HN Best Comments
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
Comments from https://news.ycombinator.com/bestcomments Source code: https://github.com/border-radius/hn-best-comments
نمایش بیشتر4 173
مشترکین
-224 ساعت
+77 روز
-330 روز
در حال بارگیری داده...
کانالهای مشابه
ابر برچسبها
اشارات ورودی و خروجی
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب مشترکین
سپتامبر '26
سپتامبر '26
+61
در 5 کانالها
اوت '26
+51
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '26
+60
در 10 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '26
+60
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '26
+64
در 5 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '26
+137
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '26
+61
در 10 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '26
+93
در 4 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '26
+134
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '25
+61
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '25
+126
در 9 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '25
+227
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '25
+429
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '25
+1 000
در 6 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '25
+249
در 5 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '25
+45
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '25
+48
در 1 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '25
+25
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '25
+23
در 1 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '25
+604
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '25
+303
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '24
+25
در 5 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '24
+24
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '24
+711
در 3 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '24
+59
در 4 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '24
+60
در 3 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '24
+53
در 1 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '24
+47
در 3 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '24
+65
در 7 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '24
+88
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '24
+133
در 4 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '24
+110
در 4 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '24
+153
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '23
+84
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '23
+130
در 7 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '23
+122
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '23
+58
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '23
+107
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '23
+67
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '23
+78
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '23
+334
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '23
+326
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '23
+51
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '23
+36
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '23
+294
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '22
+1 360
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '22
+71
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '22
+36
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '22
+55
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '22
+43
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '22
+89
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '22
+203
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '22
+42
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '22
+23
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '22
+23
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '22
+38
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '22
+47
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '21
+36
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '21
+75
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '21
+44
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '21
+14
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '21
+46
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '21
+71
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '21
+172
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '21
+287
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '21
+15
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '21
+16
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '21
+28
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '21
+34
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '20
+639
در 0 کانالها
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانالها | |
| 22 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 21 سپتامبر | +2 | |||
| 20 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 19 سپتامبر | +4 | |||
| 18 سپتامبر | +2 | |||
| 17 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 16 سپتامبر | +5 | |||
| 15 سپتامبر | +4 | |||
| 14 سپتامبر | +3 | |||
| 13 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 12 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 11 سپتامبر | +6 | |||
| 10 سپتامبر | +4 | |||
| 09 سپتامبر | +15 | |||
| 08 سپتامبر | +3 | |||
| 07 سپتامبر | +3 | |||
| 06 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 05 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 04 سپتامبر | +2 | |||
| 03 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 02 سپتامبر | +1 | |||
| 01 سپتامبر | +1 |
پستهای کانال
Re: Claude Opus 5.5
> Claude Opus 5.5 is our first release since we called for pacing the frontier.
Interesting how the very first line is used to remind the reader of their call to pace the frontier just last week, and everything else after that line is to demonstrate with very specific numbers how they absolutely are not pacing.
sailingparrot, 49 minutes ago
| 2 | Re: AI Has No Wisdom and Neither Will You
The problem imo is the slow deterioration of institutional knowledge that offloading the mental task of wisdom gathering to AI is causing.
One interesting comparison is to the history of manufacturing. West/America decided one day that manufacturing would be cheaper to outsource and better (short term) profit was to be made by outsourcing it all to China. The institutional expertise started to deteriorate, to the point that America simply didn't even have the capacity, or expertise anymore to produce stuff (such as grill brush [1])
I feel like you could take all the handwavy comment that are made today to dismiss this caution, and find equal dismissal back then when companies were actively outsourcing the manufacturing.
"I'm coding 10x faster"
"look at the output velocity per employee"
"we are producing much more (in China)"
"look at profit / number of (manufacturing) employers"
Seems ok if you're American / Chinese but I'm struggling to understand how the rest can be OK with allowing institutional knowledge to deteriorate while having an active dependency to the former two. We already see this with the tech dependency towards USA and manufacturing competition from China.
[1] https://youtu.be/3ZTGwcHQfLY
NalNezumi, 4 hours ago | 219 |
| 3 | Re: Attention is all you have
Bookmarks died because most humans are allergic to having to do bookkeeping and cleanup tasks that are incidental to what they really want to do.
We see that over and over again, in a bunch of non-tech fields. My kids never want to clean up their toys; they will pull out new ones, but it is a struggle to get them into the habit of putting the old ones away first. My parents used to keep a notebook with every gas fill-up they made; nobody born after about 1990 does that anymore. We were taught how to balance a checkbook in elementary school; basically nobody does that anymore, we put everything on autopay and if you are diligent you check a statement or import it into Quicken once a month (most people don't even do that, they have no idea what they are spending and predictably, usually no money left over). GMail succeeded because instead of putting your mail in folders, you just leave it in one lump with Google and rely on full-text search. A lot of Zoomer computer users don't even know what files and folders are, they just use apps, which take them straight to what they want to do and don't offer things like possession of your own data.
