Elders of the Black Sun IV
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
نمایش بیشتر
2 186
مشترکین
اطلاعاتی وجود ندارد24 ساعت
-47 روز
+6230 روز
در حال بارگیری داده...
کانالهای مشابه
ابر برچسبها
اشارات ورودی و خروجی
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب مشترکین
سپتامبر '26
سپتامبر '26
+66
در 15 کانالها
اوت '26
+73
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '26
+61
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '26
+83
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '26
+95
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '26
+64
در 14 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '26
+50
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '26
+156
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '26
+151
در 14 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '250
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '25
+25
در 10 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '25
+91
در 11 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '25
+207
در 15 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '25
+58
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '25
+55
در 5 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '25
+71
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '25
+8
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '25
+31
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '25
+44
در 4 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '25
+39
در 3 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '25
+57
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '24
+55
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '240
در 19 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '24
+53
در 5 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '24
+65
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '24
+99
در 15 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '24
+273
در 11 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '24
+200
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '24
+278
در 7 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '24
+335
در 4 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '24
+308
در 11 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '24
+314
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '24
+243
در 10 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '23
+304
در 10 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '23
+157
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '23
+165
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '23
+691
در 0 کانالها
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانالها | |
| 15 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 14 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 13 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 12 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 11 سپتامبر | +4 | |||
| 10 سپتامبر | +2 | |||
| 09 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 08 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 07 سپتامبر | +3 | |||
| 06 سپتامبر | +3 | |||
| 05 سپتامبر | +11 | |||
| 04 سپتامبر | +21 | |||
| 03 سپتامبر | +14 | |||
| 02 سپتامبر | +3 | |||
| 01 سپتامبر | +1 |
پستهای کانال
If you watch Emily in Paris I have to assume you’re a girl or you suck dicks
| 2 |  بدون متن... | 8 |
| 3 |  بدون متن... | 8 |
| 4 | This goes down to the individual as well, he is part of the whole, while preserving the liberty of his personality & personal equation. | 14 |
| 5 | Now I do, personally - switcharoo centralized totalitarianism, to federalist totalitarianism.
The central state is still total organizer of the parts, but the parts should have their own distinctiveness & local semi-autonomy for those things that lay below the interest of the center.
For example, it makes no sense whatsoever for every part to have its own foreign policy independent of the center (such as in the EU). In this the US Federalist model is clearly superior. But it also makes no sense that the distinctiveness between - let’s say, Bavaria & Prussia, should be leveled out into a common astroturfed sameness of “German”.
A good Empire is an organism that functions as a whole, while having many unique parts. | 12 |
| 6 |  بدون متن... | 15 |
| 7 |  +2But the AI never considers Evola as being formative too, which he is | 20 |
| 8 | Platonic-Sadean synthesis: Because eros is appetitive and dominating, reproduction must be removed from eros and governed by reason.
The final synthesis: Schopenhauer explains romantic illusion, Red Pill theory explains sexual strategy, de Sade explains domination, Greek thought explains male friendship, and Plato explains civic reproduction. | 23 |
| 9 | For your benefit, I asked AI to dig out the thought influences in the above short essay. If anything it’s interesting as a survey of ideas
—-
Schopenhauer: Romantic love is the reproductive will disguising the species’ interests as personal transcendence.
Darwin: Sexual selection produces different pressures upon male and female attraction.
Robert Trivers: Unequal parental investment generates different reproductive strategies between the sexes.
Buss and Schmitt: Men and women possess distinct, context-dependent short-term and long-term mating strategies.
Briffault’s Law: Female attachment supposedly continues only while association provides present value.
Red Pill theory: Hypergamy, sexual-market value, branch-switching, simping, and “shit tests” govern heterosexual relations.
Rollo Tomassi: Women continually measure men against superior alternatives, while male desire remains comparatively indiscriminate.
MGTOW: Men should withdraw identity, property, and purpose from institutions structured around female approval.
René Girard: Desire is socially mediated; people desire what their community teaches them to regard as valuable.
Veblen: A desirable partner can function as a form of conspicuous status rather than merely private attraction.
