![Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]](https://cdn.tlmtr.io/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.telemetr.io%2Fc%2F1ylTrQ%2F4956760673744955765%3Fty%3Dl&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
Open in Telegram
📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
Channel Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 123 062 subscribers, ranking 434 in the Politics category and 166 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 123 062 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 02 November, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -1 899 over the last 30 days and by -14 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 16.43%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects N/A% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 20 222 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 0 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 411.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 03 November, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Politics category.
123 062
Subscribers
-1424 hours
-3657 days
-1 89930 days
Posts Archive
![Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]](https://cdn.tlmtr.io/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.telemetr.io%2Fc%2F1ylTrQ%2F4956760673744955765%3Fty%3Dx&w=64&q=75){kind=small}
123 062
Who printed the mail in ballots?
Who sent out the mail-in ballots?
What happened to the mail-in ballots that were RETURNED TO SENDER???
Were returned ballots ultimately used?
If so, who used them?
123 062
In the surprise of the century, RUNBECK has partnered with Dominion Voting Systems.
123 062
RUNBECK made the ballots for Tarrant county that allegedly had a 30% error rate causing the barcodes to be unscannable.
Unscannable barcodes on ballots may cause the ballot to go to digital adjudication where it can be “fixed” by a person.
https://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/election/article246746216.html
123 062
Guess which company prints ballots for Maricopa County?
Ding ding ding!
Its RUNBECK.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2020/09/28/runbeck-election-services-prints-ballots-every-election-season/3523196001/
123 062
Runbeck, a Maricopa County printing company, was allegedly caught sending ballots to Fulton County, Georgia.
Runbeck lists Reynaldo Valenzuela as their only official testimony on their website.
https://runbeck.net
https://worthypolitics.com/breaking-news-arizona-company-who-sent-fake-ballots-to-georgia-is-closely-tied-to-democrat-party/
123 062
Who is the common denominator over the last three decades at the Maricopa County elections office?
123 062
Raynaldo Valenzuela, the permanent elections chief of Maricopa County, has worked for the Maricopa County elections department for nearly thirty years.
I am really curious about who deleted the Maricopa County election database......
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/2017/04/12/maricopa-county-installs-new-elections-director-rey-valenzuela/100391322/
123 062
Who do you think deleted the Maricopa election database?
123 062
Deleting a database under subpoena is illegal.
The vendor who made the machines had access.
The vendor also claims Maricopa County had access.
Since there is no way to say the database wasn’t deleted (it was), now it becomes a game of passing the blame.
123 062
Auditors:
Please give us the password.
Maricopa County:
We never had the password.
Vendor:
Actually we gave Maricopa County the password a few months ago.
123 062
In a high-stakes game of hot potato, the vendor is now claiming that Maricopa County Supervisors DO HAVE THE PASSWORD.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/dominion-announces-willingly-gave-passwords-maricopa-county-auditors-february-refuse-give-passwords-state-senate-audit-team
123 062
Maricopa county supervisors are taking the strategy of “We hired a professional vendor to hold the elections in good faith, we didn’t even have the passwords to the machines”.
The vendor strategy so far is to claim the auditors have no experience and to stonewall any data or information requests.
123 062
According to the AZSOS election procedures manual from 2019, the SECRETARY OF STATE is required to keep the source code in escrow.
If the vendor won’t provide it, then the AZSOS is required to.
https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/2019_ELECTIONS_PROCEDURES_MANUAL_APPROVED.pdf
123 062
Jack Sellers says the county didn’t delete any files.
The county doesn’t even have the admin password.
If the county didn’t do it, then who deleted the files?
🤔🤔🤔
123 062
Look carefully at what Jack Sellers is saying.
He says deleting files from the server is a crime.
He also says county election officials didn’t delete any files.
NOTE: He never says the files were not deleted. He just says that county election officials did not delete files.
Since we already know that the county election officials have never had the administrative password to the machines, then who deleted the files?
WHO DELETED THE FILES, JACK?
