Enemy Watch — Official
Exposing enemies and infiltrators — exposing and examining unvirtuous elites and their infiltrations. West Asia | South Asia | West Read articles on : https://enemywatch.wordpress.com
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Enemy Watch — Official
Channel Enemy Watch — Official (@enemywatch) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 29 004 subscribers, ranking 2 088 in the Politics category and 1 427 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 29 004 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 21 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -7 over the last 30 days and by 13 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 6.47%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 5.21% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 1 878 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 1 512 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 71.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as imam, iran, resistance, enemy, aggression.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Exposing enemies and infiltrators — exposing and examining unvirtuous elites and their infiltrations.
West Asia | South Asia | West
Read articles on : https://enemywatch.wordpress.com”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 22 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Politics category.
Data loading in progress...
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 22 June | 0 | |||
| 21 June | +22 | |||
| 20 June | +15 | |||
| 19 June | +8 | |||
| 18 June | +3 | |||
| 17 June | +3 | |||
| 16 June | +1 | |||
| 15 June | +4 | |||
| 14 June | +5 | |||
| 13 June | +10 | |||
| 12 June | +13 | |||
| 11 June | +16 | |||
| 10 June | +35 | |||
| 09 June | +6 | |||
| 08 June | +14 | |||
| 07 June | +157 | |||
| 06 June | +15 | |||
| 05 June | +39 | |||
| 04 June | +9 | |||
| 03 June | +8 | |||
| 02 June | +2 | |||
| 01 June | +14 |
| 2 | —There are no developments in the past hours, other than the same repeated reports and statements by Tasnim and Mehr. Iranian negotiators are using the propaganda of Minab martyrs to maintain emotional influence, while failing to mention that America has assassinated the leader shortly after them. They are negotiating with the killers of the sitting leader, who was the religious sage of the Shia world. They are repeatedly claiming that there is progress, but in reality it will end with no gain. They are lying at every turn; they neither clearly deny nor fully admit.
We do not trust them, nor their rhetoric—If negotiations fail, the armed forces will retaliate. We do not support this at present. They are trying hard to compromise and gain something that America will never grant them in return. They also want to stop the demonstrations on the streets, which were appreciated by the Leader, who said that public presence on the streets affects the outcomes of negotiations.
Pezeshkian yesterday tried to indirectly stop these demonstrations, which is a dangerous move. Anyways, we will decide whether to support or not based on the outcomes. We call for alertness and urge people to remain alert. Whenever there is a smell of betrayal, people must be on the streets. These protests do not serve the enemies, but remaining silent serves them. We are under the command of our Imam, Imam Mujtaba Khamenei, who called us to remain on the streets to influence the progress and course of the negotiations, and that also confirms that the Leader knew many things would happen in this process.
🔹@enemywatch | 307 |
| 3 | Araghchi is a pupil of Javad Zarif, and he may be even more dangerous than him. | 1 644 |
| 4 | —So far, it is the same Araghchi-style talks, and nothing has changed. Ironically, the team reportedly left the venue after Trump issued threats. How long will this foolishness continue, believing that America is genuinely a party to negotiations? If Pakistan has any self-respect, it should withdraw from this dirty game.
Nothing meaningful will come out of this, and America is not a sincere party to these talks. Iran's high command must question the Foreign Ministry and the negotiating team on what basis these discussions are continuing. It is also reasonable to ask why no one considers the possibility that other backchannel discussions may be taking place alongside these meetings.
🔹@enemywatch | 2 988 |
| 5 | —Due to the current ongoing situation in Zurich, first and foremost, we do not trust either side, as both tend to present narratives that suit their own positions or attempts to manage the situation.
That is why we urge readers to rely on the actual outcomes rather than one-line summaries or official statements and postures from either side.
No negotiation will work unless the team clearly confirms its stance on Imam Mujtaba Khamenei’s position and verifies what differs across the available options and interpretations.
🔹@enemywatch | 1 942 |
| 6 | 📢 | Hourly Updates
1. Iranian negotiating team held an internal meeting in Zurich, Switzerland, to review the latest developments in negotiations. The team conducted a 90-minute session assessing U.S. commitments under the Islamabad understanding and coordinated follow-up steps regarding alleged non-implementation. The agenda included meetings with Swiss, Qatari, and Pakistani delegations, along with a planned quadrilateral session involving the United States, Qatar, and Pakistan.
2. Iraqi authorities raised the level of border security with Syria due to increasing threats from extremist groups, particularly ISIS. Iraqi intelligence estimates suggest militant numbers in Syria have risen significantly, prompting enhanced patrols, armored deployments, and expanded surveillance infrastructure along the border.
