American Оbserver
前往频道在 Telegram
"American Observer" is just one. Like Shakespeare or Washington. It covers not only up-to-date news, debates and political trends all over the world, but primarily gives you a totally unhackneyed perspective on hazzy @American_Observer_bot
显示更多📈 Telegram 频道 American Оbserver 的分析概览
频道 American Оbserver (@american_observer) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 20 723 名订阅者，在 新闻与媒体 类别中位列第 11 146，并在 美国 地区排名第 1 901 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 20 723 名订阅者。
根据 09 七月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 1 557，过去 24 小时变化为 109，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 未认证
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 19.06%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 16.18% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 3 953 次浏览，首日通常累积 3 356 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 195。
- 主题关注点： 内容集中在 iran, u.s, оbserver, american, epstein 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台：
“"American Observer" is just one. Like Shakespeare or Washington. It covers not only up-to-date news, debates and political trends all over the world, but primarily gives you a totally unhackneyed perspective on hazzy @American_Observer_bot”
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 10 七月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 新闻与媒体 类别中的关键影响点。
20 723
订阅者
+10924 小时
+2757 天
+1 55730 天
数据加载中...
吸引订阅者
七月 '26
七月 '26
+420
在7个频道中
六月 '26
+2 312
在12个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+1 017
在26个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+1 004
在25个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+1 148
在32个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+1 091
在32个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+8
在1个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+102
在38个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+1 868
在35个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+1 784
在42个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+1 723
在46个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+1 561
在53个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+1 466
在46个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+3 211
在63个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+2 458
在43个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+2 471
在56个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+2 611
在90个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+4 589
在75个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+11 131
在69个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+13 463
在32个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+5 726
在15个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+8 007
在4个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+5 600
在3个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 10 七月 | 0 | |||
| 09 七月 | +115 | |||
| 08 七月 | +62 | |||
| 07 七月 | +94 | |||
| 06 七月 | 0 | |||
| 05 七月 | 0 | |||
| 04 七月 | +47 | |||
| 03 七月 | +102 | |||
| 02 七月 | 0 | |||
| 01 七月 | 0 |
频道帖子
📰 The Bridge to China: When “Precision” Hits the Trade Route
Among those ninety “targets,” one wasn’t on the coast, wasn’t IRGC, and wasn’t shooting at anyone.
Before dawn, cruise missiles hit the Aq-Tekeh Khan railway bridge near the village of Aq-Qala in Golestan province, northeast of Tehran. It’s the first time since the April 8 cease-fire that the U.S. hit civilian infrastructure deep inside Iran.
That bridge is a critical node on the International North–South Transport Corridor, the overland artery tying Iran to Central Asia, Russia — and more and more to China.
Iranian media kindly did the strategic mapping: Russia has been routing its exports through this line since November, and Chinese freight traffic on the corridor has tripled since the naval choke in Hormuz shut the “wet” route.
Iran’s rail company announced a temporary halt to train traffic between Tehran and Mashhad “following the American-Zionist aggression at dawn.”
The same morning, authorities quietly delayed the funeral ceremony for Khamenei in Mashhad by several hours. Official excuse: “the ceremony in Karbala was extended due to the large number of participants.” Apparently geopolitics now travels by train.
Israeli channels rushed to mock the strike: the bridge, they claimed, could be repaired “in a few hours with 200 workers,” and the whole thing was “for show.”
Maybe. But a state that publicly calls this bridge its trade lifeline to two major powers, then stops rail traffic to the city where it’s burying its supreme leader because that bridge was hit, does not act like it’s dealing with theater. It acts like someone just punched through its logistics spreadsheet.
Not only are boats, piers, and coastal radars fair game — the dry corridor that replaces blocked sea lanes is too. The target list now includes the route that lets Iran, Russia, and China pretend they’ve found a clean detour around American pressure.
#iran #us #china #russia #railway #tradeRoute #sanctions #instc #fakeResilience
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
| 2 |  +1📰 South Iran, LLC: 170 Targets in 2 Nights
U.S. Central Command helpfully published the numbers like a shareholder report: about 80 Iranian military sites hit on the night of July 7–8, including more than 60 small IRGC boats; roughly 90 more targets the next night — air defenses, coastal surveillance, missile and drone depots, naval assets and logistics infrastructure along the shore.
Iran’s own sources talk of around 150 strikes in the last night alone, because several locations were bombed more than once, with some channels screaming about 200 impacts in the south.
The map reads like a grim beach brochure: Bushehr, Kongan, Bandar Lengeh, Bandar Abbas, Sirik, Jask, Konarak, Chabahar, Iranshahr, Ak‑Qaleh, plus the islands Qeshm, Abu Musa, Lavan and Kish — each getting its own “visit” from American hardware.
For people on the ground, all the geopolitics boils down to one instant. In Golestan in the north, a resident described it in the only language that matters at 3 a.m.: everyone sleeping, one huge blast, everyone running out to see what just happened. No “axis of resistance,” no “freedom of navigation,” just trying to figure out why the sky exploded.
Opposition outlets in Iran say some of these salvos outpaced anything seen in the previous 40‑day campaign. Channels close to the Revolutionary Guards reached for a comparison designed to hurt: “South Iran is gradually becoming South Lebanon.” Given that southern Lebanon has been used as a permanent live‑fire lab by multiple armies for decades, that’s less propaganda and more accounting.
