Beat the Bailiffs Extra
Открыть в Telegram
📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала Beat the Bailiffs Extra
Канал Beat the Bailiffs Extra (@beatbailifs) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 10 913 подписчиков, занимая 815 место в категории Закон и право и 1 038 место в регионе Великобритания.
📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика
С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 10 913 подписчиков.
Согласно последним данным от 23 июля, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило -12, а за последние 24 часа — -1, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.
- Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
- Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 5.37%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 3.20% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
- Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 586 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 349 просмотров.
- Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 5.
- Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как debt, warrant, property, donation, act.
📝 Описание и контентная политика
Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“SELF HELP - SHARING THE ORIGINAL BTB FB AND MORE”
Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 24 июля, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Закон и право.
10 913
Подписчики
-124 часа
+87 дней
-1230 день
Загрузка данных...
Похожие каналы
Облако тегов
Входящие и исходящие упоминания
---
---
---
---
---
---
Привлечение подписчиков
июль '26
июль '26
+49
в 4 каналах
июнь '26
+65
в 8 каналах
Get PRO
май '26
+54
в 8 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '26
+26
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
март '26
+30
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '26
+50
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
январь '26
+67
в 13 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '25
+35
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '25
+58
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '25
+32
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '25
+22
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
август '25
+33
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
июль '25
+46
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '25
+85
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
май '25
+90
в 13 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '25
+87
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
март '25
+98
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '25
+351
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
январь '25
+214
в 42 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '24
+170
в 20 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '24
+265
в 26 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '24
+225
в 20 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '24
+293
в 27 каналах
Get PRO
август '24
+206
в 22 каналах
Get PRO
июль '24
+199
в 21 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '24
+221
в 16 каналах
Get PRO
май '24
+179
в 16 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '24
+231
в 16 каналах
Get PRO
март '24
+260
в 22 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '24
+294
в 21 каналах
Get PRO
январь '24
+339
в 25 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '23
+374
в 23 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '23
+362
в 26 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '23
+202
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '23
+314
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '23
+334
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '23
+323
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '23
+321
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '23
+666
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '23
+530
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '23
+653
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '23
+987
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '23
+804
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '22
+613
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '22
+620
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '22
+3 356
в 0 каналах
| Дата | Привлечение подписчиков | Упоминания | Каналы | |
| 24 июля | +3 | |||
| 23 июля | +1 | |||
| 22 июля | 0 | |||
| 21 июля | 0 | |||
| 20 июля | +1 | |||
| 19 июля | 0 | |||
| 18 июля | +23 | |||
| 17 июля | +1 | |||
| 16 июля | 0 | |||
| 15 июля | +3 | |||
| 14 июля | +1 | |||
| 13 июля | 0 | |||
| 12 июля | +3 | |||
| 11 июля | 0 | |||
| 10 июля | 0 | |||
| 09 июля | +1 | |||
| 08 июля | +3 | |||
| 07 июля | +1 | |||
| 06 июля | +3 | |||
| 05 июля | 0 | |||
| 04 июля | 0 | |||
| 03 июля | +2 | |||
| 02 июля | +1 | |||
| 01 июля | +2 |
Посты канала
TEMPLATE UPDATED
With Phone number
To pay the relevant fee
And “or Relevant digital form”
https://t.me/BeatBailifs/18182
| 2 | Everyone’s A Winner Hot Chocolate.mp3 | 254 |
| 3 | WE KNEW IT WAS TREASON
https://t.me/TisTreason/1087 | 253 |
| 4 |  COUNCIL PASSING OFF ANY INFORMATION OR DOCUMENT
Other Than Providing information on the correct procedure:
Set out in Magistrates Court Rules Rule 68 is:
THE WORST UK GDPR BREACH
By withholding this information and instead passing off their own administrative printouts as "judicial orders," the Council is in direct breach of the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018.
The Legal Breach
Under Article 5(1)(d) of the UK GDPR (Accuracy), personal data must be "accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date; every reasonable step must be taken to ensure that personal data that are inaccurate... are erased or rectified without delay."
By providing you with their own self-generated "Liability Order" documents instead of directing you to the Court for a certified extract under Rule 68 of the Magistrates' Courts Rules 1981, the Council has:
Provided Inaccurate Data: They have represented their own internal financial ledger entries as a formal court judgment, which is factually and legally inaccurate.
Failed the Transparency Principle (Article 5(1)(a)): Data must be processed "lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner." Deliberately withholding the correct legal procedure to obtain court records is a breach of the transparency and fairness principles.
Breached the Right of Access (Article 15): When you requested the "judicial order," their failure to provide the correct legal route (redirecting you to the Court) effectively denies your right of access to the accurate personal data held by the Court, providing you with "conflicting or incomplete" information instead.
The Impact: This misinformation leads to inaccurate financial processing, wrongful enforcement, and the potential for the Court to be misled by the Council's internal data entries. | 263 |
| 5 |  THIS IS A COURT EXTRACT OF THE SUMMONS / COMPLAINT! #FFS Here
I am now making an Application to pay the fee for Gold Standard Signed by A Court Officer “The Certified Court Extract”
As The Accompanying Email says - that I failed to read and understand in January 2025!
Ai picked this up! 🧠 | 229 |
| 6 |  Нет текста... | 237 |
| 7 |  +1CORRUPT SOLICITOR 2 4 1
Fits In Nicely in my Recent Series on Corrupt Councils, you will find Run by a TEAM OF SOLICITORS
Therefore have a
DUTY TO THE COURT
Any Sign of Fraud; Maladministration MUST be Reported to The Governing Body.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
- Richard Ivory Southampton Council Monitoring Officer is a Solicitor -registered with SRA
- Chris Thornton SCC DPO calls himself an “information lawyer” with Cylex
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
SOLICITOR JAILED FOR FRAUD
Andrew Cooper abused his position of power and authority over a three-year period; Soilicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found a cash shortage of almost £1.2m arising from improper use being made of the client account of Cooper’s firm, Streathers Solicitors, based in Baker Street, London.
