Science in telegram
الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram
Science that matters: AI, space, biotech, physics, future tech — explained sharply
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام Science in telegram
تُعد قناة Science in telegram (@science) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 120 135 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 102 في فئة حقائق والمرتبة 175 في منطقة الولايات المتحدة.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 120 135 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 08 أكتوبر, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار -392، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار 18، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 4.55%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 2.09% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 5 465 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 2 507 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 49.
- الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل medicine, cell, researcher, scientist, u.s.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“Science that matters: AI, space, biotech, physics, future tech — explained sharply”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 09 أكتوبر, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة حقائق.
120 135
المشتركون
+1824 ساعات
-977 أيام
-39230 أيام
جاري تحميل البيانات...
القنوات المماثلة
سحابة العلامات
الإشارات الواردة والصادرة
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب المشتركين
أكتوبر '26أكتوبر '26
أكتوبر '26
+124
في 7 قنوات
سبتمبر '26
+520
في 19 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '26
+851
في 9 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '26
+538
في 15 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '26
+395
في 20 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '26
+257
في 12 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '26
+133
في 22 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '26
+97
في 4 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '26
+250
في 6 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '26
+2 732
في 9 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '25
+2 505
في 12 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '25
+3 612
في 14 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '25
+3 934
في 11 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '25
+4 785
في 10 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '25
+4 299
في 9 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '25
+720
في 19 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '25
+532
في 20 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '25
+1 607
في 18 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '25
+323
في 18 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '25
+11 816
في 18 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '25
+249
في 12 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '25
+2 899
في 23 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '24
+4 714
في 35 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '24
+541
في 28 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '24
+1 384
في 16 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '24
+1 863
في 20 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '24
+902
في 21 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '24
+639
في 28 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '24
+633
في 16 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '24
+1 216
في 16 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '24
+710
في 21 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '24
+606
في 25 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '24
+453
في 15 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '24
+467
في 12 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '23
+681
في 26 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '23
+506
في 15 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '23
+577
في 16 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '23
+734
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '23
+512
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '23
+6 176
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '23
+7 252
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '23
+428
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '23
+582
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '23
+622
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '23
+541
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '23
+856
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '22
+902
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '22
+2 439
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '22
+780
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '22
+2 354
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '22
+653
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '22
+668
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '22
+2 581
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '22
+4 919
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '22
+342
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '22
+372
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '22
+5 317
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '22
+7 305
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '21
+767
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
نوفمبر '21
+867
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أكتوبر '21
+5 618
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
سبتمبر '21
+4 344
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أغسطس '21
+3 194
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يوليو '21
+3 503
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يونيو '21
+2 886
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مايو '21
+5 040
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
أبريل '21
+1 992
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
مارس '21
+1 869
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
فبراير '21
+2 852
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
يناير '21
+5 440
في 0 قنوات
Get PRO
ديسمبر '20
+101 626
في 0 قنوات
| التاريخ | نمو المشتركين | الإشارات | القنوات | |
| 08 أكتوبر | +54 | |||
| 07 أكتوبر | +14 | |||
| 06 أكتوبر | +10 | |||
| 05 أكتوبر | +7 | |||
| 04 أكتوبر | +20 | |||
| 03 أكتوبر | +5 | |||
| 02 أكتوبر | +8 | |||
| 01 أكتوبر | +6 |
منشورات القناة
| 2 | لا يوجد نص... | 2 608 |
| 3 |  جوائز السحب: 500 نجوم سيتم توزيعها بين 5 فائزين. | 2 485 |
| 4 | ⚛️ Scientists Have Built the World’s First Nuclear Clocks. They Could Change How We Measure Time.
For decades, the world’s most precise clocks have measured time using electrons moving between quantum energy levels inside atoms.
Now, two independent teams in Vienna and Beijing have demonstrated something physicists have pursued for more than 20 years:
Clocks that measure time using the atomic nucleus itself.
And the difference could be revolutionary.
Atomic nuclei are more than 10,000 times smaller than atoms and are generally much less sensitive to external electromagnetic disturbances.
That makes nuclear transitions exceptionally promising as stable frequency references.