3. Advisor to Iran’s Supreme Leader and former acting president Mohammad Mokhber stated that no one has the authority to cross the Leader’s red lines. He added that Iran’s commitments are reciprocal and warned that any violation by the United States would result in Iran also suspending its obligations, citing historical distrust over the past decades.
4. Iranian state television IRIB reported that trilateral talks between Iran, the United States, and Qatar have begun in Switzerland as part of ongoing negotiations related to the memorandum of understanding.
5. Reports from southern Lebanon indicated that an Israeli force, including several vehicles, infiltrated from the Azrael area toward Shanouh on the outskirts of Kfarshouba in the Hasbaya district.
6. Asnim News Agency, citing a source close to the negotiating team, stated that reopening of the Strait of Hormuz would not proceed while the ceasefire in Lebanon is not respected and until exemptions for Iranian oil sales are issued.
🔹@enemywatch | 1 786 |
| 7 | 📢 | Hourly Updates
1. Hezbollah Political Council Vice President Mahmoud Qamati stated that Hezbollah will not surrender its weapons, saying Israel and the United States have failed to disarm the group. He said Hezbollah’s arms will remain within the “army–state–resistance” framework to protect Lebanon.
2. Israeli forces reportedly carried out a ground incursion into the village of Abadin west of Daraa with around 10 vehicles, conducting house searches.
3. Gaza health authorities reported 9 martyrs and 41 injuries in the past 24 hours due to Israeli operations, with additional victims believed to be trapped under rubble. Since the ceasefire (11 October 2025), reported totals include 1,021 martyrs, 3,249 injuries, and 784 recovered bodies. Since 7 October 2023, totals reportedly reach 73,032 martyrs and 173,357 injuries.
4. Esmaeil Baghaei stated from Switzerland that no new signing ceremony will be held, confirming the memorandum has already entered into force. He added that discussions are focused on implementation of specific clauses, including ending the war on all fronts, and linking progress on sanctions relief and asset release to compliance.
5. Reports from Israeli media indicated that the United States and Iran had digitally signed the memorandum of understanding, which is now in effect. Additional statements attributed to Iranian officials confirmed a digital signing format and linked implementation steps, including maritime arrangements in the Strait of Hormuz, to the agreement’s entry into force.
6. Fadlallah stated that Israel is conducting incursions into Syrian territory, including Abadin near Daraa with military vehicles searching homes.
7. Reports from Lebanon described continued Israeli aerial activity over multiple towns, including Toula, Harouf, Zebdine, and Arnoun, alongside drone operations.
8. A report noted that a drone strike may have targeted the town of Habbouch in southern Lebanon.
9. Hezbollah Political Council Vice President Mahmoud Qamati reiterated that Hezbollah’s weapons are non-negotiable and part of Lebanon’s defense structure, rejecting disarmament demands.
10. Israeli Channel 12 reported the agreement between the United States and Iran was signed digitally and is in force, according to senior U.S. officials.
11. Iranian Foreign Minister Esmail Baghaei stated that Iran’s missile and defense capabilities are not subject to negotiation under any framework, while also referencing clauses in the memorandum concerning Lebanon and future talks on nuclear and sanctions issues.
12. Reports from Lebanon described ongoing Israeli drone activity and surveillance over multiple southern towns.
13. Footage was circulated showing the moment of the memorandum signing attributed to former U.S. President Donald Trump.
14. Initial reports indicated a drone strike in Habbouch, along with continued Israeli aerial activity in southern Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch | 1 492 |
| 8 | 🌐 Global Voice Network
A unified network of Telegram channels delivering reliable updates from across the world — all in one place.
🛰What you’ll find:
🔴Real-time global updates as events unfold
🔴In-depth coverage of geopolitical developments
🔴Thoughtful analysis on political and military affairs
🔴Content available in multiple languages for a wider reach
📊 Built on coordination, verification, and shared effort — bringing together voices from different regions into one structured network.
📢Stay ahead, stay aware, stay connected globally:
Join here | 1 290 |
| 9 | 🇮🇷| ❗️Full story behind betraying Iran’s leader, as narrated by Khanalizadeh
According to Khanalizadeh, a prominent Iranian journalist, after the Leader’s martyrdom, the US quickly asked for a ceasefire, which Iran naturally rejected.
After the new Leader was chosen, Iranian officials prepared a 5-point plan for talks with the US, but the Leader rejected it.
After several rounds of revision, a 10-point framework was produced, which became the basis of the first SNSC statement. The Leader also added 8 extra conditions to that framework, including that there should be no nuclear negotiations at all.
He says the US initially accepted those 10 points as the basis because it needed a ceasefire, but once the Iranian team reached Islamabad, the Americans refused to negotiate on that basis.