READ
&
SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF
Richard Jefferies, admitted in 1989, admitted all the allegations against him. He was alleged to have requested and received money from his client;
Richard Jefferies, solicitor since 1989, admitted all the allegations against him. He was alleged to have requested and received money from his client directly into his personal bank account and/or in cash; to have undertaken reserved legal work and representation of a client as a solicitor in criminal defence proceedings other than through an SRA-authorised firm; and to have provided misleading information to the courts and CPS | 13 |
| 8 |  +2Нет текста... | 368 |
| 9 |  THIS IS HOW COUNCILS BYPASS THE CONSTITUTIONAL VOTE
“Is Key Decision: NO”
Look for “Consultation Council Tax Reduction Scheme 2026/27”
If it says Key Decision “NO”👇
ALL COUNCIL TAX BILLS SINCE 2013 WERE ILLEGAL
- Southampton City Council (Executive Team) Unlawful Decision | 366 |
| 10 |  +1FUN & GAMES ON COUNCILS FOI
- Council Breach Response
WE WILL GIVE OURSELVES ANOTHER 20 DAYS
- NO!
How about you report yourself ICO for this blatant breach:
Claiming we haven’t got the information when you’ve got a statutory duty to have it!
DO YOU NEED THE ICO’s
CONTACT DETAILS? 🤡 | 370 |
| 11 | COUNCIL LIE ON FOI RESPONSE PART
Part 1
7. STATUTORY FAILURE OF THE MONITORING OFFICER (LGHA 1989)
5.1 Under Section 5 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, the Monitoring Officer has a strict statutory duty to report any proposal, decision, or omission that constitutes a contravention of law or maladministration. The Monitoring Officer has entirely failed this statutory duty.
5.2 He permitted a direct contravention of law by allowing statutorily disqualified employees to bypass the Full Council and adopt the 2026/27 CTRS.
5.3 He failed to enforce the mandatory statutory consultation required by Schedule 1A of the LGFA 1992, allowing a procedurally unlawful tax scheme to be weaponized against the public.
5.4 He remains complicit in severe maladministration by failing to rectify the Council's unlawful operation of a statutory financial relief fund (Section 13A(1)(c) of the LGFA 1992) without a logged audit trail. | 340 |
| 12 | Delegation Monitoring Officer .pdf | 316 |
| 13 |  WE DONT HAVE ACCESS TO THE INFORMATION?
Response to FOI
LIARS.. YES YOU DO…
- IT’S A STATUTORY OBLIGATION TO HAVE IT…
The council is currently in breach of Section 10(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.,
The partial responses provided are highly contradictory regarding the holding of DWP data under Section 130 and 131 ( Information Sharing Information sharing in relation to welfare services etc) of the Welfare Reform Act 2012, and exposes a complete lack of financial auditing regarding Section 13A (2)(c) applications; particularly paragraph 6; council has the power to reduce the amount to ZERO;
FOI relates directly to the unlawful adoption of the 2026/27 Council Tax Reduction Scheme by an unelected “officers” Paul Jones and Mel Creighton (as in the High Court Ruling LL AU V Trafford Council 2025, Discretionary Scheme Discriminatory) is in breach of:
1. Section 67 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, shall be discharged only by the authority" (the Full Council).
2. 13(a) cannot be delegated Section 67(2)(aa) of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. Paul Jones and Mel Creighton signed it as an Officer Decision.
3. Schedule 1A of LGFA 1992. (3)(1)(a) legally demands a public consultation:
(a)consult any major precepting authority which has power to issue a precept to it,
The Council failed to consult interested parties( ie: SUPREME COURT RULING: R (Moseley) v Haringey LBC)
4. Breach of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. Paul Jones signed it off himself as an Officer Decision.
Schedule 1A of LGFA 1992 legally demands a public consultation:
The Council failed to consult interested parties LGFA 1972, Part 1 (2) LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS AND AUTHORITIES IN ENGLAND: Principle Councils, Constitution of principle council
5. Paul Jones and Mel Creighton are not members of Council as described in as paragraph 2B Local Government Act 1972 calirifes this position stating:
2B) In such a case, a reference in this Act to a member of a council is a reference to—
(a) (b) (c) the elected mayor of the council,
the chairman of the council, or
a councillor of the council.]
6. Paul Jones and Mel Creighton are acting whilst DUSQUALIFIED LGFA 80(1)(a):
GENERAL PROVISIONS AS TO MEMBERS AND PROCEEDINGS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES
80 Qualifications and disqualifications
Disqualifications for election and holding office as member of a local
authority in England].
(1) Subject to the provisions of section 81 below, a person shall be disqualified for being
elected or being a member of a local authority in England if he—
(a) holds any paid office or employment | 331 |
| 14 | S.1 3 Executive must consult Authority .pdf | 317 |
| 15 | 13a Amounts of tax payable Reductions by billing authority.pdf | 327 |
| 16 | S. 10 FOIA.pdf | 340 |
| 17 | EXECUTIVES DISQUALIFIED FROM COUNCIL.pdf | 348 |
| 18 | AUTHORITIES- MEANING .pdf | 357 |
| 19 | COUNCILLORS Principle Council.pdf | 362 |
| 20 |  COUNCILS HAVE THE POWER TO
REDUCE THE AMOUNT TO ZERO
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/14/section/13A | 375 |