The challenge? Almost every nuclear transition requires enormous energies, far beyond what conventional lasers can provide.
But one isotope is special: thorium-229.
Its nucleus has an unusually low-energy excited state that can be accessed using ultraviolet laser light at approximately 148 nanometers.
Researchers embedded thorium-229 nuclei inside tiny calcium fluoride crystals and developed lasers capable of detecting their nuclear transitions.
Then came the breakthrough.
They used the nuclear transitions themselves to automatically stabilize the laser frequency.
The result: two independently demonstrated, functioning nuclear clocks.
The European system operated continuously for approximately 24 hours, achieving fractional frequency instability approaching 10⁻¹⁵ after a day of averaging.
That’s an extraordinarily small fluctuation — although today’s best optical atomic clocks are still substantially more stable.
But the most exciting application might have nothing to do with telling time.
One team has already used its nuclear clock to search for dark matter.
Some theories predict that ultralight dark matter could cause tiny oscillations in fundamental physical constants, subtly changing how atomic nuclei behave.
By comparing nuclear and atomic clocks, physicists can search for these otherwise invisible effects.
The experiment found no dark matter signal, but it established new constraints on certain theoretical models.
And this is only the beginning.
Future nuclear clocks could potentially improve satellite navigation, measure gravitational effects with extraordinary precision and test whether the fundamental constants of physics really remain constant.
For thousands of years, humanity has built better clocks to understand time.
Now we’re building clocks that might help us understand the universe itself.
#Physics #QuantumPhysics #NuclearPhysics #AtomicClocks #DarkMatter #QuantumTechnology #Science
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11084-4 | 2 385 |
| 5 | لا يوجد نص... | 2 698 |
| 6 | لا يوجد نص... | 3 040 |
| 7 | لا يوجد نص... | 3 136 |
| 8 | لا يوجد نص... | 3 219 |
| 9 | لا يوجد نص... | 3 622 |
| 10 | لا يوجد نص... | 4 146 |
| 11 | 🔬 An AI Scientist Just Made a Discovery by Running Its Own Lab Experiments
We’ve seen AI write scientific papers.
We’ve seen it predict proteins and search enormous biological databases.
This is different.
Researchers built a closed-loop AI scientist connected to a physical laboratory. It can generate a hypothesis, design an experiment, turn that experiment into instructions for laboratory automation, analyze the resulting data — and then decide what to investigate next.
The system was given knowledge about Saccharomyces cerevisiae — ordinary baker’s yeast — including roughly 60,000 known biological relationships involving its metabolism, physiology and phenotype.
From these, it generated 1,933 testable hypotheses about how different compounds might affect yeast growth under stress.
Then came the important part:
the hypotheses met reality.
The system selected experiments and controls, converted them into machine-readable laboratory procedures and analyzed the resulting biological data. Some predictions worked.
Others failed.
And one failure produced the most interesting result.
The AI initially predicted that glutamate might protect yeast from formic-acid stress.
The experiment contradicted it.
Instead of simply recording “wrong,” the system analyzed the new metabolomic data, searched for another explanation and identified aminoadipate, a molecule involved in lysine metabolism, as a candidate.
It formulated a new hypothesis.
The lab tested it.
And aminoadipate did improve yeast growth under formic-acid stress — by about 7% for each millimolar increase in the experiment. The researchers report this as a previously unknown protective interaction.
There is an important caveat.
This was not a completely autonomous robot scientist. Humans defined the research domain and safety boundaries, moved some physical samples between instruments and supplied the overall experimental infrastructure. The biological questions were also relatively narrow yeast-metabolism problems — not Nobel-level discoveries.
But something important has happened.
AI has already become very good at generating hypotheses from existing information.
Now the loop can close:
Hypothesis → physical experiment → unexpected result → new hypothesis → new experiment.
That is no longer just AI analyzing science.
It is AI participating in the scientific method.
What happens when systems like this can run 10,000 experiments while a human scientist sleeps?
#AI #Science #Biology #Robotics #Biotechnology #Automation #Research
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2026.0043 | 5 349 |
| 12 | لا يوجد نص... | 5 403 |
| 13 |  لا يوجد نص... | 4 181 |
| 14 | Meanwhile, something interesting is happening on Telegram: @gadget is officially up for auction.
