Crypto Narratives
Open in Telegram
Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/ Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Crypto Narratives
Channel Crypto Narratives (@cryptonarratives1) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 21 595 subscribers, ranking 5 216 in the Cryptocurrencies category and 1 822 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 21 595 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 30 August, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -43 over the last 30 days and by -1 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 24.42%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 15.41% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 5 274 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 3 328 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 41.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as mstr, hype, chart, axs, eth.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Link to my "Crypto Narratives" newsletter : https://cryptonarratives.substack.com/
Link to my Twitter profile : https://twitter.com/thedefivillain
Link to the TG degen channel : https://t.me/shitcoinsandgems”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 31 August, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Cryptocurrencies category.
21 595
Subscribers
-124 hours
-137 days
-4330 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
August '26
August '26
+166
in 14 channels
July '26
+177
in 16 channels
Get PRO
June '26
+356
in 25 channels
Get PRO
May '26
+392
in 16 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+474
in 16 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+273
in 11 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+180
in 14 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+286
in 21 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+368
in 24 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+501
in 14 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+1 481
in 31 channels
Get PRO
September '25
+708
in 12 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+711
in 28 channels
Get PRO
July '25
+494
in 12 channels
Get PRO
June '25
+409
in 10 channels
Get PRO
May '25
+838
in 31 channels
Get PRO
April '25
+338
in 16 channels
Get PRO
March '25
+452
in 16 channels
Get PRO
February '25
+752
in 21 channels
Get PRO
January '25
+882
in 20 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+1 132
in 19 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+2 145
in 22 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+1 487
in 13 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+2 825
in 8 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+581
in 9 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+396
in 12 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+442
in 7 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+1 207
in 8 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+715
in 8 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+1 167
in 10 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+931
in 13 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+725
in 5 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+1 011
in 6 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+476
in 6 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+223
in 4 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+2 009
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 30 August | +5 | |||
| 29 August | +3 | |||
| 28 August | +3 | |||
| 27 August | +3 | |||
| 26 August | +5 | |||
| 25 August | +5 | |||
| 24 August | +5 | |||
| 23 August | +13 | |||
| 22 August | 0 | |||
| 21 August | +8 | |||
| 20 August | +7 | |||
| 19 August | +4 | |||
| 18 August | +2 | |||
| 17 August | +12 | |||
| 16 August | +5 | |||
| 15 August | +4 | |||
| 14 August | +11 | |||
| 13 August | +2 | |||
| 12 August | +3 | |||
| 11 August | +5 | |||
| 10 August | +8 | |||
| 09 August | +4 | |||
| 08 August | +6 | |||
| 07 August | +5 | |||
| 06 August | +10 | |||
| 05 August | +4 | |||
| 04 August | +4 | |||
| 03 August | +5 | |||
| 02 August | +5 | |||
| 01 August | +10 |
Channel Posts
4 broad resistance tests in 10 days
Doesn't look like the type of things you'd want to short
$ETH
| 2 |  Some alt charts are ugly, but BTC daily has been a big nothingburger for a week | 2 707 |
| 3 |  $STRC is now trading at $98, just 2% away from par
As I've said a few times, the closer it gets to $100, the higher the sell pressure, because it gets extremely attractive to short around there
What's going to be interesting is to follow the evolution of the funding rate, to determine how costly it's going to be for shorts to hold around par | 3 264 |
| 4 |  NVDA beats earnings and the whole AI complex is pumping from it
I feel good about all my long-term AI stock positions even if the road is bumpy after the July deleveraging | 3 700 |
| 5 |  +4All the previous instances of pumps that were similar to the current one did resolve higher during this cycle
I'm betting on this time not being different | 5 118 |
| 6 |  This also applies to XLM, but it's not a major | 3 628 |
| 7 |  +2Best major to use as a hedge short is XRP imo
It had a +70% squeeze after months of zombie price action
XRPBTC looks like a spike that is now already exhausted | 3 567 |
| 8 |  AI stocks higher low is in?
