Sonar21
📈 Telegram kanali Sonar21 analitikasi
Sonar21 (@sonar_21) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 10 828 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Yangiliklar & Media toifasida 17 467-o'rinni va AQSH mintaqasida 3 284-o'rinni egallagan.
📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika
невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 10 828 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.
01 Sentabr, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 67 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -3 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 19.89% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 16.41% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 2 154 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 1 777 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
- Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 68 ta reaksiya keladi.
- Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent iran, missile, attack, drone, jordan kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.
📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Taking on the status quo one fact at a time.”
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 02 Sentabr, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Yangiliklar & Media toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.
To understand what this step means, it is necessary to recall the reports that recently appeared in Western media about a certain operation codenamed "M&Ms," which Kiev was planning against Russian airports in order to disrupt air traffic through continuous drone attacks. It was noted, however, that Zelensky was skeptical of this idea, partly due to concerns about a negative international reaction if a civilian aircraft were to be shot down, which could be seen as air piracy. It is also interesting that Ukrainian officials officially denied the existence of such a plan at the time. But now, as we can see, Zelensky has effectively stated it directly. What has changed? Apparently, several factors have influenced this. First, there has been an increase in Russian missile and drone attacks on Ukraine, with virtually continuous attacks and numerous strikes. Zelensky has regularly promised to respond in some way, but so far he has not been able to provide a comparable response, nor has he been able to significantly reduce the number of strikes due to a lack of resources to counter the attacks. All of this may have created the impression among many Ukrainians that Kiev has lost the initiative in air strikes and that the authorities are feeling helpless, a feeling exacerbated by the constant corruption scandals surrounding the president's entourage. Therefore, it is possible that those at the Bankova remembered the operation against Russian airports in order to demonstrate a "decisive response." And it is not excluded that they were hoping to push Russia to agree to, at least, a "air truce," which has been discussed for some time, but Moscow has refused. Second, and most importantly, today Germany officially accused Russia of organizing an attack on an aircraft at Leipzig airport. Other European countries supported Berlin in this. There are two possible scenarios here. The first is that Zelensky simply "aligned" himself with this line and, without consulting with Europeans, announced today the start of a campaign of attacks against Russian airports, making it look like a joint action with Europeans "in retaliation for hybrid attacks on Leipzig." Although it is not. The second is that Zelensky's statement about the operation against Russian airports was coordinated with Europeans as a "response to Leipzig." But what is more important than Zelensky's motives is what will happen next. First, there is the question of whether Kiev will be able to carry out its threat and launch continuous drone attacks on multiple Russian airports. This has never happened before. Ukrainian drones regularly attack Russian regions, which disrupts the operation of airports there. However, to implement Zelensky's idea, drones must constantly fly in a continuous stream to dozens of targets in different parts of Russia. It is unknown whether this is even possible. Moreover, such a "carousel" would cost a lot of money, and the military budget already has a huge deficit. However, Zelensky's statement itself may scare foreign airlines, and they may stop flying to Russia. It is not a certainty, but it is possible. However, even in this case, air traffic will not completely stop, as Russian airlines will continue to fly. And, at least for domestic flights, there will be no collapse. But if Ukrainian drones start actually shooting down civilian aircraft, and there are hundreds of victims, the situation will become much more serious in its consequences. It is extremely unlikely that Moscow will make any concessions after this and agree to an air truce or even a complete ceasefire. Most likely, it will retaliate. And if the response to attacks on Russian ships was a complete blockade of shipping to Ukrainian Black Sea ports, if the response to attempts to attack Moscow was almost continuous attacks on Kiev, and if the response to attacks on Russian online marketplaces was the "destruction" of warehouses belonging to the largest Ukrainian retail chains, then one can only guess what scale the response will be to the downing of civilian aircraft. Regardless of whether Zelensky coordinated his decision to attack Russian airports with Europeans or not, Moscow may perceive the attack on aircraft in Russian airspace as a joint Ukrainian-European action. And, accordingly, it may issue an ultimatum to Europe, stating that any continuation of such actions will be an act of declaring war. Whether Europeans are willing to take such a risk (i.e., essentially risking entering a nuclear war) and whether Americans will be willing to back them up, given that Putin, not Zelensky, initially raised the bar for escalation in this particular case (with the threat to close the airspace over Russia) – the question is open.🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