Bourdieu: Beauty, prestige, class, and relationships operate as forms of social and symbolic capital.
Otto Weininger: Masculinity is associated with autonomous personality, while femininity is reduced to sexuality and social valuation.
Freud: Civilized affection overlays deeper libidinal, possessive, and aggressive drives.
Nietzsche: Love contains command, possession, struggle, and will to power beneath egalitarian moral language.
De Sade: Erotic intensity culminates in sovereignty, objectification, transgression, and domination.
Sacher-Masoch: Submission can itself become an erotic structure, although his characteristic sexual roles reverse those in the passage.
Bataille: Eroticism approaches violence, taboo, dissolution, and the boundary between individuality and death.
Sadomasochistic polarity: Male aggression and female submission are imagined as complementary forms of sexual fulfillment.
Greek pederastic tradition: Reproduction belongs to relations with women, while formative love, education, and loyalty exist between men.
Aristotelian philia: The highest friendship rests upon equality, shared virtue, and recognition of another self.
Platonic eros: Love between men can be idealized as an ascent from appetite toward beauty, education, and shared excellence.
Plato’s Republic: Reproduction and child-rearing can be separated from private families and subordinated to civic order.
Spartan civic mythology: Men owe military service, women owe biological continuity, and children ultimately belong to the polis.
Campanella: The City of the Sun places mating, reproduction, education, and hereditary improvement under communal direction.
Hobbes: Conflicting private appetites require a sovereign power capable of imposing a stable public order.
Civic republicanism: Freedom means protection from arbitrary private domination, not exemption from public duty.
Rousseau: Civic obligation can express freedom when citizens participate in an organic political whole.
Organic statism: The individual receives purpose and liberty through service to the continuing life of the community.
Engels: The monogamous family develops alongside property, inheritance, and the preservation of private wealth.
Utopian socialism: Domestic labor, education, and child-rearing can be transferred from isolated households to communal institutions.
Shulamith Firestone: Biological reproduction and the private family reproduce sexual dependency and must be technologically or socially overcome.
Eugenic technocracy: Reproduction becomes a planned public function directed toward the cultivation of future leadership.
Sex separatism: Men and women can discharge necessary reproductive duties without organizing their entire emotional lives around one another. | 22 |
| 10 | Friendship, or Philia - is brotherhood, it’s a pursuit of equality, of finding the same soul across two hearts. It’s literally the opposite of the sexual dynamic between men & women. That’s why there’s fraternity among men generally, and why men & women are in gender warfare seemingly perpetually. We’re not friends, and your wife takes advantage of your idealistic romanticism, and placing her on a pedestal to appease her. She also hates you for it, as you lose sexual value in her eyes for doing so. If you don’t do it, she’ll leave you and take all your shit. How dare you stand up to her and not be willing to counter her option to just destroy you. She won’t respect you unless you beat the shit out of her, and believably threaten her life if she tries to leave you. Then maybe you can have a happy marriage where she actually does feel engrossed with you. She ain’t finding that anywhere else, huge value. But she will shit test to you make sure you’ll still beat her ass.
All of this is just terrible to me. We shouldn’t have to beat & enslave women, nor religiously brainwash them, to make a system like marriage - which doesn’t work without coercion, work.
Every man should be drafted into a local militia for 4 years. And every woman should be drafted for insemination and childbirth for 4 years. That is your duty to the state.
Children shouldn’t be raised by families, but by the state. When they come of age, young men should find a mentor to be his best friend & role model, his property inheritance should pass down to his romantic friends. Young ladies should be given to the women, to go be feminists, drink wine, and play with cats, and go do whatever she wants. Likewise, men should go do whatever they want. Nothing should be barred from women, except military service. Nothing should be barred from men except having a womb. If a man & a woman want to marry, that’s fine - it should be a financial, political, or social arrangement, with only breach of contract divorce, to include a lawsuit against whatever party broke the terms. If they want to raise their own child together, they should not be able to. Any child they make together, should go to the state. The biological family is an institution that only causes tensions and corruption within the state. State managed eugenics, universal kinship in the state, and curated education & development of children who are superior to their peers, for leadership roles within the state. If you want to raise children go work in the state nursery.