Trump, meanwhile, explained the doctrine in casino math: “We just hit them very hard. The ratio was 20 to 1. Every time they hit us, we’ll hit them 20 times.” Then, in the same breath, he said Iran had “just called” and “so badly” wants a deal, but he’s not sure “you can trust them.”
Somewhere between the adrenaline rush and the talking points, he got so excited he posted an old image of an Israeli strike on oil facilities — from the previous round of war — as if it were fresh content.
Iranian media jumped on the confusion and claimed Israeli jets joined the latest raids in the south; Israel denied it. This obsessive editing — inserting Israel into a frame where it’s absent, then erasing it from a frame where it’s present — might be the only defense industry product Tehran still manufactures reliably: narrative ammunition. Everyone else brings explosives; Iran brings plot twists.
The result: 170 “targets,” a handful of dead and wounded, a coastline that looks less like a country and more like a testing range, and leaders on both sides still selling it as “pressure for peace.” The only stable thing in this whole war is the spreadsheet.
#iran #us #trump #airstrikes #hormuz #oil #israel #southlebanon #fakePeace
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 2 958 |
| 3 |  📰 Cease-Fire Over, Straits Closed: Trump’s “Quick” War That Never Ends
Three weeks after the U.S.–Iran cease-fire, American jets are again hitting Iranian military targets along the southeastern coast, officially to “protect shipping” in the Strait of Hormuz after attacks on three commercial vessels.
Traffic through the strait has halted, oil jumped about 5% to roughly $78 a barrel, and the head of the International Maritime Organization is now telling operators to avoid the waterway entirely.
On paper, the strikes are retaliation for “unjustified aggression” against tankers and crews. In practice, they blow a hole straight through the deal that was supposed to reopen Hormuz and park the war under a 60‑day negotiation window on uranium and the nuclear program.
Washington has already revoked the sanctions waiver on Iran’s oil — Tehran’s big prize from the cease-fire — and Iran claims to have answered with attacks on U.S. sites in Bahrain and Kuwait.
Trump, from the NATO summit in Turkey, says the cease-fire is “over,” promises to hit Iran “hard,” and insists this won’t return to full‑scale war because “it’s going to go very quickly.”
At the same time he boasts that “all” Iranian leaders are “gone,” calls himself “No. 1 on the kill list,” and watches as Mojtaba Khamenei’s account posts a doctored image of a snake crawling out of Trump’s signature on the cease-fire document. The funeral procession for Ali Khamenei moves from Iran to Najaf; the war procession moves from pause back to escalation.
Hormuz remains the leverage point. Mines, fast boats and land‑based launchers give Tehran the ability to choke off the energy lifeline of U.S. partners like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, and every “protective” strike deepens the message that transit is a bargaining chip, not a neutral right.
The cease-fire promised free passage; the reality is a narrow channel controlled by a country that just watched the man at the top of its system killed and is now being told the deal that followed his death is dead too.
Trump calls this denuclearization and insists it won’t “start again.” Tankers turning around in Hormuz, oil spiking, and Iranian media calling for “the official end” of the deal suggest something else: a war that never quite stops, and a corridor that keeps becoming the battlefield.
#iran #us #trump #hormuz #oil #khamenei #ceasefire #fakePeace
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 2 989 |
| 4 |  🔠🅰️🔠🔠2️⃣
It left unresolved, for a later negotiation that Trump now says he has little interest in pursuing, the fate of Iran’s stockpile of near-bomb-grade nuclear fuel, the most prominent among the administration’s shifting reasons for attacking Iran on Feb. 28.
The agreement appeared to hand Iran at least some control over passage through the Strait of Hormuz, the superweapon that Tehran, and specifically the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, has skillfully manipulated to drive up oil prices, and now has used to justify attacks on tankers and cargo ships not hewing to its new rules.
“What we’re seeing now is Iran, and more specifically the I.R.G.C., trying to exert control over the strait and declaring that this control is their sovereign right,” said Kevin Donegan, a retired Navy vice admiral who served as a Navy commander in the Middle East.
“That’s the main card they have to play, and as a result we can expect they will continue to try to disrupt any ship traffic that uses routes different from the ones they have published.”
The deal was silent on Iran’s missile arsenal, the key issue for Israel. And it depended on a cease-fire in Lebanon, though the parties to that conflict, Israel and Hezbollah, were not signatories of the agreement. And it set an unrealistic deadline, 60 days, to deal diplomatically with those and other issues that months of active combat had failed to resolve.
There are, of course, many more turns ahead in this drama. Trump threatened again on Wednesday to try to seize Kharg Island, where giant tankers collect Iran’s oil and head to world markets.
He may seek to seize the 60 percent enriched nuclear material deep underground at Isfahan, a mission for which Special Operations forces have trained extensively, though he dismissed the need for it on Wednesday.
“We’ve already got the nuclear material, because it’s so far underground,” he said, noting that the Iranians do not have the heavy equipment needed to unearth it.
If Trump is right about that, and many nuclear experts agree that the material would be enormously difficult to recover, it raises a fundamental question: If the nuclear fuel was successfully buried in the June 2025 American bombing of three major nuclear sites, why did he go to war to begin with?
