uk
Feedback
UPSC prelims MCQs CAPF NDA PSC

UPSC prelims MCQs CAPF NDA PSC

Відкрити в Telegram

Practice High Quality Questions for Prelims Daily and Secure your entry for mains. Channel link https://t.me/+OC_hAm1KSRhmOWE1

Показати більше

📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу UPSC prelims MCQs CAPF NDA PSC

Канал UPSC prelims MCQs CAPF NDA PSC (@upsc_prelims_mcq) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 28 028 підписників, посідаючи 6 851 місце в категорії Освіта та 14 634 місце у регіоні Індія.

📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка

З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 28 028 підписників.

За останніми даними від 26 серпня, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на -466, а за останні 24 години на -21, загальне охоплення залишається високим.

  • Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
  • Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 0.73%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає 0.45% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
  • Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 205 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 125 переглядів.
  • Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 1.
  • Тематичні інтереси: Контент зосереджений навколо ключових тем, таких як prelim, upsc, cse, statement, prelims.

📝 Опис та контентна політика

Автор описує ресурс як майданчик для висловлення суб'єктивної думки:
Practice High Quality Questions for Prelims Daily and Secure your entry for mains. Channel link https://t.me/+OC_hAm1KSRhmOWE1

Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 27 серпня, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Освіта.

28 028
Підписники
-2124 години
-937 днів
-46630 день
Архів дописів
(B) c, a, b, d. • Atmiya Sabha (1814/1815): Established first in Calcutta to propagate monotheistic ideas and fight against social evils. • Unitarian Committee (1821): Formed in 1821 (specifically the Calcutta Unitarian Committee) in collaboration with William Adam to promote Unitarian Christianity and social reform. • Vedanta College (1825): Established to combine the teachings of Western science and Indian philosophy, focusing on monotheistic Vedanta. • Brahmo Samaj (1828): Originally founded as the 'Brahmo Sabha' in August 1828, it was the culmination of his religious reform efforts.

Codes:
Anonymous voting

Option 1 - M.G. Ranade Incorrect. Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade was one of the most prominent social reformers of 19th-century Maharashtra. He supported widow remarriage, women's education, opposition to child marriage and social reform and was associated with the Prarthana Samaj. However, the clue about being a Sanskrit scholar who resigned from government service in 1864 does not refer to Ranade. Ranade entered the judicial service and continued his professional career while simultaneously working for social reform. Option 2 - Vishnushastri Pandit Correct. Vishnushastri Pandit was a Sanskrit scholar and a prominent social reformer of Maharashtra. He strongly advocated widow remarriage, women's education and the removal of social restrictions imposed on Hindu widows. He resigned from government service in 1864 to dedicate himself to social reform. He subsequently became an important figure in the movement for widow remarriage in Maharashtra, making him the person described in the question. Option 3 - Balshastri Jambhekar Incorrect. Balshastri Jambhekar was an important pioneer of modern education, journalism and social reform in Maharashtra and is often called the Father of Marathi Journalism. He founded Darpan in 1832 and Digdarshan in 1840 and promoted scientific and rational thinking. However, he died in 1846, well before the year 1864 mentioned in the question. Therefore, he cannot be the person described. Option 4 - K.T. Telang Incorrect. Kashinath Trimbak Telang was a distinguished Sanskrit scholar, lawyer, educationist and social reformer. He was associated with the Prarthana Samaj and supported social and educational reform. However, he was born in 1850, so he was only about 14 years old in 1864 and could not have resigned from government service in that year.

Options
Anonymous voting

(A) Only 1, 2 and 3 Statement 1: Correct. The Swaminarayan Sampradaya focused heavily on moral purity, non-violence, sobriety, and ending social vices like addiction and animal sacrifice. Statement 2: Correct. Swami Dayanand Saraswati was born in Gujarat (Tankara); Arya Samaj promoted Vedic purity, Shuddhi movement, and anti-caste principles across the region. Statement 3: Correct. Branches of Prarthana Samaj in Western India/Gujarat advocated actively for women's emancipation, widow remarriage, and religious reforms. Statement 4: Incorrect. The Swaminarayan Movement was established in the early 19th century by Sahajanand Swami (Lord Swaminarayan), not Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.

Codes
Anonymous voting

Day 46 27th August - Modern History - Socio-Religious Reform Movements #Modern_History #history #modern #Socio_Religious_Reform_Movements

🔥 RAKSHA BANDHAN SPECIAL DISCOUNT 🎁 UPSC aspirants, upgrade your preparation with our high-quality, exam-oriented notes 📚
🔥 RAKSHA BANDHAN SPECIAL DISCOUNT 🎁 UPSC aspirants, upgrade your preparation with our high-quality, exam-oriented notes 📚 🎁 What you get ? 📖 PRELIMSNOTES • Ancient History • Medieval History ( Hindi also available) 📝 MAINSNOTES • Indian Society ( Hindi also available) • World History • Ethics 💰 Original Price: ₹740 🎉 Raksha Bandhan Special: ONLY ₹399 🔥 Save ₹291 — Flat 47% OFF! ( Limited-period Raksha Bandhan Offer ❤️) DM- @Mains_Short_notes_bot Make your preparation smarter, sharper & more revision-friendly.

