es
Feedback
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ir al canal en Telegram

Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Mostrar más

📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

El canal Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 132 787 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 391 en la categoría Política y el puesto 159 en la región EEUU.

📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica

Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 132 787 suscriptores.

Según los últimos datos del 25 junio, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -2 605, y en las últimas 24 horas de -15, conservando un alto alcance.

  • Estado de verificación: No verificado
  • Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 18.34%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener N/A% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
  • Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 0 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 0 visualizaciones.
  • Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 0.

📝 Descripción y política de contenido

El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 26 junio, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Política.

132 787
Suscriptores
-1524 horas
-5837 días
-2 60530 días
Archivo de publicaciones
Runbeck, a Maricopa County printing company, was allegedly caught sending ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. Runbeck lists Re
Runbeck, a Maricopa County printing company, was allegedly caught sending ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. Runbeck lists Reynaldo Valenzuela as their only official testimony on their website. https://runbeck.net https://worthypolitics.com/breaking-news-arizona-company-who-sent-fake-ballots-to-georgia-is-closely-tied-to-democrat-party/

Who is the common denominator over the last three decades at the Maricopa County elections office?

Raynaldo Valenzuela, the permanent elections chief of Maricopa County, has worked for the Maricopa County elections departmen
Raynaldo Valenzuela, the permanent elections chief of Maricopa County, has worked for the Maricopa County elections department for nearly thirty years. I am really curious about who deleted the Maricopa County election database...... 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/2017/04/12/maricopa-county-installs-new-elections-director-rey-valenzuela/100391322/

photo content

Who do you think deleted the Maricopa election database?
Anonymous voting

Deleting a database under subpoena is illegal. The vendor who made the machines had access. The vendor also claims Maricopa County had access. Since there is no way to say the database wasn’t deleted (it was), now it becomes a game of passing the blame.

Auditors: Please give us the password. Maricopa County: We never had the password. Vendor: Actually we gave Maricopa County the password a few months ago.

In a high-stakes game of hot potato, the vendor is now claiming that Maricopa County Supervisors DO HAVE THE PASSWORD. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/dominion-announces-willingly-gave-passwords-maricopa-county-auditors-february-refuse-give-passwords-state-senate-audit-team

The guilty party is becoming more and more clear.

Maricopa county supervisors are taking the strategy of “We hired a professional vendor to hold the elections in good faith, we didn’t even have the passwords to the machines”. The vendor strategy so far is to claim the auditors have no experience and to stonewall any data or information requests.

According to the AZSOS election procedures manual from 2019, the SECRETARY OF STATE is required to keep the source code in escrow. If the vendor won’t provide it, then the AZSOS is required to. https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/2019_ELECTIONS_PROCEDURES_MANUAL_APPROVED.pdf

photo content
+1

WHO DELETED THE FILES, JACK?

Jack Sellers says the county didn’t delete any files. The county doesn’t even have the admin password. If the county didn’t do it, then who deleted the files? 🤔🤔🤔

Look carefully at what Jack Sellers is saying. He says deleting files from the server is a crime. He also says county electio
Look carefully at what Jack Sellers is saying. He says deleting files from the server is a crime. He also says county election officials didn’t delete any files. NOTE: He never says the files were not deleted. He just says that county election officials did not delete files. Since we already know that the county election officials have never had the administrative password to the machines, then who deleted the files? WHO DELETED THE FILES, JACK?

With all the anomalies being shown to have happened in Maricopa county, there is one phrase you shouldn’t forget: FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING

The image is of all the files that have been UNDELETED. That shows it was recovered by the forensic IT teams. It's not to show us that they were deleted it is to show that they HAVE IT ALL.

I have a strong feeling that we’ve just seen the tip of the iceberg. 😏 🤣

They got to get their stories straight and make sure nobody is planning to be the first to confess.

If Dominion had access to the machines, and Maricopa County did not, then WHO DELETED THE DATABASES?