Back in the (~early 2010s) days when Google still allowed internal innovation, there were recurrent demos produced by engineers of full-text search over your web history, though of course it was your web history as stored by Google and none of this was local. It never became a product, largely because users are too lazy to go to a separate search product just for your history, or because they're too lazy to check a separate box saying "Search my history". Instead I think web history became a ranking input to general search and it would mix in results that you frequently visited to the general results, which honestly I think was a more useful approach.
nostrademons, 20 hours ago | 363 |
| 4 | Re: I said no and Apple said yes
Because Mac laptops are lightyears ahead of any other hardware.
Build quality (aluminum), charging (magsafe), screen resolution, battery life, noise (or lack thereof), trackpad…
It’s like other vendors aren’t even trying.
Also the OS mostly “just works”, just last week my Linux laptop disabled NVIDIA GPU (and almost bricked itself?? Not sure, had to fix apt) during automated updates
tomp, 4 hours ago | 413 |
| 5 | Re: I don't want to read what you didn't write
It's funny, i push back on pull requests because there is too much description now - a 20 line change has pages and pages of generated description, rationalisation for why it is safe, defense of each design decision, analysis of risks and side effects. People are indignant, you're rejecting my change because there is too much documentation? And my response is, I don't have time to read it and you put me in the position where I can't afford not to - because approving the PR implies I did and accepted it. The investment to read all that for the value of a code change that I'm one prompt away from doing myself if I cared is just not high enough. So it's rejected.
zmmmmm, 14 hours ago | 469 |
| 6 | Re: I said no and Apple said yes
Not trying to start flamewars, but more and more I wonder how much are people willing to put up with such practices. On linux for 15+ years and everytime I try to use mac or win, it is an ordeal. And ads. F*cking ads in a system someone has purchased. And spying. Really user hostile environment. No, thank you.
vitro, 4 hours ago | 446 |
| 7 | Re: Attention is all you have
The Mosaic browser (1993) had full text history search.
We then got a bookmark system that was every bit as terrible as a web directory.
It stayed that way. The delicious search revenue made organizing websites uninteresting. That obscure website you enjoyed a decade ago but don't even remember, they had lots of traffic like you. No point updating or keeping it online. You can't have rss in Firefox but here is a Facebook like button in your address bar in stead.
I've tried to maintain the bookmark menu but I rarely use it since everything is dead. Why aren't browsers storing a text version of the bookmark? Did people in 1993 have more resources than us? Should I be afraid it grows to a few GB over the decades?
A good few dead websites have a backup some place but there is no automation to find it. If you had a string of text from a page you might be able to search for it. If the page found is highly similar we might automate the process to have alternative location for bookmarks with a nice warning dialog.
econ, 19 hours ago | 472 |
| 8 | Re: AI coding has made CI a bottleneck, so we reworked ours to keep up
A good chunk of what my company has been doing with AI falls into either burning down our known tech-debt and "easy wins" that no one ever had the bandwidth to approach... And improving / automating our processes. The former is having a direct and meaningful impact on the quality and availability of our services.
Our QA, formerly a fairly frequent blocker of all our releases, are doing more in-depth reviews and catching issues earlier in our release process. They have become unblocked to the point they are actively chasing down work that starts to slip.
We have cleaned up and tuned both our security alerts and operations logs and improved our tenant isolation in our service in a way that makes customer and formal audits SIGNIFICANTLY easier.
We're setting ourselves up for faster human development of the hard-things. Our development environment and infrastructure are faster, cleaner, more auditable processes, and cheaper overall to operate.
These fixes mostly don't show up in our product change logs, and definitely don't fall into "new features". It would largely be invisible to the outside world, but our costs are going down (though to be fair, not offsetting the spend on AI to date), internal productivity has improved, operational incidents are down, and customer satisfaction is up.
TrueDuality, 13 hours ago | 512 |
| 9 | Re: Turn off and restrict access to Apple Intelligence features on Mac
I want the disk space taken from the models back.
I will never touch this garbage and would rather use the disk space I purchased to be used for my purposes, not the industry's pointless fad bubble endeavors.