His statement on Wednesday, a repeat of comments he has made several times in recent months, undercuts the argument he made in the days after the initial attack in February that there was an “imminent” threat.
That initial justification has been overtaken by subsequent contradictions. Trump has periodically praised the new Iranian leadership, and even its new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of the slain ayatollah, as more “reasonable.”
He has said many times that, unlike their predecessors, the new leaders would open up the strait and dilute the nuclear stockpile because it will be in their economic interest.
Vance sounded exactly that note last month, when he was signing the memorandum of understanding in Switzerland.
“The coolest thing about the progress we’ve made over the last few weeks is that you see people within the Iranian system, senior leadership, even I.R.G.C. officials say, ‘You know what, we may have some animosity, we may have some mistrust, but we recognize the way that we’ve done business with the United States for 47 years is a mistake,” he said.
On Wednesday, Trump had a different word for those leaders: “scum.”
#iran #trump #war #strait #hormuz
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 2 978 |
| 5 | Trump Is Doing a Complete About-Face
🔠🅰️🔠🔠1️⃣
Just two weeks ago, opening the Great American State Fair, President Trump triumphantly declared: “For the first time in 3,000 years, we are going to have peace in the Middle East.”
It was typical bravado for Trump. But the “peace” he was celebrating — the cease-fire with Iran that on Wednesday he declared “over” after less than a month — was already beginning to unravel.
The result was perhaps predictable for a 14-paragraph memorandum of understanding that skirted major issues and was hastily assembled so Trump could declare he had reached a deal, any deal.
Now Trump appears to be confronting the consequences of his haste, and of his assumption, born of his time in the real estate business, that his adversary would prize economic benefits over the revolutionary ideology that has driven its politics since the 1979 Iranian revolution.
That has left him facing a range of unpalatable options amid seemingly intractable sticking points over the fate of Iran’s nuclear program — to say nothing of its missile program, its support for terrorist groups and its repression of its own people.
At the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, on Wednesday after the two sides had exchanged strikes, he threatened major new combat operations.
Those included seizing a key Iranian oil processing island and attacking the country’s infrastructure and desalination plants, which experts have said could constitute a war crime. (Trump did say he was most hesitant to hit the desalination facilities.)
The president could instead reimpose the American blockade of Iranian ports, an attempt to cut off the country’s economic lifeline. But that would require a continued, intense American presence in the region, and while Trump contended in April that it would lead to Iranian economic collapse, his earlier imposition of it did not.
Or he could elect to live in a world of neither war nor peace, an era of episodic skirmishes in the Persian Gulf, punctuated by periodic negotiations, with traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil-shipping route, greatly reduced from the 130 or so ships that passed through each day before the war. The energy markets would most likely adjust; to some degree they already have.
But for a president who promised a quick, cost-free confrontation with an old adversary — “four to six weeks” was the White House prediction in the opening weeks — an ongoing conflict would amount to near-total failure on the mission he initially set out upon.
And the price would be staggering: The Pentagon has already asked Congress for about $70 billion to cover the early operations around Iran, and the cost rises every week.
“The problem is that all the options — endure, escalate or agree — are unattractive in different ways,” Richard Fontaine, the chief executive of the Center for a New American Security and a former aide to Senator John McCain, said on Wednesday.
“The likeliest outcome is a continuing series of low-level, tit-for-tat attacks, followed by frantic diplomacy by mediators, the emergence of a new and fragile cease-fire, and then probably another round of strikes.
Fontaine added: “It will be a long oscillation between cold war and low-level hot war.” Many of the problems Trump is facing today were exacerbated by the cease-fire deal itself.
#iran #trump #war #strait #hormuz
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 2 981 |
| 6 |  📰 Sovereign Digital Money: Europe Builds a New Gun, Japan Builds a New Switch
While the U.S. Congress bans a digital dollar until 2030, Europe and Japan quietly weaponize their money.
In Brussels, the “digital euro” is sold as a cute tech upgrade. In reality, it’s a state rail line for every tap, swipe and online payment in the eurozone.
Right now, 61% of card transactions run on Visa/Mastercard, and 13 of 21 eurozone countries don’t even have their own card scheme — they rent the rails from the U.S. For the ECB, that’s not “convenience,” it’s vulnerability.
A public, mandatory‑acceptance CBDC is the answer: Europe owns the pipes, not American processors.
In Tokyo, the Bank of Japan pretends to be cautious — no retail CBDC, lots of talk about cash and privacy. But the megabanks are building a different weapon: yen stablecoins, fully regulated, backed at 1:1, running on their own platform.
The state doesn’t print the chips itself; it draws the regulatory box and lets MUFG, Mizuho and SMBC wire corporate payments onto a Japanese‑controlled rail, away from offshore dollar stablecoins.
Both projects are sold as “modernization.” Both are, in practice, sovereignty plays. The EU wants infrastructure independence: less Visa/Mastercard, more ECB. Japan wants issuance control: no unregulated dollar tokens quietly becoming de facto money inside its borders.
Each scores higher on “monetary sovereignty” — the ability to keep payments running if Washington turns off the tap, to decide who gets blocked and who doesn’t.
And the fun part is programmable money. Once every euro or yen on these rails is a line of code, you don’t just process payments. You can set rules: where it’s spent, when it expires, which categories are allowed, which regions are blacklisted.