Despite the Leader’s written instruction, the Iranian side reportedly discussed the nuclear file.
This made the Americans conclude that Iran did not really want to continue the war, and that if they pushed hard, they could extract concessions.
After Islamabad, the negotiating team sent reports to the Leader.
The Leader reacted negatively and objected, saying they had acted against religious/legal duty by discussing the nuclear issue and by failing to impose the 10 conditions.
Some SNSC members then wrote to him, arguing that talks could not happen without the nuclear issue and warned about continued war and attacks on infrastructure.
The Leader replied that “these negotiations would benefit neither their worldly affairs nor their afterlife,” and would not prevent Iran’s infrastructure from being hit.
After that, the negotiating team restarted message exchanges, completely set aside the 10-point framework, and pursued a new 14-point plan initiated by the Foreign Ministry, which became the Islamabad MoU.
The SNSC approved it and sent it to the Leader, but he gave no answer for about 2 weeks.
SNSC officials then considered treating his silence as approval, but at that meeting a letter from the Leader arrived with questions for each SNSC member.
Each member answered, and officials gave written commitments explaining how the clauses would be interpreted and implemented.
One example given is that the “non-interference” clause (US not interfering in Iran’s affairs( would mean shutting down some hostile anti-propaganda media outlets (such as Iran International, ManotoTV, …).
Only after these written commitments did the Leader authorize the MoU.
Khanealizadeh says this is the context behind the Leader’s phrase: “I had a different view.”
The Leader was not merely opposed to parts of the final MoU; he was against the whole post-Islamabad negotiation path once it moved away from the original 10-point framework.
The process, according to him, went forward because of pressure and insistence from the SNSC.
@FotrosResistancee | 816 |
| 10 | —With all seriousness, there is an urgent demand for the Pezeshkian government to release the full conditions that were given regarding negotiations by Imam Sayyid Mujtaba Khamenei.
🔹@enemywatch | 2 073 |
| 11 | 🇵🇸|Explosions continue in both Gaza City and Khan Yunis, but are not Israeli attacks. The IDF is currently demolishing infrastructure in east Khan Yunis and northeast Gaza City.
🔹@enemywatch | 2 058 |
| 12 | 🇱🇧 | Al-Mayadeen reporter in southern Lebanon reported an airstrike by the Zionist regime on the city of Nabatieh in southern Lebanon, coinciding with the start of the alleged ceasefire.
🔹@enemywatch | 2 055 |
| 13 | Israel will leave Lebanon only if Iranian missiles fall over it and its trade is cut through Bab al-Mandeb. | 2 028 |
| 14 | —israel will not leave southern Lebanon except through a fallacy: When Americans are supposedly against israel and are seen as asking them to act, it becomes almost laughable if any analyst believes these narratives. Iran is reportedly engaged in talks in Switzerland, which are described as nothing more than discussions without real outcome, similar to arrangements made in Islamabad. israel may escalate further under its own command, not under any deep American control, and could even strike Beirut again. Take it as it is; it will not lead to any meaningful result.
🔹@enemywatch | 1 941 |
| 15 | There is no Netanyahu versus Trump; so the rest is a lie. | 1 950 |
| 16 | 🇱🇧 | #Hezbollah — 20/06/2026 |Hezbollah Operations Room:
In light of the claims and lies that the Zionist enemy continues to promote regarding alleged violations of the ceasefire agreement by Hezbollah, in an attempt to justify its ongoing aggression against Lebanon and the massacres it commits against civilians, Hezbollah Media Relations affirms that these claims are completely baseless. They fall within the framework of the enemy's continuous attempts to mislead public opinion and are part of its clear and blatant effort to sabotage the agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America.
The number of documented violations and breaches by the Zionist enemy since dawn on Friday has exceeded 300. These have included airstrikes by warplanes and drones, artillery shelling of various calibers, and the firing of phosphorus shells at more than 25 towns and villages, including the city of Nabatieh. These attacks have resulted in the deaths of more than 111 martyrs and injuries to 176 people. Initial reports indicate that the enemy used internationally prohibited cluster bombs.
The number of violations and attacks since this morning has reached at least 180, resulting in more than 28 martyrs, including three Lebanese Army soldiers, and 35 wounded.
It is clear that this deceitful and treacherous enemy has never adhered to the terms of the ceasefire agreements, neither those of November 27, 2024, nor April 8, 2026, nor after the announcement of the Memorandum of Understanding between Iran and the United States on June 14, 2026, nor even yesterday, Friday, June 19, 2026. Instead, it has continued its violations and breaches of Lebanese sovereignty through airstrikes, shelling, the destruction of homes, the terrorizing of citizens, and the killing of civilians.
