Science in telegram
Open in Telegram
Science that matters: AI, space, biotech, physics, future tech — explained sharply
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Science in telegram
Channel Science in telegram (@science) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 120 206 subscribers, ranking 104 in the Facts category and 178 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 120 206 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 25 September, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -447 over the last 30 days and by -9 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 4.28%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 2.07% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 5 147 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 2 485 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 48.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as medicine, cell, researcher, scientist, u.s.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Science that matters: AI, space, biotech, physics, future tech — explained sharply”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 26 September, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Facts category.
120 206
Subscribers
-924 hours
-737 days
-44730 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
September '26Sep '26
September '26
+431
in 18 channels
August '26
+851
in 9 channels
Get PRO
July '26
+538
in 15 channels
Get PRO
June '26
+395
in 20 channels
Get PRO
May '26
+257
in 12 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+133
in 22 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+97
in 4 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+250
in 6 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+2 732
in 9 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+2 505
in 12 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+3 612
in 14 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+3 934
in 11 channels
Get PRO
September '25
+4 785
in 10 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+4 299
in 9 channels
Get PRO
July '25
+720
in 19 channels
Get PRO
June '25
+532
in 20 channels
Get PRO
May '25
+1 607
in 18 channels
Get PRO
April '25
+323
in 18 channels
Get PRO
March '25
+11 816
in 18 channels
Get PRO
February '25
+249
in 12 channels
Get PRO
January '25
+2 899
in 23 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+4 714
in 35 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+541
in 28 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+1 384
in 16 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+1 863
in 20 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+902
in 21 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+639
in 28 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+633
in 16 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+1 216
in 16 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+710
in 21 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+606
in 25 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+453
in 15 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+467
in 12 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+681
in 26 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+506
in 15 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+577
in 16 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+734
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+512
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+6 176
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+7 252
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+428
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+582
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+622
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+541
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+856
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+902
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+2 439
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+780
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+2 354
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+653
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+668
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+2 581
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+4 919
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+342
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '22
+372
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '22
+5 317
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '22
+7 305
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '21
+767
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '21
+867
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '21
+5 618
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '21
+4 344
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '21
+3 194
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '21
+3 503
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '21
+2 886
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '21
+5 040
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '21
+1 992
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '21
+1 869
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '21
+2 852
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '21
+5 440
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '20
+101 626
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 26 September | +2 | |||
| 25 September | +16 | |||
| 24 September | +26 | |||
| 23 September | +22 | |||
| 22 September | +13 | |||
| 21 September | +3 | |||
| 20 September | +25 | |||
| 19 September | +10 | |||
| 18 September | +23 | |||
| 17 September | +23 | |||
| 16 September | +12 | |||
| 15 September | +18 | |||
| 14 September | +25 | |||
| 13 September | +19 | |||
| 12 September | +8 | |||
| 11 September | +12 | |||
| 10 September | +9 | |||
| 09 September | +13 | |||
| 08 September | +17 | |||
| 07 September | +14 | |||
| 06 September | +28 | |||
| 05 September | +10 | |||
| 04 September | +55 | |||
| 03 September | +9 | |||
| 02 September | +7 | |||
| 01 September | +12 |
Channel Posts
| 2 | No text... | 2 344 |
| 3 | 🪐 Astronomers Just Watched a Planet Being Built
We know surprisingly well how planets should form.
The problem is that the crucial parts of the process happen hundreds of light-years away, on scales so tiny that astronomers have mostly had to reconstruct them from simulations and indirect clues.
Now they have caught the process in action.
Using Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, astronomers imaged gas moving around WISPIT 2b, a newborn planet about 430 light-years from Earth.
It is a monster in the making: roughly five times the mass of Jupiter, orbiting inside the disk of gas and dust from which its planetary system is still emerging.
And around the planet, the gas is doing something remarkable.
On one side of WISPIT 2b it is moving toward us; on the other, away from us.
Together, those motions reveal a swirl of gas around the growing planet — exactly the kind of interaction predicted by simulations of planet formation, but never directly observed around a known protoplanet before.
The system is unusually valuable because astronomers can now see essentially every major piece of the process at once:
the enormous protoplanetary disk, the planet itself, hydrogen emission showing that WISPIT 2b is still accreting material, the gap it has carved through the disk — and now the surrounding gas responding directly to the planet.
A second young planet, WISPIT 2c, is also reshaping the system by carving out a larger cavity. And at the center, astronomers recently discovered that there isn’t even one star.
There are two.
The scale of the observation is extraordinary.
At WISPIT 2’s distance, resolving a structure the size of Earth’s orbit around the Sun is roughly equivalent to reading a normal book from five kilometers away.
For decades, simulations have shown us beautiful animations of planets growing inside swirling disks.
Now nature has finally provided the footage.
We are beginning to watch solar systems assemble in real time.
#Space #Astronomy #Exoplanets #PlanetFormation #ALMA #WISPIT2 #Science
https://www.mpg.de/26990768/astronomers-produce-the-first-complete-picture-of-gas-planet-formation-in-action | 2 693 |
| 4 | 🧬 An AI Just Made a Biological Discovery
Not summarized a paper.
Not predicted a protein structure.
Found something in nature that scientists apparently hadn’t noticed before.
Researchers gave Claude AI agents a relatively broad task: search enormous DNA databases for unusual reverse transcriptases — enzymes that copy RNA into DNA.
Then they mostly stepped aside.
About 950 AI agents spent 21 hours analyzing more than 200,000 enzymes, narrowing them to 3,500 candidate systems and eventually 20 especially interesting ones.
One agent noticed something strange.
Next to a reverse transcriptase gene in a bacteriophage — a virus that infects bacteria — it found a long, organized array of repeating DNA sequences.
The pattern looked oddly familiar.
It resembled the repeat architecture of CRISPR.
Claude investigated the sequence, measured the repeats, compared them with known systems and searched the scientific literature. It concluded that the combination appeared to represent a previously uncharacterized biological system.
Human scientists then took over in the laboratory.
Their initial experiments supported a key prediction: the mysterious DNA array is actually expressed into multiple short RNA molecules.
The researchers named the system ART — array-associated reverse transcriptases.
And this is where the story gets interesting.
CRISPR also contains arrays that generate short RNAs, which ultimately help make the system programmable. Several other recently discovered molecular systems with similar combinations of features can cut, copy or insert genetic material.
But an important warning: nobody yet knows what ART actually does.
This is an early preprint, not a peer-reviewed discovery, and there is currently no evidence that ART is a new gene-editing system. Experiments are still underway to determine its biological function.
The bigger story may therefore be Claude itself.
For decades, biological discovery depended partly on humans noticing something strange hidden inside enormous datasets.
Now we may have machines capable of doing the noticing.
What happens when thousands — or millions — of AI scientists start searching nature simultaneously?
#AI #Biology #CRISPR #Genetics #Biotechnology #Claude #Science
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-discovers-novel-enzyme-system | 3 656 |
| 5 | No text... | 3 907 |
| 6 | No text... | 4 311 |
| 7 |  No text... | 4 766 |
| 8 | No text... | 3 726 |
| 9 | ⚛️ Scientists Found Quantum Entanglement Inside Higgs Boson Decays
Einstein famously disliked quantum entanglement enough to call it “spooky action at a distance.”
Now physicists have found strong evidence that the same bizarre quantum connection survives inside some of the most violent particle collisions humans can create.
Using the ATLAS Experiment detector at the Large Hadron Collider, researchers studied Higgs bosons decaying into pairs of Z bosons — massive particles that exist for only a tiny fraction of a second.
The question was simple:
Are the quantum states of those two particles independent — or entangled?
The Z bosons disappear far too quickly to measure directly. Instead, researchers reconstructed their spin states from the directions of the electrons and muons produced when they decayed.
The resulting correlations strongly favored quantum entanglement. A statistical analysis rejected a separable, non-entangled description at 4.7 sigma — strong evidence, although just below particle physics’ conventional 5-sigma discovery threshold.
There is another unusual detail.
A Z boson has three possible spin projections. So instead of the familiar two-state qubits used in quantum computing, the entangled Z bosons behave mathematically as qutrits — three-state quantum systems.
Entanglement itself is not new. Scientists have demonstrated it spectacularly with photons, atoms and other systems.
What is new is where it survived.
These Z bosons were created in proton collisions at energies of 13 and 13.6 TeV. They are enormously heavier and vastly shorter-lived than the particles used in traditional entanglement experiments. The result provides the first measurements of entanglement between pairs of Z bosons and strong evidence for entanglement between massive vector bosons at the electroweak scale.
Quantum mechanics, in other words, does not become less weird when you turn the energy up.
It just gets a much bigger laboratory.
#QuantumPhysics #HiggsBoson #CERN #LHC #QuantumEntanglement #Physics #Science
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/y1nh-1b82 | 4 560 |
| 10 | No text... | 4 440 |
| 11 | 🧠 Scientists Replaced Most of a Mouse’s Cortex With Human Brain Tissue
This sounds like science fiction, but the experiment is real.
Stanford researchers genetically engineered mice so that most of their cerebral cortex and hippocampus never developed. The adult animals were left with only about 2% of the normal amount of corresponding cortical tissue.
Then, shortly after birth, scientists implanted tiny human cortical organoids — brain-like structures grown from human stem cells — into the empty space.
Three months later, more than 90% of the cortical tissue by volume was human-derived.
And it did not simply sit there.
Human neurons became integrated into the mouse nervous system, developed organized electrical activity and sent long-range projections — some extending as far as the spinal cord. The mice retained broadly normal movement, although researchers found specific differences in coordination and spontaneous behavior.
Then came an unexpected discovery.
Inside the transplanted human tissue, researchers found cells resembling von Economo neurons — extremely rare, large neurons associated with brain regions involved in social awareness and decision-making. They occur in humans, great apes, elephants, dolphins and whales, but scientists had never previously succeeded in generating them in laboratory brain cultures.
The team also demonstrated why the model could matter medically. When the animals experienced several hours of reduced oxygen, the human cortical tissue was severely damaged while comparable mouse tissue was largely spared — potentially giving researchers a living model for studying why the developing human brain is particularly vulnerable to oxygen deprivation.
An important distinction: these are not mice with human intelligence or a human brain. The transplanted tissue remained developmentally immature, and the experiment provides no evidence of human-like cognition or consciousness. It is a new animal model for studying human neural development and disease.
But the boundary scientists have crossed is remarkable.
We can now grow substantial amounts of developing human neural tissue not just in a dish —
but inside a living brain, connected to a living nervous system.
Where should the ethical boundary for experiments like this be?
#Neuroscience #Brain #Organoids #StemCells #Biotechnology #Stanford #Science
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11032-2 | 4 407 |
| 12 | No text... | 3 880 |
| 13 | No text... | 4 698 |
| 14 | No text... | 4 196 |
| 15 | No text... | 5 549 |
| 16 | No text... | 5 595 |
| 17 | No text... | 6 362 |
| 18 | No text... | 5 246 |
| 19 |  +2No text... | 5 650 |
| 20 | No text... | 5 752 |
