Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin
Simple, plain, and fast crypto digests. Since 2017 Russian version: @Coin_Post Editor: @Anastasiia_CoinPost Advertising: @CoinPost_Agency Chat: https://t.me/+x91r5TkB3rE3MGUy Creator: @K_Capitan
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin
Channel Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin (@coinpost) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 277 760 subscribers, ranking 466 in the Cryptocurrencies category and 309 in the International region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 277 760 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 14 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -11 405 over the last 30 days and by -489 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 0.53%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 0.27% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 1 461 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 754 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 20.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as u.s, liquidity, etfs, faq, venezuela.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Simple, plain, and fast crypto digests. Since 2017
Russian version: @Coin_Post
Editor: @Anastasiia_CoinPost
Advertising: @CoinPost_Agency
Chat: https://t.me/+x91r5TkB3rE3MGUy
Creator: @K_Capitan”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 15 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Cryptocurrencies category.
Don’t start with vibes. Check the basics: revenue, fees, users, volume, TVL, active addresses. If the chart looks bullish but the protocol is losing users and volume, that’s not a hidden gem. That’s probably exit liquidity2️⃣ Does the token capture value?
This is the part most people miss. A project can be great, but the token can still be useless. Ask: ➖ Does the token get revenue share? ➖ Are there buybacks or burns? ➖ Is staking actually meaningful? ➖ Does governance control real fees or emissions? ➖ Does demand for the product create demand for the token? If the answer is "no," the business can grow while the token goes nowhere3️⃣ Is the valuation reasonable?
Look beyond market cap. FDV matters because future unlocks can dilute you hard. Then compare the token with similar projects: 🟠 FDV / revenue 🟠 FDV / fees 🟠 FDV / TVL A 10x multiple can be cheap in one sector and expensive in another. Context matters4️⃣ What can go wrong?
Check unlocks, emissions, competition, weak tokenomics, smart contract risks and regulation. If supply is about to hit the market, "cheap" can get cheaper5️⃣ What’s the actual setup?
You don’t need one perfect target price. Build 3 scenarios: 📈 Bull case ➖ Base case 📉 Bear case Then ask: is the current price attractive compared to the realistic upside and downside?🔧 Useful tools: DefiLlama, Token Terminal, Dune, Artemis, TokenUnlocks Don’t buy an alt just because the narrative sounds hot. Personally, I only care when the numbers, value capture and valuation actually make sense. Down bad ≠ undervalued #FAQ
Every binary market has two opposite contracts: YES and NO. Example: "Will Argentina win the World Cup?" Once the event settles, the winning contract pays $1, while the losing one pays $0. So 100 winning shares return $100. But YES and NO prices don’t always add up to exactly $1. This can happen because of bid-ask spreads, low liquidity and uneven order-book depth. That temporary mispricing is what traders try to catch. Example: 📈 YES costs $0.40 📉 NO costs $0.55 You can buy both sides for $0.95. No matter what happens, one side will settle at $1, leaving a gross profit of $0.05 per pair. You’re not betting on the correct outcome – you’re trading a temporary pricing error. Risk: the setup only becomes neutral after both orders fill. If your YES order fills but NO moves higher before you buy it, you’re left holding a regular directional position. Fees and slippage can also wipe out the spread.2️⃣ Hedging through a crypto exchange
Suppose there’s a live market with the question, "Will BTC hit $100k before the end of the year?" and traders are already pricing both the YES and NO outcomes. The NO token trades at $0.35, meaning the market currently prices the probability of "no" at roughly 35%. A trader compares that price with their own estimate: how far BTC still needs to move, how much time remains, and how volatile it usually is. If the trader believes the real probability of NO is closer to 45%, the token looks undervalued at $0.35. They buy it expecting the market to reprice NO higher – for example, to $0.45. That would produce a potential profit of $0.10 per token, before expenses. But if BTC suddenly pumps, the probability of reaching $100k rises and the NO token loses value. To partially protect against that move, the trader simultaneously opens a BTC long on a futures exchange. The setup looks like this: ▶️ BTC rises – NO loses value, but the long offsets part of the loss ▶️ BTC falls – NO gains value, while the long moves into the red ▶️ If the trader correctly spotted an undervalued NO token, its repricing becomes the source of profit So the profit doesn’t come simply from holding two opposite positions. It comes from estimating the probability more accurately than the market, while the futures hedge reduces the impact of BTC price moves on the trade. Risk: this isn’t a perfectly neutral setup – it’s only a partial hedge. Funding costs and price differences between platforms can also eat into the profit.3️⃣ Market making
Market maker doesn’t need to decide which outcome is correct. They place limit orders around the current price and try to earn the spread between buying and selling. Example: 📈 Buy YES at $0.50 📈 Sell YES at $0.52 If both orders fill for the same size, the trader earns $0.02 per token. The more times this cycle repeats, the more spread revenue they collect. Some markets may also offer liquidity rewards. Risk: the buy order may fill while the sell order doesn’t. Then the trader is left holding YES, and the result once again depends on the event. That’s why market makers constantly monitor inventory, adjust quotes and limit position sizes.Crypto degens have turned Polymarket from a betting platform into yet another trading venue. No altseason yet, so we trade whatever moves 😁 #FAQ
Available now! Telegram Research 2025 — the year's key insights 