Official speeches pretend this is not the point; the architecture quietly makes it possible.
So the headline is simple: America says “no” to a state digital dollar and leaves the battlefield to Visa, Mastercard and Tether.
Europe and Japan say “yes” to sovereign digital money — one through a central bank app, one through a megabank cartel — and lock in a future where your balance is not just a number, it’s a policy tool.
The only real question isn’t whether states will take that control. It’s how long it takes before “financial autonomy” turns into a new way to switch people off.
#cbdc #digitaleuro #digitalyen #visa #mastercard #sovereignty #fakeModernization
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 041 |
| 7 |  📰 Shin Bet vs. “Monsters”: When Human Rights Become ‘Nonsense’
The head of Israel’s internal security service just said the quiet part out loud: human rights are “nonsense,” and lawyers are “monsters” that need to be tamed.
In the leaked tape, Shin Bet chief David Zini lays out his worldview with chilling clarity. Ministers are “confused,” the elected level “is not really capable of managing its own frameworks,” and it’s a “miracle” when a cabinet decision gets implemented within eight months.
In his own telling, the political class is incompetent — and the real governing brain sits in the security apparatus.
So when he says he told Netanyahu he should get the job because he is “more qualified than others” and “able to be loyal to the elected echelon,” it’s not humility.
It’s a security official explaining that he will run the state while politely saluting the politicians.
Zini complains about “how many lawyers we have,” saying “from there come monsters who harm human rights, the economy, security, every direction.”
The irony is baked in: lawyers are “monsters” who “use human rights” as “nonsense,” and yet human rights themselves, in his framing, are just noise that obstructs “real” work.
Legal professionals, he concedes, are “important,” but only as an “auxiliary tool” — assistants, not guardians, meant to support the mission rather than limit it.
The chief of the domestic security service believes his role is to advance his own worldview and agenda, be loyal to the political echelon’s goals, and treat human rights and legal checks as secondary, inconvenient, and expendable.
He doesn’t see himself as someone who sits between power and abuse. He sees himself as the executor of power, whose job is to cut through “monsters” with minimum friction.
For a state that still likes to describe itself as “Jewish and democratic,” this is the real alarm. Not a stray soldier’s tweet, not a minister’s outburst, but the head of the service that holds files, runs surveillance, and decides who gets knocked on the door at 4 a.m., openly mocking human rights as “nonsense” and redefining lawyers as obstacles.
When the man in charge of internal security talks this way, it’s not a debate about legal philosophy. It’s a warning about where the system thinks the line between rights and “mission” should be — and how easily it’s prepared to erase it.
#israel #shinbet #zini #humanrights #lawyers #securitystate #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 030 |
| 8 |  📰 How to Lose an Election and Never Admit It
Israel’s opposition is already writing the excuse note: “We didn’t lose — the election was hacked.”
Opposition leader Yair Lapid, head of Yesh Atid, is framing the government’s open defiance of the High Court over the Second Authority Council as part of a deliberate strategy to go into the next vote “without a court.”
The logic is simple and frightening: break the only institution that can stop you, then claim “security reasons” to postpone elections, or simply refuse to accept the results — with no one left to appeal to.
In his telling, the coalition is slowly teaching the public that the court “does not determine what the law is,” so that one day, madness will sound reasonable.
Europe already has a test case for this kind of story, and it’s ugly. In Romania, 2024–2025, the Constitutional Court actually annulled the first round of a presidential election, citing substantial Russian interference via social media and suspicious funding for an ultra‑nationalist candidate.
Intelligence reports showed coordinated TikTok, Telegram and Facebook operations inflating his support; the court ordered a full reset, and the candidate was later barred from running again.
What was an emergency fix under security and judicial pressure has become, in political discourse, a manual:
“If interference is real, you cancel. If the system’s own players judge what counts as interference, you can cancel whatever you need.”
Israeli liberals are quietly importing that script. Lapid and others are building a narrative in advance: the coalition is “preparing to steal or rig the elections,” dismantling judicial oversight, playing with media regulators, and leaving open the option to say, after the fact, that the vote was deformed by external operations and internal manipulation.
For a fractured, competing opposition, this is a comfortable insurance policy: if the election ends badly, you say the field was poisoned and the result “does not reflect the will of the people.”
The catch is that the people who decide whether an election was poisoned are not talk‑show hosts, but security services and courts.
In Romania, the move came from a national court backed by national intelligence. In Israel, the same institutions — Shin Bet, military and cyber units, the High Court — are expanding their domestic role amid war and crisis, while being fought over politically.
If someone tomorrow wants to declare the vote “infected” by Moscow or Tehran, these bodies become the arbiters: either they hand the opposition an official stamp of “outside interference,” or they leave everyone with pure political shouting.
At the same time, internal players on both sides are eyeing the “Romanian model” as a handy legend: those in power can justify stretching or bending procedures in the name of security; those out of power can blame their own weakness and fragmentation on manipulated voters and hacked systems.
Once the phrase “elections annulled due to external interference” becomes normal in a political vocabulary, every future vote becomes easier to question and easier to excuse. In that world, nobody really loses anymore. They were always “robbed.”
