2 147
订阅者
-424 小时
-57 天
+130 天
数据加载中...
吸引订阅者
七月 '26
七月 '26
+18
在2个频道中
六月 '26
+83
在7个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+95
在9个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+64
在14个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+50
在8个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+156
在9个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+151
在14个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '250
在9个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+25
在10个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+91
在11个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+207
在15个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+58
在8个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+55
在5个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+71
在9个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+8
在2个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+31
在2个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+44
在4个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+39
在3个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+57
在2个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+55
在9个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '240
在19个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+53
在5个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+65
在6个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+99
在15个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+273
在11个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+200
在13个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+278
在7个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+335
在4个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+308
在11个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+314
在13个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+243
在10个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+304
在10个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+157
在13个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+165
在6个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+691
在0个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 11 七月 | 0 | |||
| 10 七月 | 0 | |||
| 09 七月 | 0 | |||
| 08 七月 | +4 | |||
| 07 七月 | +2 | |||
| 06 七月 | +1 | |||
| 05 七月 | +2 | |||
| 04 七月 | 0 | |||
| 03 七月 | +3 | |||
| 02 七月 | +1 | |||
| 01 七月 | +5 |
频道帖子
Oh, in another way - it’s not the votes that count, or even he who counts the votes … it’s the party bosses who decides ahead of time, who the candidates will be.
| 2 | Imagine you are a king, with two nobles who threaten your power.
If you were to threaten them, they would unite against you.
But if you were to bribe them - they would simply be expensive allies.
So what do you do? You need to control them somehow?
Nobleman A loves Military Glory.
Nobleman B loves his Family Heritage.
So you secretly fund a group of scholars to “discover” a battlefield (of a battle which never took place) - on Nobleman B’s property, which Nobleman A’s family supposedly once fought in.
Suddenly, Nobleman A & B each have a reason for wanting to keep land for themselves.
>no risk for alliance
And … they come to you, for your aid and favor. No need for a bribe, you have the power to give them what they want. You can milk that ambition, play them off each other, and ultimately - control them both.
You don’t actually have to take away either of their free will. You just set the stage for their free will to operate within. | 44 |
| 3 | Imagine you are a king, with two nobles who threaten your power.
If you were to threaten them, they would unite against you.
But if you were to bribe them | 1 |
| 4 | We’re in big trouble - but people don’t want to connect the dots, because it is just very uncomfortable to do.
They’re not caught up in the same superficial layers of engagement we are, they’re puppet mastering our reactions - which means they preserve the vitality of action. The game is currently in their hands. | 41 |
| 5 | Absolutely, but the game is much more sinister than American Imperialism vs 3rd Worldist Multi-Polarity.
The NWO is coming, and the Architects of such are the deep power behind both. It is an occult war.
But the truth of the matter, is the painful fact that no one wants to speak of.
It’s “God”, or the “Gods”, or the “Nazi’s” or what have you.
No one wants to be honest about this, because sometimes it sucks to meet your heroes.
They’re crashing the US, using Multi-Polarity as the battering ram - and their plan is to emerge in the fallout to set up a hyper traditionalist world UN, with a technocratic elite at the top, and a deeply de-populated cattle race at the bottom - not even proper serfs anymore, they’ll have robots for that. We will eat the bug, own nothing, and pretend to be happy.
… and don’t dismiss the climate thing too fast, they’re using it - because when the pole shift stuff comes, they’re going to use that to bludgeon us back to the Stone Age, back hoeing turnips. | 42 |
| 6 | ☝️I think it's difficult to refute this guy's thesis, which is that seeing multipolarity as some sort of salvation from the ravages of the post-human future is delusional. | 37 |
| 7 | "And since all the countries of the world are implementing the same common agenda, I have called the new international reality THE END OF CLASSICAL GEOPOLITICS. In other words, it is obvious that there is only one world center of power, which imposes a single model of the future on all countries.
Beyond the horizontal conflicts between various countries, a single vertical of power is clearly visible. It seems that these conflicts are actually being stimulated by the craftsmen of the New World Order with regard to create the illusion of fundamental contradictions."
https://open.substack.com/pub/iurierosca/p/professor-dugins-avatars-10?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=10v1d0 | 47 |
| 8 |  没有文字... | 64 |
| 9 | If I had to write an updated paper today; I think I would call it “Fighting for the End: The Weaponization of Eschatology Towards the End of History” | 62 |
| 10 | The paper was called “the rebeginning of history” subtitled “the end of American Unipolarity” | 63 |
| 11 | I was right on geopolitics 10 years ago when I wrote a 50-some page paper detailing exactly where the world was going, was correct on like literally everything to a T (all that’s really left is the NATO breakup / war against Russia, and the Chinese move on Taiwan).
My teacher failed that paper because it was “dangerous and unAmerican”. I got everything, the rise of the Right in Europe & America, Brexit, the fall of Assad’s Syria (though I said to ISIS … idk if I’m technically right?), Iran War, constitutional crisis in 2020 election (stop the steal), the rise of multipolarity / 3rd Worldism, America drawing out of Afghanistan, Ukraine, anti-Zionism coming out full force, deportations of immigrants becoming a top charting issue - even the alienation of Europe & America, American imperialism in the western hemisphere (though I did not get “threaten Canada”, but Venezuela, Cuba, and Greenland were on my bingo card - (so was Panama, so maybe I got this wrong, but it was nuanced - I didn’t say there would be an invasion but a throwing out of Chinese influence on the canal, which is true).
Biggest misstep, I think - was I thought ISIS would be more relevant today, and that Turkey would be *more* expansionist than it has been, fighting ISIS. Turkey has been expansionist into Syria, but I thought it would be more.
Anyways, this was all clearly forecastable a decade ago, and it’s been playing out as anyone who was paying attention then, knew it would. I don’t think it’s special insight, it’s just looking at the world with honesty.
Still waiting on Russian incursion into Moldova though, that too is still on the card. | 61 |
| 12 | You still haven't convinced me yet, just because you were right on geopolitics | 58 |
| 13 |  Well, if that last part comes true then I will have *unfortunately* been accurate in the whole process from start to finish | 59 |
| 14 | 🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ — A U.S. official told reporters that the recent strikes on ships in the Strait of Hormuz came from "an errant part" of the Iranian system that "was trying to undermine the deal."
Despite those increased hostilities, a different senior U.S. official said that they think, "Iran is showing a lot of signs of wanting to make this deal." | 55 |
| 15 |  https://www.deseret.com/faith/2020/7/8/21310235/mormon-temple-square-demolition-latter-day-saints-project/
Interesting that the SLC LDS temple is undergoing earthquake proofing in time for next year completion | 76 |
| 16 | Yes, actually - little known benefit of making it to the apocalypse, looting and raiding is on the menu. Very good stimmy. | 83 |
| 17 | Will we be getting a stimulus check | 83 |
| 18 | You might still be okay, the simulated flood maps are not too bad - but you never *truly* know just how big the tsunami wave will be. We can simulate a hypothesis, but it’s not like we have any real life replicable examples to draw data from. The further in and higher up the better, but don’t expect a strict cut off. And besides - getting flooded out by a 5 footer isn’t the same as a 500 footer. Even if you touch water, it doesn’t mean it’s game over necessarily.
I’d worry more about being survivable if the lights go out, if you already have sizable land in a “gray area” location. Maybe build on a tall hill. | 73 |
| 19 | Ouch. I wishfully hoped about twice that size. I have some land a few hours outside that. | 76 |
| 20 |  没有文字... | 86 |
