Don't get caught by a cheater! Telemetrio finds and tags such channels 👉 If you want to see the tag, subscribe

0/0

Open in Telegram

0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot

Saudi Arabia6 857Religion & Spirituality8 055...

📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel 0/0

Channel 0/0 (@error0error) in the Arabic language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 11 310 subscribers, ranking 8 055 in the Religion & Spirituality category and 6 857 in the Saudi Arabia region.

📊 Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 11 310 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 13 November, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 146 over the last 30 days and by 10 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

Verification status: Not verified
Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 11.70%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 5.57% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
Post reach: On average, each post receives 1 323 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 630 views.
Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.
Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن.

📝 Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot”

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 14 November, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Religion & Spirituality category.

Buy Ad

11 310

Subscribers

+1024 hours

+227 days

+14630 days

1 323

Post views

~ 63024 hours

~ 81448 hours

11.70%

Engagement rate

~ 5

Posts per day

Ads index

Posts Archive

11 305

Repost from CHAOS

11 305

Repost from Αθηνά

Quī docet, discit. He Who Teaches, Learns.

11 305

Repost from Chaotic mind

متتصورون انو تعلم اللغة الانكليزية هسة من ضروريات الحياة؟

11 305

Bot: اني ما اقرا العربي اقرا الإنكليزي

11 305

Bot: خويه دعوف هل حموضه واكتب بس بالعربية

11 305

هذا ادمن قناة منافِسة ضايج لأن ما قريت اخر بوست نشره

11 305

Bot: محد يقرة ترة بس يسوون روحهم مثقفين شوفونا مشتركين بقناة تنشر انجليزي

11 305

+ لا، بس اللي الة واهس يقراه، يقراه. اللي ماله واهس، يشوف الميمز 🍻

11 305

أمانةً اني بعدني مصدوم اكو 6k مهتمين أصلًا باللي ينشمر هنا

11 305

Bot: اكلك يعني من تنشر انكليزي مطمئن ان احد حيقرا؟

11 305

+ ذكرني بمحاضرة الـ chaos & reductionism مال روبرت سابولسكي

11 305

A useful analogy comes from Horace Barlow, a British visual neuroscientist whose work is central to understanding the statistics of natural scenes. Imagine that a Martian biologist arrives on Earth. The Martian is asexual and reproduces by duplication, like an amoeba, so it doesn’t know anything about sex. The Martian dissects a man’s testicles, studies its microstructure in excruciating detail, and finds innumerable sperm swimming around. Unless the Martian knew about sex (which it doesn’t), it wouldn’t have the foggiest understanding of the structure and function of the testes despite all its meticulous dissections. The Martian would be mystified by these spherical balls dangling in half the human population and might even conclude that the wriggling sperm were parasites. The plight of many of my colleagues in physiology is not unlike that of the Martian. Knowing the minute detail doesn’t necessarily mean you comprehend the function of the whole from its parts. — The tell-tale brain

11 305

One has to be careful to not overdo this type of reductionist thinking about art and the brain. I recently heard an evolutionary psychologist give a lecture about why we like kinetic art, which includes pieces like Calder mobiles made up of moving cutout shapes dangling from the ceiling. With a perfectly straight face he proclaimed that we like such art because an area in our brain called the MT (middle temporal) area possesses cells that are specialized for detecting the direction of motion. This claim is nonsense. Kinetic art obviously excites such cells, but so would a snowstorm. So would a copy of the Mona Lisa set spinning on a peg. Neural circuitry for motion detection is certainly necessary for kinetic art but it’s not sufficient: It doesn’t explain the appeal of kinetic art by any stretch of logic. This chap’s explanation is like saying that the existence of face-sensitive cells in the fusiform gyrus of your brain explains why you like Rembrandt. — The tell-tale brain

11 305

بُعادي عنكم أجملُ بي وأحسن، عينٌ لا تَرى وقلبٌ لا يحزن — ألف ليلة وليلة

11 305

القرندلية أو القلندرية جانوا فِرقة صوفية تحوّلت فيما بعد إلى نوع من الشحاذة بالقرون الوسطى الإسلامية (تقريبًا من بعد دمار بغداد وصولًا للقرن الـ 19 ميلادي). بالأساس بدأوا بشكل فرقة صوفية تشبه البوذية من ناحية أنهم جانوا يركّزون على التخلي تمامًا عن الأُمور الدنيوية والمادية حتى يتقربون من الله، بحيث جانوا يعتبرون حتى العبادة ممكن تبعدك عن الله، لأنها تخلي الناس يمدحوك على ورعك وتقواك وبالنتيجة يخلوك تتكبر. شوية شوية صاروا يدّعون حتى الفسوق (وأحيانًا يقومون بالمعاصي علنًا مثل شرب الخمر أو ترك الصلاة) حتى يكسرون غرورهم وتكبّرهم والناس ما توصفهم بالورع والتديّن. وشوية شوية صاروا حتى يتمسكون بالصفات الجسدية الذميمة مثل حلق الحاجب ولبس الأسمال وعدم النظافة، لأن يكلك اني اريد ابتعد عن الدنيا وماريد أحد يمدحني بشي ولو صغير

11 305

*أصلُها من بَرَى، يَبري

11 305

إجعَل فؤادي دواةً والمِدادَ دمي وهاك فابرِ* عظامي مَوضِعَ القَلَمِ وصَيِّر اللوحَ وجهي وامحُه بيدي فإنّ ذاك بَرءٌ لي مِنَ السَقَمِ

11 305

تَرى المحبّين صَرعى في ديارهم كفتيةِ الكهفِ لا يدرونَ كَم لبثوا قَومٌ إذا هُجِروا مِن بعدِ ما وُصِلوا مَاتوا وإنْ عاد مَن يَهوونه بُعِثوا