ar
Feedback
Martin Geddes Channel

Martin Geddes Channel

الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram

I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes

إظهار المزيد

📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام Martin Geddes Channel

تُعد قناة Martin Geddes Channel (@geddes) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 14 319 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 3 799 في فئة السياسة والمرتبة 2 584 في منطقة الولايات المتحدة.

📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك

منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 14 319 مشتركاً.

بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 26 أغسطس, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار -218، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -6، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.

  • حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
  • معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 11.37‎%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 5.12‎% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
  • وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 1 628 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 733 مشاهدة.
  • التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 0.
  • الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل justice, ghost, essay, authority, procedure.

📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى

يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
I mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes

بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 27 أغسطس, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة السياسة.

14 319
المشتركون
-624 ساعات
-537 أيام
-21830 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات
New AI tool: Smoking guns, hot pistols, warm casings. How do you distinguish a genuine internal failure of authority from a strong anomaly, a suggestive pattern, or mere suspicion? I’ve turned months of forensic work into a reusable tool you can apply to your own encounters with misshapen authority. Free to download. Built to challenge your theory, not confirm it. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/smoking-guns-hot-pistols-warm-casings

Some of you are sick of this custody case. Others are fighting your own version of it. The latest AI companion extracts the reusable forensic method: Same facts, different recogniser. Same recogniser, different facts. What matters is children, not AI. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/what-the-two-smoking-guns-reveal

Two smoking guns. The facts changed. The recognition did not. The classifier was removed. The recognition did not. So what was the court actually recognising—and what envelope contains a court when “child custody” no longer explains what it did? https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/two-smoking-guns-and-just-one-envelope

Can a court become the “murder weapon” that converts child-stealing into lawful custody? Violation → reality → authority. I went looking for the constitutional answer. I was asking the wrong question. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/constitutional-cluedo

12 branching points. 12 outcomes in the same direction. That doesn’t prove judicial bias. The interesting finding is stranger: The inputs vary. The transformations vary. The output direction does not. When every off-ramp leads back onto the same road, eventually you investigate the road. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/when-the-off-ramps-are-all-blocked

The child is maximally contestable. The house is minimally contestable. So what happens if you stop watching the child—and use a Tennessee farmhouse to debug the court instead? My AI companion extracts the deeper lessons: https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/what-the-farmhouse-experiment-reveals

She owns the house. She pays the mortgage. She lives in it. She calls it her permanent residence. The father confirms she is back. His attorney calls it her “permanent address.” The judge orders: “When Plaintiff Mother establishes a permanent residence…” This article is about what happened in the middle. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/a-republic-cannot-survive-plagium

What comes after OODA when warfare moves upstream into recognition, corrigibility, and reality itself? 5GW captures what you recognise. 6GW captures your ability to escape. 7GW captures the basis on which you could know you needed to. And at the bottom of the rabbit hole: why love is the antidote to capture. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/orroda-and-the-war-on-repentance

233 people. A crippled A321. A cornfield. Nobody died. The job wasn’t to fly well. It was to crash well. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/ural-178-when-safety-and-success

AI can be too credulous. Or too conspiratorial. The trick is pushing inquiry right to the evidential limit — but no further. I built a tool for that. The “coffin corner” method of rational inquiry Now try to break it: https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-coffin-corner-method-of-rational

I have lost many of my intellectual playmates. So this is a rather personal essay about Covid, AI, epistemology, Aphex Twin, information warfare, loneliness — and why I don’t want to spend the rest of my life grieving. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/murdered-by-non-recognition-of-the

New essay: 🍫 When does an enshittified product stop being a bad version of the thing—and cease to be the thing at all? KitKat → ShitKat → KatShit. A chocolate-fuelled excursion into brands, recognition, reconstruction, trust, and why reality gets the final say. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/kitkat-shitkat-or-katshit

Why did intelligent people get trapped inside the Covid “mind lock”? And why were “conspiracy theorists” such a threat? R–R–R suggests the answer lies upstream: control the Recognition, then make Reconstruction progressively harder. And Q pre-positioned the antidote. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/how-the-scamdemic-mind-lock-worked

What if everyone is carefully studying an apple… but the thing in the case is actually a banana? The reasoning can be perfectly sound. The original recognition can still be wrong. My new essay explores the philosophical gap where counterfeits acquire “it-ness” — and good reasoning can make the error harder to undo. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/ontic-caching-and-the-ontological

Professor of Mischief has been cooking. 😈 I’ve released a prototype AI “information weapon” for auditing authority. Give an AI the R–R tool, an official document, and enough context. Ask it to reconstruct the claimed chain of authority and show you where — if anywhere — it breaks. Free to experiment with, reverse-engineer and improve. Go create some productive havoc. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-recognitionreconstruction-information

Civilisation requires recognition in order to scale. It requires reconstruction in order to remain corrigible. We need both. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/recognition-is-not-enough

The most powerful mind-control system isn’t the one that lies to you. It’s the one that turns reality into evidence against itself. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/is-trump-a-cult-leader

I challenged the legal basis for enforcing a court fine. Instead of pausing while the High Court considered the issue, the State outsourced coercion to Marston Recovery, who increased the amount I had to pay as enforcement escalated. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-states-strongmen

British Airways doesn’t just paint its aircraft. It paints its organisational philosophy. This article explores why the BA livery is unusually effective, and in doing so teaches a general method for analysing any designed system: Geometry, Topology, Field and Observability (GTFO). The examples don’t stop with BA. Brussels Airlines, American Airlines and Lufthansa all reveal different failure modes. The paint stops being decoration. It becomes evidence. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/british-airways-livery-as-gtfo-teaching