ru
Feedback

Не попадитесь на канал ботавода! Telemetrio находит и помечает такие каналы 👉 Хотите видеть метку — оформите подписку

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Открыть в Telegram

Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Больше

📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Канал Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 123 062 подписчиков, занимая 434 место в категории Политика и 166 место в регионе США.

📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика

С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 123 062 подписчиков.

Согласно последним данным от 02 ноября, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило -1 899, а за последние 24 часа — -14, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.

  • Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
  • Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 16.43%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает N/A% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
  • Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 20 222 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 0 просмотров.
  • Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 411.

📝 Описание и контентная политика

Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]”

Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 03 ноября, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Политика.

123 062
Подписчики
-1424 часа
-3657 дней
-1 89930 дней
Архив постов
Who printed the mail in ballots? Who sent out the mail-in ballots? What happened to the mail-in ballots that were RETURNED TO SENDER??? Were returned ballots ultimately used? If so, who used them?

In the surprise of the century, RUNBECK has partnered with Dominion Voting Systems.
In the surprise of the century, RUNBECK has partnered with Dominion Voting Systems.

RUNBECK made the ballots for Tarrant county that allegedly had a 30% error rate causing the barcodes to be unscannable. Unsca
RUNBECK made the ballots for Tarrant county that allegedly had a 30% error rate causing the barcodes to be unscannable. Unscannable barcodes on ballots may cause the ballot to go to digital adjudication where it can be “fixed” by a person. https://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/election/article246746216.html

Runbeck, a Maricopa County printing company, was allegedly caught sending ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. Runbeck lists Re
Runbeck, a Maricopa County printing company, was allegedly caught sending ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. Runbeck lists Reynaldo Valenzuela as their only official testimony on their website. https://runbeck.net https://worthypolitics.com/breaking-news-arizona-company-who-sent-fake-ballots-to-georgia-is-closely-tied-to-democrat-party/

Who is the common denominator over the last three decades at the Maricopa County elections office?

Raynaldo Valenzuela, the permanent elections chief of Maricopa County, has worked for the Maricopa County elections departmen
Raynaldo Valenzuela, the permanent elections chief of Maricopa County, has worked for the Maricopa County elections department for nearly thirty years. I am really curious about who deleted the Maricopa County election database...... 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/2017/04/12/maricopa-county-installs-new-elections-director-rey-valenzuela/100391322/

photo content

Who do you think deleted the Maricopa election database?
Anonymous voting

Deleting a database under subpoena is illegal. The vendor who made the machines had access. The vendor also claims Maricopa County had access. Since there is no way to say the database wasn’t deleted (it was), now it becomes a game of passing the blame.

Auditors: Please give us the password. Maricopa County: We never had the password. Vendor: Actually we gave Maricopa County the password a few months ago.

In a high-stakes game of hot potato, the vendor is now claiming that Maricopa County Supervisors DO HAVE THE PASSWORD. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/dominion-announces-willingly-gave-passwords-maricopa-county-auditors-february-refuse-give-passwords-state-senate-audit-team

The guilty party is becoming more and more clear.

Maricopa county supervisors are taking the strategy of “We hired a professional vendor to hold the elections in good faith, we didn’t even have the passwords to the machines”. The vendor strategy so far is to claim the auditors have no experience and to stonewall any data or information requests.

According to the AZSOS election procedures manual from 2019, the SECRETARY OF STATE is required to keep the source code in escrow. If the vendor won’t provide it, then the AZSOS is required to. https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/2019_ELECTIONS_PROCEDURES_MANUAL_APPROVED.pdf

photo content
+1

WHO DELETED THE FILES, JACK?

Jack Sellers says the county didn’t delete any files. The county doesn’t even have the admin password. If the county didn’t do it, then who deleted the files? 🤔🤔🤔

Look carefully at what Jack Sellers is saying. He says deleting files from the server is a crime. He also says county electio
Look carefully at what Jack Sellers is saying. He says deleting files from the server is a crime. He also says county election officials didn’t delete any files. NOTE: He never says the files were not deleted. He just says that county election officials did not delete files. Since we already know that the county election officials have never had the administrative password to the machines, then who deleted the files? WHO DELETED THE FILES, JACK?