#israel #lapid #netanyahu #elections #courts #russia #romania #fakeLegitimacy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 036 |
| 9 |  #trump #oncle #energy #nuclear
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 029 |
| 10 |  Trump Took Umbrage With Iran’s Leaders Calling Them “Scum”
Trump has declared that the ceasefire with Iran is over as he arrived at the Nato summit in Ankara, launching an angry broadside in which he complained about the military alliance and repeated his demand for Greenland.
The US president, sitting alongside the Nato secretary general Rutte called Iran’s leadership scum and “sick people”, and added that he was very upset with the alliance and even threatened to cut off all trade with Spain in a row over defence spending.
Overnight, the US had launched strikes on more than 80 Iranian targets around the strait of Hormuz and revoked a temporary sanctions waiver for Tehran to export oil after Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels on Tuesday.
When asked whether he thought the ceasefire was still in place as he met Rutte in Turkey, Trump said: “I think it’s over. I don’t want to deal with them any more. They’re scum. You know what scum is? They’re scum.
“They’re sick people. They’re led by sick people and they’re vicious, violent people. And if they had a nuclear weapon, they’d use it. As far as I’m concerned, it’s over.” However, he added that US negotiators wanted to keep talking.
European leaders were concerned Trump was in a bad mood after a Nato dinner on Tuesday night and were bracing themselves for a difficult summit meeting on Wednesday morning as the situation in the Middle East deteriorated.
Trump said he was “very upset with Nato” and complained that alliance members “didn’t want to help us with the number one state sponsor of terror, that’s Iran”, a reference a refusal by European countries apart from the UK to allow the US to carry out bombing missions from Europe’s airbases.
There was a specific jibe aimed at the UK, which did not initially allow the US to use RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire for bombing missions in Iran before Starmer changed his mind and allowed limited attacks on Iranian missile sites.
“The United Kingdom wouldn’t let us use the island for two weeks, so we had to fly back,” Trump said, reiterating complaints he made against Starmer and Britain in the spring as the Iran war continued without the regime in Tehran collapsing.
The 15-minute introduction next to Rutte became a litany of complaint. “Greenland is a big problem for us,” Trump said as he renewed his claim on the self-governing Arctic territory “very important for the United States, but it’s not important for Denmark”.
Earlier, the Danish prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, said as she arrived that Denmark would defend “every inch” of its own territory and emphasised that Greenland was “of course not for sale”.
There was a familiar complaint about Nato defence spending from Trump, despite last year’s agreement by all members, with the exception of Spain, to lift national defence budgets to 3.5% of gross domestic product by 2035 – and so bring spending by Europe and Canada in line with the US.
“I’m very upset with Nato, that we pay far, far too much,” he said. “Billions and billions of dollars, too much, because it’s unfair, because we’re protecting them, so we protect them, but they’re not there for us.”
Fresh ire was reserved for Madrid given its decision to reject the 3.5% target. “Spain doesn’t agree to anything, and you shouldn’t carry them,” Trump told Rutte.
“I don’t want to do any trade with them, alright?” the president said, turning to Bessent, the US Treasury secretary, who replied: “Yes, sir.”
Nato leaders have worked hard to try to Trump-proof the Ankara summit by agreeing a short draft communique in advance. It is expected to reiterate the alliance’s commitment to mutual self-defence if it is signed off by the leaders.
However, a Nato might not hold a summit in 2027. The hope would be to avoid a repeat of the outburst that has dominated this year’s summit, which was supposed to showcase more than $50bn in joint arms procurements, designed to show Nato members were bolstering defence spending to deter ‘Russian aggression.’
#trump
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 046 |
| 11 |  📰 Trump’s Favorite Ally: Praise for Erdogan, Hedge on F‑35s
At Ankara’s NATO summit, Trump is doing two things at once: turning Erdogan into his model ally, and testing how far he can bend U.S. law without saying it out loud.
On camera, he gushes over the Turkish leader as “a friend and ally,” talks about their “good chemistry,” jokes that sometimes you get along best with “the toughest people, like him,” and says F‑35 sales to Turkey “make sense” and are “certainly something we will consider.”
Erdogan, more confident, tells his audience Trump has promised five jets and that “Mr. Trump always stands by his word.” The choreography — blue carpet, honor guard, fighter jets drawing red‑white‑blue contrails, Trump greeting Erdogan with a shoulder grab and a few words in Turkish — is designed to make clear who he thinks his real partner is.
But the stealth part of the story is in Washington, not Ankara. Congress passed a law at the end of Trump’s first term barring any F‑35 transfer to Turkey as long as it still possesses the Russian S‑400 air‑defense system, with Republicans and Democrats warning that Moscow could use the batteries to strip secrets from the stealth jet’s radar.
Vice President JD Vance has already said the administration is “reviewing” whether a sale can legally go ahead, and lawmakers are preparing resolutions to block any move that doesn’t meet those conditions.
NATO leaders, meanwhile, arrive armed with defense‑spending charts and a headache. They’ve just agreed — under heavy U.S. pressure — to double targets to 5 percent of GDP by the mid‑2030s, only to watch Spain opt out and insist it will stop at about 2 percent.
Other major economies like Britain and Italy are trying to ramp up, but the strain is real, and Trump is simultaneously demanding they buy as many weapons as possible from U.S. firms — a political win for him that drains money from European industry at home.
