Free Open Source Posthumanism
📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Free Open Source Posthumanism
Channel Free Open Source Posthumanism (@shitposthumanism) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 12 014 subscribers, ranking 10 040 in the Technologies & Applications category and 2 940 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 12 014 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 02 October, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 157 over the last 30 days and by 2 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 53.89%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 19.38% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 6 476 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 2 329 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 178.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Low Tech Low Life
feedback: @fosshplus_v2_bot”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 03 October, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
Data loading in progress...
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 03 October | 0 | |||
| 02 October | +4 | |||
| 01 October | +8 |
| 2 | No text... | 5 220 |
| 3 | No text... | 6 039 |
| 4 | No text... | 5 814 |
| 5 | No text... | 7 219 |
| 6 | No text... | 7 250 |
| 7 | No text... | 6 314 |
| 8 | No text... | 7 633 |
| 9 | No text... | 6 704 |
| 10 | He has three different reflux condensers hooked up with the same trap in the same configuration, which doesn't really make any sense.
also, how are both his separatory funnels completely spotless.
none of the bottles in the background have Carolina Chemical, CC-S, or DIYchemicals printed on them. These are the main three suppliers willing to ship chemicals to residential addresses. Unless he has a proxy business taking hazmat deliveries on his behalf, then he is not doing at-home chemistry unassisted.
A quick google search reveals ︀︀PAC-3310 is tied to a Chinese pharmaceutical
also, the molecule itself isn't published anywhere and is being kept confidential for clinical trials
In general, chatGPT is pretty shit at chemistry. However, if you give it a synthesis paper, it could probably distill into moree digestible instructions. However, I HIGHLY recommend you learn enough chemistry to where you don't need to rely on an LLM walking you through jargon in a synthesis paper.
Lastly, why did this guy not DIY his own fume hood? maybe the shit I do at home is more toxic than his stuff, but either he's either rawdogging toxic fumes or is doing this in full tyvec PPE. | 6 629 |
| 11 | You may have seen this image circulating around social media the last day or so.
Well, I'm call bullshit that he did anything with the setup in the second picture. | 5 761 |
| 12 | No text... | 5 964 |
| 13 | No text... | 7 572 |
| 14 | No text... | 9 565 |
| 15 | No text... | 8 644 |
| 16 | No text... | 9 776 |
| 17 | No text... | 10 311 |
| 18 | No text... | 12 863 |
| 19 | No text... | 7 559 |
| 20 | No text... | 10 361 |
