ru
Feedback
Litigation updates

Litigation updates

Открыть в Telegram
871
Подписчики
+324 часа
+77 дней
+830 дней

Загрузка данных...

Похожие каналы
Нет данных
Возникли проблемы? Пожалуйста, обновите страницу или обратитесь к нашему support-менеджеру .
Входящие и исходящие упоминания
---
---
---
---
---
---
Привлечение подписчиков
сент. '26
сентябрь '26
+22
в 0 каналах
август '26
+21
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '26
+41
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '26
+5
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '26
+64
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '26
+39
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '26
+7
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '26
+30
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '26
+76
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '25
+40
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '25
+55
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '25
+23
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '25
+11
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '25
+530
в 0 каналах
Дата
Привлечение подписчиков
Упоминания
Каналы
27 сентября0
26 сентября+3
25 сентября+2
24 сентября+2
23 сентября+2
22 сентября+4
21 сентября0
20 сентября+1
19 сентября+1
18 сентября+1
17 сентября0
16 сентября+1
15 сентября0
14 сентября0
13 сентября0
12 сентября+1
11 сентября0
10 сентября+1
09 сентября0
08 сентября0
07 сентября0
06 сентября0
05 сентября0
04 сентября0
03 сентября+1
02 сентября0
01 сентября+2
Посты канала
Is BHC on leave tom?
Is BHC on leave tom?

2
wow!
wow!
187
3
Court is not audible now. :((((((((((((((((( 1231 pm
177
4
Matter taken up. Rohtagi is here. He is for state? Wow. 12:22 PM
173
5
SG made brief submission - there are various layers while passing an order. Quashing an order is a diff thing, passing strictures against DM is diff . This was totally unwarranted. Since, Rohtagi wasnt present, matter has been passed over. Not a single word/remark from the Bench. They kept nodding! 1157 AM
172
6
Matter taken up. Arguments started 1154 AM
158
7
Matter was called out. Rohtagi & SG are appearing. They are occupied in diff court. PASSED OVER . 1147 AM
146
8
Home secy, UP is also online. Currently, item 35 is going on. 1146 AM
141
9
Item 34 rn
135
10
Guess which matter is going on in Delhi HC. Plaintiffs are claiming copyright infringement over Gurbani. Defendant has raised
Guess which matter is going on in Delhi HC. Plaintiffs are claiming copyright infringement over Gurbani. Defendant has raised objection of territorial jurisdiction. Interesting!
144
11
That Noida DM wala case is listed in SC, Court 16 at item 37. Currently, item 20 is going on. 11:24 AM
That Noida DM wala case is listed in SC, Court 16 at item 37. Currently, item 20 is going on. 11:24 AM
142
12
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/NBK22092026RFA6342026_165723.pdf Today's DHC case. Good case on sec 73, contract act/ computation of damages. Easy facts. Look how HC appreciated the facts in first appeal. And ultimately dismissed it
168
13
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/67921092026CMM6732021_191934.pdf Today's DHC case. In a 227 petition, DHC has refused to allow the amendment application filed by Plaintiff in 2014 concerning suit filed in 2012. Judgement doesnt mention status of trial in the matter. Not sure if this is a good case. Let me know your views.
195
14
https://lnkd.in/p/dUcy-jfa
313
15
https://lnkd.in/p/dFnmTJG7
374
16
Can anyone share pdf of this book? I have got this 221 pg thing, but its all index. :/
Can anyone share pdf of this book? I have got this 221 pg thing, but its all index. :/
353
17
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60809092026BA24892026_172455.pdf Nothing big but this was one of the orders in anticipatory bail appl. Do give it a read.
340
18
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68807092026MATFC2852026_172329.pdf Today's DHC case on sec 19, Family Act. • Family court held no jurisdiction made out in Delhi, plaint returned under O. 7, R10 • Appealed in HC • Appeal dismissed. • Saying, sec 19 demands suit to file where parties resided together. • Here, parties resided in Delhi for 1.5 yrs after marriage. Then shifted to Gurugram where they got separated. • Hence, this petition.
376
19
Appearnce of this adv wasnt marked in previous order. Then this happened. 🥹😭
Appearnce of this adv wasnt marked in previous order. Then this happened. 🥹😭
443
20
Can a private person be booked under PC Act? Refer todays DHC case: https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59131082026CRLMM18582026_174956.pdf A police man was alleged to have been involved in demanding & accepting the money. But, the petitioner, a tea stall worker would receive money 1st and then he passed on to police man. When they were trapped, FIR was registered against him under PC act too. This petition was for quashing the FIR. HC refused to do so. ___________________ is that allowed?
389