VCFundedGenYer, 13 hours ago | 521 |
| 10 | Re: Xiaomi MiMo v2.6
Anyone else more excited about Chinese models than American models these days? Big thing for me is affordability.
lwansbrough, 5 hours ago | 536 |
| 11 | Re: I don't want to read what you didn't write
As I have been saying for years:
Writing is fundamentally the transfer of information from your brain to my brain. If you have 1000 bits of semantic information you want to transfer, you can't give 300 bits of semantic information to an LLM and have it fill in the remaining 700, because it doesn't know what those 700 bits are. If it's able to guess those 700 bits correctly, then they aren't true semantic information, and you really only have 300 bits you want to transfer. You might as well transfer those bits to me directly, rather than having the LLM add on an extra superfluous 700 bits that I then have to filter out.
hatthew, 4 hours ago | 545 |
| 12 | Re: AI coding has made CI a bottleneck, so we reworked ours to keep up
Here's my constant question:
Everyone's going so fast that they keep hitting walls. Review, CI, product asking for things, whatever.
Why have we not seen an improvements in products?
While every post and thread feels like a 90's wall street office, the new android and iphone ship with fewer features than usual. No indie guys come up with a linux-sized alternative OS. Switch 2 remains unhacked. Windows takes 3 seconds to show the right click menu.
Is everyone just running full speed in circles or something?
torben-friis, 5 hours ago | 514 |
| 13 | Re: US halts flights at busy East Coast airports, says fiber line cut
It happens. There use to be a joke during the first big DC build out phase that went like if you're ever going into the wilderness take a 1ft length of fiber optic cable with you. If you get lost bury it and a back hoe operator will appear and sever it within an hour. You can get a ride back with them.
chasd00, 4 hours ago | 505 |
| 14 | Re: Fable 5 – Median thinking declined in August
The Office of Weights and Measures exists because, long before any of us were born, in 1836, companies were up to shady shit and consumers were paying for inconsistent products. I.E. Being scammed.
AI companies should be subject to the OWM like any other company that sells a product that varies in weight. Perhaps when a sane administration is re-elected; one that can read history books and comprehend why our regulations exist in the first place. Or have even a semblance of respect for its citizenry.
jesse_dot_id, 5 hours ago | 528 |
| 15 | Re: The NASA/ESA Mars Sample Return mission has been canceled
Anyone wanting to be involved in the future of scientific research should probably start learning Mandarin. We're going the way of the Soviets, where political officers will quash any science that doesn't fit their ideology.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/09/trump-planning-to-ha...
notabee, 2 hours ago | 537 |
| 16 | Re: Xiaomi MiMo v2.6
I know we have strong views on what a truly open model is (open weights, open training data, open training code etc.) but I really like how transparent they’ve been about the training of this model.
The realtime dashboard they shared during training (https://mimo.xiaomi.com/rl/) was an incredible learning and teaching tool for me, and they’ve been unusually comprehensive in sharing details about their methodology (check out that tech report - it's got lots of clever behind the scene tricks like Google or Deepseek writeups) and benchmark scores (even the stuff they didn’t do well on).
If you’re releasing an open model going forward, please consider offering the community more of this transparency!
rao-v, 2 hours ago | 518 |
| 17 | Re: The NASA/ESA Mars Sample Return mission has been canceled
This article only obliquely mentions in the last paragraphs, but there's a parallel Chinese program that recently brought back samples from the moon, and will attempt Mars sample return, launching in 2028,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tianwen-3
peri-cl, 2 hours ago | 521 |
| 18 | Re: Fable 5 – Median thinking declined in August
Could there be a benefit to releasing a new model, slowly dumbing it down over a couple months, then releasing a new model that’s marginally if at all better than the original to create a perceived improvement when in reality there isn’t really one?
For an industry that’s stagnant in progress yet relies on new frequent releases to survive (non-progress being an existential risk), this could make sense.
I have no idea if that’s what’s happened, I completely pulled it out of my butt. And I have no idea is the actual frontier is stagnating.
talon8635, 3 hours ago | 552 |
| 19 | Re: Jev-Leftpad
I have to be honest. While this is obviously a smart and useful idea, it misses one of the core features of Jev: its confidence scores. Partial confidence could easily be mapped to fractional spaces, using unicode characters like U+2009: THIN SPACE. As it stands, this package is not harnessing the full power of Jev.
sethaurus, 9 hours ago | 554 |
| 20 | Re: The senior engineer death spiral
The senior you get the more you realise that the only reward for hard work is more work. Then, you learn to say no more often and set boundaries and negotiate like if you want me to work on project A, then I won’t have capacity to work on project B.
Unfortunately, this is something you have to learn through experience and cannot be taught by someone else.
sajithdilshan, 1 day ago | 576 |
