𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔸𝕖𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕞

The Fantastic Jack London The Beginning of Modern Fantastics https://arkhaven.substack.com/p/the-fantastic-jack-london

Reading about how the big foundations - the Carneige, Rockefellers, the Guggenheims, the Fords - all funded historians to advance their one world government and merger with communism agenda makes me really wonder what the Rockefeller Foundation was doing funding the Copenhagen Interpretation.

After the War it was determined that the key was alteration in the teaching and narrative of American history. Noted and respected historians like Charles and Mary Beard were approached, but they rejected the foundation’s overtures. The Guggenheim Foundation on the other hand agreed to supply fellowships to hand-picked historians who began to write history with a new slant and delusive perspective. The new texts and books were quickly picked up by schools who in turn received payoffs from the Guggenheim and Carnegie foundations. The American Historical Association was captured by Foundation money and in 1934, a report was published under its auspices which concluded that the day of the individual in the United States had come to an end and that the future would be characterized, inevitably, by some form of collectivism and an increase in the authority of the State. The Reece Report itself revealed, ‘the Committee shed light on the big foundations’ promotion of empiricism, centralized team research, big universities over small colleges, moral relativism, internationalism, and social engineering. [See Tax-Exempt Foundations: Hearings, 83rd Congress, 2nd Session, 1954 – links are now dead With the arrival of the foundation’s hand picked puppet President Franklin Roosevelt, the years 1933-1936, marked a change which was so drastic as to constitute a “revolution”. The minutes reveal conclusively that the responsibility for the economic welfare of the American people had been transferred heavily to the Executive Branch of the Federal Government.

https://www.winterwatch.net/2025/07/1954-reece-report-showed-foundations-funded-collectivist-capture-of-us-education/

Here's the column on the latest Watergate revelations that tend to support that interpretation: https://archive.is/P5nPP

Lots of suspicions that Watergate was a Deep State Coup in which ex-Navy Intelligence officer, Carl Bernstein helped unseat a President who dared conduct foreign policy without keeping the intelligence services informed what he was up to. https://redstate.com/ben-sellers/2026/08/25/how-the-once-mighty-militaryindustrial-complex-was-reduced-to-demanding-fresh-fruit-and-dairy-n2205998

A competing theory on Watergate — which was famously broken by ex-Naval Intelligence officer Bob Woodward — suggests the Nixon coup was a military operation resulting from foreign policy disputes that involved the president’s détente with China and withdrawal from Vietnam. In a New York Times op-ed in February, Newsmax correspondent James Rosen presented newly unsealed evidence from Nixon’s own testimony in a committee hearing suggesting that the origin of today’s deep state may have been the Pentagon’s efforts to spy on the White House after being excluded from key foreign-policy decisions.

G. Edward Griffin interviews 83 year old Norman Dodds in 1982. This is a very important testimony about how WWI was encouraged by the Carnegie Foundation, and how the Carnegie Foundation collaborated with the Rockefeller and Guggenheim Foundations to take over American historical education. Their goal was to converge American society toward a union with Soviet communism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5eHdTk5hjw

The Exile of an Economist The Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu is being expelled from the technocratic elite by The Economist itself due to his excessive sympathies for the suffering of the Western working class: It is worth remembering that Daron Acemoglu is no revolutionary in the classical sense, even within his own discipline. The first book of his to […] https://voxday.net/2026/08/28/the-exile-of-an-economist/

