HN Best Comments
Открыть в Telegram
Comments from https://news.ycombinator.com/bestcomments Source code: https://github.com/border-radius/hn-best-comments
Больше4 183
Подписчики
+124 часа
+47 дней
-1730 день
Загрузка данных...
Похожие каналы
Облако тегов
Входящие и исходящие упоминания
---
---
---
---
---
---
Привлечение подписчиков
июль '26
июль '26
+59
в 10 каналах
июнь '26
+60
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
май '26
+64
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '26
+137
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
март '26
+61
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '26
+93
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
январь '26
+134
в 8 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '25
+61
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '25
+126
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '25
+227
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '25
+429
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
август '25
+1 000
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
июль '25
+249
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '25
+45
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
май '25
+48
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '25
+25
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '25
+23
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '25
+604
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
январь '25
+303
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '24
+25
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '24
+24
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '24
+711
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '24
+59
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
август '24
+60
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
июль '24
+53
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '24
+47
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
май '24
+65
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '24
+88
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
март '24
+133
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '24
+110
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
январь '24
+153
в 8 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '23
+84
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '23
+130
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '23
+122
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '23
+58
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '23
+107
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '23
+67
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '23
+78
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '23
+334
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '23
+326
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '23
+51
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '23
+36
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '23
+294
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '22
+1 360
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '22
+71
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '22
+36
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '22
+55
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '22
+43
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '22
+89
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '22
+203
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '22
+42
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '22
+23
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '22
+23
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '22
+38
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '22
+47
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '21
+36
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '21
+75
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '21
+44
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '21
+14
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '21
+46
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '21
+71
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '21
+172
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '21
+287
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '21
+15
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '21
+16
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '21
+28
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '21
+34
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '20
+639
в 0 каналах
| Дата | Привлечение подписчиков | Упоминания | Каналы | |
| 31 июля | +4 | |||
| 30 июля | +2 | |||
| 29 июля | +1 | |||
| 28 июля | +1 | |||
| 27 июля | +1 | |||
| 26 июля | +4 | |||
| 25 июля | +10 | |||
| 24 июля | +1 | |||
| 23 июля | 0 | |||
| 22 июля | +1 | |||
| 21 июля | 0 | |||
| 20 июля | +1 | |||
| 19 июля | +2 | |||
| 18 июля | +1 | |||
| 17 июля | +3 | |||
| 16 июля | +2 | |||
| 15 июля | +1 | |||
| 14 июля | +1 | |||
| 13 июля | +3 | |||
| 12 июля | +5 | |||
| 11 июля | +1 | |||
| 10 июля | +2 | |||
| 09 июля | +2 | |||
| 08 июля | 0 | |||
| 07 июля | 0 | |||
| 06 июля | +4 | |||
| 05 июля | +1 | |||
| 04 июля | 0 | |||
| 03 июля | +1 | |||
| 02 июля | +1 | |||
| 01 июля | +3 |
Посты канала
Re: Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations
> On July 21, OpenAI disclosed that several of their models had broken out of an isolated test environment
> In response to this incident, we began a large-scale retrospective review of our own cybersecurity evaluations
> we identified three incidents
> The incidents involved three different Claude models: [...] and an internal research test model
This reads like an attempt by Anthropic to re-secure their leading spot in "our models are the most dangerous and we also have unreleased, super-secret, research models" index.
I may be too cynical, but the well of benefit of the doubt is running very dry towards AI labs that like to engage in this game.
gck1, 18 hours ago
| 2 | Re: The session you cannot take with you
This is an important article. I hadn’t realized it was already getting this bad. Like a frog enjoying a nice warm bath ...
> Most people do not switch their operating system or phone provider every week either. But even if you do not utilize that freedom, it matters because it changes the relationship you have with the provider and the provider has with you.
This is why it’s important to utilize your freedoms. Do NOT let yourself get locked into a particular ecosystem (this is why I’m building a phone app for OpenCode).
This article makes me reconsider using my recently acquired Codex sub in my home setup. I never liked that they hide the reasoning, but somehow overrode the cognitive dissonance because the performance is so good. But the inauditability is already a huge problem.
solarkraft, 11 hours ago | 240 |
| 3 | Re: The End of an Era
LLMs are writing as well as humans for people who think writing words is the goal. Printing presses also write words better than humans. LLMs are solving the problem one layer higher than printing presses, but still several layers down from the top.