"Don't worry about missing the last 7 weeks of quizzes. You can reattempt all previous quizzes during the revision period starting August 31st. This means 70+ daily MCQ practice questions will be available starting August 31st."

SPECIAL RAKSHABANDHAN DISCOUNT: FLAT ₹100 OFF - LOWEST PRICE! UPPSC & SPSC Prelims Accelerator Program ​Fast-Track Your Selec
SPECIAL RAKSHABANDHAN DISCOUNT: FLAT ₹100 OFF - LOWEST PRICE! UPPSC & SPSC Prelims Accelerator ProgramFast-Track Your Selection with 4000+ High-Yield MCQs!Program Highlights: ✅​Daily 9 PM Bot Quiz: Practice 30+ targeted MCQs every day (Sunday OFF). ✅​Comprehensive Coverage: Master State PSC PYQs (UPPSC, OPSC, RAS, GPSC, CGPSC, MPSC, MPPSC, KAS, JKPSC) + Current Affairs + Statics. ✅​Structured Preparation: Full syllabus schedule included to keep you on track. ✅​24/7 Revision: Missed the quiz? MCQs are available anytime for seamless revision. ✅​Massive Question Bank: Gain access to a total of 4000+ MCQs. ✅Fee: Only ₹699 Rakshabandhan Special: ₹599 (Flat ₹100 OFF!) ⚠️ LIMITED SEATS AVAILABLE – Secure Your Spot Today! ✅Schedule - CLICK HERE ✅Enroll CLICK HEREShort notes topic wise  Click hereDaily Quiz  summary with themes wise arrangedCLICK HERE Dame que click here

c) 850.  The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on April 16, 2026, as part of a legislative package to restructure India's electoral framework.  Key Highlights of the Bill Expansion of Strength: The Bill proposed increasing the maximum strength of the Lok Sabha from its current limit of 550 to 850 members. Seat Distribution: Of the 850 seats, 815 were to be allocated to the States and 35 to the Union Territories. Delimitation and Census: It sought to lift the long-standing freeze on the redistribution of seats (currently based on the 1971 Census) and allow for fresh delimitation using the 2011 Census data. Women's Reservation: A primary stated objective was to "operationalise" the 33% women's reservation (from the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023) by creating additional seats rather than redistributing existing ones.  Outcome of the Bill The Bill was defeated in the Lok Sabha on April 17, 2026. Although it secured a simple majority (298 votes in favour to 230 against), it failed to reach the mandatory two-thirds majority (approximately 352 votes) required for constitutional amendments under Article 368. Following this defeat, the government withdrew the allied Delimitation Bill, 2026 and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026.  Why Other Options are Incorrect (a) 552: This was the maximum strength allowed before the 104th Amendment Act(which removed the two nominated Anglo-Indian seats), effectively reducing the formal cap to 550. (b) 888: This is the physical seating capacity of the Lok Sabha chamber in the New Parliament House, not the legislated maximum membership proposed in the 131st Amendment. (d) 750: This figure was not part of the formal proposal in the 2026 Bill, which specifically aimed for a near-50% increase to 850.

Options
Anonymous voting

The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026, which was recently debated in Parliament, primarily proposes to increase the maximum strength of the Lok Sabha to how many members? (a) 552 (b) 888 (c) 850 (d) 750

b) Amar Jain vs Union of India.  In this landmark 2025 ruling, the Supreme Court of India significantly expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) to include the right to access digital services.  Key Highlights of the Judgement: Digital Inclusivity: The court held that in a "Digital India," access to online platforms—ranging from banking and education to government portals—is not a luxury but a necessity for a dignified life. Focus on Disabilities: The petitioner, Amar Jain, highlighted the barriers faced by persons with disabilities (PwDs) in using inaccessible apps and websites. The Court ruled that failure to provide accessible digital interfaces violates the Right to Equality (Article 14) and Right to Life (Article 21). Mandatory Accessibility Standards: The SC directed all government and private service providers to comply with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.  Why the Other Options are Incorrect: (a) Madras Bar Association vs Union of India: This is a recurring case primarily dealing with the independence of Tribunals and the validity of search-cum-selection committees, not digital rights. (c) Vanshakti vs Union of India: This case is typically associated with environmental conservation, specifically regarding the protection of wetlands and eco-sensitive zones in Maharashtra. (d) Amlesh Kumar vs State of Bihar: This 2025 judgement focused on criminal jurisprudence, specifically clarifying the guidelines for "anticipatory bail" and the prevention of arbitrary arrests.

Options
Anonymous voting

Which landmark Supreme Court judgement in 2025 established that "access to digital services" is a fundamental right under Article 21, particularly for persons with disabilities? (a) Madras Bar Association vs Union of India (b) Amar Jain vs Union of India (c) Vanshakti vs Union of India (d) Amlesh Kumar vs State of Bihar

🚨 Only 57 days left for BPSC Prelims! 🚨 Don't miss out! Boost your prep with: ✅ 5,000+ total MCQs (80+ daily) ✅ Daily tests & rankings ✅ VC discussions & doubt solving 📅 Revision quiz starts August 31st! 🏃‍♂️ Join fast—slots filling up!