Once upon a time there was a Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) Officer. In a long ago war, this BDA Officer was ordered to assess damage done against Iraqi SCUD missiles. When the General wanted to tell the President that his fancy new F-15E Strike Eagles had destroyed all of Iraq’s fixed SCUD launchers, the BDA Officer had to inform him that the evidence showed none had been destroyed. This made the General angry. Later the General went on national television to report that his fancy F-15E aircraft had destroyed seven mobile SCUD launchers. But the BDA Officer had to tell the General that these were only civilian fuel trucks. The General was so angry he fired the BDA Officer. But back in Washington DC the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reviewed the BDA Officer’s report, and has his specialists examine the evidence. The specialists reported that the BDA Officer was right. The General had to give the BDA Officer his job back. The General was then told that his super duper ultra secret commando force had destroyed a SCUD launchers. But the BDA Officer, after examining the evidence, concluded that the super duper ultra secret commandos had only killed a decoy launcher. The General got so mad he had the BDA Officer arrested. The BDA Officer was released only when the evidence, upon review, confirmed his assessment. The moral of the story? Believe the professionals. Leave BDA to the professionals. Don’t believe the Generals. Or Defense Secretary. Or White House Press Secretary. Or the President. Because they aren’t professional BDA Officers. They are politicians. And politicians lie. The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

"I came to America because it remained the country most committed to liberty and private initiative. The challenge today is not merely resisting new interventions, it is to start questioning old ones." https://www.econlib.org/econlog/atlas-shrugged-and-interventionism/#:~:text=I%20came%20to%20America%20because%20it%20remained%20the%20country%20most%20committed%20to%20liberty%20and%20private%20initiative.%20The%20challenge%20today%20is%20not%20merely%20resisting%20new%20interventions%2C%20it%20is%20to%20start%20questioning%20old%20ones.

Independence Day play set with the Twin Towers (and ‘plasma bombs’) from the late 90s

Fireworks near Kiev paralyzed a major highway. Could be a Patriot interceptor ammo depot, according to sources. Night kicks off with a bang, as usual.

There is an ominous air about all of it. We may be about to hit post scarcity. Biologically, post-scarcity will destroy humanity, we know that from the mouse utopia experiments. The elites are not worried about this. Local law enforcement is acting like the community no longer has any say in anything. Surveillance is going up everywhere, seemingly in preparation for something. It just feels like some kind of thunderclouds in the distance, moving in fast. https://x.com/TheShadowIntelX/status/2091877434593509485

🚨🩸 There’s a direct line between the murder of JFK, the removal of Nixon (too soon to kill him — so they took him down in a silent coup), the attempt to assassinate Reagan, and the attempt to impeach, remove, and kill Trump. These are the same institutions — the same interests

Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

"This means if you want to argue that selecting for oppressed groups (at any stage later than first contact with the oppressor’s system of education) does not lead to a loss of competence, you would have to challenge premises A or C, or the logical relationships outlined above." https://luctalks.substack.com/p/does-affirmative-action-reduce-competence?r=lp6h7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Looking over history, and how much labor was worth in silver or gold at various points in history, I think it's safe to say that the American salaries and standards of living that existed last century were hilariously unsustainable no matter who was in charge of the country. According to Google's AI (which might not be super accurate with these numbers), a typical artisan worker in the 2nd century AD, close to Rome's peak, made about 2-3 denarii per day, we'll call it 2.5 as a baseline estimate. Each denarius was about 4.5 grams of silver, so about 11.25 grams of silver per day was a typical Roman wage for a skilled worker. In today's silver prices that is worth about $27-$28, and that was a whole day's labor for a skilled worker in peak Rome. As I've told you guys before, the federal minimum wage in the early 1960s was about $1.25, and five silver quarters (before they were debased of course) was about 28 grams of silver, with a melt value of about $63. So in other words, an unskilled minimum wage worker in the 1960s made more per hour than a skilled Roman artisan would have made per day in the 2nd century. The early 1960s minimum wage was comparable to a six figure salary today in terms of its value. This is a huge disparity of course. I think looking back at history you'll see the Roman situation is a lot closer to the norm than the American situation, and in a way what is going on in America right now is sort of a regression to the mean. The Roman daily wage (about $28 as I stated earlier) is about $7,280 per year, and according to Google's AI the median wage today globally is about $10,000 per year which isn't that far off from the Roman number, a lot closer to the Roman number than even the modern American number as we slowly regress to the mean.

Feminists are amazing.

Geomagnetic storms Now and future forecast. #weather #storm #magneticstorm #geomagneticstorm #sun #sunactivity ✅ Subscribe to Geomagnetic storms ✅ .