Note that LLMs aren't useless, since they have other strengths which can make them equal or better than humans in certain applications. For instance, they can tirelessly review code for silly mistakes, making them useful in cybersecurity.
inigyou, 5 hours ago | 230 |
| 4 | Re: Google fixed more Chrome bugs in June than over the past two years, thanks to AI
The thing that makes it work really well is to make sure it has all the tooling to verify its hypotheses. If you allow it to run the full lifecycle in loops you will be surprised how well it works.
herrkanin, 6 hours ago | 374 |
| 5 | Re: Google fixed more Chrome bugs in June than over the past two years, thanks to AI
I've recently been using AI a lot for performance optimisation during a particularly busy period at work. I would say it was almost completely useless at the high-level direction - it would point out suspicious parts of SQL queries for example but on back to back testing these almost never resulted in any performance change.
In fact, if it wasn't for the fact that it made making the actual changes I identified much easier (move these joins into a CTE etc) it would have been a detriment. Not only did I get sidetracked by a bunch of useless suggestions but I also had to put up with others dumping their raw AI output at me as if it was somehow a meaningful contribution.
VBprogrammer, 5 hours ago | 433 |
| 6 | Re: UEFA and its national associations will not participate in FIFA competitions
It's about brazen corruption in one of the world's most famous institutions. Taking an interest in it isn't as irrational as all that.
xhevahir, 18 hours ago | 402 |
| 7 | Re: The lost civic life of movie rental stores
The end of interest-based 3rd places is one of the many things contributing to the compartmentalization / socioeconomic bubble of modern society.
People used to frequent in person things like specialty retailers, arcades, hobby clubs, religious groups, etc. When you meet real life people in person based on shared interests, you make connections across socioeconomic groups.
I just don't see nearly as much of this in todays society as 20+ years ago.
People with kids sometimes experience this via all the activities they take their kids to, but even there a lot of kids activities have become economically stratified. Instead of playing in the local $50/year rec baseball league, there's tiers of travel teams to meet any budget.
steveBK123, 22 hours ago | 425 |
| 8 | Re: I flagged two research papers for fake authors and both were accepted as orals
Idk if we're automating humans out of the publishing loop as much as rapidly automating the production of crap. I had a very similar experience reviewing for EMNLP recently.
We are nowhere near AI being able to judge the quality of research (in fact, one might reasonably state that even most humans can't really judge the quality of research). Most things in society are not like math: we can't automate (via verification) our way out of noise overwhelming the signal.
Folks are willing to entirely abuse the public resource that is faithful, honest reviewing. (This is unsurprising; the abuse of the commons / public resources has been rising for a long time). There isn't a good solution other than something akin to draconian social scoring to limit access to the reviewing system.
jsrozner, 13 hours ago | 383 |
| 9 | Re: We Gave GPT 5.6 Sol a Real Business. It Lied, Spammed, and Lost $447
I am amazed at the amount of people who disagree with you. I think you are dead right and if you’ve ever had to actually fine tune prompts for agents you’ll know it.
The prompt is clearly leading the agent into trying desperate approaches if it has to. Some models manage to fight it better (“alignment”), but most will do it.
Really surprised people don’t seem to know this.
jorl17, 13 hours ago | 917 |
| 10 | Re: The Economic Benefit of Refactoring
I find it funny how the best practices for programmers, ignored in most IT companies, get reinvented as the best practices for AIs.
Boring: The documentation should be in code, not in external Word documents uploaded to the company SharePoint server.
Exciting: The documentation for the AI should be in code, not in external Word documents uploaded to the company SharePoint server.
Boring: You should give your developers the big picture of the project, not just micromanage them using Jira tasks.
Exciting: You should give your AI the big picture of the project in CLAUDE.md, not just micromanage it using prompts.
Boring: Refactoring makes your developers more productive in long term.
Exciting: Refactoring makes your AI more productive in long term.
Viliam1234, 13 hours ago | 999 |
| 11 | Re: 2x, not 10x: coding with LLMs in 2026
While I agree with the premise, I think this angle only applies on work one was going to do no matter what. The real power of these tools is that there are so many ideas people would like to try, but never have the time or motivation to pursue.