Yes — the actual @gadget username.
Telegram usernames can be turned into blockchain-based collectibles and traded through Fragment. Whoever wins the auction gets control of the handle and can assign it to a Telegram account, channel, group or bot.
And @gadget is exactly the kind of digital property that could be valuable: short, memorable, universally understandable and sitting right in the middle of the global tech industry.
It’s a strange new category of internet real estate — not a domain name, not quite an NFT, but a piece of identity infrastructure inside a platform used by more than a billion people.
Let’s see what the market thinks @gadget is worth.
https://fragment.com/username/gadget | 4 609 |
| 15 | ⚡️ GPT-6 Astra deciphered a letter to a Napoleonic marshal that nobody had been able to read for 217 years
Researcher Carter Church used GPT-6 Astra to decipher an encrypted letter to Marshal Auguste de Marmont, one of Napoleon's generals. The letter is dated March 1809, and the model took about six hours to do the whole job.
The first step was simply to extract readable text from a poor scan of the manuscript. Astra recognised 1,300 cipher characters, among which there turned out to be 155 distinct signs.
The model then found a published partial key by French cryptology historian Daniel Tant: 33 letters covering roughly 435 characters. For the remaining signs it wrote a simulated-annealing solver, and then checked the result against historical correspondence and corrected the document's date.
Inside was a military briefing from Eugène de Beauharnais's headquarters: troop positions and Austrian movements on the eve of Austria's invasion in April 1809. Marmont is told not to fear "a few detachments or a gathering of rabble." It also turned up the ending of a sentence that breaks off in Napoleon's memoirs, published in 1865.
The solution was reviewed by Satoshi Tomokiyo, who runs the historical ciphers site Cryptiana, and the cipher is now listed there as solved.
https://runtimewire.com/article/gpt-6-astra-marmont-cipher-carter-church
https://x.com/Machinelearrn/status/2105593763582107849 | 5 016 |
| 16 | لا يوجد نص... | 5 217 |
| 17 | 🌌 The Ingredients for Planets Were Spreading Through Space Just 500 Million Years After the Big Bang
The newborn universe started simple.
After the Big Bang, almost everything was hydrogen and helium. Carbon, oxygen, silicon and nearly every other element needed to build planets — and eventually us — had to be manufactured later inside stars.
Astronomers expected that process to take time.
JWST has now shown that it happened remarkably fast.
Researchers analyzed nearly 30 hours of Webb observations of three galaxies seen as they existed roughly 500–700 million years after the Big Bang.
They found unmistakable chemical fingerprints of carbon, oxygen and silicon in gas associated with the galaxies.
But the really interesting part was where that gas was going.
The absorption signatures were blueshifted by roughly 50–250 km/s, indicating that metal-enriched material was moving outward from the galaxies — consistent with powerful galactic winds carrying newly forged elements into surrounding space.
That means an entire cosmic recycling system was already operating while the universe was only about 3% of its present age.
Stars formed.
They forged heavier elements.
Stellar winds and explosions returned those elements to their galaxies.
And galaxies began spraying them outward, chemically transforming the surrounding universe.
Remarkably, the chemical fingerprints look similar to those seen around galaxies billions of years later.
The result may also help solve another mystery.
Astronomers have spent decades searching for Population III stars — the hypothetical first generation of stars, made almost entirely from pristine hydrogen and helium.
None has ever been conclusively found.
If early galaxies contaminated their surroundings with heavier elements this quickly, the window in which truly pristine stars could form may simply have been much shorter than expected.
Important caveat: the result comes from only three unusually bright early galaxies. We don’t yet know whether such rapid enrichment was universal across the young cosmos.
Still, the implication is striking.
Only half a billion years after the Big Bang, the universe had already started distributing the carbon in our bodies, the oxygen in our water and the silicon beneath our feet.
Cosmic chemistry apparently wasted very little time.
#JWST #Space #Astronomy #Cosmology #BigBang #EarlyUniverse #Science
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-026-02988-2 | 4 939 |
| 18 | لا يوجد نص... | 4 068 |
| 19 | لا يوجد نص... | 4 313 |
| 20 | لا يوجد نص... | 4 858 |