I don’t believe marriage is a sacrament of anything, it’s a business arrangement. If you end up liking each other, great, that’s very nice.
The Tibetan case is functional, but coercive. The modern marriage is liberating but dysfunctional. And civic reproduction is functional, liberating from private domination and permanent sexual dependency, while remaining dutiful to the organic community. | 24 |
| 11 | Some Muslim account reshared this old video from out of Tibet calling them savages and human traffickers for their marriage traditions.
Polyandry - when 2 or more men are married to the same woman - is a fairly common thing in some parts of Tibet among brothers. It has to do with how inheritance works.
You and your brothers marry the same woman, and live in the same household - so that all the brothers get to keep the inheritance, and neither the “family farm” so to speak, has to get split up in 4 ways, or 3 of the brothers end up without any inheritance and dies poor, homeless, and impoverished.
It’s a sensible system.
The marriages are often arranged marriages based on karma & divinations, which is why she’s crying and throwing a fit - there’s no romance there, it’s not impossible that this is the first time they’ve met.
Genuinely, what’s the problem? Arranged marriages are superior to “romantic” marriages, because there’s no such thing as romance between men & women. There’s just not.
What there is - for men - is appetite based attraction and youthfulness, an appetite based drive for procreation, and thereafter a psychological/emotional dependency relationship that forms.
For women - there is the appetite based procreative impulse, but also opportunistic status & value seeking … she will fall out of love with you if you’re a loser in a heartbeat. Something many men don’t understand is that women’s sexual attraction is heady, and of the brain - not visual. Hypergamy is real, but they genuinely don’t care if another man would find you physically attractive, they care if you are the most socially & financially successful. “The CEO” versus the gym rat. They will fall in “love” with the CEO their age gapped 30 years with, over the hot 19 year old twunk that works at the gas station. That’s not to say physical fitness has no sexual market value at all, of course it does - but this is geared more towards fucking physically attractive men for the sake of their own social status, they don’t even see you like a person, you’re just a dildo in their quest to feel like they deserve to marry someone who looks like you & is a movie star. It’s why liberal women fuck black men, virtue signaling to other women because liberal media has given blacks an artificially inflated sexual market value. They’re more animalistic than civilized, and women seek the uncivilized rape experience … though they don’t have a problem then virtue signaling how they got raped and getting the rapist thrown in jail (yet again, inflating their view of themselves to others - look girlies, the predator wanted me, and it was SUCH an aggressive experience, I got fucked so brutally, you’ll never understand).
Romance between men & women is fake, and the further we’ve drifted away from our own era of patriarchal arranged marriages, and into “marriages of love”, the more the divorce rate has gone up.
Women will confuse the “fun” of you simping for them, and taking them on trips, and being doled upon, with being in love. So when you’re in your 7th year of marriage, and you’re grinding away at work to provide a life for your family - they’re apt to just take the kids and leave your ass for someone that “makes her feel special” again. That is, someone with some sexual market value, since you have lost yours in her eyes. If she loses the kids & gets no money or house, maybe your value stays high. But as soon as no fault divorce let her just take your shit and then double up her income with someone else - you become the sucker. This changes if she’s involved in social groups that makes a virtue out of being the perfect wife, which are often small town, Christian church communities, with family that meets up often. When the values of the group changes, so does the sexual strategy.
Nevertheless, where’s the romance? In real life, romance happens between men. It’s the basis of friendship.
You can’t be friends with a girl, no matter how much we might like them or find them agreeable & sweet … we can’t be friends with them. | 25 |
| 12 |  بدون متن... | 26 |
| 13 |  بدون متن... | 39 |
| 14 |  بدون متن... | 45 |
| 15 |  بدون متن... | 60 |
| 16 |  بدون متن... | 114 |
| 17 |  Nobody else has this level of motion | 113 |
| 18 |  بدون متن... | 112 |
| 19 |  بدون متن... | 112 |
| 20 |  بدون متن... | 107 |
