobile-based accounts are locked then forced to download the app and provide biometric data.
Web-based accounts are forced to "confirm they are human" by scanning a QR code with their mobile phones (leaking privacy-compromising device information), which begins the same biometric data harvesting process. | 23 635 |
| 6 |  Digital Panopticon Update: The KIDS Act passed within the House and only 32 Republicans voted against it.
It includes almost a dozen bills (e.g. the Kids Online Safety Act) aimed at throttling online freedom.
- Age verification for using websites that host porn or other sexual content (this includes every social media platform)
- Age verification to send private messages
- Age verification to use in-game chats
- Most web/app features disabled by default unless age verified
- Restrictions on encrypted messaging
- Restrictions on AI chatbots
- Government-directed moderation / restriction of lawful speech
- etc.
As I said, while the digital ID agenda has bipartisan support in America, it is primarily pushed by myopic GOP tradcuck retards who either don't understand or don't care that they are playing directly in the hands of the left. These people are a plague. | 13 119 |
| 7 | Sex bias in hiring does exist! Women are favored while men are discriminated against.
A meta analysis of real-world experiments spanning over four decades (1976-2020) found that all hiring bias against women has disappeared in the studied countries (mostly the West + China).
Since the 2000s, women have been favored for "female-type" and "gender-balanced" jobs, and since the 2010s, even "male-type" jobs have reached sex parity, meaning women are favored for "all jobs." [An odds ratio above 1 = male bias, below 1 = female bias].
The paper also surveyed US laymen and academics, who both overestimated sex bias in hiring practices to a significant degree — i.e. they hallucinated nonexistent discrimination against women.
Source: On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions (2023) | 7 207 |
| 8 | The most absurd aspect of this cuckservative push to "protect children" online is that the entirety of modern Western civilization is riddled with filth from top to bottom.
The shit kids see in the average city, the shit they see on TV, the shit they're taught in school, etc. can hardly be more harmful than the shit they see online.
To truly protect children, you'd have to take them off grid and live in the wilderness. Even then, you're likely to drive past a degenerate billboard or two.
Why don't they campaign to bring back modesty laws or something? | 9 337 |
| 9 | Digital ID in America is primarily pushed by cuckservative organizations and GOP lawmakers.
After Roe v. Wade was overturned, these bible-thumping busybodies needed a new flagship "save the kids" cause to virtue signal about: The total abolition of online anonymity.
They are playing directly into the hands of the left by further throttling the only relatively free source of information available today, while laying the foundations of European-style digital tyranny and a Chinese-style social credit system.
The Digital Childhood Alliance is funded by Meta btw. | 9 811 |
| 10 | Digital Panopticon Update: People who create a new Apple account in Texas will be asked to verify that they're over 18
"Apple will introduce age verification in the App Store for users in Texas starting on Thursday, June 4th. The move, as spotted by MacRumors, comes just days after a federal appeals court allowed Texas’ App Store Accountability Act to go into effect while a lawsuit against it proceeds."
"People in Texas who are creating a new Apple account will need to verify they’re over 18 using a credit card or government ID."
Source: Apple is bringing age verification to Texas this week | 4 408 |
| 11 | Early Medieval 'Slavic Period' (~600-900 AD) samples from southern Poland and northern Ukraine had variable levels of Germanic, Balkan, and Greco-Roman ancestry, as per the recent study on Slavic migrations (Gretzinger 2025). I think these early Slavs also had Scythian and minor Uralic ancestry.
It's currently unknown whether or not these samples represent the Proto-Slavic population, but I suspect that they don't.
They were found in close geographic proximity to the theorized Proto-Slavic homeland, but the Czechia_EarlySlav sample (also from the early Slavic Period) has significantly less Balkan, Germanic, and Scythian ancestry. I suspect that the Proto-Slavs were more similar to this sample — i.e. more Baltic-like — than those from Grodek and NW Ukraine. | 6 755 |
| 12 |  Nonsuicidal self-harm is 37% heritable for men and 59% heritable for women. | 4 853 |
| 13 | Rebel News uploaded the Montreal shooter's 104 page manifesto to their website. They claimed it was riddled with virulent anti-semitism, but Jews were only mentioned briefly in one footnote.
The shooter said that the "Zionist elites" are bad, but the problem in the West is "capitalism, not the Jewish race."
He then went on to praise Jews for being "some of the most renowned and effective combatants against the western bourgeois class."
https://www.rebelnews.com/manifesto_reveals_alleged_montreal_gunman_s_antisemitic_far_left_and_incel_ideology | 15 933 |
| 14 | Clown world failed mass shooting in Canada:
An incel communist tried to shoot up the HQ of a company in Montreal that operates multiple prominent pornography websites, including Pornhub.
The shooter killed a male muslim cop called Mohamed, then a female cop accidentally killed a fleeing civilian named Moshe Mizrahi, who happened to be a rabbi. The female cop was wounded, the shooter was killed (not by the female cop, obviously), and nobody else was harmed. | 9 758 |
| 15 | Cash transfers and fertility (2024):
In 2016, Poland began to give households a cash benefit of $130 USD per month per child under 18.
All families with 2+ children qualified regardless of income, as did low-income 1 child families.
The results of this policy were:
- Increased birth probability among women aged 31-35 (+1.8 percentage points) and 36-40 (+0.7 pp)
- Decreased birth probability among women aged 21-25 (-2.2 pp) and 26-30 (-2.6 pp).