$MU | 4 394 |
| 9 |  We are in risk-on szn | 6 561 |
| 10 | By keeping STRC below par, the market is essentially forcing Saylor's hand into destroying bitcoin-per-share as well as making him unable to buy BTC
By creating a new "USD Cash" balance, he's now for the first time dipping his toes into explicit "market timing".
What he has done instead until now was basically buying BTC as soon as possible whenever he had cash, and then he was forced to de-lever (ie sell MSTR or BTC) at rather bad prices as a punishment for his fomo'ing at local highs.
The fact that he now has a USD Cash balance means he'll be able to try to time the market on his purchases and sales, which you can either see as good (if you think he'll be rather conservative) or catastrophically bad (considering his historical 'top blasting' urge)
https://x.com/saylor/status/2091859021456146659 | 5 121 |
| 11 |  I'm getting bulled up alone watching the chart being unable to dump | 4 393 |
| 12 |  I guess we have the answer lol
$ZEC | 5 063 |
| 13 | Flipping your bias from bearish to bullish after you missed the opportunity of closing your shorts in profit is one of the hardest things to do
Psychological biases are the biggest enemies of the trader | 5 487 |
| 14 |  LTF blow-off tops like that are often the signal for ALTBTC charts to shine, with BTC needing some time to consolidate after a giga-run
But it's even more bullish if BTC immediately goes up again | 5 182 |
| 15 | Reminder that BTC is a momentum asset, meaning it finds new buyers by going up | 5 678 |
| 16 |  Lockout rally
Textbook no-pullback price action | 5 288 |
| 17 | Lockout trend on BTC, chart looks like we'll have continuation before getting a pullback | 5 217 |
| 18 |  $BTW is a $7bn FDV scam coin
When one of these appears, my question always is "can it reach the $20bn FDV club?"
Given the fact that the funding has been highly positive on that one, I'd say no.
Positive funding also implies that it's significantly less riskier to short, but there's always a risk of the funding rate flipping negative. | 5 643 |
| 19 | Congrats to Venice equity holders!
$VVV would be a no-brainer bid if there wasn't a token<>equity dual structure
But unfortunately there is one, and VVV is "only" buying back & burning $7M a year worth of tokens, against a $700M mcap and $40M annual emissions
https://x.com/ErikVoorhees/status/2089375845425287610 | 5 969 |
| 20 | Unfortunately, Saylor is doubling down on his very bad idea to keep capping $STRC at $100.00
In his example, someone is shorting $10bn of STRC at $100 AND Strategy is able to keep issuing a ton of STRC at $100 at the same time, but that's not what's going to happen
Some people will be shorting a lot of STRC between $99 and $100, which will prevent the price from reaching $100 and incentivize holders to sell right below $100 too.
STRC not reaching $100 means Strategy has to keep deploying efforts and money to get it back to par, which in the current situation means selling BTC or MSTR at a 'low price' to buy STRC close to $100, ie the exact opposite of the trade he wants to do once STRC is at par.
The only thing that will push STRC decisively to $100 will be BTC pumping high enough, which also implies that when Saylor will be able to raise USD, BTC will be at a "high price" on a relative basis.
His reasoning is that he wants holders to be certain that STRC won't go above $100, which should reduce uncertainty and paralysis with regards to buying/selling STRC.
I think that's completely wrong because he's imagining that the ideal scenario will be STRC trading between $99 and $100, so he caps STRC at $100 to get closer to this idealistic scenario, but he doesn't realize that it's unrealistic and will never happen.
I's mathematically IMPOSSIBLE to reduce the volatility of STRC down to 1%, the volatility swings will always be around 10%, but now instead of having this volatility between $95 and $105, he's forcing it to be between $90 and $100.
So the holders will have the uncertainty/paralysis anyway, but they'll have it at a lower price and with a much worse r/r profile than if he didn't cap STRC at par.
I'm going to write a full article on this topic because it's important and I'm surprised he's doubling down on this.
https://x.com/TNorth/status/2089509833699369363 | 7 558 |