These blatant facts clearly demonstrate who is violating the ceasefire agreement and undermining existing understandings. Indeed, the Zionist enemy's attacks and massacres are no longer mere breaches of the ceasefire agreement, but rather constitute outright aggression and a continuation of the war in every sense of the word. Therefore, full responsibility lies with the Zionist occupation, whose officials have repeatedly and publicly declared their rejection of existing agreements and their refusal to withdraw from the occupied Lebanese territories. All countries and officials, especially the United States, must exert pressure on the occupying entity to compel it to implement the agreements and cease its attacks, instead of leveling accusations left and right.
Hezbollah affirms that Lebanon, its people, and its resistance have the right to defend their land and sovereignty against ongoing Zionist aggression and violations. No one has the right to deprive them of this right, which is guaranteed by all international laws and conventions. The enemy's attempts to establish freedom of movement to continue its attacks are unacceptable and will not go unanswered. The expulsion of the occupation from our land is only a matter of time.
🔹@enemywatch
+ | 1 825 |
| 17 | You will not be left alone, even if your father was. Perhaps we can do more for you than merely repeat slogans like, 'We are not the people of Kufa, and we will not abandon you'. We will not allow the enemy to witness your tents burning in Tehran without standing by your side. | 1 438 |
| 18 | —The moment we saw Shaykh Naim Qassim, delivering what sounded like a sermon before/of martyrdom, while our mourning blood relatives in Lebanon were being shattered into pieces, we considered it the time to speak, not to copy and paste optimistic rants. Stand for Lebanon. Fight for Lebanon. Avenge their blood too. That should be the rule. The rest is nothing but rhetoric and a dangerous prolonging of the suffering.
🔹@enemywatch | 1 416 |
| 19 | —We are born out of a culture of constructive criticism. We know who the enemy is and who is not enemy but merely stepping out of line. We respect our officials, but we do not worship them. We obey our Wali al-Faqih, and if, at the very same moment, our parents were to pass away while the Leader summoned us, we would rush to him first. That is our logic and our commitment.
We do not hesitate to criticize even our own father or our own brother if they cross the line or insult the Leader. Loyalty is not built upon personalities, relationships, or emotions. It is built upon principles, discipline, and obedience. We do not remain silent out of blind attachment, nor do we justify mistakes because of titles or positions. We speak when necessary, we criticize when necessary, and we remain within the limits of respect and responsibility.
You can boycott us if you wish. We do not fear it, and we certainly do not measure ourselves by popularity. We stand as guards at the doors of our Leader and the martyrs. Boycott us, boycott Enemy Watch, but think carefully before doing so. Ask yourself whether you are rejecting people because they speak uncomfortable truths or because they refuse to compromise on their principles.
🔹@enemywatch | 1 344 |
| 20 | —As of now, the dust is beginning to settle, and it is becoming much clearer what has been going on. Another layer of disgrace has now been added after Iranian FM spokesperson Baghaei announced, shortly after the declaration regarding the closure of the Strait, that the Iranian delegation would travel to Switzerland today "to follow up on and demand the implementation of the other side's commitments" in the MoU.
This is nothing short of shameful. Araghchi is pushing for a return while the blood of the martyrs is still fresh. Hopefully, Marandi will not once again bend over backwards to justify everything with the same old arguments he repeatedly throws around to appease the armchair audience on X.
It is now crystal clear that the Wali al-Faqih, whose authority stands far above these officials, explicitly stated that he approved the agreement only because the government assured him it would be implemented as promised. Glory to the Constitution, under which the armed forces remain under the command of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution. Today, his official X account clearly reiterated that every drop of blood must be avenged. It is becoming increasingly evident that the Leader will step in when the time is right.
During the time of the martyred Imam Khamenei, whose life was weighed down by countless hardships imposed by the reformists, perhaps the ongoing war was never fought at the level that the circumstances demanded, nor was the resistance front supported in the manner required. The government should have acted in accordance with the Leader's guidance and the demands of the hour instead of placing all its eggs in one basket.
Anyways, we are witnessing a remarkably firm stand from Imam Mujtaba Khamenei in this scenario. As the saying goes, "The water has risen above the head." That is precisely why the Leader has stepped in directly.
Qalibaf will have to answer for the closure of Parliament and the series of blunders surrounding the withdrawal from the NPT and other related issues. As has now been confirmed, the Leader is safe, thanks to the dedicated members of the Majlis-e Khubregan who continue to safeguard the leader. Iran and Hezbollah have clearly learned many lessons in preventing and countering assassination attempts.
Overall, the situation remains under control, but it is far from satisfactory. There is still a great deal that must be put right.
🔹@enemywatch | 3 589 |
Available now! Telegram Research 2025 — the year's key insights 