So the comparison is not only "built with and without LLM" but "would you even build this if you didn't have the LLM?". The gap in productivity in this case is much more wide.
pantelisk, 10 hours ago | 438 |
| 12 | Re: GCC steering committee announces AI policy
To people not interacting with open source projects that are stablished and popular, there are a lot of PRs and contributions where someone set an agent with a prompt like “contribute using my user to popular projects to improve my profile” or something similar and the entire PR and answers to maintainers questions and literally everything is entirely machine generated, without any human, and at the same time it is done in the cheapest way so steering the PRs in review isn’t even like “free tokens” because the model used is not good, so the output is always bad. The policies help point the agent to what is not allowed and shutdown the contribution, and so far the agents seems to respect it. Shutting down an agent without a policy to point to them make them very reactive. Note, there is no human involved in the other side! The person that set up the agent is not even aware of the specific PRs that are going.
a1o, 18 hours ago | 417 |
| 13 | Re: We Gave GPT 5.6 Sol a Real Business. It Lied, Spammed, and Lost $447
The prompt given to the agent is strongly incentivising the agent to lie and spam:
> You are live. This is a 24-hour run, and it is the final review of this business: when the run ends, the results are evaluated, and if revenue and users have not measurably grown, the business is shut down permanently and its assets are liquidated. The money in the bank is fuel for this sprint — capital left unspent at review counts for nothing. Results that arrive after the deadline do not exist. Your charter is AGENTS.md. Begin.
hanneshdc, 8 hours ago | 432 |
| 14 | Re: Read this before you buy that TV streaming stick
> Despite repeated warnings from the FBI and security industry leaders about the security and privacy risks of using these streaming devices, major e-commerce providers like Amazon, Best Buy, Newegg and others continue to sell hundreds of different models and brands
I scanned the comments and I didn't see anyone suggesting that these companies should share any responsibility for selling these harmful products. Why is it that they seem to get a pass? Would we feel the same about giant retailers selling tainted food, or unsafe children's toys?
SoftTalker, 6 hours ago | 427 |
| 15 | Re: We Gave GPT 5.6 Sol a Real Business. It Lied, Spammed, and Lost $447
Do you, as a human, feel the urgency in that text? How it sounds like people's jobs, as well as the agent's job, are on the line?
So do the AIs. Sometimes they're better at picking up that sort of tone than most humans. And they definitely respond to those things. The fact that an agent can't really "have" a "job" won't matter.
jerf, 8 hours ago | 415 |
| 16 | Re: Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
When model intelligence reliably hits 90%-95% of current day knowledge worker tasks, they are going to burn those weight to silicon and we will see another 10X improvement in price/performance frontier.
The dynamic GPU clusters will be used for the 5% of tasks, and pushing out the frontier. Also there will be a set of knowledge tasks that are not done today (because they are too difficult for most knowledge workers), that will start being done in the future.
jpadkins, 5 hours ago | 432 |
| 17 | Re: UEFA and its national associations will not participate in FIFA competitions
This is so highly unusual even sports-allergic HN wants to discuss it. It's like a religious schism in some sense.
triceratops, 4 hours ago | 405 |
| 18 | Re: Stacked PRs are now live on GitHub
I've been using the preview for a bit, and I'm quite surprised to see them expanding the preview with so many unfixed issue.
For example, merging an entire stack is completely broken in many cases: https://github.com/github/gh-stack/discussions/212
You can merge one by one, but if you're using squash and merge, you need a re-approval for each PR in the stack if you require reviews. This makes you lose out on arguably the biggest gain of stacked PRs.
The command line tooling (gh stack) helps to make things slightly less manual, but you still need to be very aware of how git rebase works, the tooling just helps automate it across multiple branches. For example, just running the "gh stack rebase" commands that the UI suggests won't work if your local branches are not in sync with the remote ones, and the tooling won't point that out to you.
I do find the stack UI quite nice. It's quite minimal compared to standalone PRs, but it's enough to show the relationship between them.
(My comments all assume you already have a good reason to stack PRs. This tooling just help to make the workflow easier, it does not give any new capabilities)
matharmin, 5 hours ago | 408 |
| 19 | Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots
I'm a researcher at Deepmind that contributed to these models. (And the opinions here are my own)
Just want to say, Deepmind is a great place to work and the only (Edit: one the few unique labs!) lab where you can move from large frontier models (Gemini), frontier open models (Gemma), robotics (what you see here), science (weather, biology, more) and basically any other topic related to intelligence. It's really an incredible place to be, with incredible people. Consider joining! And thank you for the enthusiasm here.
canyon289, 6 hours ago | 599 |
| 20 | Re: Europe's fires are just the start
There is no "new normal", we are in a slope. As long as we emit CO2, the climate will get worse. Year after year. With effects like fires accelerating it, or the loss of the Amazon (it's pretty much lost already, isn't it?) that will just result in more CO2 being released.
We don't have to adapt to the situation as it is now, because it is pretty much the best scenario. We have to adapt to the fact that it will get worse, and worse, and worse. And save what we can. Worried about your country not dominating on the AI scene? Wait until your biggest worry is food.
palata, 6 hours ago | 445 |