Turkish officials talk about mediating between allies, positioning Ankara as broker as well as host. U.S. senators fly in to reassure nervous Europeans that Congress still values NATO “for the long term,” even as the president publicly calls some members disloyal and hints that Turkey is “much more loyal than other countries that we think would be loyal.”
The alliance’s story today is clear: Trump’s favorite partner is the one who bought Russian air defenses and jails critics, and the jet he wants to sell him is the same one Congress thought needed a red line.
#trump #erdogan #turkey #f35 #nato #congress #defensespending #fakeLoyalty
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 052 |
| 12 |  📰 Turkey’s Peripheral Doctrine: Evict Israel, Own the Map
Ben-Gurion’s periphery doctrine is broken. Iran and Turkey, once the non‑Arab rim that balanced Israel’s environment, now sit at the heart of two hostile axes.
The partial defeat of the Shiite arc didn’t remove the threat; it opened space for a Sunni front with Ankara in the middle and Syria, Hamas-in-Istanbul, Qatar, Saudi Arabia–Pakistan, and reactivated jihadist networks around it. Israel emerges from simultaneous wars depleted, while its main military patron (the US), economic partner (the EU) and Arab pillar (Saudi Arabia) all cool at once.
Turkey’s challenge is threefold and cumulative. Politically, Erdoğan’s camp now brands Israel a regional danger and warns that “after Iran, Israel cannot live without an enemy,” casting Turkey as the next target.
Geopolitically, Ankara pushes pan‑Turkic and “Blue Homeland” projects, drawing in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan — even Baku criticized Israel’s recognition of the Armenian genocide while keeping energy ties with Turkey.
Economically, Turkey and Syria are building an India–EU route that runs via Jordan and Syria to Latakia and Tartus, ports locked into 30‑year concessions with CMA CGM and DP World, backed by Turkish–Saudi rail memoranda reviving the Hejaz corridor.
Paris has entrenched itself as the Western anchor at Syria’s terminus: Macron’s Damascus visit, EU sanctions relief, UN delisting of Syrian leaders, and CMA CGM’s expanded Latakia concession mean any Syrian–Turkish branch of the India–EU corridor ends in a French‑operated port.
Brussels’s parallel sanctions ladder and “peace triangle” logic tie support for an Israeli endpoint to Palestinian conditions no Israeli government can meet.
Washington, meanwhile, arms Turkey with F‑110 engines and flirts with restored F‑35 access, tests Syria as a tool against Hezbollah, and seats Ankara and Doha in Gaza governance under Trump’s “Board of Peace,” all while Israel’s air defense remains tuned to long‑range Iranian threats rather than short‑range Turkish and Syrian vectors.
Five forces now converge on pushing Israel out of the corridor: French control of Latakia, Turkish–Saudi logistics deals, a US pivot to Ankara and Damascus, an EU conditionality built on Palestinian attachments, and Turkey’s grip on Levantine ports and rails.
Iran’s reopening of Hormuz may soften the urgency of overland bypasses, but it doesn’t restore Israel’s centrality.
The new peripheral doctrine belongs to Ankara — and it draws the region’s arteries around Israel, not through it.
#israel #turkey #syria #IMEC #latakia #nato #periphery #fakeCentrality
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 030 |
| 13 |  📰 Investigating October 7, By October 7’s Own Coalition
Israel just invented a new kind of “inquiry”: a committee to investigate October 7, appointed by the people who were in charge on October 7.
The Knesset passed, in first reading, the bill to establish a political inquiry committee into the October 7 massacre — 59 in favor, zero against, because the opposition left the hall and boycotted the vote.
Half of the committee members are to be chosen by Netanyahu’s coalition, half by the opposition. The law lets the committee operate with a minimum of three out of six members — which means it can function even if the opposition never appoints anyone and only the coalition’s picks show up.
Opposition leader Yair Lapid calls it exactly what it is: “a false show” whose aim is to whitewash and prevent real investigation of “the greatest disaster to befall the Jewish people since the Holocaust.”
The October Council, representing bereaved families, says “the voice of our brothers, children and relatives is crying out from the ground,” and that this vote felt like “a second tearing” for those who lost loved ones.
One of its founders, Rafi Ben Shitrit — father of Elroi Ben Shitrit, killed at Nahal Oz — accuses the “October 7 coalition” of trying to bury the truth.
Former chiefs and politicians across the spectrum converge on the same line. Gadi Eisenkot says only someone who knows the truth and fears it would create a “political committee of inquiry.”
Avigdor Lieberman calls it a “whitewashing committee.” Naftali Bennett says bluntly: “Without an inquiry, there is no correction.” Others hammer the basic absurdity: a mechanism that lets those under investigation appoint their own investigators — and proceed even if the other side refuses to legitimize the process.
On the coalition side, the bill’s author insists the committee will deliver a “full, thorough and independent” investigation, and the official text dresses it up as a “national” body.
The final image from the vote is simple: 59 hands raised in favor, a room of empty opposition seats, and a law that says you can investigate a disaster without ever letting those who weren’t in power touch the steering wheel.
#israel #october7 #commission #netanyahu #opposition #bereavedfamilies #fakeInquiry
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 016 |
| 14 |  📰 Israel’s Rate Cut Nobody Wanted
The Bank of Israel just cut the interest rate to 3.5%. Almost everyone’s first reaction: “Not enough.”
