Sonar21
📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Sonar21
El canal Sonar21 (@sonar_21) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 10 828 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 17 467 en la categoría Noticias y medios y el puesto 3 284 en la región EEUU.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 10 828 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 01 septiembre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 67, y en las últimas 24 horas de -3, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 19.89%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 16.41% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 2 154 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 1 777 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 68.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como iran, missile, attack, drone, jordan.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“Taking on the status quo one fact at a time.”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 02 septiembre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Noticias y medios.
To understand what this step means, it is necessary to recall the reports that recently appeared in Western media about a certain operation codenamed "M&Ms," which Kiev was planning against Russian airports in order to disrupt air traffic through continuous drone attacks. It was noted, however, that Zelensky was skeptical of this idea, partly due to concerns about a negative international reaction if a civilian aircraft were to be shot down, which could be seen as air piracy. It is also interesting that Ukrainian officials officially denied the existence of such a plan at the time. But now, as we can see, Zelensky has effectively stated it directly. What has changed? Apparently, several factors have influenced this. First, there has been an increase in Russian missile and drone attacks on Ukraine, with virtually continuous attacks and numerous strikes. Zelensky has regularly promised to respond in some way, but so far he has not been able to provide a comparable response, nor has he been able to significantly reduce the number of strikes due to a lack of resources to counter the attacks. All of this may have created the impression among many Ukrainians that Kiev has lost the initiative in air strikes and that the authorities are feeling helpless, a feeling exacerbated by the constant corruption scandals surrounding the president's entourage. Therefore, it is possible that those at the Bankova remembered the operation against Russian airports in order to demonstrate a "decisive response." And it is not excluded that they were hoping to push Russia to agree to, at least, a "air truce," which has been discussed for some time, but Moscow has refused. Second, and most importantly, today Germany officially accused Russia of organizing an attack on an aircraft at Leipzig airport. Other European countries supported Berlin in this. There are two possible scenarios here. The first is that Zelensky simply "aligned" himself with this line and, without consulting with Europeans, announced today the start of a campaign of attacks against Russian airports, making it look like a joint action with Europeans "in retaliation for hybrid attacks on Leipzig." Although it is not. The second is that Zelensky's statement about the operation against Russian airports was coordinated with Europeans as a "response to Leipzig." But what is more important than Zelensky's motives is what will happen next. First, there is the question of whether Kiev will be able to carry out its threat and launch continuous drone attacks on multiple Russian airports. This has never happened before. Ukrainian drones regularly attack Russian regions, which disrupts the operation of airports there. However, to implement Zelensky's idea, drones must constantly fly in a continuous stream to dozens of targets in different parts of Russia. It is unknown whether this is even possible. Moreover, such a "carousel" would cost a lot of money, and the military budget already has a huge deficit. However, Zelensky's statement itself may scare foreign airlines, and they may stop flying to Russia. It is not a certainty, but it is possible. However, even in this case, air traffic will not completely stop, as Russian airlines will continue to fly. And, at least for domestic flights, there will be no collapse. But if Ukrainian drones start actually shooting down civilian aircraft, and there are hundreds of victims, the situation will become much more serious in its consequences. It is extremely unlikely that Moscow will make any concessions after this and agree to an air truce or even a complete ceasefire. Most likely, it will retaliate. And if the response to attacks on Russian ships was a complete blockade of shipping to Ukrainian Black Sea ports, if the response to attempts to attack Moscow was almost continuous attacks on Kiev, and if the response to attacks on Russian online marketplaces was the "destruction" of warehouses belonging to the largest Ukrainian retail chains, then one can only guess what scale the response will be to the downing of civilian aircraft. Regardless of whether Zelensky coordinated his decision to attack Russian airports with Europeans or not, Moscow may perceive the attack on aircraft in Russian airspace as a joint Ukrainian-European action. And, accordingly, it may issue an ultimatum to Europe, stating that any continuation of such actions will be an act of declaring war. Whether Europeans are willing to take such a risk (i.e., essentially risking entering a nuclear war) and whether Americans will be willing to back them up, given that Putin, not Zelensky, initially raised the bar for escalation in this particular case (with the threat to close the airspace over Russia) – the question is open.🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