- Negative effect among higher-income women (-1.1 pp).
- No significant effects for women under 21 or over 40.
Source: Cash transfers and fertility: Evidence from Poland’s Family 500+ Policy (n=87,006)
https://demographic-research.org/volumes/vol51/28/51-28.pdf
#fertility | 4 610 |
| 16 | If you give women UBI, they have less children. If you give their husbands UBI, they have more children.
Caveats: Study focused on low-income women and the experiment lasted two years; possible (but unlikely) that long-term fertility effects could differ from these results.
Source: How Changes in Cash Transfers Can Affect Childbearing Among Low‑Income Women: Evidence from the Finnish Basic Income Experiment (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-025-09735-9
#fertility | 9 760 |
| 17 | Housing and Fertility:
A recent study used Brazilian housing credit lotteries to investigate the relationship between home ownership and fertility.
20-25 year olds randomly obtaining housing increased their probability of having children by 32% and more children by 33%.
The lifetime fertility boost for 20 year old winners was double that of 30 year old winners.
The effect was stronger for men than women (other studies have found that financial/economic incentives increase male but not female TFR, see: https://t.me/thuletide/8097, https://t.me/thuletide/7921, https://t.me/thuletide/8102)
The housing lottery had effect on the fertility of winners over 40.
Source: Housing and Fertility (July 15, 2025)
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5046571
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5046571
#fertility | 5 685 |
| 18 | Murder rate vs. incarceration rate in El Salvador, 2000-2024 | 4 200 |
| 19 | The age gap "pedophilia" moral panic, spawned by feminism and kicked into overdrive during the #MeToo era that began circa 2017, is a potentially civilization-ruining phenomenon. I am, of course, not referring to very real problems, like grooming gangs in Britain, but the fact that 18-year-old boys are frequently accused of being an "Epstein diddy blud" merely for talking to 17-year-old girls. If you wanted to vaporize our already plummeting birth rates, stigmatizing any age gap larger than that between identical twins is a great way to do it.
Girls typically reach physical sexual maturity (adult secondary sexual characteristics) between the ages of 15 and 17, while boys mature a couple of years later. Yet, it is disturbingly common to conflate an 18-year-old dating a 16-year-old — a relationship between two biological adults, legal everywhere in the West aside from a handful of deranged US states — with a 40-year-old raping a 9-year-old. Apparently, the people who do this have no problem with trivializing actual pedophilia (the sexual abuse of prepubescents), which causes immense and long-lasting harm.
The crux of this issue is that healthy male heterosexuality — the preference for younger but sexually mature women — has effectively been criminalized. Meanwhile, older-female age gap relationships are constantly celebrated by the Gynocratic World Order (see e.g. the safe-horny "dommy mommy" phenomenon), to the extent that female teachers who sleep with their male students are routinely spared jail time and socially excused: "Where was she when I was a student?!"
For all of human history until very recently, older-male-age-gap relationships were regarded as normal and good; the average age gap in America from 1850 to 1950 was 4.5 years. Even today, in face of widespread moral hysteria, the average 23-year-old white man and woman in the West prefer partners who are 2 and 3 years older than themselves, respectively. The evolutionary theory is simple: Men prefer fertile women, women prefer men who can provide for offspring; women are most fertile when young, men accumulate resources with age.
Older-male age-gap relationships produce more children, with total lifetime fertility peaking at +7 years (although the variation from +3 to +13 years is very small). The negative fertility effect of older wives begins immediately at +1 year and declines linearly; at +3.5 years, couples produce 0.5 fewer children, on average. Obviously, this is due to women's limited fertility window, which is much smaller than commonly believed: by age 31, ~10% of women are sterile and ~50% are subfertile (they have difficulty conceiving, decreased egg quality, etc).
In case it were not immediately obvious, I will state explicitly that I do not endorse procreation between e.g. 16-year-old girls and 60-year-old grandpas with mutationally-loaded sperm. The risk of deleterious de novo mutations increases with age, and while the effects are small, they compound over generations, as the botched are no longer filtered out of the genepool via natural selection. Moreover, Joseph Bronski has provided evidence of a paternal age effect on leftism, whereby older fathers produce more hereditarily left-wing babies.
To increase birth rates and reduce dysgenics, early marriage should be encouraged, particularly among the intelligent. Ideally, both husband and wife should be in their late teens to very early 20s. Older-male relationships between young adults (~16-25) should also be destigmatized. Society should be restructured to ensure that intelligent couples can have as many children as possible before age 30-35; reduce time spent in education, prioritize youth for high-paying jobs, give intelligent young men huge lump sums per child (funded by e.g. abolishing welfare), and so on. | 5 421 |
| 20 |  +1The claim that younger age at marriage (late teens to early 20s) causally increases divorce risk was debunked by two relatively recent studies.
Older papers were confounded: the increased risk is caused by "unobserved factors" such as the innate traits of those who typically marry young today (impulsive, low IQ, low SES, etc.).
The 2021 paper found that young midnight marriages induced by the Vietnam war were actually slightly less likely to divorce. This is not necessarily a universal trend, just evidence that young marriage per se does not cause an increased risk of divorce.
Neither paper looked specifically at very young teen marriages, but I think we can conclude that normal* young people from age 18-25 can safely marry without increased risk of divorce.
* "Normal" defined vaguely as "not retarded, mentally unstable, impulsive, etc." | 4 486 |