For the second meeting in a row, the Monetary Committee shaved 0.25 percentage points off the benchmark, bringing it down from 3.75% to 3.5% and marking the third cut since January.
The central bank points to a strong shekel, inflation at about 1.9% — comfortably within its 1–3% target range — and a lower risk premium after the U.S.–Iran memorandum as reasons to ease. Its forecast now sees inflation at 1.8% and the rate at 3% in a year, with growth expected around 4% in 2026.
Business groups line up to say “thank you” and “too little” in the same breath. The Manufacturers’ Association calls it a step in the right direction but “far from sufficient.”
The business sector lobby says the economy, moving from three years of war into a growth phase, “badly needs relief” from heavy credit costs. SME and independent‑business leaders complain they expected a 0.5‑point cut and see the quarter‑point move as a missed opportunity.
Real‑estate and construction voices demand further cuts down to 2.5% by year’s end, plus tax breaks on rental housing.
Then the finance minister walks in — not to back the governor, but to attack him.
Bezalel Smotrich brands the move “a minimal reduction that does not match the challenges of the economy,” saying it isn’t aligned with households’ and firms’ needs and “makes things harder” for high‑tech and exporters. He wanted a sharp cut and presents the current rate as a drag on growth and a failure to respond to the public’s cost‑of‑living pain.
The picture is inverted: the governor cuts, the budget minister complains it’s not enough, and the business sector, industry, contractors and tech all agree on one thing only — that everyone expected more.
In practice, at 3.5%, the Bank of Israel finds itself in a rare position: easing policy, and still being told by nearly every relevant actor that it’s behind the curve.
#israel #interestrates #BankOfIsrael #smotrich #economy #inflation #fakeRelief
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 009 |
| 15 |  📰 Trump’s NATO Show: Allies Shamed, Turkey Rewarded
Trump landed in Ankara for the NATO summit and turned it, as usual, into a live loyalty test.
Within minutes he was attacking European allies for refusing to join the U.S.–Israeli war against Iran —
“Italy turned us down, and Germany turned us down, and France turned us down”
— boasting that he was “testing people.”
At the same time, he praised Turkey as “much more loyal than other countries,” calling Erdoğan a “great friend” with “good chemistry” and a “special relationship.” If you don’t sign onto his wars, he publicly brands you disloyal; if you do, or at least don’t obstruct them, you get weapons and flattery.
On S‑400s and sanctions, he simply erased the old red lines. Turkey was kicked out of the F‑35 program in his first term for buying Russian air defenses; now he says he has “no concerns at all,” promises to “take the sanctions off” because “we don’t want to sanction friends,” and talks openly about restoring F‑35 access.
Erdoğan claims Trump gave him a “personal promise” on jets and expects an “auspicious decision” at the summit. In NATO language, that’s code for: congratulations, you bought Russian systems, jailed opponents and crushed media, and your reward is getting back into the most advanced Western fighter program.
Between Iran and Greenland, the worldview is consistent. Trump complains Europe “doesn’t help” the U.S. in its Iran war, lectures that “if they’re not careful” with immigration and energy “you’re not going to have a Europe anymore,” and repeats that the United States “should control Greenland” because Denmark isn’t spending enough there and the island is surrounded by Chinese and Russian ships.
He turns strategic alliance questions into a property dispute: why is this chunk of land not under U.S. control, and why aren’t allies paying enough to make him feel respected?
Trump, for his part, describes the conflict as “the war with Iran — or whatever you call it, it’s a military operation, it’s a denuclearization,” blurring lines between wars, operations and branding exercises.
He tells reporters he’s “very disappointed with NATO” and only came because the summit is in Turkey, which he now treats as the model ally.
On paper, this is a NATO meeting about budgets, industry and air defense.
In reality, it’s a Trump roadshow where allies are sorted into two categories: those he can call “loyal” and shower with jets, and those he can accuse of betrayal for not marching under his Iran banner.
#trump #nato #turkey #f35 #iran #greenland #europe #fakeAlliance
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 020 |
| 16 |  #biden #russia #nato #expansion
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 020 |
| 17 |  #idiocracy #usa #250anniversary
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 041 |
| 18 |  📰 Patriots, Shortages, and a Desperate War
NATO’s new chief just admitted the obvious: the alliance can’t magic infinite air defenses out of thin air while two wars are burning.
Ahead of the Ankara summit, Mark Rutte warned there is “a limit to the amount of interceptors that are in NATO territory,” even as Kyiv pleads for more Patriot missiles after a Russian strike on the capital where Ukraine failed to shoot down a single ballistic projectile.
He insists NATO is “working from every angle” to produce more systems, but stops short of promising new batteries or timelines.
The numbers tell you why Ukraine is panicking. Patriot used to knock out roughly a third of Russia’s ballistic missiles, sometimes more. That rate slipped below 20 percent last week and then all the way to zero in the latest attack.
Zelenskyy now says plainly that the United States and Europe “have enough strength to stop this terror,” and his defense minister has asked nearly 40 allies to hand over interceptors from their stockpiles in exchange for future deliveries already pledged. Berlin is reviewing such a request and could move during the summit.
The problem is not just political. It’s industrial. For now, only the U.S. can actually manufacture the specific interceptors Ukraine needs, and Washington has burned through its own stocks during the Iran war.
