Science in telegram
前往频道在 Telegram
📈 Telegram 频道 Science in telegram 的分析概览
频道 Science in telegram (@science) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 120 019 名订阅者，在 事实 类别中位列第 103，并在 美国 地区排名第 174 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 120 019 名订阅者。
根据 06 十月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 -406，过去 24 小时变化为 -26，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 未认证
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 4.65%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 2.08% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 5 585 次浏览，首日通常累积 2 501 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 52。
- 主题关注点： 内容集中在 medicine, cell, researcher, scientist, u.s 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台：
“Science that matters: AI, space, biotech, physics, future tech — explained sharply”
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 07 十月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 事实 类别中的关键影响点。
120 019
订阅者
-2624 小时
-1257 天
-40630 天
数据加载中...
相似频道
标签云
进出提及
---
---
---
---
---
---
吸引订阅者
十月 '2610月 '26
十月 '26
+57
在7个频道中
九月 '26
+520
在19个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '26
+851
在9个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '26
+538
在15个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '26
+395
在20个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+257
在12个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+133
在22个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+97
在4个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+250
在6个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+2 732
在9个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+2 505
在12个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+3 612
在14个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+3 934
在11个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+4 785
在10个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+4 299
在9个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+720
在19个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+532
在20个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+1 607
在18个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+323
在18个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+11 816
在18个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+249
在12个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+2 899
在23个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+4 714
在35个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+541
在28个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+1 384
在16个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+1 863
在20个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+902
在21个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+639
在28个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+633
在16个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+1 216
在16个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+710
在21个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+606
在25个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+453
在15个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+467
在12个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+681
在26个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+506
在15个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+577
在16个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+734
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '23
+512
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '23
+6 176
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '23
+7 252
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '23
+428
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '23
+582
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '23
+622
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '23
+541
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '23
+856
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '22
+902
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '22
+2 439
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '22
+780
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '22
+2 354
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '22
+653
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '22
+668
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '22
+2 581
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '22
+4 919
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '22
+342
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '22
+372
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '22
+5 317
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '22
+7 305
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '21
+767
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '21
+867
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '21
+5 618
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '21
+4 344
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '21
+3 194
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '21
+3 503
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '21
+2 886
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '21
+5 040
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '21
+1 992
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '21
+1 869
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '21
+2 852
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '21
+5 440
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '20
+101 626
在0个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 07 十月 | +1 | |||
| 06 十月 | +10 | |||
| 05 十月 | +7 | |||
| 04 十月 | +20 | |||
| 03 十月 | +5 | |||
| 02 十月 | +8 | |||
| 01 十月 | +6 |
频道帖子
| 2 | 没有文字... | 1 821 |
| 3 | 没有文字... | 2 733 |
| 4 | 没有文字... | 3 311 |
| 5 | 🔬 An AI Scientist Just Made a Discovery by Running Its Own Lab Experiments
We’ve seen AI write scientific papers.
We’ve seen it predict proteins and search enormous biological databases.
This is different.
Researchers built a closed-loop AI scientist connected to a physical laboratory. It can generate a hypothesis, design an experiment, turn that experiment into instructions for laboratory automation, analyze the resulting data — and then decide what to investigate next.
The system was given knowledge about Saccharomyces cerevisiae — ordinary baker’s yeast — including roughly 60,000 known biological relationships involving its metabolism, physiology and phenotype.
From these, it generated 1,933 testable hypotheses about how different compounds might affect yeast growth under stress.
Then came the important part:
the hypotheses met reality.
The system selected experiments and controls, converted them into machine-readable laboratory procedures and analyzed the resulting biological data. Some predictions worked.
Others failed.
And one failure produced the most interesting result.
The AI initially predicted that glutamate might protect yeast from formic-acid stress.
The experiment contradicted it.
Instead of simply recording “wrong,” the system analyzed the new metabolomic data, searched for another explanation and identified aminoadipate, a molecule involved in lysine metabolism, as a candidate.
It formulated a new hypothesis.
The lab tested it.
And aminoadipate did improve yeast growth under formic-acid stress — by about 7% for each millimolar increase in the experiment. The researchers report this as a previously unknown protective interaction.
There is an important caveat.
This was not a completely autonomous robot scientist. Humans defined the research domain and safety boundaries, moved some physical samples between instruments and supplied the overall experimental infrastructure. The biological questions were also relatively narrow yeast-metabolism problems — not Nobel-level discoveries.
But something important has happened.
AI has already become very good at generating hypotheses from existing information.
Now the loop can close:
Hypothesis → physical experiment → unexpected result → new hypothesis → new experiment.
That is no longer just AI analyzing science.
It is AI participating in the scientific method.
What happens when systems like this can run 10,000 experiments while a human scientist sleeps?
#AI #Science #Biology #Robotics #Biotechnology #Automation #Research
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2026.0043 | 4 383 |
| 6 | 没有文字... | 4 593 |
| 7 |  没有文字... | 3 533 |
| 8 | Meanwhile, something interesting is happening on Telegram: @gadget is officially up for auction.
Yes — the actual @gadget username.
Telegram usernames can be turned into blockchain-based collectibles and traded through Fragment. Whoever wins the auction gets control of the handle and can assign it to a Telegram account, channel, group or bot.
And @gadget is exactly the kind of digital property that could be valuable: short, memorable, universally understandable and sitting right in the middle of the global tech industry.
It’s a strange new category of internet real estate — not a domain name, not quite an NFT, but a piece of identity infrastructure inside a platform used by more than a billion people.
Let’s see what the market thinks @gadget is worth.
https://fragment.com/username/gadget | 4 208 |
| 9 | ⚡️ GPT-6 Astra deciphered a letter to a Napoleonic marshal that nobody had been able to read for 217 years
Researcher Carter Church used GPT-6 Astra to decipher an encrypted letter to Marshal Auguste de Marmont, one of Napoleon's generals. The letter is dated March 1809, and the model took about six hours to do the whole job.
The first step was simply to extract readable text from a poor scan of the manuscript. Astra recognised 1,300 cipher characters, among which there turned out to be 155 distinct signs.
The model then found a published partial key by French cryptology historian Daniel Tant: 33 letters covering roughly 435 characters. For the remaining signs it wrote a simulated-annealing solver, and then checked the result against historical correspondence and corrected the document's date.
Inside was a military briefing from Eugène de Beauharnais's headquarters: troop positions and Austrian movements on the eve of Austria's invasion in April 1809. Marmont is told not to fear "a few detachments or a gathering of rabble." It also turned up the ending of a sentence that breaks off in Napoleon's memoirs, published in 1865.
The solution was reviewed by Satoshi Tomokiyo, who runs the historical ciphers site Cryptiana, and the cipher is now listed there as solved.
https://runtimewire.com/article/gpt-6-astra-marmont-cipher-carter-church
https://x.com/Machinelearrn/status/2105593763582107849 | 4 538 |
| 10 | 没有文字... | 4 513 |
| 11 | 🌌 The Ingredients for Planets Were Spreading Through Space Just 500 Million Years After the Big Bang
The newborn universe started simple.
After the Big Bang, almost everything was hydrogen and helium. Carbon, oxygen, silicon and nearly every other element needed to build planets — and eventually us — had to be manufactured later inside stars.
Astronomers expected that process to take time.
JWST has now shown that it happened remarkably fast.
Researchers analyzed nearly 30 hours of Webb observations of three galaxies seen as they existed roughly 500–700 million years after the Big Bang.
They found unmistakable chemical fingerprints of carbon, oxygen and silicon in gas associated with the galaxies.
But the really interesting part was where that gas was going.
The absorption signatures were blueshifted by roughly 50–250 km/s, indicating that metal-enriched material was moving outward from the galaxies — consistent with powerful galactic winds carrying newly forged elements into surrounding space.
That means an entire cosmic recycling system was already operating while the universe was only about 3% of its present age.
Stars formed.
They forged heavier elements.
Stellar winds and explosions returned those elements to their galaxies.
And galaxies began spraying them outward, chemically transforming the surrounding universe.
Remarkably, the chemical fingerprints look similar to those seen around galaxies billions of years later.
The result may also help solve another mystery.
Astronomers have spent decades searching for Population III stars — the hypothetical first generation of stars, made almost entirely from pristine hydrogen and helium.
None has ever been conclusively found.
If early galaxies contaminated their surroundings with heavier elements this quickly, the window in which truly pristine stars could form may simply have been much shorter than expected.
Important caveat: the result comes from only three unusually bright early galaxies. We don’t yet know whether such rapid enrichment was universal across the young cosmos.
Still, the implication is striking.
Only half a billion years after the Big Bang, the universe had already started distributing the carbon in our bodies, the oxygen in our water and the silicon beneath our feet.
Cosmic chemistry apparently wasted very little time.
#JWST #Space #Astronomy #Cosmology #BigBang #EarlyUniverse #Science
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-026-02988-2 | 4 251 |
| 12 | 没有文字... | 3 495 |
| 13 | 没有文字... | 3 619 |
| 14 | 没有文字... | 4 322 |
| 15 | ⚛️ Scientists Watched Matter “Appear” Inside a Quantum Computer
Pull two quarks apart and something deeply strange happens.
You never actually get two isolated quarks.
Instead, the energy binding them grows — almost as if an invisible string were being stretched between them. Eventually, storing more energy in that string becomes so expensive that nature takes another option:
it creates a new particle–antiparticle pair.
The string breaks.
This process, called string breaking, is fundamental to the strong nuclear force and probably played an important role in how matter evolved in the extremely hot early universe.
But calculating its real-time quantum dynamics is extraordinarily difficult.
So researchers from Duke University, the University of Maryland, Oxford, Caltech, Cornell and KU Leuven built a miniature analogue of the problem inside a quantum machine.
They programmed a chain of 13 trapped ytterbium ions to behave according to a simplified lattice gauge theory.
The ions were not literally turned into quarks.
Instead, their quantum states encoded the particles, fields and “string” connecting them — allowing researchers to watch the simulated system evolve with both spatial and temporal resolution.
And then the string broke.
New effective particle pairs appeared and propagated through the simulated system, reproducing the essential quantum dynamics physicists wanted to study.
But the experiment also produced a surprise.
The conventional expectation was that particle pairs would spontaneously appear throughout the string through a process related to the Schwinger mechanism.
Instead, the researchers observed pairs forming preferentially near the two ends of the string, then spreading inward.
Their calculations indicate this is a distinct, previously unobserved mechanism for dynamical string breaking.
This is not a simulation of the full Standard Model, and no real matter was created inside the computer. The experiment used a simplified 1+1-dimensional Z₂ gauge theory, and today’s classical computers can still reproduce a system this small.
The real prize comes later.
As quantum simulators grow, they could attack versions of these problems that conventional supercomputers cannot efficiently calculate — potentially letting physicists experimentally explore the quantum dynamics of particle collisions and conditions resembling the universe shortly after the Big Bang.
We built computers out of quantum mechanics.
Now we’re beginning to use them to ask quantum mechanics how the universe built matter.
#QuantumComputing #QuantumPhysics #ParticlePhysics #BigBang #Physics #Science
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03422-0 | 4 503 |
| 16 | 没有文字... | 4 766 |
| 17 | 没有文字... | 5 030 |
| 18 |  没有文字... | 4 938 |
| 19 | 没有文字... | 5 408 |
| 20 | 没有文字... | 5 953 |
