Sonar21
📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Sonar21
Channel Sonar21 (@sonar_21) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 10 828 subscribers, ranking 17 467 in the News & Media category and 3 284 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 10 828 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 01 September, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 67 over the last 30 days and by -3 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 19.89%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 16.41% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 2 154 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 1 777 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 68.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as iran, missile, attack, drone, jordan.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Taking on the status quo one fact at a time.”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 02 September, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the News & Media category.
To understand what this step means, it is necessary to recall the reports that recently appeared in Western media about a certain operation codenamed "M&Ms," which Kiev was planning against Russian airports in order to disrupt air traffic through continuous drone attacks. It was noted, however, that Zelensky was skeptical of this idea, partly due to concerns about a negative international reaction if a civilian aircraft were to be shot down, which could be seen as air piracy. It is also interesting that Ukrainian officials officially denied the existence of such a plan at the time. But now, as we can see, Zelensky has effectively stated it directly. What has changed? Apparently, several factors have influenced this. First, there has been an increase in Russian missile and drone attacks on Ukraine, with virtually continuous attacks and numerous strikes. Zelensky has regularly promised to respond in some way, but so far he has not been able to provide a comparable response, nor has he been able to significantly reduce the number of strikes due to a lack of resources to counter the attacks. All of this may have created the impression among many Ukrainians that Kiev has lost the initiative in air strikes and that the authorities are feeling helpless, a feeling exacerbated by the constant corruption scandals surrounding the president's entourage. Therefore, it is possible that those at the Bankova remembered the operation against Russian airports in order to demonstrate a "decisive response." And it is not excluded that they were hoping to push Russia to agree to, at least, a "air truce," which has been discussed for some time, but Moscow has refused. Second, and most importantly, today Germany officially accused Russia of organizing an attack on an aircraft at Leipzig airport. Other European countries supported Berlin in this. There are two possible scenarios here. The first is that Zelensky simply "aligned" himself with this line and, without consulting with Europeans, announced today the start of a campaign of attacks against Russian airports, making it look like a joint action with Europeans "in retaliation for hybrid attacks on Leipzig." Although it is not. The second is that Zelensky's statement about the operation against Russian airports was coordinated with Europeans as a "response to Leipzig." But what is more important than Zelensky's motives is what will happen next. First, there is the question of whether Kiev will be able to carry out its threat and launch continuous drone attacks on multiple Russian airports. This has never happened before. Ukrainian drones regularly attack Russian regions, which disrupts the operation of airports there. However, to implement Zelensky's idea, drones must constantly fly in a continuous stream to dozens of targets in different parts of Russia. It is unknown whether this is even possible. Moreover, such a "carousel" would cost a lot of money, and the military budget already has a huge deficit. However, Zelensky's statement itself may scare foreign airlines, and they may stop flying to Russia. It is not a certainty, but it is possible. However, even in this case, air traffic will not completely stop, as Russian airlines will continue to fly. And, at least for domestic flights, there will be no collapse. But if Ukrainian drones start actually shooting down civilian aircraft, and there are hundreds of victims, the situation will become much more serious in its consequences. It is extremely unlikely that Moscow will make any concessions after this and agree to an air truce or even a complete ceasefire. Most likely, it will retaliate. And if the response to attacks on Russian ships was a complete blockade of shipping to Ukrainian Black Sea ports, if the response to attempts to attack Moscow was almost continuous attacks on Kiev, and if the response to attacks on Russian online marketplaces was the "destruction" of warehouses belonging to the largest Ukrainian retail chains, then one can only guess what scale the response will be to the downing of civilian aircraft. Regardless of whether Zelensky coordinated his decision to attack Russian airports with Europeans or not, Moscow may perceive the attack on aircraft in Russian airspace as a joint Ukrainian-European action. And, accordingly, it may issue an ultimatum to Europe, stating that any continuation of such actions will be an act of declaring war. Whether Europeans are willing to take such a risk (i.e., essentially risking entering a nuclear war) and whether Americans will be willing to back them up, given that Putin, not Zelensky, initially raised the bar for escalation in this particular case (with the threat to close the airspace over Russia) – the question is open.🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