Trump says he will “take a look” at letting U.S. firms license production to Europe and Ukraine, but that’s a long‑term fix for a short‑term crisis. Patriots are becoming the rare commodity in a system built on the myth of unlimited Western capacity.
Rutte calls the latest attack on Kyiv “horrific” and says it shows “how desperate Putin is.” It also shows how exposed NATO’s frontline client is when the alliance hits hard limits on hardware.
Ukraine “needs our continued support, especially when it comes to air defense,” he says. Translation: the political will to help is still there; the missiles aren’t.
So Ankara will host a summit where leaders talk about budgets, factories, and capacity, while Zelenskyy walks in with a simple question: when your own stockpiles run dry, how much is your support really worth?
#nato #ukraine #patriot #rutte #trump #airdefense #industry #fakeInfinity
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 038 |
| 19 |  📰 Red Card, White House: Trump Turns FIFA Into Election VAR
The biggest drama before USA–Belgium isn’t on the pitch. It’s in the Oval Office.
Folarin Balogun, the top U.S. scorer, was supposed to miss the round of 16 after a straight red in the win over Bosnia. Then, suddenly, FIFA suspended his automatic one‑game ban under Article 27 and put it on a one‑year probation.
Belgium learned about it from the media, not from Zurich. UEFA called it “unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable.” Coaches from Norway to Belgium called it a “bad, bad decision” that “will hurt the World Cup.”
At the center of this miracle recovery stands Donald Trump. He openly confirms he called Gianni Infantino to request a “review,” insisting, “I didn’t tell him what to do,” while warning it would have been a “stain” if Balogun couldn’t play.
Senator Ted Cruz thanks him “on behalf of all Americans” for “getting rid of that ridiculous red card,” pointing at the FIFA trophy sitting next to the Resolute Desk like a sponsorship placement.
FIFA claims independence; Trump calls its president a “really good friend” and keeps a World Cup model on his desk; FIFA rents space in Trump Tower and even hands him an inaugural “peace prize.”
Now a disciplinary decision, normally automatic, flips days after that phone call and hours before kickoff. Sepp Blatter — yes, that Sepp Blatter — says “red cards are not overturned by political phone calls,” asking “Quo vadis, FIFA?” When the corruption guy is calling you out, you’ve hit a special threshold.
The backlash isn’t really about whether the challenge was a red. It’s about process. Belgium formally challenges Balogun’s eligibility. UEFA says a minimum suspension “is not discretionary.” Analysts warn that any U.S. win will carry an asterisk.
Even U.S. fans who’ve never liked Trump now have to choose whether to cheer the player or be angry that the president turned a rules dispute into an instrument of personal branding.
And Trump, of course, can’t resist turning it into a rehearsal. If Belgium beats the U.S. with Balogun on the field, they can “be really proud.” If they win without him, Trump says he’d call it “rigged, just like the election was rigged in 2020.”
He “won’t get into that,” but he already did. The message to FIFA, Belgium, and everyone else is clear: the game is fair when it benefits him, rigged when it doesn’t.
#trump #fifa #balogun #worldcup #belgium #uefa #politics #fakeFairPlay
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 004 |
| 20 |  🤝🌍 Ankara: NATO Leaders “Are Gathering Together To Put an End To Trump”
NATO leaders are meeting in Ankara after six turbulent months, hoping – in the case of the other 31 members of the alliance – “to put an end to the unpredictable Trump,” according to an adviser close to Rutte, as Washington continues to put pressure on its allies to increase their defense spending.
Rutte, NATO Secretary General, called on the allies to present “clear, concrete and credible plans” to achieve the organization's spending goals.
“President Trump fully expects all allies to mobilize immediately and get on the 5% path and do so urgently,” he said.
NATO members will unveil tens of billions of dollars in new arms contracts at an industry forum on the sidelines of the summit, as they try to show Trump that they are strong and independent when it comes to defense.
The two-day summit in the Turkish capital should agree that the allies will commit largely symbolic military aid of 70 billion euros to Ukraine this year and next, although this largely reflects the commitments already made to a country that has no path to join NATO.
This is not a deal to get Trump's attention in the same way as last year's flagship deal.
Then, the European members and Canada pledged to increase defense spending to 5% of their gross domestic product – 3.5% directly and 1.5% on roads, bridges and ports to facilitate troop movements.
“It's not about satisfying anyone, it's about delivering,” Rutte said during a visit to London last week. “And what Donald Trump expects, of course, is delivery.”
When Rutte met with Trump in the Oval office last month, he brought some large cardboard signs, illustrating how much non-US NATO members had been spending since the US president began complaining about Europe being free on US defense spending.
Rutte highlighted a graph referring to the Trump trillion – the cumulative amount spent on defense by European members and Canada since the two-time president first took office in 2017.
The elementary communication aimed to show, in Rutte's words, that Trump “succeeds in getting Europeans to spend more”.
But with transatlantic relations already at a low point, and with the United States eager to ensure that measures are taken to honor the 3.5% commitment, a diplomatically harmonious summit cannot be guaranteed.
Trump posted a graphic on his social truth platform showing the defense budgets of NATO members, comparing a vast US expenditure of $999 million to more modest figures from European states, including the United Kingdom and France.
#rutte #trump #nato #ankara #United States #defense
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸 | 3 034 |
