es
Feedback
Litigation updates

Litigation updates

Ir al canal en Telegram
868
Suscriptores
-224 horas
+57 días
+530 días

Carga de datos en curso...

Canales Similares
Sin datos
¿Algún problema? Por favor, actualice la página o contacte a nuestro gerente de soporte.
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
sep '26
septiembre '26
+18
en 0 canales
agosto '26
+21
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '26
+41
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '26
+5
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '26
+64
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '26
+39
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '26
+7
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '26
+30
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '26
+76
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '25
+40
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+55
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+23
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '25
+11
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '25
+530
en 0 canales
Fecha
Crecimiento de Suscriptores
Menciones
Canales
25 septiembre+1
24 septiembre+2
23 septiembre+2
22 septiembre+4
21 septiembre0
20 septiembre+1
19 septiembre+1
18 septiembre+1
17 septiembre0
16 septiembre+1
15 septiembre0
14 septiembre0
13 septiembre0
12 septiembre+1
11 septiembre0
10 septiembre+1
09 septiembre0
08 septiembre0
07 septiembre0
06 septiembre0
05 septiembre0
04 septiembre0
03 septiembre+1
02 septiembre0
01 septiembre+2
Publicaciones del Canal
Is BHC on leave tom?
Is BHC on leave tom?

2
wow!
wow!
157
3
Court is not audible now. :((((((((((((((((( 1231 pm
150
4
Matter taken up. Rohtagi is here. He is for state? Wow. 12:22 PM
149
5
SG made brief submission - there are various layers while passing an order. Quashing an order is a diff thing, passing strictures against DM is diff . This was totally unwarranted. Since, Rohtagi wasnt present, matter has been passed over. Not a single word/remark from the Bench. They kept nodding! 1157 AM
150
6
Matter taken up. Arguments started 1154 AM
141
7
Matter was called out. Rohtagi & SG are appearing. They are occupied in diff court. PASSED OVER . 1147 AM
132
8
Home secy, UP is also online. Currently, item 35 is going on. 1146 AM
126
9
Item 34 rn
121
10
Guess which matter is going on in Delhi HC. Plaintiffs are claiming copyright infringement over Gurbani. Defendant has raised
Guess which matter is going on in Delhi HC. Plaintiffs are claiming copyright infringement over Gurbani. Defendant has raised objection of territorial jurisdiction. Interesting!
129
11
That Noida DM wala case is listed in SC, Court 16 at item 37. Currently, item 20 is going on. 11:24 AM
That Noida DM wala case is listed in SC, Court 16 at item 37. Currently, item 20 is going on. 11:24 AM
127
12
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/NBK22092026RFA6342026_165723.pdf Today's DHC case. Good case on sec 73, contract act/ computation of damages. Easy facts. Look how HC appreciated the facts in first appeal. And ultimately dismissed it
150
13
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/67921092026CMM6732021_191934.pdf Today's DHC case. In a 227 petition, DHC has refused to allow the amendment application filed by Plaintiff in 2014 concerning suit filed in 2012. Judgement doesnt mention status of trial in the matter. Not sure if this is a good case. Let me know your views.
174
14
https://lnkd.in/p/dUcy-jfa
297
15
https://lnkd.in/p/dFnmTJG7
357
16
Can anyone share pdf of this book? I have got this 221 pg thing, but its all index. :/
Can anyone share pdf of this book? I have got this 221 pg thing, but its all index. :/
344
17
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60809092026BA24892026_172455.pdf Nothing big but this was one of the orders in anticipatory bail appl. Do give it a read.
331
18
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68807092026MATFC2852026_172329.pdf Today's DHC case on sec 19, Family Act. • Family court held no jurisdiction made out in Delhi, plaint returned under O. 7, R10 • Appealed in HC • Appeal dismissed. • Saying, sec 19 demands suit to file where parties resided together. • Here, parties resided in Delhi for 1.5 yrs after marriage. Then shifted to Gurugram where they got separated. • Hence, this petition.
367
19
Appearnce of this adv wasnt marked in previous order. Then this happened. 🥹😭
Appearnce of this adv wasnt marked in previous order. Then this happened. 🥹😭
436
20
Can a private person be booked under PC Act? Refer todays DHC case: https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59131082026CRLMM18582026_174956.pdf A police man was alleged to have been involved in demanding & accepting the money. But, the petitioner, a tea stall worker would receive money 1st and then he passed on to police man. When they were trapped, FIR was registered against him under PC act too. This petition was for quashing the FIR. HC refused to do so. ___________________ is that allowed?
382